August 19, 2011

Tharanga's ODI exploits

He has the third-best average among Sri Lankan batsmen with 4000 runs, but he can't be considered one of their best just yet

Talk about the Sri Lankan batting line-up and all the focus over the last few years has been on Sanath Jayasuriya, Mahela Jayawardene, Kumar Sangakkara, and Tillakaratne Dilshan. That has suited Upul Tharanga perfectly, as he has quietly gone about accumulating runs in one-day cricket. A regular Test spot still eludes him, but as an ODI opener he has done pretty well for himself, knocking off more than 4000 runs at a healthy average. His 111 against Australia in Hambantota might not have been his most fluent effort, but it brought Sri Lanka back into the series, and in the process Tharanga became the fastest Sri Lankan to get to 4000 ODI runs, achieving the milestone in four fewer innings than Marvan Atapattu, the previous record-holder.

Admittedly Tharanga doesn't ooze the kind of batting class that Jayawardene and Sangakkara do, and some of his technical deficiencies have been exposed more ruthlessly in Tests, a format in which he has managed only one century - and that against Bangladesh - in 15 matches. However, in the shorter version he has been far more comfortable, especially over the last two and a half years.

In the early part of his career Tharanga did play some important innings, getting a century in Christchurch in January 206, and then two more in England later that year. However, soon after that came a prolonged slump, as he went 52 innings without a century, averaging only 27 over a three-year period. Thankfully for Sri Lanka, Tharanga has regained his form and his ability to score hundreds, getting six in his last 38 innings. Since the beginning of 2009 he has averaged almost 45, which is a huge improvement on his pre-2009 average of 30.91.

Upul Tharanga's ODI career
Period ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Till Dec 2008 74 2133 30.91 70.67 6/ 9
Jan 2009 onwards 50 1923 44.72 78.26 6/ 10
Career 124 4056 36.21 74.08 12/ 19

Tharanga is only the ninth Sri Lankan batsman to get to 4000 ODI runs, and among those players only Sangakkara and Marvan Atapattu have higher averages. At the moment Tharanga has a higher ODI average than Jayawardene, Aravinda de Silva and Jayasuriya - that isn't to say he is a better batsman than them, but he is doing a good job of maximising his potential and making the most of his opportunities.

Sri Lankan batsmen with 4000-plus ODI runs
Batsman ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Kumar Sangakkara 292 9243 38.03 75.52 11/ 62
Marvan Atapattu 268 8529 37.57 67.72 11/ 59
Upul Tharanga 123 4046 36.45 74.19 12/ 19
Arjuna Ranatunga 269 7456 35.84 77.91 4/ 49
Tillakaratne Dilshan 212 5587 35.36 87.41 10/ 23
Aravinda de Silva 308 9284 34.90 81.13 11/ 64
Mahela Jayawardene 345 9520 32.82 77.80 14/ 56
Sanath Jayasuriya 441 13,364 32.51 91.27 28/ 68
Roshan Mahanama 213 5162 29.49 60.59 4/ 35

One of the best aspects of Tharanga's batting is his ability to convert his starts into big scores. All teams look for batsmen in the top three who have the ability to bat deep into the innings and score reasonably quickly, and Tharanga fits that bill perfectly: of his 31 scores of 50-plus, 12 have been hundreds. He briefly lost that ability during the 52-innings slump mentioned above, but despite that, his overall conversion rate is still among the best. Of the 16 openers who've scored at least 10 centuries at the top of the batting order, Tharanga's conversion rate of 1.58 fifties per century is second-best, next only to Herschelle Gibbs' 1.33.

Sachin Tendulkar's numbers are exceptional, considering he has sustained them over such a long period, but most of the others have less than 20 centuries, and conversion rates of more than two fifties per century.

Tharanga's innings-per-century ratio is excellent too: among these 16 openers, only Tendulkar and Mark Waugh have a better ratio, which means Tharanga has done better in this aspect so far than some big names in ODI batting - Sourav Ganguly (12.42), Chris Gayle (10.84), and Saeed Anwar (11) all have poorer ratios.

Best conversion rate of 50s to 100s for openers in ODIs (Qual: 10 hundreds)
Batsman Innings Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s Inng per 100 50s/100s ratio
Herschelle Gibbs 182 6103 35.69 82.86 18/ 24 10.11 1.33
Upul Tharanga 114 3993 36.97 74.17 12/ 19 9.50 1.58
Sachin Tendulkar 330 14,995 48.84 88.20 44/ 74 7.50 1.68
Marcus Trescothick 122 4335 37.37 85.21 12/ 21 10.17 1.75
Saeed Anwar 220 8156 39.98 79.93 20/ 37 11.00 1.85
Mark Waugh 141 5729 44.06 76.74 15/ 32 9.40 2.13
Chris Gayle 206 7839 41.04 84.62 19/ 42 10.84 2.21
Sanath Jayasuriya 383 12,740 34.61 92.49 28/ 66 13.68 2.36
Virender Sehwag 197 7005 36.67 104.45 13/ 34 15.15 2.62
Nathan Astle 186 6176 34.89 72.72 14/ 37 13.29 2.64

A less flattering aspect of Tharanga's batting, though, is his tendency to get out early in his innings very often. Thirty times he has been dismissed for single-digit scores, which is a quarter of his total innings. Ten of those dismissals were for ducks, which works out to an average of one duck every 11.40 innings. When compared to some of the other top openers, this rate is among the poorest: Tendulkar averages 27.50 innings per zero, Ganguly 18.15, Matthew Hayden 21, Anwar 15.71, Waugh 15.67, and Jayasuriya 13.21.

Tharanga also has 41 innings (including two not-outs) between 10 and 29, which means 71 of his 119 ODI innings haven't topped 30. Once he touches 30, though, his chances of getting a century go up to 25%.

Break-up of Tharanga's ODI innings
  < 10 10 to 29 30 to 49 50 to 99 100 and above
No. of innings 30 41 17 19 12

Tharanga's opening combination with Dilshan is on its way to becoming Sri Lanka's best. They've already put together the third-highest number of partnership runs, but at a much higher average than the earlier opening combinations. Atapattu and Jayasuriya tallied 3382 partnership runs for the first wicket, which remains Sri Lanka's highest, but their average stand of 43.92 is well short of the Tharanga-Dilshan average of 64.16.

Sri Lanka opening pairs with more than 1000 partnership runs
Pair Innings Runs Ave stand Run rate 100/ 50 stands
Dilshan-Tharanga 37 2310 64.16 6.01 8/ 9
Atapattu-Jayasuriya 79 3382 43.92 5.05* 8/ 19
Jayasuriya-Tharanga 52 2021 38.86 5.78* 4/ 8
Gunawardene-Jayasuriya 44 1374 31.95 4.95* 1/ 9
Jayasuriya-Kaluwitharana 105 3230 31.05 5.24* 6/ 19
* Complete balls-faced data not available for these pairs

Despite all the runs and hundreds Tharanga has scored, though, he remains a few rungs below Sri Lanka's top names in ODIs. Apart from the fact that he needs to sustain this run over a longer period of time, what he also needs to do to enter the big league is score more runs against the better teams, and on the big stages. At the moment Tharanga's numbers are a bit lopsided: in seven tournament finals he averages 14.85, while his average against the lesser sides is about one and a half times his average against the seven better teams. Against those seven sides he averages a century every 13 innings; against the poorer sides, he gets one every six. The hundred against Australia in Hambantota was a step in the right direction; Tharanga now needs to ensure these big knocks against the best sides happen more often.

Tharanga against the top teams and against the rest
Against ODIs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
Top 7 teams 92 2703 32.56 71.62 7/ 12
The rest 31 1343 47.96 79.98 5/ 7
Excludes his innings for Asia XI v Africa XI

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • johnathonjosephs on August 21, 2011, 7:40 GMT

    I like Tharanga and all (he does have a great innings to century ratio) but his coming back in the squad complicates things for the team. Chandimal was a revoultionizing #3 for Lanka when Mahela opened, especially in England when he scored 100* against the same England attack that is murdering India AND in alien conditions (only 6th or 7th match too at that time)... Now that Tharanga is back, Chandimal is at 5 and Mahela is at 3 AND Tharanga is not being that consistent. Like also shown in the Stats, he has a LOT of ducks for the small amount of matches he played..... So it comes down, Individual records and for Lanka having a great player that ultimately acts like Sachin (breaking records/making lots of centuries but not helping team to win) or for the team effort? Hard, but i think the obvious would be team effort.....

  • johnathonjosephs on August 20, 2011, 8:00 GMT

    @emancipator sehwag is different. He hasn't been that big of a revelation in the ODI arena and I think its because of his playing style. In tests when the fields are close in to the bat, he can make shots easily to the boundary where no fielders are.... in ODI's and T20, the fields are out near the boundaries, so he tends to miskew it there more often. His strike rate isn't that crazy as one would think (in most Test Innings his strike rate is around 105-110 and almost same in ODIs)... aside from that, sri lankan ODI batsman have the huge problems of doing magnificent in some innings and then horribly (like a duck or something) in another. Jayasuriya has the 2nd most ODI centuries, yet his average is barely above 30. Its because he either gets out or hits the ball. Same with Tharanga/Mahela and many other Sri Lankans. If they can get this right, the world will give them the respect they deserve

  • dummy4fb on August 19, 2011, 20:48 GMT

    Sri lankans always enter the international arena raw. I remember having a chat a year or so ago about batsmen to watch for the next decade and when I said Tharanga he thought I was mad. Too much talent for it to lie dormant, I only see him getting better and being a major player in both formats over the next 10 years.

  • CricketPissek on August 19, 2011, 14:49 GMT

    Charith99, i think we all romanticise players from an era when we were growing up. Even for me, no one can bring out raw emotion as a CLASS player as much as Aravinda did. There was a touch of genius about him that came out even when the rest of the team seemed mediocre at times. But don't kid yourself, he didn't ALWAYS perform when the chips were down. It was horrible to see SL lose this year's WC Final after Mahela played an innings that was as good as Aravinda's. Remember, Mahela's was against an Indian team playing at home in front of a packed house rooting for the opposition. As far as Tharanga is concerned, his appetite for big runs should NOT be underestimated. Neither should his amazing fitness. Something Aravinda always lacked (as does most Indian 'great' batsmen).

  • stormy16 on August 19, 2011, 11:06 GMT

    I think the last para of the article is the key issue with Tharanga and why he hasnt had success at test level. I reckon his record at home is lopsided too. He is a pleasure to watch and easy on the eyes but the better bowlers will work him out and he has challenges outside the off stump which will be exposed away from home by the better bowlers. Having said that he has done really well and I wish him well and hope he plays for a long time to come.

  • Charith99 on August 19, 2011, 11:02 GMT

    no matter what the stats say everyone in sri lanka knows that no current sl batsman can come close to de silva's class. even sangakkara and mahela would acknowledge that. the major difference was that de silva played well when the chips were down & in big finals. something even the great SRT can't match.

  • NT_ROXX on August 19, 2011, 9:52 GMT

    You have one thing missing S Rajesh.Tharanga involved in 6 double hundred opening stands.....Apart that nice article.

  • bigbang07 on August 19, 2011, 5:55 GMT

    Rajesh, dont mean to be to be harsh on you but you've made a small error. Dilshan and Tharanga have made 4 century partnerships(two of them double century stands as well)-you're article suggests they have none.

  • Dilmah82 on August 19, 2011, 5:39 GMT

    In the table outlining opening partnerships, is the data for 50/100 run partnerships around the wrong way?

  • dummy4fb on August 19, 2011, 5:29 GMT

    Upul Tharanga had lost his home because of tsunami(2004). It had been very disastrous for Upul's career. But systematically he could manage to cement his place in SL team. His batting average and strike rate has been improving.

  • No featured comments at the moment.