Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Replacing the coach is fine, but what about the batting?

Lehmann can tell his charges not to do England any more favours, but the players have to win games by themselves

Ian Chappell

June 30, 2013

Comments: 50 | Text size: A | A

Darren Lehmann addresses the Australia team, Somerset v Australians, Taunton, 1st day, June 26, 2013
It's up to Clarke and the team to turn Lehmann's support into a positive performance © Getty Images
Enlarge

First as a player then as captain, I always felt that Australia would receive at least one "favour" from England during an Ashes series. That favour generally came in the form of a strange selection; either the inclusion of an England player who we were happy to play against, or the exclusion of one - John Snow in 1974-75, for instance - that delighted us.

However, in the lead up to this Ashes series, the boot is on the other foot. Australia have "helped" England by way of some poor lead-up results, player suspensions and misbehaviour, and eventually the sacking of coach Mickey Arthur.

Such drastic action so close to an Ashes series could be seen as a panic move but the elevation of Darren Lehmann to the coach's role may be one of few recent decisions emanating from Cricket Australia that actually makes sense.

It had probably reached a stage where Cricket Australia decided the team was going to lose with Arthur in charge, so there was no downside in dumping him on the eve of a crucial series. As an American baseball manager once said to a player who was demanding more money: "We're losing with you, we can sure as hell lose without you."

To understand why this dramatic decision has caused such a furore in Australia and brought unbridled joy to all of England, onlookers need to realise the ferocity of this long-standing rivalry. It's probably best encapsulated in a story concerning one of England's finest captains, and undoubtedly their most controversial, Douglas Jardine.

Jardine, with his hardline but well thought out strategy of utilising Bodyline to restrict the run scoring of Don Bradman, left an indelible mark on the Ashes in 1932-33.

In 1954 a young Peter May was named in the England squad to tour Australia later that year. The following day May entered the Surrey dressing room at The Oval, where an elderly gentleman invited him over. "Son," he began, "I believe you've just been chosen to tour Australia."

"Yes sir," May replied proudly, "I'm hoping to do well and represent my country with honour."

"Don't worry about that," the older man exploded, "just beat the ***kers."

The elderly gentleman was none other than Jardine.

The spirit of those words still reverberate in England, and hence the joyful sniggering as Australia lurch from one crisis to another.

While Lehmann will immediately command the players' respect and has already brought some much-needed common sense to the squad with his decision to open with Shane Watson, the coach doesn't make any runs or take any wickets. Michael Clarke and his team are the only ones who can turn around their recent fortunes and, with an improved performance, give Australian fans hope that the Ashes series is not a lost cause.

Many a player has felt positive and strong sitting in a hotel lounge, listening to a rousing speech. The problem comes the next day when, under intense scrutiny, he actually has to find a way to score runs against the swing of a Jimmy Anderson and the guile of a Graeme Swann. Even a confidence-boosting net session isn't the complete answer. It's only when a player actually gets out in the middle and scores runs against Anderson and Swann that he finally feels comfortable in his own mind that success is a possibility.

What has sustained Australian hopes throughout this rough patch has been the confidence inspired by a strong pace attack. This is not unrealistic, because putting together a viable attack - one capable of taking 20 wickets economically - is the toughest task in cricket.

However, no matter the strength of the Australian attack, they can't conjure up victory without considerable help from the batsmen. That's where the big improvement must come from.

Despite the good cricketing sense behind the change to Lehmann, he can't help the players once they are in the middle. About the best words he can offer the team as they leave the dressing room are either a choice of Jardine's refrain, or "Don't do the opposition any favours."

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator for Channel 9, and a columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (July 2, 2013, 21:23 GMT)

I wonder what ChappellI thinks of having Lehman batting at 5 and bowling his gentle left-arm finger spinners (occasionally)? Would Australia do worse by using someone else there?

And how about the other Australian Captain (Bailey) batting at 6?

Posted by Rocketman1 on (July 2, 2013, 8:34 GMT)

At this level you probably don't need a coach. You are an elite athlete at international level. A manager is probably a better term for coach's and what Australia is suffering from is not really a coaching issue. It's a lack of leadership. A leader of men to inspire and take charge and be accountable for his actions and take responsibility for his team. A man that his peers can look up to for guidance and support. Australia have decent enough players to win games. They just need a captain to take charge and make them play as a team and perform as individuals.

Posted by Sunil_Batra on (July 2, 2013, 0:58 GMT)

I have faith that our young guns(i.e Khawaja, Warner, Maddinson) who were not shining under Arthur will do well under boof and provide the world class batsman we have been looking for.

Posted by hhillbumper on (July 1, 2013, 20:06 GMT)

wont need any change of batting.That bowling attack will defeat England before they even lead the changing room. Already people are talking about the strength of this line up. No one can live with them. They only need ten runs a game and England will crumple for less each time. You Aussies paid attention to your recent history?

Posted by android_user on (July 1, 2013, 5:35 GMT)

Yaa! its true that Ausies only consuntrate there batting department after all they are look like prety good in others departments

Posted by Paul_Rampley on (July 1, 2013, 5:24 GMT)

I just think its fantastic boof has taken over as coach, a great left handed batsman who used to get centuries in shiel cricket with his eyes close and would have played more had there not been a golden era going on. Now his experience will be invaluable for the likes of Warner, Khawaja, Wade and other young lefties who can benefit so much from his experience. Expect these young left handers to really shine under him.

Posted by android_user on (July 1, 2013, 5:17 GMT)

Aus facing their wrost time in their cricket history. In this Aus team there is lack of test batsman.They have to think about their batting line up against swinging star Anderson.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

    Benn shows up in body and spirit

Tony Cozier: The spinner has brought in a sense of discipline into his bowling and behaviour on the field since his Test comeback

    The return of Bob Simpson

Rewind: When the 41-year-old former captain came out of retirement to lead Australia against India

Bowling to blame for India's poor overseas record

Kartikeya Date: The inability to build pressure by denying runs, even on helpful pitches, is India's biggest problem

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days