Ashley Mallett
Former Australia offspinner

The art of the gully man

Fielding at gully calls for its own set of skills

Ashley Mallett

April 16, 2012

Comments: 39 | Text size: A | A

Jacques Kallis forces a ball through gully as James Anderson dives in vain, 4th Test, South Africa v England, Johannesburg, 15 January, 2010
Gully fielders these days stay too deep to snaffle all the chances that come their way © Getty Images

Australia's Jeff Thomson was the fastest bowler to draw breath, and fielding to Thommo in the gully was something else. With other fast bowlers, such as Dennis Lillee, you'd watch the bowler move in, and it was not until he released the ball that your gaze shifted from the bowler's hand to the edge of the bat.

My method for most medium and fast bowlers was to watch the ball out of the hand, then go to the edge of the bat. But for Thommo it had to be different, because there was no time to do as you did with the others. With Thommo, you'd watch that approach until he loaded up. You knew that the ball would come at breakneck speed. Dear moderns, imagine the velocity if you can: about two yards quicker than Shoaib Akhtar at his absolute quickest. Often in the gully I'd catch a glimpse of a red sphere flash past my eyes on its way to Rodney Marsh behind the stumps: the ball rose like a 747, its climb stopped by Marsh's gloves, making a sound that resounded like a solid right hook to the jaw from Muhammad Ali.

Get closer
I watched some of the great gully fieldsmen, such as Richie Benaud, who made the position his own for more than a decade. Benaud fielded close to the bat, which Alan Davidson reckons Benaud learned from fearless gully fieldsman Ron James, who took some sensational catches at leg- or regulation gully in his 45 matches for NSW. "Ron got as close to the bat as he could," Davidson recalled. "He reckoned that the closer to the bat you were in the gully, the more chances you would get, simply because the closer in you are, the less of an angle is produced."

That always made sense to me. I was amazed how far back Steve Waugh fielded to Glenn McGrath. The big fast bowler took 563 wickets in his brilliant Test career, but he should have had more, given the number of edges that bounced before they reached the gully fieldsman. Waugh, Geoff Marsh and Matthew Hayden were blessed with sure hands, but all of them stood far too deep in the gully. So too does Mike Hussey these days. Twice in the recent series against India, Hussey had to dive forward at gully to catch edges that ballooned off the shoulder of Gautam Gambhir's bat. Hussey is usually so deep in the gully that you could sneak a single to him. It's a pity because he has brilliant hands and great anticipation. But he should get in closer to the bat.

I stood some seven paces back in the gully. On the bouncy Perth track I made that about eight paces, which probably equates to near ten yards. I was always mindful of how the edge of the bat looked to me from my position at gully.

Stay low, time it right
Like a wicketkeeper, the gully fieldsman needs to crouch low on the balls of his feet - balanced as to be able to spring to his left or right. Staying low is essential, as many catches come low and fast, either a forward drive or a defensive push to a late outswinger. The drive usually comes hard and fast, but the defensive push can often sort of loop in the air and be on the "down" when you move to complete the catch.

My hand-eye co-ordination was boosted by catching a rebounding golf ball off a rough wall in practice. On my left hand I wore my baseball catcher's glove. After hours of practice, I could catch a ball, sensing its exact location, speed and direction by instinct alone: you didn't have to watch the ball into your hand
I found the key to success in the gully was to get the timing right, and that with the right method you would take more than you missed. You need to know almost to the split second when the ball will arrive. If that sense of timing is missing and the ball suddenly looms at you, the instinct is the grab at it, and invariably it either goes missing or goes down.

By staying low you could do as a wicketkeeper does when taking slow bowling: you come "up" with the ball, thus covering for a low snick or a high slash. By the time the ball is within a few feet of the batsman, you have to be in good position, knees bent and hands cupped together and ready for the catch.

You have to combine timing with watching the edge of the bat like a hawk. When you got the timing right, the whole scene seemed to be to be in slow motion, even a snick from a Thomson fireball. The ball careered from the outside edge, but it was easy to see and to complete the catch.

From the hand to the bat's edge
The great Australian slip fieldsmen, such as Bob Simpson, Mark Taylor, Mark Waugh, Jack Gregory and Ian Chappell might have struggled to field in the gully unless they changed their method. In the gully, you cannot succeed if you watch the ball from the bowler's hand all the way down the track until the batsman plays his shot.

Martin Chappell taught his son Greg to catch a cricket ball by the time Greg was two years old. "My way was simple," Martin once told me, "If I threw the ball to my son, his eyes would invariably look at his dad - his eyes were on me, not the ball, making it impossible for him to catch it. So I showed him the ball, then tossed it against the wall. Greg's eyes left mine and focused on the rebounding ball, which he caught easily." In a way, that is a simplistic version of the method good gully fieldsmen use: your gaze goes from the ball release to the edge of the bat.

In my own experience, my hand-eye co-ordination was boosted by catching a rebounding golf ball off a rough wall in practice. On my left hand I wore my baseball catcher's glove. After hours of practice, I could catch a ball, sensing its exact location, speed and direction by instinct alone: you didn't have to watch the ball into your hand.

Watching the batsman
Batsmen give clues as to how the ball might come at you in the gully. A batsman who stood with an open face of the bat always lifted your heart rate - you knew the likes of a Roy Fredericks or a Ken Barrington would edge square, towards gully, when they made a mistake driving at a ball of full length that swung away late.

I would watch the batsman, see how he shaped. When he wasn't quite to the pitch of the ball, did it go very square? All these things help build a picture in your mind's eye. Today we have batsmen such as India's Gambhir and Virender Sehwag who open the face and hit square of the wicket. They heighten the expectation of the gully fieldsman. Sehwag gets away with a lot of lofted shots through the gully area because, as I said earlier, most gully men these days field too far away from the bat.

The Australian slips cordon on the attack, Australia v West Indies, 4th Test, 4th day, December 29, 2000
Staying low is essential at gully © Getty Images

Others who open the face a bit and edge through the area are Sachin Tendulkar, especially on wickets that allow bounce, Shivnarine Chanderpaul, and Ed Cowan and David Warner.

The great England left-arm spinner Tony Lock was the best leg-gully man I've seen. The method is the same as for regulation gully, only difference is the ball would suddenly appear from behind the batsman's front pad. As the best close-in fielders watch the bowler's hand to the point of release to get a sense of when the ball is likely to arrive, so too those who field at leg gully. You figure out when the ball is likely to come your way, via the edge of the bat and the pad, and it usually comes like a balloon, easy to snare. Sometimes the bat is in front of the pad and the ball skips off the edge quickly, but if your timing is right, you can take the chance.

Fielding at gully had its rewards. Once at the Adelaide Oval in the 1974-75 Ashes series, Colin Cowdrey back-cut Lillee. The ball was on the down but somehow I flung myself towards it and clutched it with my left hand. Cowdrey looked at me in astonishment; then he touched the peak of his cap and said cheerily, "Well caught, master."

Ashley Mallett took 132 Tests wickets in 38 Tests for Australia. An author of over 25 books, he has written biographies of Clarrie Grimmett, Doug Walters, Jeff Thomson and Ian Chappell

RSS Feeds: Ashley Mallett

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Meety on (April 19, 2012, 12:21 GMT)

@waspsting - as much as I am pro-Thommo, you are right, nobody can really say for 100% sure when comparing from now to 30 yrs ago. @Ken McCarron - awesome tale to tell! (re Hall)

Posted by Dubious on (April 18, 2012, 17:08 GMT)

This site shows that in 75 and 76 he was measured at 160 and I heard him talk about how they measured the ball after it passed the stumps when they now measure it from the hand and how the wicket can take off something like 5-10 kilometres from the delivery.

Posted by   on (April 18, 2012, 13:29 GMT)

The last word on who was the fastest. Thommo was clocked at 159 km/h when he was injured with a side strain. Even the West Indians acknowledge that Thommo in 1975/76 frightened them and they ahve said he was the quickest bowler in the 1978 series in the caribbean as well. Much quicker than Holding, Shoab and Brett Lee. There are blokes in Sydney grade cricket like Ken Hall who faced both, playing against Thommo when he was 20 years old and Brett Lee when he was 50. Ask Ken Hall who was the quickest.

Posted by Mad_Hamish on (April 18, 2012, 6:28 GMT)

From Pace definition 3. any of various standard linear measures, representing the space naturally measured by the movement of the feet in walking: roughly 30 to 40 inches (75 cm to 1 meter). Compare geometrical pace, military pace, Roman pace. 4. a single step: She took three paces in the direction of the door. 5. the distance covered in a step: Stand six paces inside the gates.

Posted by SouthPaw on (April 18, 2012, 3:32 GMT)

Some of you guys need to consider this. Yes, people could field at gully, like 10 yards from the bat because the bowlers didn't offer width as they do nowadays. Also, the modern batsman has evolved, learning how to make room and creating width even if non-existent. I have fielded at 10 yards and even at silly point, because I had a great bowling team that I could trust.

Posted by Rally_Windies on (April 17, 2012, 19:08 GMT)

idk guys, haven't people who faced Holding said that he was faster than Thomo ?

but what frightened people was that Holding was thought to bowl within himself to concentrate on line and length and bowl longer spells ...

I think Boycott once said something to Holding and got the full throttle treatment once ...

I know Thomo was fast, we may never now who was fastest ... Holding and Pre-back injury Ian Bishop where scary fast ............

I've seen Shoib and Lee, and they were not as quick as Bish, before he damaged his back.....

Waqar was fast, but he also had the slant action that Fidel Edwards and Malinga use... that used to make him more dangerous than someone else at the same speed...(but when using that action, it can come out horribly wrong at times)

Posted by waspsting on (April 17, 2012, 14:52 GMT)

re: Thomson's pace - its generally accepted that he was the fastest of his time - and there were some real quick men then.

However, pay no attention whatsoever to comments like "he was two yards faster than Shoaib". There is absolutely NO WAY anyone can measure this type of thing from off the field.

You can't even judge whose faster among bowlers bowling together (without the clue of how far back the keeper is, and how rushed the batsman appears).

Judging whose faster - a guy now against a guy 30 years ago? Not possible. just poetic exaggeration here

Posted by waspsting on (April 17, 2012, 14:45 GMT)

not sure about Mallet's modern-fielders-stand-too-far point.

The gulley stands for thick edges, open faced glides, and full blooded shots, and his clue as to where to stand comes from the keeper (and slips).

You might miss the odd chance from a lobbed ball of the shoulder of the bat for standing too far back, but if you'd stood closer, you wouldn't have had time to react to the full blooded shots (that standing further back for gives you an advantage for). I think its a personal choice of Mallet's to stand closer, not a general rule.

Also, standing at leg gully is not at all like standing at gully. you mainly get balls that are glided away at leg gully (as well as edges). There's no leg side equivalent to the full blooded cut shot (most pulls go squarer).

always nice to read what the practioner's have to say, but this is piece is more personal than generally applicable.

Posted by Meety on (April 17, 2012, 11:37 GMT)

@Henrik Loven - don't want to argue (never said steps), but 1.7m gait is not normal, I'm 6ft 1 - it would be quite painful to stretch 1.7m between feet. I believe a sprinter's gait is about 240 cm or 8 feet & they are nearly flying, 1.7m is nearly 6ft, I actually measured my "normal" gate & I reckon it is about 1/2 metre! Ten yards is actually 9 metres!!! == == == Regarding Thommo - I do believe he was bowling full tossers for the speed gun, whatever, he was bloody fast!!!! All this talk of speed reminds me of Glen McGrath when speed guns started regularly being used in International matches. I remember him saying (with a straight face, he was serious I think), that because he "so tall", he is bowling faster than the speed gun registers because the ball travels further! LOL!

Posted by   on (April 17, 2012, 8:16 GMT)

@Mike Best ... I read somewhere (can't remember the source) that when Thommo was clocked at 100mph it was worked out using slow motion cameras that timed the ball from release point to when it reached the batsman and the speed was worked out mathematically. As a result it was the average speed from 1 end to the other. Speed guns now measure the velocity out the hand which is considerably quicker than when it reaches the batsman. Not sure how true, but if so puts Thommo streets ahead of the Akhtars, Taits etc.

Posted by Chris_P on (April 17, 2012, 8:13 GMT)

Xolile. I am only repeating statements made by Ian Chappell, although having witnessed that phenomenal season, I wouldn't doubt it. I also had the privilege of going to a Viv Richards/Ian Botham night & when Richards was asked who was the fastest bowler he ever faced, he whistled & said "Thommo, man he was quick". Let me tell you, in the era of no helmets & little protection, a lot of batsmen were playing him backing away. To his credit, he didn't bowl bouncers at tailenders. @Henrik Lovén, I do recall this book & would confirm Mallet's post, some of his catches were unbelievable the way he plucked them out from full blooded shots.

Posted by   on (April 17, 2012, 7:36 GMT)

@Meety, he said "paces", not steps, as can be inferred from this passage "which probably equates to near ten yards". A pace is the distance heel to heel of the same foot, i.e. a double step. Since "a pace" for a 6'1" man is about 1.7 meters when walking, Mr Mallett claims to have stood some 12 meters from the bat, 13½ at the WACA. While not exactly ten yards, I'll allow him the poetic licence as 12 meters from the bat in gully is frighteningly close.

Posted by Game_Gazer on (April 17, 2012, 2:57 GMT)

Funny observations: 1. Most of the times, the one who does well in gully is not the most natural/gifted athlete, but known for his grit in the team 2. Gully is the most dangerous position but attracts lazy-ones/slow runners that have great reflexes & hand-eye...rather than gifted-ones 3. No matter how experienced one is, he ALWAYS fears being hit and is never comfortable, because, the pace of the ball coming at you is very difficult to judge (many times, one is blinded due to the flashing blades...add Thommo & Roy to the mix ;-) .. )

Posted by Cantbowlcantbat on (April 17, 2012, 1:55 GMT)

Xolile, Thommo was measured in '74 after pitching, modern measurements are made shortly out of the hand. The ball slows down with time after it leaves the hand and after it pitches. I saw Thommo bowl at his peak and do not consider it crazy to suggest he was bowling around 170 kph out of the hand.

Posted by Meety on (April 17, 2012, 0:13 GMT)

@Henrik Loven - does that book have any photos of a slip cordon, because I find it hard to imagine fielding at gully only 7 or 8 paces from the wicket? My meories of those matches is that they were a long way back, but I wouldn't be able to quantify how far.

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 20:54 GMT)

This is what Rod Marsh said about Ashley Mallett ("Gloves of Irony" pp 101-3): "Apart from being an extraordinary off-spinner, "Rowdy" was the best gully fieldsman we may ever see. In the 1974-75 series, when we regained the Ashes, some of his catches in that position were unbelievable. Even more so when you consider his poor vision. Gully is perhaps the most difficult of all catching positions... ...But in the gully, you're all on your own mate - and the stroke is usually the full-blooded square cut. I'd demand danger money to field at gully. Ashley made it look so easy. He'd merely thrust out a hand and the ball would stick as if glued." That passage has fascinated me for thirty years. Thank you for telling me the story from your point of view Mr Mallett!

Posted by BellCurve on (April 16, 2012, 19:59 GMT)

Harry Kool seems to be saying Jeff Thomson was bowling between 170khm and 175kmh in Brisbane in December 1974. Wow! That makes him almost 50kmh faster than Glen McGrath and Vernon Philander! The batsmen must have been absolutely clueless!

Posted by cyclist00752 on (April 16, 2012, 18:57 GMT)

I just love the example of given of catching the ball rebounding from a wall. I should do that a lot as a hobby in my younger years at my house (and against my parents wishes!). And I completely agree after some practice I could do it almost with my eyes closed ... it felt divine!

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 18:25 GMT)

I have always regarded gully as the most difficult place to field. The angle itself seemed unnatural to me and for sighting the ball, it was probably one of worst places to stand.

Regardless, this is a superb piece by Ashley Mallett.

Posted by Harry_Kool on (April 16, 2012, 16:48 GMT)

@Mike Best. Yep he has been timed at this pace on 2 occasions. The interesting point about the first time was that he was timed at 160.2 against the West Indies in Perth (where Fredericks hit a 78 ball century), Ian Chappell reckoned he was 10 to 15 kph slower than his quickest he bowled in Brisbane the previous test! His shoulder injury 2 seasons later effectively slowed him down from the 160+ mark down to 150. To see him bowl live is a memory that will stay with me for life.

Posted by BellCurve on (April 16, 2012, 15:58 GMT)

I love reading this kind of stuff. As they say, there is no fool like an old fool.

Posted by Mad_Hamish on (April 16, 2012, 14:31 GMT)

I believe Thommo was timed at 99.7 mph in one match but the radar guns weren't there for many matches so it's open to question as to whether that was up at his peak speed or lower (I think it was also after he'd had a broken collarbone in a fielding mishap) The footage I've seen of him early in his career looks quicker than anybody else I've seen but that's not exactly strong evidence

Posted by Meety on (April 16, 2012, 12:41 GMT)

@tommy.T - perhaps he was good at the long jump? Man I'll have to pay more attention the next time I see some old footage of Thommo with the slip cordon!

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 12:40 GMT)

I was about to write that I didn't believe he could bowl as quick as Akhtar but seems he was timed at 160.5 Kph, can anyone confirm that?

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 12:23 GMT)

It help me a lot about fielding in gully , but in history of cricket the fastest ball ever bowled is by shoiab akhtar,fielding with pakistan is always a big prolb till know the drop dollys but still better then before imagine in late 80 and 90s the amount of catches drop on the bowling of wasim waqar shoiab etc because of the poor fielding the lost like 300 wickets between them ...

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 12:21 GMT)

Thanks Rowdy for another interesting piece. I really enjoy your insight on the finer points of the game, especially regarding off-spin bowling during the recent Aus vs India series. Keep up the good work!

Posted by Noman_Yousuf_Dandore on (April 16, 2012, 11:46 GMT)

Brilliant piece; about time someone wrote on of my favourite positions to field at and set as a skipper-gully. This underrated position can fetch you a lot of wickets, if used wisely. Cheers!

Posted by Harry_Kool on (April 16, 2012, 11:30 GMT)

@tommy.T . I have seen Mallet play tests and have many DVD's of the Aussie ero of the 70's, especially the Thommo era, believe me, he fielded that close. Do yourself a favour and grab "The Ashes 74/75" DVD, Mallet took some absolute screamers when that close, even though away from the field he was apparently very clumsy.

Posted by vinjoy on (April 16, 2012, 11:22 GMT)

I saw Azhar often fielding brilliantly at Gully, ith super reflexes for fielding as well as catching. It was in early 1990s, sure he was one of the best there.

Posted by tommy.T on (April 16, 2012, 10:51 GMT)

Absolute rubbish that Mallett fielded 10 yards from the bat at gully! Oh how the memories become exaggerated as the years go on. Anyone 10 yards from the bat to a pace bowler would be killed by a full-blooded cut shot. 10 yards and you would barely have time to react to a genuine edge off a gentle medium pacer. I'm willing to believe 20 yards to Thommo with the new ball, and 15 yards to Lillee in his second spell with an older ball.

Posted by Digimont on (April 16, 2012, 10:21 GMT)

Well done Rowdy, as usual spot on! As Richie continually states regarding slip positions, you can't catch it if it doesn't carry. Better to drop 2 out of 10 chances than catch 3 out of 3 in the same timeframe. Fielders in general seem so frightened of dropping one these days they don't create opportunities for themselves. This is what sets the brilliant fielders from the solid.

Posted by   on (April 16, 2012, 9:39 GMT)

Ashley forgot to mention another 'delight' of fielding gully. If you dive at a ball going past you, the slips or point run and fetch it, saving you the trouble. You have to dive to do your best to save the single! :)

Posted by IlMagnifico on (April 16, 2012, 8:52 GMT)

A middled square cut goes between sily point and backward point.

Posted by Romanticstud on (April 16, 2012, 8:29 GMT)

I know that he didn't field in the gully ... but more a backward-point position ... Jonty Rhodes often cut off balls through moving closer and anticipating which side the ball was going to go of him. Also by being that much closer ... you have more time to run people out ... if you hit the stumps ... Now facing the bowling of a Brett Lee ... and the batting of Sehwag ... You will more than likely get a catch down third man's throat ... or with a mis-hit 3 quarters to the boundary ... but then a genuine edge off a glove from an attempted cut pops up closer ... so what are the guys standing so far back for ... Gulley is like the tail of a slip cordon ... although there for the thicker edges ... and also the balls that are hit behind square ... for those you need to look at the ball hitting the bat and watch the path of the ball ...

Posted by vatsap on (April 16, 2012, 7:07 GMT)

Super piece. The gully position is possibly under stated in the cricket field. Slips and Point grab all the glamour, thanks to the masters there in the form of Jonty, Gibbs, Ricky Ponting, Mark Taylor, M Waugh, Stephen Flemming. Would be very interesting to hear from Hussey, S Waugh and other gully specialsts.

Posted by dinosaurus on (April 16, 2012, 6:49 GMT)

Thommo was 100 mph, 160 kph - not peak velocity but the speed for the whole distance!

Posted by Stevo_ on (April 16, 2012, 6:40 GMT)

@Mad_Hamish- Sehwag only hits it hard("er") becaise of modern bats

Posted by SouthPaw on (April 16, 2012, 4:27 GMT)

Ashley Mallett is as good a writer as he was a bowler! And I am enjoying his presentations of the different nuances of cricket. Perhaps the byline should have included the fact that he took 30 catches (in addition to the 132 wickets), almost a catch per match.

Keep them coming "Rowdy" :)

Posted by Mad_Hamish on (April 16, 2012, 4:12 GMT)

I suspect that modern gully fielders field further away from the batsman because with modern bats the ball flies much faster off an outside edge. Not to mention that I really wouldn't want to be 7 or 8 steps away from the bat if Sehwag middled a square cut...

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Ashley MallettClose

    Test cricket's young Fab Four

Martin Crowe: Kohli, Root, Smith and Williamson will take turns as the No. 1 Test batsman. So far each has shown only one technical weakness

    Can keep, can bat

Numbers Game: The modern wicketkeeper needs to be more than capable with the bat, and West Indies and Pakistan have had some success with them recently

    'Which current England Test star made a duck on first-class debut?'

Cricket Brain: Ian Bell takes the challenge. How well does he know his own team-mates?

Pietersen has won Tests on his own in India, SL

Modern Masters: Dravid and Manjrekar on KP's ability to change the course of a game in two or three hours

What cricket can learn from baseball's review system

Kartikeya Date: In baseball, technology is used to help experts, not to second-guess them

News | Features Last 7 days

India disgraced themselves by not competing

MS Dhoni and the BCCI are to blame for a touring party that became too comfortable and compliant

'I couldn't bring myself to set a batsman up by giving him runs'

Glenn McGrath talks about the method behind his metronomic consistency, visualisation, and why aggression isn't about sledging

Errant elbows, and Priyanjan's shuffle

Plays of the day from the first ODI between Sri Lanka and Pakistan

Dhoni doesn't heed his own warning

Plays of the Day from the second ODI between England and India, in Cardiff

Don't lap sweep when Sangakkara keeps

Plays of the day from the second ODI between Sri Lanka and Pakistan, in Hambantota

News | Features Last 7 days