July 1, 2012

'We are known as the cricket capital of the USA'

The mayor of Lauderhill, which is hosting two T20s between West Indies and New Zealand, is a cricket fan. Who better as an evangelist for the game in America?
  shares 17

In the lead-up to this weekend's pair of T20 matches in Florida between West Indies and New Zealand, many players and administrators talked excitedly about the opportunity to bring cricket to an American audience who might have never seen it before. Others dismissed the notion of bringing the game to an "American" audience as more fiction than reality because the majority of the crowd at the Central Broward Regional Park is expected to be predominantly Jamaican, Guyanese and Trinidadian expats from South Florida.

Those who think that the games are only being played in Florida to satisfy the expats might be surprised to find out that perhaps the biggest advocate for international cricket in the USA is a middle-aged man from Michigan with Jewish heritage, who not only watches but actively plays cricket in and around Lauderhill.

"In this area, to be white and Jewish and playing cricket is not the most common thing you'll find in the world," says Richard J Kaplan, the mayor of Lauderhill. "When you're involved in a city, one of the things you want to do is provide those services, those events, those amenities, that the people you represent want. This city has a large contingent of people from the Caribbean and they love the sport of cricket. I've been supporting it. I've been out there not only talking about it but actually playing the game, enjoying the game, and I think people have appreciated that I've stuck my neck out there for them."

Anyone who looks around Kaplan's office at Lauderhill City Hall will recognise that his words are not grandstanding political bluster. The walls are adorned with cricket paraphernalia, including framed pictures of players and teams, cricket bats and balls, as well as a banner from the Lima Cricket & Football Club in Peru, and an action shot of Kaplan at the crease in a textbook follow-through pose that appeared on the front page of an area newspaper back in 2003.

It's been a long time coming, but Kaplan, 56, is happy that this weekend will be an opportunity to show residents that county officials were right to build a dedicated cricket stadium capable of hosting big-time international matches.

"This event has to prove that cricket can be viable," he said. "You have to show them that economically it's viable, and I believe we've done it - that there is a draw, people will buy tickets to come to the game and that it will boost their fan support and ultimately the bottom line of continuing to develop the sport. If you can show that, why wouldn't you want to do it again?"

Areas in South Florida like Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach have been hit hard economically in recent years, especially with the collapse of the housing market since 2008. Kaplan says an event like this is very important because in addition to all the interest from residents in the area, it is estimated that over 5000 people have travelled in from out of town for the matches, providing a big boost to the South Florida economy through tourism.

"Our Convention & Visitors Bureau wouldn't be doing this if they didn't feel it would have a major impact to the community," Kaplan said. "It wouldn't be what we would achieve through a Super Bowl, but it will still be one of the larger impacts this county could potentially have."

"I will find out more about this game by reading foreign press coverage than I will from my own local paper where the game is at. I'm a little disappointed about it"
Kaplan on the lack of enthusiasm for the T20s in the local media

While New York, Philadelphia and Los Angeles have historical ties to cricket that go back further, Lauderhill's association with the game has really only developed in the last decade or so. Kaplan says he first noticed cricket while driving down Florida's Turnpike in 1999, a year after he became mayor. It took a few more years for him to develop an interest in the game.

"A local gentleman was interested in us creating a sister city with Chaguanas, Trinidad. We had an event that we developed, called United Fest, which was a big Caribbean festival here in the city, and they wanted us to do a sister city and get more involved in expanding cricket. I was very happy to go down to Trinidad with a contingent from the city. I didn't know anything about cricket."

Before he left for Trinidad, Kaplan says he printed some explanation sheets to get better acquainted with the game, but what really propelled his interest on that trip in 2002 was attending the second Test between India and West Indies in Port-of-Spain.

"I sat in a box with the US ambassador to the West Indies and he helped me understand it. I was enjoying the game a lot. It was just a giant party. It really was a lot of fun watching the game."

It was around this time that a bid was being organised for South Florida to host 2007 World Cup warm-up matches and the idea came along for a stadium to be built in Lauderhill to make that happen. Although the bid was unsuccessful, Kaplan credits Lance Gibbs, the former West Indies spinner, with continuing to make a push to get the stadium built and eventually getting international cricket to come to the ground.

Gibbs, a resident of South Florida, chaired a committee in 2003 to lead the charge to bring part of the World Cup to Florida and to raise the profile of the game in the area. "He was a great figurehead," Kaplan said. "He gave a lot of credibility to our process and to our programme that we wanted to develop. It wasn't like a bunch of people involved who didn't know about cricket said, 'Hey this is a good idea. Let's see if we can do it.' Lance is one of those people that you have to take seriously. He's an established person. I thank him for all the years he's been involved."

Not everyone was in favour of the idea of a cricket stadium, though. When plans were first put forward in August 2003, former Broward County commissioner Josephus Eggelletion was quoted as saying, "The worst thing for this county to do would be to build a facility that begins to gather pigeon poop." An August 2009 article in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel highlighted unease among taxpayers after the stadium, built as part of a reported $70 million complex that contains a variety of other sports facilities, sat virtually unused for cricket in the first two years after opening.

Kaplan says he has been frustrated at the lack of media exposure for this weekend's games in the local newspapers, and that it doesn't help when trying to deflect criticism from detractors. The games will have a sizeable worldwide audience but will be completely unavailable to viewers wanting to watch on TV in the USA.

"A lot of foreign press has been here," Kaplan said. "I will find out more about this game by reading foreign press coverage than I will from my own local paper. I'm a little disappointed about it. It's expensive to travel and people are flying here to cover this thing. They [the local media] can get in their car and drive a couple of miles, so you would think that since it doesn't really cost them anything to cover it, it might help them sell a couple newspapers."

More criticism recently came from Guyana president Donald Ramotar, who said, "I think the West Indies Cricket Board is slapping the whole Caribbean in its face by moving some of the international matches to Florida." Kaplan disagrees with that assertion and says that playing games in Florida is a way forward.

"If cricket in the West Indies or internationally wants to grow its pie and wants to build on new revenue sources that ultimately contribute to the health of the sport and the growth of the sport, it's got to start moving into those areas where it can grow," he said. "What we need to [show] is that we're not trying to take away from them. We're trying to expand the sport to make it overall healthier and larger on a worldwide stage. If you don't grow the pie and you don't move into the United States and have these tournaments, if you're satisfied with cricket worldwide as it is right now, it has limited potential to grow and might shrink some. You might have somewhat of a stagnant sport, and I don't think cricket wants to be stagnant."

Part of that future growth might be having a franchise play its home games in the stadium in a proposed T20 professional league that New Zealand Cricket and the USA Cricket Association are trying to get underway for next summer. For now, though, Kaplan is just hoping that this weekend is as successful as he's projecting it to be. Only 8600 tickets were sold across two matches between New Zealand and Sri Lanka here in 2010, but nearly four times that many could be gobbled up by hungry fans this weekend.

"We are officially known as the cricket capital of the United States," Kaplan said. "If everything goes as we're hoping it should, it will be validation for a lot of people. It will prove what we believed and what we've been talking about for the last couple of years can and will work. From that success the next step is to build on it. When things are successful and you've proven it, other people all of a sudden want to be a part of it. There are people that are ahead of the curve and there are people that show up after the curve, after you've shown that things work. We're being ahead of the curve."

Peter Della Penna is a journalist based in New Jersey

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY Swingit on | July 4, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    This is too funneeeeee! The most beautiful and popular game on the planet Football (as in soccer) cannot even get a toehold in America and you guys expect cricket to take hold here? Get real. Where will it rank among the hundreds of sports on offer in the US? Somewhere way below the X games I bet. I mean the 4 major sports where the athletes are paid an ludicrous amount of money are Football, Baseball, Basketball and Hockey and let me tell you FOOTBALL is king nothing even comes close. As much as basketball is the most international of the 4 it cannot touch football. Americans like things that are uniquely theirs (it suffices if they believe it whether its true or not), see the resistant to hockey even if it is one of the big 4 simply because most Americans find it too "Canadian" (forgetting a Canadian invented basketball). So sorry guys cricket is just too "foreign" for Americans so it will never work.

  • POSTED BY Cpt.Meanster on | July 2, 2012, 22:25 GMT

    @Hammond: It is obvious you want to put down the USA with your comments. The Americans don't have to get it. They have better sports of their own. No, they don't wish to play a British sport. They are THE republicans remember ? why should they care ? I seriously cannot see a real American embrace cricket. Only the expats will carry on supporting it.

  • POSTED BY RohanMarkJay on | July 2, 2012, 19:10 GMT

    Ironically Hollywood used to be a hotbed of cricket activity in America. Although I don't think it is now. Hollywood used to be in the 1930s,40s and 50s. However that was due to British,Australian, South African, New Zealand actors, film producers, Directors etc who were also fanatical cricket fans. They took their love of the sport to America and Hollywood. Despite this the Americans still didn't get cricket. LOL! One reason is because maybe I am just theorizing besides being too slow and taxing the attention span for Americans also saw cricket as a symbol of British Imperialism.Therefore no self respecting patriotic American would take up cricket. We shouldn't forget. US was initially a country created out of fighting a war against Imperialism from England.This I think is at the heart of patriotism in USA for Americans. As a result Cricket would be tough sell for Americans. Besides they have their own sports.I think if they market cricket with strong SL or WI style cricket has chance

  • POSTED BY SagirParkar on | July 2, 2012, 18:37 GMT

    i think this is good for the globalisation for cricket.. Test cricket might take longer to catch on but T20 is on par in terms of time with most of the american sports at the moment.. it is a huge market, can get financial support as well over there and it will bring many more viewers and followers to the sport.. the expat population from the Windies, England, south asia can help with the promotional aspects as well.. ofcourse, i am not overly optimistic about the States embracing cricket full time.. but never say never.. and with time things might change..

    as for Mr Hammond, he'd perhaps do well to realise that Test cricket and its snobbish insularity is what is holding the game from being truly global. why is it compulsory that test cricket has to be everyone's prerogative ? the three formats can exist wonderfully together if the ICC knows how to handle and promote them. it is the top tier, no doubt. but to take cricket to the vast masses, T20 is the way forward.

  • POSTED BY NAZMO-CRICKFANN on | July 2, 2012, 17:33 GMT

    thank you all for the series opportunity

  • POSTED BY Hammond on | July 2, 2012, 15:39 GMT

    I hope it never catches on in the US. They would simply take all the parts out of it that they didn't like (like they did with draws in football) and leave the cricket world with a poor facsimile of baseball.. oh hang on that has already been done, it's called the IPL ;).. Seriously though the yanks will never get test cricket, they already have a great bat and ball game there of their own.

  • POSTED BY jb633 on | July 2, 2012, 13:48 GMT

    It would be quality for the global game if USA were to become a major force. Surely if it did catch on and become mainstream they would end up being the best side in the world. They have the population, money, climate and facilities to become a force. I am very glad the ICC has targetted the USA as a potential prospect. There are a few nations at present who are looking better and better. Netehrlands and Afghan in particlar look to have some real talent, the ECB has done very well to involve them in the domestic leagues. I would hope that they have aspirations for Afghanistan too. It would mean so much to their people if they could produce a side capable of competing on a gloabal scale. The effects of Afgan national side would far outstrip just cricket. It would help to instil a greater sense of national pride. Do no restrict the game, but spread it. The more nations that can compete the better. Well done ICC on this experiment.

  • POSTED BY sweetspot on | July 2, 2012, 9:46 GMT

    The great glorious tradition of the game and stuff like that will be totally lost on anyone new coming into the sport of cricket. What should really be trumpeted is that this game can be played by both boys and girls, with a leather ball or a tennis ball, by big and small, young and old, athletically or lazily, physically or artistically. It will attract Americans by the hundreds if this becomes a recreation first. There is just too much fun to be had, and there should be no "English" attitudes attached to furthering the cause.

  • POSTED BY ooper_cut on | July 2, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    What enthusiasm this man has, here's wishing this series will be a big boost for Cricket in this country.

  • POSTED BY fataquie on | July 2, 2012, 7:11 GMT

    I think to show the cricket at its best, they need India vs. Pakistan T20 series....followed by England vs. Australia.....

  • POSTED BY Swingit on | July 4, 2012, 5:43 GMT

    This is too funneeeeee! The most beautiful and popular game on the planet Football (as in soccer) cannot even get a toehold in America and you guys expect cricket to take hold here? Get real. Where will it rank among the hundreds of sports on offer in the US? Somewhere way below the X games I bet. I mean the 4 major sports where the athletes are paid an ludicrous amount of money are Football, Baseball, Basketball and Hockey and let me tell you FOOTBALL is king nothing even comes close. As much as basketball is the most international of the 4 it cannot touch football. Americans like things that are uniquely theirs (it suffices if they believe it whether its true or not), see the resistant to hockey even if it is one of the big 4 simply because most Americans find it too "Canadian" (forgetting a Canadian invented basketball). So sorry guys cricket is just too "foreign" for Americans so it will never work.

  • POSTED BY Cpt.Meanster on | July 2, 2012, 22:25 GMT

    @Hammond: It is obvious you want to put down the USA with your comments. The Americans don't have to get it. They have better sports of their own. No, they don't wish to play a British sport. They are THE republicans remember ? why should they care ? I seriously cannot see a real American embrace cricket. Only the expats will carry on supporting it.

  • POSTED BY RohanMarkJay on | July 2, 2012, 19:10 GMT

    Ironically Hollywood used to be a hotbed of cricket activity in America. Although I don't think it is now. Hollywood used to be in the 1930s,40s and 50s. However that was due to British,Australian, South African, New Zealand actors, film producers, Directors etc who were also fanatical cricket fans. They took their love of the sport to America and Hollywood. Despite this the Americans still didn't get cricket. LOL! One reason is because maybe I am just theorizing besides being too slow and taxing the attention span for Americans also saw cricket as a symbol of British Imperialism.Therefore no self respecting patriotic American would take up cricket. We shouldn't forget. US was initially a country created out of fighting a war against Imperialism from England.This I think is at the heart of patriotism in USA for Americans. As a result Cricket would be tough sell for Americans. Besides they have their own sports.I think if they market cricket with strong SL or WI style cricket has chance

  • POSTED BY SagirParkar on | July 2, 2012, 18:37 GMT

    i think this is good for the globalisation for cricket.. Test cricket might take longer to catch on but T20 is on par in terms of time with most of the american sports at the moment.. it is a huge market, can get financial support as well over there and it will bring many more viewers and followers to the sport.. the expat population from the Windies, England, south asia can help with the promotional aspects as well.. ofcourse, i am not overly optimistic about the States embracing cricket full time.. but never say never.. and with time things might change..

    as for Mr Hammond, he'd perhaps do well to realise that Test cricket and its snobbish insularity is what is holding the game from being truly global. why is it compulsory that test cricket has to be everyone's prerogative ? the three formats can exist wonderfully together if the ICC knows how to handle and promote them. it is the top tier, no doubt. but to take cricket to the vast masses, T20 is the way forward.

  • POSTED BY NAZMO-CRICKFANN on | July 2, 2012, 17:33 GMT

    thank you all for the series opportunity

  • POSTED BY Hammond on | July 2, 2012, 15:39 GMT

    I hope it never catches on in the US. They would simply take all the parts out of it that they didn't like (like they did with draws in football) and leave the cricket world with a poor facsimile of baseball.. oh hang on that has already been done, it's called the IPL ;).. Seriously though the yanks will never get test cricket, they already have a great bat and ball game there of their own.

  • POSTED BY jb633 on | July 2, 2012, 13:48 GMT

    It would be quality for the global game if USA were to become a major force. Surely if it did catch on and become mainstream they would end up being the best side in the world. They have the population, money, climate and facilities to become a force. I am very glad the ICC has targetted the USA as a potential prospect. There are a few nations at present who are looking better and better. Netehrlands and Afghan in particlar look to have some real talent, the ECB has done very well to involve them in the domestic leagues. I would hope that they have aspirations for Afghanistan too. It would mean so much to their people if they could produce a side capable of competing on a gloabal scale. The effects of Afgan national side would far outstrip just cricket. It would help to instil a greater sense of national pride. Do no restrict the game, but spread it. The more nations that can compete the better. Well done ICC on this experiment.

  • POSTED BY sweetspot on | July 2, 2012, 9:46 GMT

    The great glorious tradition of the game and stuff like that will be totally lost on anyone new coming into the sport of cricket. What should really be trumpeted is that this game can be played by both boys and girls, with a leather ball or a tennis ball, by big and small, young and old, athletically or lazily, physically or artistically. It will attract Americans by the hundreds if this becomes a recreation first. There is just too much fun to be had, and there should be no "English" attitudes attached to furthering the cause.

  • POSTED BY ooper_cut on | July 2, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    What enthusiasm this man has, here's wishing this series will be a big boost for Cricket in this country.

  • POSTED BY fataquie on | July 2, 2012, 7:11 GMT

    I think to show the cricket at its best, they need India vs. Pakistan T20 series....followed by England vs. Australia.....

  • POSTED BY denwarlo70 on | July 2, 2012, 6:56 GMT

    What is needed is to popularize the game of cricket between the Americans and not the expat Indians or Pakistanis mate. They don't even have cricket channels in America unless someone logs on to the internet. So, ICC has a long journey in the USA. First, get the DRS going between the members and then concentrate on the Americas ICC now, will ya?

  • POSTED BY glance_to_leg on | July 1, 2012, 19:47 GMT

    America had a great cricketing tradition until the early twentieth century, which was killed off, presumably because it did not fit with American commercial culture. One cannot hope to import the game successfully to the US unless one builds on immigrant communities. The wonderful novel Netherland by Joseph O'Neill has as one of its central characters a man desperate to import cricket to a bigger audience. In this he fails. Frankly, I suspect the nearest the US will get to engaging with the sport seriously will be the odd T20 game, and a continued immigrant subculture. Rubgy is just a hell of a lot easier to get if it is not central to your culture. A shame, but I am not optimistic.

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 19:21 GMT

    Well they have done the right thing by targeting expats first. Once this proves viable, then as Nathan opines, ICC could spread the game outward by getting youngsters involved at grade level, College/University etc. Back in the early 90s, I introduced the game to a middle school where I was a teacher. Only sons & daughters of Caribbean immigrants showed up for tryouts. Had about 15 or so, with boys being in the majority. I acquired gear, showed them cricket videos and had practice two or three times per week. The young charges enjoyed themselves. Problem was they were no opponents against whom to compete! I'd asked Willie Bourne, then coach of B'dos senior squad to conduct some coaching sessions, but never it never came to pass. So the idea died when the youngsters graduated and I began teaching at another school. Sad. Can't see the average American sports fan sitting through a 5-day Test if we ever get one. The shorter versions are far more appealing/entertaining and would go over big

  • POSTED BY MrGarreth on | July 1, 2012, 18:52 GMT

    The last American who was a big fan of cricket turned out to be bad news so lets hope this doesnt turn out the same way

  • POSTED BY MasudRUETeee091040 on | July 1, 2012, 18:42 GMT

    Yes India vs Pakistan match can be arranged here.

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 8:43 GMT

    Just aiming at expats won't do it for American cricket. They need to develop it in college's, just as rugby has began to develop in that manner. It will take a lot of time and money, but it can be done.

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 4:53 GMT

    wat they need is an india Vs pakistan t20 match to get things kickstarted,,,there would be a huge audience for it....

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 4:53 GMT

    wat they need is an india Vs pakistan t20 match to get things kickstarted,,,there would be a huge audience for it....

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 8:43 GMT

    Just aiming at expats won't do it for American cricket. They need to develop it in college's, just as rugby has began to develop in that manner. It will take a lot of time and money, but it can be done.

  • POSTED BY MasudRUETeee091040 on | July 1, 2012, 18:42 GMT

    Yes India vs Pakistan match can be arranged here.

  • POSTED BY MrGarreth on | July 1, 2012, 18:52 GMT

    The last American who was a big fan of cricket turned out to be bad news so lets hope this doesnt turn out the same way

  • POSTED BY on | July 1, 2012, 19:21 GMT

    Well they have done the right thing by targeting expats first. Once this proves viable, then as Nathan opines, ICC could spread the game outward by getting youngsters involved at grade level, College/University etc. Back in the early 90s, I introduced the game to a middle school where I was a teacher. Only sons & daughters of Caribbean immigrants showed up for tryouts. Had about 15 or so, with boys being in the majority. I acquired gear, showed them cricket videos and had practice two or three times per week. The young charges enjoyed themselves. Problem was they were no opponents against whom to compete! I'd asked Willie Bourne, then coach of B'dos senior squad to conduct some coaching sessions, but never it never came to pass. So the idea died when the youngsters graduated and I began teaching at another school. Sad. Can't see the average American sports fan sitting through a 5-day Test if we ever get one. The shorter versions are far more appealing/entertaining and would go over big

  • POSTED BY glance_to_leg on | July 1, 2012, 19:47 GMT

    America had a great cricketing tradition until the early twentieth century, which was killed off, presumably because it did not fit with American commercial culture. One cannot hope to import the game successfully to the US unless one builds on immigrant communities. The wonderful novel Netherland by Joseph O'Neill has as one of its central characters a man desperate to import cricket to a bigger audience. In this he fails. Frankly, I suspect the nearest the US will get to engaging with the sport seriously will be the odd T20 game, and a continued immigrant subculture. Rubgy is just a hell of a lot easier to get if it is not central to your culture. A shame, but I am not optimistic.

  • POSTED BY denwarlo70 on | July 2, 2012, 6:56 GMT

    What is needed is to popularize the game of cricket between the Americans and not the expat Indians or Pakistanis mate. They don't even have cricket channels in America unless someone logs on to the internet. So, ICC has a long journey in the USA. First, get the DRS going between the members and then concentrate on the Americas ICC now, will ya?

  • POSTED BY fataquie on | July 2, 2012, 7:11 GMT

    I think to show the cricket at its best, they need India vs. Pakistan T20 series....followed by England vs. Australia.....

  • POSTED BY ooper_cut on | July 2, 2012, 7:27 GMT

    What enthusiasm this man has, here's wishing this series will be a big boost for Cricket in this country.

  • POSTED BY sweetspot on | July 2, 2012, 9:46 GMT

    The great glorious tradition of the game and stuff like that will be totally lost on anyone new coming into the sport of cricket. What should really be trumpeted is that this game can be played by both boys and girls, with a leather ball or a tennis ball, by big and small, young and old, athletically or lazily, physically or artistically. It will attract Americans by the hundreds if this becomes a recreation first. There is just too much fun to be had, and there should be no "English" attitudes attached to furthering the cause.