New Zealand v India, 2nd Test, Wellington, 4th day

Defensive Dhoni hurts India again

Is it time for a Test captain who will be more authoritative in the big moments in overseas Tests?

Sidharth Monga

February 17, 2014

Comments: 541 | Text size: A | A

MS Dhoni has a chat with Duncan Fletcher, Durban, December 7, 2013
All too often in away Tests, MS Dhoni and Duncan Fletcher have been happy to sit back and wait instead of going on the attack © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Ian Chappell : Time for Dhoni to go
Players/Officials: MS Dhoni
Series/Tournaments: India tour of New Zealand
Teams: India

Unless New Zealand make a generous declaration and India bat out of their skins on day five, India will have gone 14 Tests and three years without an overseas Test win. Only Zimbabwe have a poorer record over the same period. Admittedly 14 is not a huge number, but that only accentuates the lop-sidedness of the ICC rankings, which give no weightage to how well you have performed away.

However, it is not like India haven't had opportunities to win over the last three years. They shut down a chase in Dominica when there was no way they could have lost the Test; they had an outside chance at Lord's; they were favourites to win Trent Bridge after two days; they had a good chance to put one past Australia at the MCG; and they had chances of their lifetimes at the Wanderers and Basin Reserve. Except for the Wanderers, there is a common thread running through these missed opportunities: a leadership group adamant that modern cricket is all about drying up runs, and a man signing autographs at the deep-point fence.

These turning points have been mentioned before, but they are worth repeating. At Lord's, England went into lunch on day four at 72 for 5, effectively 260 for 5. Ishant Sharma had just bowled a spell of 5-3-4-3, which included two great deliveries to get Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell out. The ball was only 31 overs old. Forty minutes later, MS Dhoni began the middle session with Suresh Raina and Harbhajan Singh. Yes, India had lost Zaheer Khan, but what was the harm in going down slinging if you were going down anyway?

At Trent Bridge, India had England down at 124 for 8, but fearing an apocalyptic counter-attack from Stuart Broad and Tim Bresnan, India went on the defensive again, losing all momentum. In the second innings they refused to take a bona fide run-out, a last moment of inspiration that could have galvanised them. The next two Tests were just a nightmarish daze featuring Alastair Cook and an unfit RP Singh.

In Australia, India's fight lasted only one Test, but what an opportunity it was. At the MCG, you have Australia down at 214 for 6 on day one, a real opportunity in front of you, and Brad Haddin has just arrived, but you bowl to him with a long-on, a deep midwicket and a deep fine leg. In the second innings you have them down at 27 for 4 but are almost coy about attacking, thinking about saving runs and thus getting wickets. After that the tour is a recurring reel of Ishant dropping Michael Clarke, and David Warner pulverising the four Indian horsemen of the apocalypse on the quickest pitch of them all.

 
 
There is a common thread running through these missed opportunities: a leadership group adamant that modern cricket is all about drying up runs, and a man signing autographs at the deep-point boundary
 

In Johannesburg, Dhoni had three fast bowlers who maintained the intensity, and he broke away from type, but something about the closeness of the match told you this was the last time in a long time that he would be risking it all. Sure enough, in the second Test he refused to take the new ball until he was forced to do so after 146 overs, preferring to sit and wait than to take wickets to slow runs down, a tactic that drew criticism from Rahul Dravid, a man who rarely criticises.

Over to Wellington then. On the third morning, his quicks have nicked three men out, New Zealand are five down with about 130 required to make India bat again, the ball is about 45 overs old, and here we have Ishant bowling to Brendon McCullum with no slips and a 6-3 leg-side field. The dropped catch at silly mid-on will be pointed out, which is fair enough, in that an opportunity was created, but in the desire to place men to snap up that rarest of catches, India sacrificed the slips and not the boundary riders.

Ravindra Jadeja bowled 24 unthreatening overs on the afternoon, many of them from over the stumps, just because he was keeping the runs down. He bowled with a long-on and long-off throughout for McCullum, who was happy to milk the singles. This is not to take away from McCullum's effort, but Dhoni underestimated him, in that he tried to block his release shots, expecting a poor shot around the corner. In a marvellous innings, McCullum showed he had enough restraint and discipline to not hole out to those deep fielders. When a slip catch did arrive with New Zealand still less than 100 for 5, India had only one man stationed there, which, as William Shakespeare wrote, was neither here nor there.


Ravindra Jadeja caught Corey Anderson off his own bowling, New Zealand v India, 2nd Test, 3rd day, Wellington, February 16, 2014
Ravindra Jadeja was tidy but posed little threat, and he was still persisted with for 24 overs in the afternoon © AFP
Enlarge

It's not that this strategy hasn't worked for Dhoni, but it has worked only in home Tests, where he has actually been able to build up pressure through his spinners. It has worked for him in ODIs. Nor have developments in modern cricket been lost on this space. The bats are heavier, the batsmen are bolder, they generally prefer hitting a slightly risky four to taking four risk-free singles, so captains make them pick up the singles, and boundaries early in the innings give them great confidence, etc. Nor can it be denied that Dhoni doesn't have a Mitchell Johnson or a Dale Steyn in his attack. Or even Ryan Harris. Or even Neil Wagner.

But how defensive is too defensive? Even the fourth day began with New Zealand practically 6 for 5. It was a tense time for the batsmen, who would have had to start afresh against bowlers who had had a night's rest. A wicket in the first session would have reaffirmed India's position as favourites to win the Test. The ball was only 19 overs old. The first ball of the day hit the shoulder of McCullum's bat after seaming away a touch. Still it took India only seven overs to begin to resort to denial as a means of taking wickets. And if India struggled on day four, the seeds for it were sown on the third afternoon when McCullum was allowed to bed in amid strange fields.

It became ridiculous at times. Dhoni once asked Ishant and Mohammed Shami to bowl from round the stumps with a 7-2 off-side field. As a bowler it is difficult to keep up with such fancies. When Rohit Sharma bowled, he had a slip stationed where one would be for fast bowlers. Sunil Gavaskar was so baffled he said, "This one takes the cake. No, this one takes the whole bakery." Throughout, Dhoni kept following the ball, placing fielders wherever the shot went. Those who have watched many of these Tests at the grounds remember all too clearly how a fielder who goes to fetch the ball from the boundary rarely comes back: he is stationed there. Most memorably it happened when Jacques Kallis reverse-swept - yes, reverse-swept - Harbhajan Singh for a four at Newlands, and a deep point was placed instantly.

It has been stated previously that Dhoni is a great ODI batsman, a very good ODI captain and Test captain at home, and that he was just the leader of men India needed after the fractious Greg Chappell regime, but in overseas Tests he always seems to lose the big moments.

You can't blame Dhoni alone, though. The other half of this leadership team is a coach who can be credited with giving Test cricket deep point. Dhoni already was a captain who thought New Zealand need to be set 617 to preserve a series lead. And he met a man who defended the idea that India could lose seven wickets in 15 overs if they went for a 2-0 series win as opposed to 1-0. Between the two of them, they will go any length to save boundaries and eliminate risk.

India have been lucky that these last two "series" have each been only two Tests long. India were competitive in the initial parts of the England and Australia series too. Once they lost the big moments, the rest of those tours were a blur of defeats. India's next two assignments won't be so short. It will be imperative they win the big moments in the initial stages otherwise it is quite possible they will come back with a nightmarish haze. Have India reached the stage where they could do with a Test captain who will be more authoritative in those big moments?

Sidharth Monga is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

RSS Feeds: Sidharth Monga

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (February 20, 2014, 8:57 GMT)

Objective analysis by Sidharth Monga. True Dhoni's team lacks quality fast bowlers who can bowl the opposition twice, but this has always been the case even with our former captains. Dhoni is not a thinking captain for test cricket. In fact, were he to not be the captain, even his place in the test team would be doubtful, for coming in a No 7, what value can he add, and how many times has he saved a test at this level. His field placement in the last NZ test was not even school level thinking. GOD knows what made him resort to this kind of filed placement. It is about time, Virat Kohli is given the mantle. In stating this, not wanting to take anything away from Dhoni, he has been a great cricketer and done the country proud. But it is better to leave on a high then be thrown out.

Posted by Naresh28 on (February 20, 2014, 6:39 GMT)

Some fans miss the point by saying Dhoni is a good captain in all formats. Its only in the T20's and ODi's his plan works - NOT TESTS. If we look at the silverware achievements it leans to the shorter format. Sometimes we hear the commentators saying that the slip cordon and wicketkeeper is about a meter to far back. Edges fall short. Does he change this - No.STUBBORNNESS. With the speed of our bowlers this is obvious. We saw Vijay, Rohit and Kholi put down catches - DONT THEY FEEL GUILTY when we lose the test.

Posted by praneethtz on (February 20, 2014, 6:09 GMT)

All who are trashing dhoni for overseas performance just check back on India's performance overseas in the entire cricketing history..its as bad as it is today but i guess dhoni is critisized more for over seas lossses but he doesnt have bowling attack which can take 20 wickets..he is defensive bcoz the bowlers have never showed that they are capable of bowling well..umesh has to play more test matches..he can becum match winning wit his pace..even zaheer was not consistent in his early days but u will learn by playing..!!

Posted by   on (February 19, 2014, 13:18 GMT)

Everyone should understand that the team is only as good as a captain. It applies to both bowlers and batsmen. If the captain does not have faith in his fast bowler that he can take wickets, he is going to spread the field and make the bowler look worse. Thats why no fast bowler has developed well under dhoni's captaincy though there is a pool of good fast bowlers in india now. In fact there has never been a reliable wicket taking spinner who has developed in dhoni's captaincy. This is all because of dhoni's poor defensive mentality that our bowlers are no good even in conditions abroad. Dhoni needs to be sacked from all forms of captaincy. if he remains the captain for ODI team, I am sure india will exit from the world cup 2015 very early.

Posted by naren1983 on (February 19, 2014, 13:02 GMT)

It really raises the eye brow of Chief Selectors who now-a-days throwing out batsmen & bowlers who under perform for some time, but won't be applicable to Captain ? Still few reckon there won't be change in captaincy for next one year at-least until WC 2015, but we can expect surprises before that for test captaincy. But the real question is who will be the next captain ? Virat has yet to mature, Pujara has some experience in leading India A team, Rohit showed he has captaincy skill at IPL. But he is just started trying to justify his selection in the team. This may ask at-least Dhoni to continue for next one year. But after one year, its going to be big change neither we will nor lose.

Posted by Siddiee on (February 19, 2014, 10:44 GMT)

First thing that needs to be inculcated in India players is that winning is the only thing one plays for. There should be no room for excuses such as less time to adapt, young team etc. Kohli, Pujara, Rahane & Shami were least experienced of the lot but most impressive over past two series, sadly they were led down by their captain.

Dhoni has long complained about lack of fast bowlers, but is he a captain that knows how to use a fast bowler ? Clearly not as they go for runs in effort to get wickets but dhoni is too scared to go for runs. Ashwin and Jadeja - they bowl to their captain's demands and replace each other whenever one of them is out of form, are India's spin options limited to these two spinners (who only look to contain)? Surely not.

It only magnifies the fact that dhoni is more comfortable with attacking batsmen and defensive bowlers, which is not that big an issue in limited overs cricket as in test matches.

Posted by santik on (February 19, 2014, 10:16 GMT)

@ KamalRaghu when the opposition is 58/3 and when your highest wicket taker is bowling, common sense will tell you to be offensive.. you don't need any expert commentator to tell this..goni definitely doesn't deserve a place in the test team either as a batsmen or skipper.. one thing i agree is that there is not enough candidates as of now..

Posted by KamalRaghu on (February 19, 2014, 6:19 GMT)

It's not the time to be blinded by the comments of commentary experts. This is a very young team and it has be recognized that Indian cricket is undergoing transition where legends have left. During this time of team building, I think its only fair to give the team more chance. Looking at this team's performance in last two overseas tournaments it is not bad when compared to the performance with the stable team (star-studded) which struggled in England and Australia. Coming to Dhoni's captaincy, I dont think there is no one more efficient or worthy enough currently to replace him. Kholi is still young and needs more mentoring before he can handle captaining. Defensive or offensive depends on the bowling resources available at the hand. In India people are restless/fast food culture and have a very bad habit to bring down their heroes/achievements ignoring the realities and assessing dispassionately.

Posted by   on (February 19, 2014, 4:28 GMT)

Kohli has to be the captain and Ishant Sharma, Rohit Sharma, Murali Vijay etc need to go out. Pujara and Rishi Dhawan need to play Odi and test series both

Posted by Sandt on (February 19, 2014, 3:36 GMT)

It is high time Dhoni should step down from captaincy.He is hurting Indian cricket now.My question is when Kapil dev, Gavaskar, Azhar, Tendulkar, Ganguly, dravid and all has been lost the captaincy after some series loss why this is not applying to Dhoni.When india wins he gets all credit, but when looses he is responsible for that and he should take the responsibility.He should remove from test captaincy atleast.Even in ODI what he had achieved in last outside tours.Is this way to play for world champions.I don't know why BCCI has not taking any action. Open you eyes BCCI and see the truth or else indian cricket lovers will react.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Sidharth MongaClose
Tour Results
New Zealand v India at Wellington - Feb 14-18, 2014
Match drawn
New Zealand v India at Auckland - Feb 6-9, 2014
New Zealand won by 40 runs
NZ XI v Indians at Whangarei - Feb 2-3, 2014
Match drawn
New Zealand v India at Wellington - Jan 31, 2014
New Zealand won by 87 runs
New Zealand v India at Hamilton - Jan 28, 2014
New Zealand won by 7 wickets (with 11 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days