April 8, 2016

The Kohli and Root show

The 2016 World T20 saw some fine batting, but Kohli and Root stood out not just for the runs they scored, but the manner in which they got them

There were other batsmen who starred in an innings or two, but over the entire tournament Virat Kohli and Joe Root were the best of the lot © ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Many batting feats stood out in the recently concluded World T20 - Carlos Brathwaite's four sixes in four successive balls was the most memorable, no doubt, but there were also hundreds for Chris Gayle and Tamim Iqbal, and other worthy performances by Martin Guptill, Jos Buttler, Marlon Samuels, Mohammad Shahzad, among several others. In terms of consistency and sheer class of batsmanship, though, it's difficult to look beyond Virat Kohli and Joe Root, the leading run-getters in the tournament from the Super 10 stage onwards.

Kohli passed 20 in each of his five innings and had a lowest score of 23, while Root was dismissed before 20 only once - run out for 12 against Afghanistan - in six innings.

Kohli was obviously the bigger star in chases - he does them better than anyone else - and twice led the batting in tricky chases against Pakistan and Australia. However, Root didn't do badly when batting second either, scoring 83 off 44 to help England overhaul 229 against South Africa.

Apart from the bucketload of runs they scored, there was also an orthodoxy and calmness in their approach that stood out, in a format where most others resort to a frenetic, unorthodox methods. Their strike rates were outstanding and remarkably similar - the difference was 0.3 - and they scored at nearly 150 runs per 100 balls by playing mostly orthodox cricket shots, and unerringly picking the gaps in the field. Neither is a big six hitter, which is reflected in the fact that both hit fewer than ten sixes in the tournament, and scored fewer than 20% of their runs in sixes. The others among the top five run-getters in the entire tournament hit at least 12 sixes. The percentage of runs in boundaries is similar for both as well.

Though the strike rates were similar, Root's runs came in high-scoring games, in which the average strike rate of all batsmen was 137; in the matches that Kohli played, the average was only 119. That means the strike-rate factor (which is the batsman's strike rate divided by the rate of all batsmen excluding him in these matches) was much better for Kohli than for Root.

Kohli and Root in the 2016 WT20
Batsman Runs Runs/inngs Strike rate SR factor 4s/ 6s % runs in 6s % runs in bound
 Virat Kohli  273  54.60  146.77  1.29  29/ 5  10.98  53.48
 Joe Root  249  41.50  146.47  1.08  24/ 7  16.87  55.42

Apart from their shot selection and impeccable placement, another aspect of their batting that stood out was their ability to make every ball count; if a boundary wasn't possible, they still picked the gaps and ran hard. That is reflected in the dot-ball percentages of these batsmen when compared with others in the tournament. Among all batsmen who faced at least 75 balls in the tournament, the dot percentages for Root and Kohli were the lowest. Some of the other big names in the tournament either had a tough time keeping the dots down, or simply didn't care about them - the percentages were 46 for Rohit Sharma and Kane Williamson, 43 for Guptill and 41 for Gayle - but Kohli and Root worked the ball around expertly, even when they weren't hitting the boundaries.

Lowest dot-ball percentages in the 2016 WT20
Batsman Runs Balls SR Ave dot%
 Joe Root  249  170  146.47  62.25  24.12
 Virat Kohli  273  186  146.77  136.50  26.34
 Mohammad Nabi  105  80  131.25  21.00  27.50
 Samiullah Shenwari  122  95  128.42  24.40  29.47
 Jos Buttler  191  120  159.16  47.75  30.00
 Shakib Al Hasan  129  102  126.47  32.25  32.35
 Glenn Maxwell  109  84  129.76  27.25  33.33
 Hashim Amla  120  89  134.83  60.00  34.83

The run-scoring patterns for the two in the tournament had some similarities and some differences. Both preferred the midwicket region more than any other, but Root scored a much bigger chunk of his runs there - more than 35%, compared to Kohli's 24%. Both scored more than 110 runs in the midwicket and mid-on region, but Kohli was more prolific in the V, scoring 79 of his 273 runs through mid-off and mid-on, compared to just 45 for Root. Kohli's spread of runs on either side of the wicket was also far more even - 47% on the off side, and 53 on the leg side - compared to Root, who scored only 34% on the off side, and 66% through the leg side.

Where Kohli and Root scored their runs in the WT20
  Virat Kohli Joe Root
Region Runs Percentage Runs Percentage
Third man 17 6.23 17 6.83
Point 38 13.92 24 9.64
Cover 45 16.48 32 12.85
Mid-off 28 10.26 12 4.82
Mid-on 51 18.68 33 13.25
Midwicket 65 23.81 89 35.74
Square leg 23 8.42 18 7.23
Fine leg 6 2.20 24 9.64

The other number that stood out for both Kohli and Root was their control factor, a number that indicates the extent to which they were in control of their shots, and how often they were beaten or mistimed their shots. The 20-over format necessitates batsmen to go for big shots and take chances, which is why control factors are normally lower for batsmen than they are in the longer forms of the game.

In the entire tournament, the overall control factor for all batsmen was 74%. Since the start of the Super 10s, it was 75%. Both Root and Kohli were well above that mark: Kohli's was very nearly 85%, and Root's was 87%. Most other batsmen struggled to hit the 80s: Williamson, Rohit, Steven Smith, Buttler and Tamim - who was the leading run scorer over the entire tournament - had control factors of 77-78%, while Jason Roy's was only 68%, despite him being the sixth-highest run scorer in the tournament. Samuels touched 80%, while Guptill did even better, with a control factor of 84%. That Kohli and Root scored so many runs with such consistency, and did so with such a high control factor, indicates the level at which they were batting through the World T20.

Control factors for Root and Kohli in the 2016 WT20
Batsman In control Not in control Control %
 Joe Root  148  22  87.06
 Virat Kohli  158  28  84.95

Given the sort of form that both Kohli and Root have been in over the last year and more, it wasn't much of a surprise that they racked up the sort of numbers they did in the World T20. Along with Williamson and Smith, they are clearly the batsmen for the future.

The current numbers for both Kohli and Root are impressive across formats, and both have shown several times that they can adapt to different forms of the game pretty easily. A comparison of their averages in different formats is interesting, though. Root's stats are pretty conventional - he averages the highest in Tests, followed by ODIs and then T20Is. With Kohli, though, the order is reversed. His average in T20Is is the highest, followed by ODIs and then Tests. The shorter format numbers are incredible, but Kohli will want that Test average of 44.02 to get closer to Root's 54.93. Root, meanwhile, has clearly made himself the batsman that opposition bowlers will focus most attention on, regardless of the format.

Joe Root's batting stats in international cricket
Format Mat Runs Ave SR 100s 50s
 Tests  39  3406  54.93  53.52  9  19
 ODIs  68  2572  44.34  84.46  8  12
 T20Is  20  594  39.60  138.78  0  4
Virat Kohli's batting stats in international cricket
Format Mat Runs Ave SR 100s 50s
 Tests  41  2994  44.02  52.92  11  12
 ODIs  171  7212  51.51  89.97  25  36
 T20Is  43  1641  58.60  135.17  0  16

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Ian on April 9, 2016, 14:04 GMT

    @EVDA_CHETA: Unknown. None of those three played much T20 (if at all). Admittedly Glenn McGrath was at the end of his career when T20/IPL came along, but on the occasions he wasn't exactly a class above. Out of the other two, Akram has potential and is a left-armer, but I saw him get taken to the cleaners a few times over 50 overs in county cricket and I think it's far from a given (if you'd said a young Waqar Younis we'd be talking!). Ambrose? I just don't know. Pace and bounce can be used against you if you meet the right batsman. Finally: one other Root/Kohli similarity: throw one of them the ball and you'll find a golden arm as well.

  • Mustansir on April 9, 2016, 7:05 GMT

    kohli has advantage of flat pitches, medicre bowlers, small grounds and big bat. if kohli would have faced ambrose, akram, mcgrath, etc. than his greatness can be actually measured

  • o on April 8, 2016, 16:49 GMT

    Would be amazing to see them bat together some day, if IPL changed schedule or ECB had more allowance, the chance of them both playing for RCB would be truly special.

  • Sid on April 8, 2016, 15:52 GMT

    Saw someone comment that Kohli still has to master England as he nicked everytime on his last tour there. But the point here is that when India visited england last time, kohli was struggling with his form and many other aspects in life an he clearly has got a good grip on things now and has changed as a batsman for better and he is only going to get better from here on. Williamson is in the same league as these two gentlemen mentioned in the article (kohli & Root) and also i consider Smith not far behind and Sharma, Guptill and de kock having the same potential provided they are consistent. In all, we have a bright batting future ahead from over the world which is a good thing for cricket. Only not so bright spot here i would like to mention is UMAR AKMAL. He had potential and initially Paki fans showcased him as someone matching kohli's skills.But since then there graphs have gone in entirely opposite directions. Akmal needs to get a god grip on his game and come back.

  • Russell on April 8, 2016, 15:25 GMT

    @ COOLCAPRICORN - I'm sure he'll score more runs in England next time. I think shot selection is the answer - he'd do well to forget about playing the cover drive until he's got to 30 or 40. He can't expect to come out and start smacking it through the covers every time in England. Sometimes you need to concede a little ground to the bowlers

  • Nish on April 8, 2016, 13:56 GMT

    @THEBATSMANHOLDINGTHEBOWLERSWILLEY Think since Kohli's poor showing in England the last time, we have since sometimes seen him batting well outside his crease to negate any swing & seam - so think he has worked on this weakness of nicking behind. Perhaps a short stint on the county circuit before India next tour England could also help him.

  • Russell on April 8, 2016, 11:32 GMT

    Two legends that's for sure. Root has all the shots and the temperament too. The only criticism is that in the last year or so in Tests he didn't convert enough 50s into 100s. Kohli is a fighter for sure but there are questions over his technique outside off stump against quality seam/swing bowling. I don't think he even made it into double figures on the last tour of England, he nicked off in the slips every time. I'm sure next time he'll do better because he'll want to prove he can do it in England. Virat is without doubt the best T20 batsman though.

  • VIJAY on April 8, 2016, 11:26 GMT

    @DAYA ANAND..Kohli has centuries in longer format in Aus, NZ, SAf...only place he is yet to prove is England..im sure he will rectify this in his next England tour in 2017...

  • Nish on April 8, 2016, 8:50 GMT

    Just as sometimes VK's stats to date is unfairly compared to ABD or Amla when they both are about 5 years older than him & he has yet to reach his prime, it must be also pointed that Root is two years younger than Kohli. From their stats to date, JR has clearly done much better than VK on the Test circuit whilst the opposite holds true in the shorter forms of the game. So putting aside our bias as fans, both these batsmen are only going to get better in the next few years & look forward to the India-England series later this year where these two star batsmen will be locking horns & pitted against each other.

  • prepat4210194 on April 8, 2016, 8:43 GMT

    Both the players have similar stats in this World cup, but I would like to emphasis on the condition and situations the two faced. Root had most of his runs on flat wickets with no lateral movement or turn. Whereas Kohli was faced with tough situations and battled the odds, everytime, he walked out to bat, for instane, that innings against Australia. He played on turners which is rare in this formats, therefore, for me Kohli batted far better than anyone in the tournament. On the other hand, Root showed great class, he also played an eye catching innings while chasing 230, showing his prowess. Root lacks experience in limited overs format and thus it is not fair to compare him to Kohli, as yet. He's been a fine player in test and I am glad to see that he isn't one-dimensional like other English players.

  • No featured comments at the moment.