Aakash Chopra
The Insider The InsiderRSS FeedFeeds
Aakash Chopra looks at various aspects of cricket from a player's perspective

Memo to Sehwag

He needs to remember, when he gets to 30 or 40, that he isn't playing like he used to

Aakash Chopra

November 12, 2012

Comments: 43 | Text size: A | A

Virender Sehwag bats at the nets as Gautam Gambhir watches on, Hyderabad, August 21, 2012
A lot of Sehwag's success has been due to the fact that he is honest about his strengths and weaknesses © AFP

What makes Virender Sehwag such a special player? Is it his monk-like stillness at the crease while playing the most outrageous shots that charm and baffle? Or is it his supreme eye-hand coordination, backed by remarkable bat speed, that compels you to marvel at his inimitable flair? All of the above have had a part to play in making Sehwag who he is today, yet it would be unfair not to take into account other, not-so-technical, factors that have contributed to his success.

Let's begin with his game sense. In a Ranji Trophy match against Orissa, played in Delhi, on one of the worst pitches I've played first-class cricket on, I remember Sehwag stepping down the track to a medium-pace bowler, playing a wild slog and missing the ball by at least a foot. Delhi were already one-down for next to nothing and needed to consolidate. I went up to him to persuade him to take it slow, but Sehwag told me that coming down the track and missing the ball by a mile had been a part of a bigger plan. On the damp and green Kotla pitch, it was impossible to put bat to ball when the bowler pitched it up. Since Orissa's bowlers were not budging from that length, he needed to do something extraordinary to make them falter. Just as he anticipated, the next two balls were pitched short. Sehwag obliged by hitting two crisp boundaries.

It was not his skill but his incisive understanding of the game that made him so successful. He always knew how big the windows of opportunity were and capitalised accordingly.

Another fascinating thing about his game is the belief he has in his abilities. While most people tell him to move his feet, get behind the ball, and so on - especially against better bowlers in bowler-friendly conditions - he always sticks to his game plan and his strengths. Where others practised caution, Sehwag saw opportunities. In Chennai in 2004 against Australia, when he went out to bat at the fag end of the day, everyone advised him to show restraint. But he said that since the Aussies would attack him, he could easily pick up a few boundaries. And he did.

He backed himself to beat his opponents at their own game - playing Shane Warne and Muttiah Muralitharan against the spin, for instance. Once Sehwag did that successfully, they played into his hands. By hitting a boundary off a fairly good ball, he forced the bowler to raise the bar and subsequently falter. It isn't a coincidence that he gets more balls pitched on his legs than other openers. Even the best bowlers overdo it when trying to cramp him for room.

Thirdly, he has been successful because of the honesty with which he acknowledges his strengths and weaknesses. After surviving Brett Lee and Jason Gillespie in the first session on a slightly damp pitch in Sydney in 2004, Sehwag confessed how it was brilliant that I took more of the strike against Lee, because he didn't fancy his chances against the moving ball. Not that he wouldn't have survived - a week before that match, he had scored 195 in Melbourne on day one - but he fancied his chances more against Gillespie. He would always gracefully accept what he could do and what he couldn't.

However, things seem to have changed a little bit for Sehwag in the last couple of years. It may have something to do with age, and the eyes losing their sharpness, or the hands not generating the same bat speed anymore. Players who rely on eye-hand coordination find the going tough if things are not in perfect sync.

If that is the case, should Sehwag rebuild his game from scratch and find ways to move his feet more?

Any plan to develop a technical skill that Sehwag did not possess would have meant compromising on his strengths. Unlike other players, the only plan B he has is that of biding time

John Wright, under whom Sehwag blossomed, would perhaps advise against such radical shifts. During his tenure as the India coach, whenever Sehwag went through a lean patch, Wright told him to keep the faith, play to his strengths, and yet be selective. Wright never tinkered with his batting, even when things weren't going right, since Sehwag's strengths are his balance and his hands. Any plan to develop a technical skill that Sehwag did not possess would have meant compromising on his strengths. Unlike other players, the only plan B Sehwag has is that of biding time.

Logically, game sense, once developed, stays with you forever. So that's not what Sehwag is missing. It's evident that his mind is still sharp, as is his self-belief, because he still goes after balls like he did earlier, and he isn't shying away from playing against the spin or from attacking from the outset.

So it's possibly the honesty that has gone missing. While I'm 100% sure that Sehwag acknowledges that of late he hasn't been among the runs, he seems to forget it whenever he gets a start. To me, an opener getting out cheaply is acceptable, because the chances of him getting a good ball early on are higher than for batsmen lower down the order. But not capitalising on a start isn't. And that's what is ailing Sehwag these days. More than the lack of starts, it's that when he reaches 30 or 40, he begins playing like the Sehwag of old, which he isn't at the moment.

The days when he used to hit three boundaries per over for 90 overs can return, but only if he's happy to hit one in two overs for a few consecutive innings. He needs to be ruthlessly honest about his current predicament. That's the only way to get out of it. There's a thin line between having immense belief and becoming arrogant. The moment that line gets blurred, honesty goes out of the window.

It isn't too late for Sehwag to turn it around, and he doesn't need to bat in the middle order to do so. He just needs to find a new process to build an innings, which might be in contrast to how he did it earlier. He doesn't need to rebuild his game from scratch but needs to discover another way of scoring runs. Isn't that a hallmark of all good players?

Former India opener Aakash Chopra is the author of Out of the Blue, an account of Rajasthan's 2010-11 Ranji Trophy victory. His website is here and his Twitter feed here

RSS Feeds: Aakash Chopra

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (November 14, 2012, 15:21 GMT)

well...akash batted alongside viru..in australia..so of course..he knows viru well..viru is a great cricketer ..no doubt...of course he gets criticism by people who say he is irresponible etc. but still no one ever doubted the man's ability...tomorrow ..there is a big test..if viru fires ..that means indian cricket is safe for next 4 years at least ..hope he does because we do need viru badly... viru..plz fire..it's big time now..

Posted by imluckychamp on (November 14, 2012, 3:10 GMT)

watch out the stars for team India in this series will be sachin and sehwag

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 13, 2012, 5:12 GMT)

As one poster has mentioned, Viru is OBVIOUSLY having some sort of a confidence issue. And that issue is his captain who is NOT satisfied with the fact that Viru averages 43 under (way above his career av.) his captaincy in ODIs with a 50 plus score every 3rd innings. Regular dropping from shorter formats, snide remarks about "slow seniors" and Viru (EVERY fan in India knows about his simple, uncluttered approach to life and cricket) feels undermined (much like Sreesanth after DECISVELY winning 2 Tests for India in toughest test cauldron-SAfrica). Cricket leadership is about managing your matchwinning assets (which Ganguly and Kumble knew). What I said long ago about Viru NEVER being out of form -otherwise how did he suddenly score that 219 in ODI followed by 67 in 1st innings in Melbourne Test (was recently attested by Mike Hussey and Akram); he just needs management and dare I say it -pampering.

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 13, 2012, 5:11 GMT)

@itswayuplay:Been seeing a lot of ur scurrilous remarks about Viru's capabilities.Even with his EXTREME high-risk game, he is scoring a 50 every 3 innings in Tests, a 50 every 4.5 innings in ODIs (at that AWESOME SR).Also how is Viru the ONLY Player in history to score 13 plus 50s in calendar year-2010 (ESPN recent stat).This kind of consistency is unprecedented for a strokeplaying opener(converted) in cricket history (as none of Jaya,Haydos,Slats,Gayle have been able to sustain this SR ball 1 till end over so many innings unlike Viru). His lack of runs is SINGULARLY responsible for India not being able to compete in OZ/Eng. In SA 2010 also after 1st innings duck, he scored that blitzing 67 at Centurion to give confidence to India to take on SA & win at Durban.Indian fans can be RABID about their legends (Viru is a ONE-OFF in history).None of Slats,Jaya,Haydos,Gayle(none with comparable records except Haydos) have been slammed so much about their game but respected by their teams/fans.

Posted by BnH1985Fan on (November 13, 2012, 2:53 GMT)

Dear Akash -- I'd word my memo to Sehwag quite simply: Time to hang up, and hang out with me, Dravid, Laxman.

Posted by joshvino on (November 13, 2012, 0:45 GMT)

what the hell did dhoni did in the no.1 journey .he never proved as a individual test player.. in recent 8-0 loss if seniors are the one to blame ..then what did he inspired as captain(seniors have contributed for more than 10 years in every country tour .expect the last 2 tours .. when did Dhoni contributed from his 2005 ....never ...and you wants him as captain.he doesn't even qualify as a test batsman .then comes captaincy).he never played good when we are no.1 team and never inspired when we are losing 8-0..dont forget he was not even in the squad of previous tour(srilanka) before he became captain in 2008 :)..An unqualified test batsman captains the team from 2008.......and u still support him as best player.This is the IPL effect!!(What a joke it is!when seniors perfomed and made India no.1 .the fame went to Dhoni but when dhoni perfomed as poor captain and team flopped seniors got critisised and retired)..

Posted by S.N.Singh on (November 12, 2012, 22:29 GMT)


Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (November 12, 2012, 22:01 GMT)

@RyanHarrisGreatCricketer: Yeah, I am not surprised one bit at your comment on Sehwag, but it's funny it's coming from a person who thinks of Ryan Harris as a great cricketer. If Ryan Harris is great then there is NOTHING wrong in Aakash Chopra calling Sehwag SPECIAL !!

Posted by HyderabadiFlick on (November 12, 2012, 21:49 GMT)

@itsthewayuplay, @GRVJPR, @RyanHarrisGreatCricketer, @ Gaurav Srivastava These are some of the opening batsmen to play for India before Viru...1.Raman, 2.Ramesh 3. Gandhi, 4. Das, 5. Williams, 6.Rathore, 7.Somasundar 8.Jaffar 9. Akash. now, tell me how many people survived all conditions, I bet they have scored less runs collectively than Sehwag as an opener. Sehwag changed the test matches so much that cricket without him is empty. How many players have 2 triples and good number of 200's. Whatever people say Viru is A once in a lifetime phenomenon. If you are so critical about Viru then your comments hold good for Dhoni too. Same people who hate him will eat their words this season. - Jai Hind

Posted by IndCricFan2013 on (November 12, 2012, 21:24 GMT)

Greg Chappel wrote a memo before T20, what happened? Shewag never changes and never will. He can be great master scoring 300's in sub continent, that is the only reason he is on the team, to see if he can still score in India. If he does not do it in the first two tests, then he is going to be gone for ever. But it still does not address the long term issue. I hope he does not score huge and some one else comes in for longer term.

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 18:12 GMT)

indian cricket can't be and should'nt be held to ransom on the whims & fancies of a player like sehwag....or for that matter gambhir too.......i mean .......there's nothing like a succession or replacements in indian team...especially with some players who get too big for there boots.........if sehwag can't smell the coffee...bring out the hatchet and let him bat himself out of his ego in dust bowls in ranji.......give others .....doing well in domestic cricket .....and i don't mean high averages...but ones who show temperament....and technique....persist with them ....and stop replacing sehwag with himself ...after some time as is the case with BCCI........

Rant Over!!!

Posted by peter56 on (November 12, 2012, 18:01 GMT)

I hope I am wrong but I just cannot see any centuries for either Viru or Sachin this series. Such has been their decline, it is even possible they might both only average in the low twenties

Posted by timohyj on (November 12, 2012, 17:59 GMT)

sehwags problem is a lack of confidence. That is why he should be persisted with until he finds form again. Maybe he should bat in the middle order also. In the last ranji game he batted at 6 and scored a hundred

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 16:34 GMT)

Dear Aakash i know Viru is your good friend. But Modern day cricket is a reflection of quality Cricket stemming out of fierce Competition. An Ajinkya Rahane looks far more convincing and sound than a Sehwag. It is for the team India and Indian fans that you please start writing pieces on our collective wishes. Not on Individual wishes. I mean Vinod Kambli was far more talented and technically sound than Sehwag, But did he maintained himself ? The Answer is "NO". Today's Sehwag is the same case. From being an expected Test Cricket Legend he is turning into a regular disgrace when he swings at those deliveries outside off stump.

Posted by GRVJPR on (November 12, 2012, 15:35 GMT)

@RyanHarrisGreatCricketer Then why not some of your player slog 294 in a day against murali and reverse winging malinga!!!

Posted by SoverBerry2 on (November 12, 2012, 14:54 GMT)

Sehwag (in Eng, Aus, NZ, WI and RSA) ODI batting average:31.82 Test batting average: 35.16 ! Subcontinental bully!

Posted by trueanalyst on (November 12, 2012, 14:24 GMT)

@Starhawk,Brilliant answer to these armchair critics.Pakistan with all its reverse swinging bowlers is a weak bowling attack to these critics. Shoaib Akthar & Saqlain Mushtaq(whose career came to end post Multan 300) are pie chuckers in the opinion of these critics. Muthaiah Murali is a gully bowler to be taken for 300 runs

Posted by itsthewayuplay on (November 12, 2012, 14:15 GMT)

if he gets a 30 or 40 will be an achievement and no doubt justify his place in the team until he retires.the fact that aakash rather sehwag faced lee surely means that aakash was the better opener of the two . openers have to have to have the technique and temperament to face the new ball. sehwag has neither of these and yet aakash who had a steady and consistent if unspectacular start to his international was inexplicably dropped but a 1 in 10 player was made permanent. do you see gambhir saying to sehwag 'don't worry viru leave it to me, i'll handle anderson finn now and steyn morkel and philander later'. how honest was sehwag about his own fitness and form. has sehwag ever said 'i'm just not scoring enough runs for the team, i think someone else ought to have to a go.' how about in england did he say 'i'm not available because i've not fully recovered from my operation'. honesty - ha.

Posted by RyanHarrisGreatCricketer on (November 12, 2012, 13:38 GMT)

first line is wrong sehwag is not a special player he is a subcontinent slogger

Posted by GRVJPR on (November 12, 2012, 13:10 GMT)

People who were one match legends are writing expert columns, Give me a break please!

Posted by PadMarley on (November 12, 2012, 13:00 GMT)

Sehwag is Sehwag ... he is not an average player.... plus should not be overated as one of the greatest! by any means no! Greatest players deliver when the country need you the most.. instead Sehwag delivered whenever he feels like delivering... Good entertainer though..

Posted by SHKS on (November 12, 2012, 12:27 GMT)

Shewag will back in this series.He must hit a triple century.this is my prediction.

Posted by nayonika on (November 12, 2012, 12:27 GMT)

Good piece from one's compatriot. Chopra writes well and lucid.

Posted by StarHawk on (November 12, 2012, 11:44 GMT)

@ electric_loco_WAP4, yea, its very easy to score 22 centuries in test cricket, that too including 2 triple centuries and 3 double centuries. I'm sure you can do that too right, on a "flat track"???

Posted by Sobhan_Sachinfan on (November 12, 2012, 11:43 GMT)

I read a FACEBOOK post earlier that 'No one rises abruptly; not even the sun'. Lol. I commented there, 'Sehwag does!!!!!!!!!!He suddenly rises into form once in every 40 or 50 matches suddenly. He is a Gem of player...But somehow, he underachieved to his calibre and talent !!!

Posted by CricketMaan on (November 12, 2012, 9:50 GMT)

I cant see Viru scoring 100s, but I certainly do see him scoring 1 or 2 crucial 50+ that will change the course of the match. With GG out of form, Viru's first hour could be the diff between an Indian win and loss.

Posted by electric_loco_WAP4 on (November 12, 2012, 9:38 GMT)

Can't wait for flat track blaster to continue his flop show in the coming series .The Eng bowling is not 'that' rubbish after all.Interesting to see if some of the young openers ever get their chance and Sehwag 'flash in pan' or walking wicket is carried for a few more games...

Posted by sandy_bangalore on (November 12, 2012, 8:33 GMT)

Sehwag, without doubt, is far ahead of Tendulkar, both as a match winner and entertainer. Without his 80 odd in Chennai 2008, India would never have won

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 8:24 GMT)

Beautifully written. I feel Sehwag has had a confidence slump though. This more than honesty i think is the issue. He is thinking too much about succeeding and that more often than not clutters your mind resulting in failures. What he needs is a fresh morning , bat first and stick to sehwag basics. He needs 2-3 solid innings to get the confidence back.... hopefully shd happen this winter....

Posted by yogi.s on (November 12, 2012, 6:39 GMT)

Aakash chopra is fast becoming one of my fav columnists on cricinfo. He makes a good point here about the need for sehwag to have an honest rethink of his game.

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 6:31 GMT)

Sehwag's a really good player; it's a shame that he's been suffering from a lack of form lately. However, you make a very good point here when you say he may have to take it slow for a while and/or discover another way of scoring runs. I really hope he does something like that; he's still a very good player and I hope he can succeed for some more time. I do wonder, though (and it's just a question, believe me), what is the difference between changing your playing style and finding another way to score runs?

Posted by sensible-indian-fan on (November 12, 2012, 6:14 GMT)

Phenomenal article. Loved it. I just get the feeling Sehwag and Gambhir are getting very arrogant. I think dropping them and asking them to win back their place in the team would actually make them perform better in the long run. Moreover, it would send out a signal to all that consistent performance matters.

Posted by sk12 on (November 12, 2012, 6:13 GMT)

if this is a memo to Sehwag, why are you addressing Sehwag as Sehwag?

Posted by avilashi on (November 12, 2012, 6:08 GMT)

I fully agree with the analysis of strengths & weaknesses of blaster Shewag: yes he needs to fathom his batting prowess with the phase of time. We never deny his boldness of turning the complexion of the change by gifting scintillating innings to his team.Currently, we believe he is passing through a kind of jinx or drought and he needs to seal the vipers being spat at by his critics:action speaks louder than actions.

Posted by murthydn16 on (November 12, 2012, 5:54 GMT)

Pls talk to him and advise him.

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 5:42 GMT)

hope viru heeds these words ...

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 5:35 GMT)

Aakash, I think this is a good article.. Written and presented very well.. As u hav mentioned, changing technique is pointless with regards to sehwag n i dnt think he needs to.. He does not look all tht uncomfortable against the moving ball.. When the ball is swinging it troubles any good batsman even those thoroughbred in swing and seam havens like Eng, NZ, SA n Aus.. Bt he does look scratchy when he tries to go after every ball.. His centuries in Aus n SA came after a period of watchfulness followed by attack.. He's playing way too many shots at the start now compared to the early part of his test career.. N he can defend well.. Nt like raina or yuvraj whose defense is nt solid enough.. The innings in adelaide is a testament to that.. Like u've mentioned, he has to be honest with himself n look to spend some time in the middle n look to go aftr bad balls for a few innings before reverting back to the old sehwag.. Dnt think he's out of form by any stretch of imagination..

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 12, 2012, 5:33 GMT)

2.Viru is a CLEAR ONE-OFF raging talent in Test cricket as none among Haydos,Jaya,Dilshan,Gayle could maintain the same sustained assault from ball one over so many 150 + scores.Viv Richards had clearly fallen away during the latter half of his career & was also not scoring too many runs away but his legacy as a middle-order (as against what Viru does as an opener) marauder is intact. One cannot write away the first half of Viru's great record away & now just call him a sub continental bully. Even now he seizes initiative with his pulverizing attack on Gul in World Cup semis,rapid score in that record OZ tri-series chase (which Kohli won).His ODI record is awesome too with that blinding SR as a 35 plus score (his av.) gives early momentum (much like Gilly,Jaya with similar avgs did) to ODI innings. Prob is he has never bothered about legacy, records & like.He had the potential to be fastest to 10,000 Test runs &would be the most unorthodox player of that list if he gets there.

Posted by Emancipator007 on (November 12, 2012, 5:30 GMT)

1.Off late,there seems to be concerted efforts to discredit Sehwag's IMMENSE Test achievements, with folks forgetting he is a CONVERTED opener.His only intent is to seize winning momentum & initiative for his team.No doubt,he has become impatient off late,but u can't have 14 150+ scores and be termed overrated.It is not EASY to blast pacers like Akthar,Sami,Asif,Steyn,Morke,Ntini even on so-called flat decks (which he did while hitting 300s against these attacks). Another factor is how well Ganguly &Kumble managed him vs the undermining of confidence by Dhoni (comments about "slow seniors").Viru plays best when having an uncluttered mind. Note before OZ tour, he blasted 219 in an ODI despite supposedly being out of form & then hit 67 in 1st Innings of Melbourne before falling away.To play such a high-risk game, ENTERTAIN and still maintain that Av. is no joke. Fact is, he has under-achieved & with a tad more patience and Dravid's cussed mindset would have had an Av.nearing 60.

Posted by Percy_Fender on (November 12, 2012, 5:25 GMT)

It was a big gamble which made history that Sehwag was asked to open in Sri lanka. He is a fearless charecter really and could bat in the same mode. He stood at the crease with his feet wide. Like Srikanth used to. Maybe that is what makes him get into position earlier than others do and time the ball which just races to the boundary when he connects. But with that stance he would always find it difficult to play the short ball to which he gets contorted in doing so. But he is very good of the front foot and has the daring to do as he pleases. he is good on the leg side as well. I wonder what Akash thinks about a suggestion that he takes guard on off stump and plays from there ! With someone like Viru even a mobile stance could work. As long as he knows where his off stump is.It will have the bowler looking for the line to bowl. And that could be very interesting. Sehwag has no inhibitions because he started as a bowler and has the good tailender attitude. Good luck to him.

Posted by Mark00 on (November 12, 2012, 4:53 GMT)

Sehwag never batted the "way he used to." He does exceptionally in favourable circumstances and fails everywhere else.

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 4:01 GMT)

viru always god gifted player for india....because of him only lot of test playing nations threatened to declare their innings below 350 runs....i'll eagerly waiting 2 see sehwag batting in forthcoming england series....

Posted by   on (November 12, 2012, 3:25 GMT)

no words.. simply awesome article.. reflects the reality.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Aakash ChopraClose
Aakash Chopra Aakash Chopra is the 245th Indian to represent India in Test cricket. A batsman in the traditional mould, he played 10 Tests for India in 2003-04, and has played over 120 first-class matches. He currently plays for Delhi in the Ranji Trophy; his book Beyond the Blues was an account of the 2007-08 season. Chopra made a formidable opening combination with Virender Sehwag, which was believed to be one of the reasons for India's success in Australia and Pakistan in 2003-04. He is considered one of the best close-in fielders India has produced after Eknath Solkar.

    'A test of Kohli's mental strength'

Bowl at Boycs: Geoffrey Boycott on Kohli's recent form, and Cook's captaincy

    Kallis: a standard-bearer for a nation

Mark Nicholas: He made South Africans proud and he made the rest of the world stand up and take notice

    'Like a ballet dancer'

My XI: Martin Crowe on Mark Waugh's lazy elegance and batsmanship that was easy on eye

    Sea, sun, scandal

Diary: Our correspondent takes in the sights and sounds of Galle and Colombo, and reports on a tampering controversy

Remembering Ashok Mankad

V Ramnarayan: The late 'Kaka' was a terrific batsman, a shrewd captain, and a wonderful raconteur. But most of all he was a genuine friend

News | Features Last 7 days

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Ugly runs but still they swoon

Alastair Cook did not bat like a leading man but the crowd applauded him for simply not failing

Boycott floored by an Indian trundler

When Eknath Solkar got under the skin of Geoff Boycott, leading to a three-year self-imposed exile from Test cricket

The woeful world of Pankaj Singh

Pankaj Singh greeted his most expensive analysis in Test history with the words 'That is cricket'. It was admirable acceptance from an impressive man of a record he did not deserve

England's selection errors could lead to series defeat

Their decision to persist with Alastair Cook as captain, and to pick batsmen who can only score runs against weak attacks, will hurt them

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!