| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
In the 1980s, Test run rates in the West Indies used to be higher than in any other country; since 2000, it's become the lowest
April 20, 2012
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Numbers Game : Last week's column: The best Test batsmen at home
Series/Tournaments:
Australia tour of West Indies
Teams:
West Indies
|
|||
Over the last couple of weeks, the two extreme forms of cricket have given the viewers a good example of just how different the two versions are. While batting teams have motored along at about seven-and-a-half to the over in the IPL (which itself is relatively slow by IPL standards), the West Indies-Australia series has produced runs at the rate of 2.69 to the over (going into the final day of the second Test in Trinidad).
There used to be a time when cricket in the West Indies used to be about quick pitches which encouraged bowlers to bowl fast and batsmen to score quickly - in the 1980s the West Indies was the only region in which the average scoring rate in Test cricket was more than three runs per over. Those were the golden days of West Indian cricket, when most of the batsmen were aggressive and bowlers bowled fast.
That, though, was more than 20 years back. Now, cricket in the West Indies is often characterised by slow pitches and slow outfields, which means batsmen don't get value for their shots, fast bowlers don't get much out of it, and bowlers in general struggle to get batsmen out quickly. In the two Tests of the ongoing series, the only innings in which a team scored at three an over or more was in the fourth innings of the first Test, when Australia had a target before them and limited time to get the runs in - they scored at 4.08 per over to get to 192 in 47. Other than that, the highest run-rate has been West Indies' 2.93 in their first innings in Barbados. In the two completed innings in Port-of-Spain, the run-rates have been 2.30 and 2.45, and most of the stats highlights have been about slow scoring or slow bowling: in the Australian innings, four bowlers bowled 15-plus overs at economy rates of less that two, the first time this had happened since 1961; when West Indies batted, Australia opened the bowling with Michael Beer, the first time since 1938 that a slow bowler had shared the new ball for Australia in the opposition first innings. This is also the first time since 2000 that Australia's run rate in a series is less than three runs per over.
The table below lists the run-rates in each country since 2000, and West Indies is right at the bottom of the list (among countries that have hosted at least 20 Tests; UAE is lower at 2.88, but they've hosted only 12). In fact, from the 1980s, when they were the only country with a three-plus run rate, they've now become the only ones with a rate of less than three. The average runs per wicket stat is similar to many of the other host countries, but the lower scoring rate means more overs used up to make those runs. That, coupled with weather interruptions, means the result percentage in the West Indies is the lowest among all countries.
| Host country | Tests | Results | Percentage | Average | Run-rate |
| England | 85 | 66 | 77.65 | 34.32 | 3.44 |
| Australia | 72 | 62 | 86.11 | 35.62 | 3.36 |
| South Africa | 64 | 54 | 84.37 | 32.31 | 3.30 |
| Pakistan | 32 | 22 | 68.75 | 37.35 | 3.26 |
| New Zealand | 51 | 35 | 68.63 | 32.42 | 3.17 |
| Bangladesh | 37 | 32 | 86.49 | 32.27 | 3.17 |
| India | 57 | 36 | 63.16 | 37.53 | 3.15 |
| Sri Lanka | 65 | 48 | 73.85 | 33.22 | 3.10 |
| Zimbabwe | 25 | 21 | 84.00 | 33.09 | 3.03 |
| West Indies | 61 | 37 | 60.65 | 33.67 | 2.98 |
The conditions in the West Indies has made quick run-scoring tough for many batsmen, as is reflected in the table below. Among those who've faced at least 750 deliveries in the West Indies since 2000, several batsmen have much lower strike rates in the West Indies than over their entire careers. Jimmy Adams' overall strike rate in the West Indies was 36.85, only marginally below his career number, but in the five Tests since 2000, it went down to less than 28. The more surprising stat is Herschelle Gibbs's strike rate in the West Indies: 34.41, compared to a career rate of more than 50. His strike rate outside the West Indies was 52.79, which means his scoring rate dropped by about 35% when he played in the Windies. The strike rate is all the more surprising as Gibbs' average in the West Indies was reasonably good, which means he spent a fair amount of time at the crease. But as this list of innings shows, on several occasions he failed to increase his scoring rate despite spending long periods at the crease: the list includes 45 off 195 balls, 49 off 206, and 87 off 275 - numbers that you'd seldom associate with Gibbs.
A couple of slots down the table is Michael Hussey, another batsman who's played plenty of deliveries in the West Indies without quite converting them into runs. Till the end of the first innings in Trinidad, he'd played 766 balls and scored only 290; had he scored at his career strike rate of 49.49, he'd have scored 379 runs in those deliveries. Even Darren Bravo has been far more subdued at home (average 33.30, strike rate 37.58) than abroad (average 70.25, strike rate 55.17). Further down the list, the strike rates for Rahul Dravid and Shivnarine Chanderpaul are almost the same in and outside the West Indies, with similar averages too.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Balls faced | Average | Strike rate | Career SR |
| Jimmy Adams | 5 | 315 | 1130 | 63.00 | 27.87 | 37.57 |
| Neil McKenzie | 5 | 301 | 952 | 33.44 | 31.61 | 42.00 |
| Herschelle Gibbs | 9 | 583 | 1694 | 41.64 | 34.41 | 50.26 |
| Darren Bravo | 7 | 433 | 1152 | 33.30 | 37.58 | 47.87 |
| Michael Hussey | 5 | 290 | 766 | 32.22 | 37.85 | 49.49 |
| Ryan Hinds | 11 | 320 | 825 | 20.00 | 38.78 | 40.56 |
| Ashwell Prince | 6 | 359 | 905 | 71.80 | 39.66 | 43.70 |
| Jacques Kallis | 12 | 942 | 2369 | 55.41 | 39.76 | 45.59 |
| Rahul Dravid | 12 | 1151 | 2797 | 63.94 | 41.15 | 42.51 |
| Marlon Samuels | 15 | 606 | 1451 | 22.44 | 41.76 | 46.01 |
| Shivnarine Chanderpaul | 51 | 4173 | 9988 | 61.36 | 41.78 | 42.60 |
On the other hand, there're very few batsmen who've scored faster in the West Indies than in other countries during this period. The table below lists the batsmen with the highest scoring rates in the West Indies (with a 750-ball cut-off). Only three batsmen in the list below have scored significantly quicker in the West Indies, compared to their overall rates: Justin Langer, Andrew Strauss and Paul Collingwood. Clearly, quick scoring and the West Indies no longer go together, which is a pity considering the adventurous batting and boundary-hitting that the West Indies used to be famous for a few decades ago.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Balls faced | Average | Strike rate | Career SR |
| Justin Langer | 4 | 483 | 788 | 69.00 | 61.29 | 54.22 |
| Ricky Ponting | 8 | 903 | 1542 | 69.46 | 58.56 | 58.98 |
| Brian Lara | 33 | 3177 | 5449 | 58.83 | 58.30 | 60.51 |
| Andrew Strauss | 5 | 541 | 943 | 67.62 | 57.37 | 49.16 |
| Inzamam-ul-Haq | 4 | 462 | 815 | 77.00 | 56.68 | 54.02 |
| Paul Collingwood | 5 | 430 | 780 | 61.42 | 55.12 | 46.44 |
| Chris Gayle | 45 | 2777 | 5225 | 38.56 | 53.14 | 59.10 |
| Ridley Jacobs | 25 | 974 | 1859 | 37.46 | 52.39 | 47.80 |
| Graeme Smith | 7 | 876 | 1728 | 73.00 | 50.69 | 60.39 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
'You can't taint the whole IPL'
Bowl at Boycs: Geoff Boycott on spot-fixing, Adil Rashid's future, and yorkers in Test matches
Harsha Bhogle: The spot-fixing controversy teaches us about the pitfalls of insecurity and of the desire to keep up with the Joneses
The new Harmison? Or is it the new Caddick?
Numbers Game: Stuart Broad is destructive at his best, but at other times his bowling average is unusually high
Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Less cricket on TV? Hallelujah
Matt Cleary: Why Channel Nine should be applauded for not broadcasting domestic cricket in Australia
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Vijay slips, Ashwin does a Sahara
Plays of the day from the IPL qualifier between Chennai Super Kings and Mumbai Indians in Delhi
Spirited Sunrisers exceed expectations (74)
Sunrisers began this tournament as one of the underdogs, but fought impressively to reach as far as the Eliminator
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (42)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
@Stephen Miller - I'm not questioning the amount of Indians writing on here, but why so many people write ABOUT India all the time, even when the original article was a focus on another country and/or player.
Posted by G.Sri on (April 21, 2012, 6:47 GMT)@Shan156: England is playing test cricket since 19th century and they should have won in all countries because the others are relatively new to cricket. I'll ask you 1 thing. Can you name any England XI for last 10 year with all English men in it? At least whatever and wherever we won, its due to our local players and not the imports. How many test matches does your mighty United XI won in India for last 25 years? 1 and lost 6, ya, only 1 test in last 25 years. In that same period India won 4 tests in your country and losing 7. If you take out last year's disaster, India actually leading 4-3 in your country. India is the only team to challenge and beat Australia when they're at their prime. England was literally thrashed left and right during that period. Forgot the good old thrashings? Cricinfo please publish.
Posted by@TheDoctor394: I don't know what all the whinging about the focus on India in comments is about. The country has a population of about one and a quarter billion, which probably means about two thirds of all cricket fans are Indian. Of course their fans are going to dominate discussion---and what's wrong with that?
Posted by Shan156 on (April 20, 2012, 23:25 GMT)@G.Sri, For starters, England have won test series in all countries. India are yet to win one in Australia and SA. Yes, England lost 4 tests in a row and that is poor. But, what to make out of the 8 successive, huge defeats suffered by the mighty Indians?
Posted by TheDoctor394 on (April 20, 2012, 23:11 GMT)Why is it that, no matter what the article on CricInfo, no matter what country is the topic, no matter which players are mentioned, the majority of replies are arguments about India? :-|
Posted by Meety on (April 20, 2012, 22:54 GMT)@AdrianVanDenStael - the table for "Batsmen with highest strike rates in the West Indies in Tests since 2000 (Qual: 750 balls)" is interesting in that it there are as many batsmen with significantly higher S/R in WI v Career! However, obviously by & large most are lower. Also I'd like to know if Pakistan home e/r include UAE, I'd like to see the UAE seperate.
Posted byA very informative article. And answers many puzzling questions. And this might not be only in the WI, but many other cricketing nations. However with global warming & stuff we may not be able to do much with the pitches. I don't know. I had made a suggestion that the new ball becomes available at the 65th or 70th over. A shiner & harder ball will befit all concern;more stroke play,faster bowling, spinners have a harder ball, less injuries to the pacers etc. MORE wickets will fall, crowd excitement. Food for though. Change what u can change, leave the rest to GOD. Think about it.
Posted by RohanMarkJay on (April 20, 2012, 21:23 GMT)The West Indies team of the late 1970s and whole of 1980s. Has there ever been a better cricket team in the history of cricket? I doubt it. I am sure we will never see a more impressive cricket team like the West Indies team of the late 1970s and 1980s ever again. Oh they were good days if you were a genuine cricket fan.
Posted by AdrianVanDenStael on (April 20, 2012, 17:12 GMT)@Technical-1: when I began to read this article I was expecting part of the reason for the slowing of run rate in the West Indies to be a decline in the quality of batting in the side who by definition provides 50% of the line-ups that contest tests in the West Indies (i.e., the home team); Ganga and Samuels aren't Greenidge and Richards, e.g. However, much of the evidence of this article contradicts both my point and your point, I think, in suggesting that even batsman who have scored quickly elsewhere have tended to score slowly in the West Indies. If we object to low scoring rates, therefore, the point is that it is not slow batsmen who should be discouraged, but slow pitches. I remember Stuart Broad for instance complaining about dead pitches in the West Indies, and the likes of Michael Holding have also complained about test pitches globally getting slower and lower, partly as a result of commercial demands for matches that last 5 days (although ironically draws are rare now).
Posted by G.Sri on (April 20, 2012, 13:33 GMT)@Valavan: Before criticising others for the inaccuracy in their comments, you get your's right. India have won the test series in NZ in 09 by 1-0 which is 3 years back, so they won 2 series abroad in last 4 years. India have 2 ODI world cups, 1 T20 world cup, no.1 in tests for nearly 2 years, sure, they aren't a team, right? Then what is your sorry England(or United XI) achieved since 1889? Apart from 1 T20 world cup which is won with the help of SA, you guys haven't done anything to gloat about. Maybe a whitewash from Pakistan is not enough for you. Cricinfo publish.