October 2, 2013

Where are the great cricket films?

Boxing, baseball, motor-racing and other sports have produced classics that films based on our game cannot hold a candle to
165

Last week I watched two new films about sport, 42 about baseball and Rush about Formula One. So why has there never been a good movie about professional cricket? Come on, let's be honest. The odd decent TV series, maybe. Endless revisiting of the Bodyline series, certainly. It is true that charming films (such as Lagaan) have used amateur cricket as a recurrent motif. But a proper, grown-up film about top-flight cricket that also appeals to non-cricket fans? I wish I was wrong, but I can't think of one, either fictional or a documentary.

Other sports manage it. Baseball has produced dozens of films, from The Natural and Bull Durham to Moneyball and 42 (more about that in a moment). Boxing boasts Raging Bull and the Oscar-winning When We Were Kings. Motor-racing mined documentary gold with the magisterial Senna, and has now inspired the sparkling Rush, a recreation of the Formula One rivalry between James Hunt and Niki Lauda. The Damned United brought to life football's dugout and changing room. American football allowed Al Pacino to give one of the greatest of all team-talks in Any Given Sunday. Television went one better with Friday Night Lights, a remarkable five-season series based on a sheltered town in Texas obsessed with its high-school football team. I finished the final season wondering why no one has achieved - or attempted - anything so ambitious or complete about cricket.

In a recent ESPNcricinfo blog, Jonathan Wilson asked a similar question about the lack of fine cricket novels. Cricket provides the social backdrop for several good novels, notably JL Carr's A Season in Sinji and Joseph O'Neill's Netherland. But few novelists have dared to tackle the nitty gritty of professional cricket.

As my father is a novelist who loves cricket, and happens to be sitting next to me, I asked him what makes writing fiction about cricket so difficult. "I've often wondered if there's something unique about first-class cricket that eludes both film-makers and novelists. It's easy enough on the village green, but as soon as I strayed onto the first-class pitch, I came up against two recurrent problems. First, though it sounds trivial, the fictional names somehow undermined the characters' credibility. Secondly, even within the freedom of a novel, cricket action is very hard to dramatise convincingly. It's hard to capture the pace and the tempo of cricket."

Dramatising the action is even harder on film. Actors invariably can't bat, they can't bowl, and directors, for some bizarre reason, tell them to appeal to the umpire when someone is clean-bowled or hits it straight to cover point. And that's without trying to capture the latest shemozzle of the DRS.

The difficulty of filming realistic cricket matches explains the impulse to set dramatisations deep in the historical past: once the protagonists are poncing around in Edwardian striped caps, the fact that they can't play cricket is somehow less central. In the absence of verisimilitude, cricket writers take refuge in caricature. But cricket's familiar nostalgic sepia tint deprives us of the contemporary social realism that makes Friday Night Lights so immediate and powerful.

Watching Rush last week suggested another problem facing cricket films. Motor-racing, like boxing, invites the pleasing simplicity of a two-handed duel: two men fighting, almost to the death. When the central characters have richly contrasting personalities - as was the case with the hedonistic Hunt and the calculating Lauda - all the elements of dramatic tension are automatically built into the structure of the story.

Dramatising the action is hard on film. Actors invariably can't bat, they can't bowl, and directors, for some bizarre reason, tell them to appeal to the umpire when someone is clean-bowled or hits it straight to cover point

One reason why Bodyline has been so tempting for film-makers is that the haughty colonial arrogance of Douglas Jardine creates a perfect counterpoint for Bradman's gutsy Aussie resilience. Much more often, however, cricket's greatest rivalries are more abstracted. We think of Tendulkar and Lara vying to be the greatest batsman in the world. Or Ian Botham, Kapil Dev, Imran Khan and Richard Hadlee pushing each other to be the best allrounder in the world. In fact, some of the greatest rivalries have been played out within the same team - think of Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis. Rush comes down to the last race of the 1976 season, with two champions pushing each other to the limit. That's harder to recreate in cricket.

42 made me wonder if there isn't a subtler problem with portraying cricket in film. It describes the life of Jackie Robinson, who, by signing for the Brooklyn Dodgers in 1947, became the first black man to play in the major leagues. Until then baseball operated a system of total racial segregation. In 1946 there were 400 players in the major leagues, every one of them white. In 1947 that number dropped to 399. The one was Jackie Robinson.

In many ways it is an unremarkable retelling of an absolutely remarkable story - The New Yorker justly described it as a "square film". But somehow that didn't matter, because the grandeur and importance of the true story itself could fill the gaps left by the film-making. Perhaps that's the whole point. The history of baseball, America's "national pastime", is also the story of 20th-century America. And what a story it is: the emergence of a former colony into the world's greatest power, struggling with its own demons as it does so. Cricket doesn't have such obviously heroic faultlines to explore.

Until now, perhaps. In the whole history of international cricket, from 18th-century English lawns to T20 franchises today, I cannot think of a more remarkable story than the rise of Indian cricket. "Cricket is an Indian game accidentally discovered by the British," as Ashis Nandy put it. And it is. Indian cricket possesses every ingredient of great drama. India's success on the pitch perfectly mirrors its ascent as a world power, with the inevitable tensions that follow along every axis - of race, region and religion. Above all, Indian cricket almost certainly inspires more love and emotion than any other national sport in the world.

What more could an aspiring Oscar-winner want for material?

Ed Smith's latest book is Luck - A Fresh Look at Fortune. He tweets here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • android_user on October 5, 2013, 20:43 GMT

    Don't forget a few Australian cricket films... Save Your Legs and I Know How Many Runs You Scored Last Summer!!

  • dummy4fb on October 5, 2013, 18:40 GMT

    The thing is if there is a country that can make a big movie on cricket, it's undoubtedly India. The Bollywood. Firstly because cricket is ever popular in this South Asian region, and secondly, most importantly, most of the USA is not even aware of the game to make a Hollywood movie on it. But the problem is that apart from Indians,few Pakistani,Nepali and Sri Lankans actually watch Bollywood movies. Usually Bollywood movies, as Russel Peters said, are too long and filled with stupid dances and overacting. So you can't expect an American or a European to fancy those types of movies. There goes the dream of seeing non cricket fans watching a cricket movie.

  • android_user on October 4, 2013, 15:53 GMT

    recently a Pakistani movie was made on cricket which show cassed the modern day cricket with glamour ground realities .. if anyone is willing to watch it .. its a great movie .. and a proud Pakistani movie .. the name is .. main hoon shahid afridi .. based on a young cricketer inspired by shahid afridi the living legend

  • jay57870 on October 4, 2013, 12:28 GMT

    The BMB movie has a close cricket link: Yograj Singh acts as Milkha's coach. He's an ex-India cricketer & notably the father of Yuvraj Singh. Yograj bonds "emotionally" with Farhan Akhtar (who plays Milkha superbly); it reminds him of his training days with Yuvi. The multi-talented Yuvi was a National U-14 roller-skating champion. But his dad threw out the medal & steered him solely to cricket. It pays off. Yuvi was a top performer in India's winning 2007 WorldT20 & 2011WC teams: he famously hit 6 sixes in an over off Stuart Broad in 2007; he was Man of the Tournament in 2011WC. Then calamity strikes in his prime: cancerous tumour in a lung. Yuvi beats it with expert treatment in USA. He returns to cricket but struggles. So he goes to France for fitness training & earns a fighting comeback to India's limited-overs squad. What a compelling story of grit & human spirit! Yuvi's a tall handsome man, who can act too! What more could an aspiring Oscar-winner want for material? Well said, Ed!

  • jay57870 on October 4, 2013, 12:20 GMT

    Ed - Spot on re: Indian cricket films! Maybe Bollywood can show the way: The super hit "Bhaag Milkha Bhaag" is a "great drama" that aptly mirrors Ed's "inevitable tensions ... of race, region and religion"! It's a biopic & sports film based on the life of Milkha Singh, the iconic athlete. It's also a period film depicting the Partition of India (1947): His father's last words "Run Milkha Run" (translated) haunt him as the orphaned boy flees the riots in Punjab to a new life in free India. An intense dramatisation of Milkha on the run: a wayward refugee kid, a romantic village lad, a listless army soldier, an accidental world-class sprinter. The defining moment comes in the 400m final at the 1960 Rome Olympics: He looks back (flashback to his dying parents) & it costs him a heart-breaking 4th place finish. But the climax comes in 1962, when a reluctant Milkha is persuaded by PM Jawaharlal Nehru to run a friendly race in Pakistan. He wins. President Ayub Khan names him the "Flying Sikh"!

  • JAH123 on October 4, 2013, 2:32 GMT

    Nice insights Ed, but the main reason is that cricket is not big in the US. In terms of money and audience, the British, Indian and Australian film industries can't hold a candle to their American counterpart. Unless the power in film-making shifts away from the US or cricket becomes an American pastime, nothing will change no matter how good actors are or how well a director understands the nuances of the game.

  • dummy4fb on October 3, 2013, 22:53 GMT

    Jonny Brugh wrote a lovely one-man play called "The Second Test" which we went and saw in a workshop at the Pumphouse Theatre, Takapuna. Eventually the play was finished and performed at the Auckland Town Hall and I dragged my kids along - glad I was too, because a group of legendary NZ players attended that night.

    The play recounts the extraordinary events on Boxing Day 1953 in Johannesburg, one of the most famous days in NZ cricket and which has been described a couple of times here on Cricinfo.

    The play has since been converted into a TV movie called "Tangiwai" which screened on national television here in NZ in the prime time Sunday night slot last year. It is well worth a look - full cast, some actual recreation of that famous day and Iain O'Brien (one of the best NZ commentators at present) playing Neil Adcock.

  • Leonb on October 3, 2013, 22:43 GMT

    There is a terrific little film called Wonderous Oblivion which actually focusses on racial issues etc in England in the 60's(?) and uses cricket as the medium. There are cricket cards with Sobers, Compton etc that 'come to life' in the mind of a young boy. A west indian family moves in next door and the dad builds a pitch in his back yard. It is a simple film with a deep message and uses school boy cricket to help tell the story. Other than that, as the article says - there is not much.

  • dummy4fb on October 3, 2013, 22:37 GMT

    I greatly enjoyed the film "Tangiwai: A Love Story." Admittedly not just a cricket film, but it tells the story of Bob Blair falling in love, and his fiancee then being killed in the Tangiwai rail disaster while he was with New Zealand playing in South Africa in 1953. It's quite a tear jerker. I'm not sure how available it is outside of New Zealand. I'm guessing it's not.

  • dummy4fb on October 3, 2013, 19:14 GMT

    well i think it would be a good idea and i would really wish that hollywood makes a cricket film and then they launch it with a t20 cricket match in USA. That will certainly help bringing more people to cricket in USA. There r lots of guys who retired recently and have appeared in many commercial adds, so they know a little bit about acting. I would like to see Wasim Akram, Rahul Dravid, Andrew Flintoff, Andrew Symonds, Brian Lara.