Sri Lanka Premier League 2012

SLPL will give provinces a place in the sun

The Twenty20 League starts on Saturday after false start in 2011 and recent hiccups

Andrew Fernando

August 10, 2012

Comments: 15 | Text size: A | A

Angelo Mathews, Lasith Malinga and Kumar Sangakkara at the launch of the inaugural Sri Lanka Premier League, Colombo, July 16, 2012
Organisers have attempted to drive up interest in the provinces through the shrewd placement of icon players Manoj Ridimahaliyadda / © ESPNcricinfo Ltd
Enlarge

Before the tournament has even had a chance to begin, the ubiquitous Sri Lanka Premier League billboards above Colombo's concrete chaos already seem outdated. Many of the advertisements feature an intense Kumar Sangakkara; others a grinning Chris Gayle. A fractured finger will keep Sangakkara out of the tournament until the very end - if at all - and Gayle's groin strain has ruled him out completely. For a domestic Twenty20 tournament supposedly of the cash-cow variety, the SLPL's birth has been long and laboured. After a false start in 2011, and a failure to convince the BCCI to release its players for the second year running, the growing list of high-profile withdrawals has become yet another complication for a tournament that has not yet seen the light of day.

But while the SLPL may so far have lacked in execution - sometimes through no fault of its own, as with player injuries - it has not skimped on vision. The SLPL will be played at a provincial level, with teams representing fans from every corner of the island - a dramatic change from the domestic diet of Colombo-centric club cricket and a school competition that is largely the preserve of the elite. Many regions famed for their love of the game have not had a team to support since the demise of the short-lived Inter Provincial First-Class tournament in 2010. With the club competition also set to be shrunk substantially, they are unlikely to have a team outside the SLPL in the near future.

"A provincial cricket tournament allows you to reach out wider," says Sandeep Bhammer, CEO of Somerset Entertainment Ventures (SEV), who have handled much of the organisation and the marketing for the SLPL. "There are no clubs across the country, so with a provincial tournament you can basically encompass the whole country."

Organisers have also attempted to drive up interest in the provinces through the shrewd placement of icon players. Naming Lasith Malinga as the icon for the Ruhuna franchise is an obvious move, but having Muttiah Muralitharan, a Kandyan by birth, captain the team representing a largely Tamil Uthura province aims to win over a northern population that has been unable to produce a star of its own thanks to the Civil War. Angelo Mathews, who went to school in Colombo, serves a similar purpose in the eastern province of Nagenahira. The role cricket must play in the post-war reconciliation process has been highlighted by many, including Kumar Sangakkara in last year's Cowdrey Lecture, but as the only tournament that gives the North and Northeast a stake in domestic cricket, the three-week long SLPL may be all that is fulfilling that mandate at present.

The process of building cricketing infrastructure and developing young players from outstation is a long one, however. The local players have largely fallen into franchises befitting their provincial background, and though Bhammer speaks of the SLPL's potential to identify new talent in the provinces, there are no structures in place to foster the game outside the main centres.

"Development depends on how the board and the authority handle [the SLPL]," says Sri Lanka's former vice captain Aravinda de Silva, who has been a campaigner for provincial domestic cricket in Sri Lanka since the early 2000s. "It could help in provincial development, but I think it's quite a way off. First the cricket board has to make it a viable venture for the franchises and maybe they will be interested in developing cricket in the future. The board needs to take responsibility for that."

The SLPL's provincial ambitions are also hamstrung severely by its use of only two venues. Fifteen of the tournament's 24 matches will be played at the Premadasa Stadium in Colombo, with Pallekele Stadium, just outside Kandy, hosting the remaining nine. All of the teams' practice sessions are held in the two cities, and it's unlikely they will stray far into the provinces, save when travelling in between venues. "For a tournament like this I would have expected that they would have had at least three or four venues. In addition to the two they are using, Dambulla and Hambantota could have been looked at," de Silva says.

 
 
The cricket board has to make it a viable venture for the franchises and maybe they will be interested in developing cricket in the future. The board needs to take responsibility for that. Aravinda de Silva
 

Dambulla, though, which is still hours away from the North and East provinces, is no longer able to host day/night encounters because its lights have been deemed too dim by the ICC, and the logistics of broadcasting the tournament, Bhammer says, allow only two venues. "It takes about two days to rig a stadium, in order to make it production friendly. If you have a tournament that's 15 days [of play], and you have four venues, eight days are just going in the rigging process. It becomes a very, very long tournament because there also have to be reserve days in case of sporadic rain. You don't have a 30-day window to play a tournament like this.

"What we can do in future is experiment with different venues. So if one year we play in three venues, in the next year we can play in three different venues. It's a small tournament so that's what we are looking at."

The overseas player pool however, has not started out small, even if it has been thinned significantly by the withdrawals. Fifty-six foreign players were contracted initially, including Shahid Afridi, Richard Levi, Tamim Iqbal, Ryan Harris and Albie Morkel, in addition to Gayle and Shakib Al Hasan, who have since pulled out. The coaching staff come with their own profiles, with Waqar Younis coaching Ruhuna and former Sri Lanka coaches Tom Moody and Trevor Bayliss in charge of the Uthura and Wayamba franchises respectively.

"From an opportunity point of view, the SLPL gives the local players a chance to interact with the international players and develop in that way," de Silva says. "It's something that we dreamt about when we were younger and wanted to play for English counties. When you play with international players, you realise your own talent. You see that they are also human and they make mistakes and that's something that helped me in my own career."

For the SLC, the SLPL is shaping to bring slight relief to a debt of almost $70 million. Their partnership with SEV has insulated them from the tournament's vast promotional costs, and ensured $2.1 million in revenue from the franchises each year for seven years, as well as $350,000 in licensing fees per tournament. If the SLPL succeeds over seven years, the SLC will also be able to tender the tournament at a higher price, once their deal with SEV ends.

"There are costs for us in terms of anti-corruption, security and the other expenditures involved when playing cricket at this level," treasurer of SLC, Nuski Mohamed says. "But we're expecting to spend about 70 million rupees during the tournament ($540,000) and the rest (approximately $1.6 million) is profit." A failed SLPL might further dent a reputation already drowned in disaster, but financially, they stand largely to gain from the venture. It could become their first significant boon since the 2011 World Cup that kicked off their financial calamity.

Bhammer's company meanwhile, must rely on the first few SLPLs being successful, just to break even. SEV has spent well in excess of its first years' revenue to market the tournament according to Bhammer, and even the franchises may be in line for a first year loss. "The [franchises] come on board with deep pockets and they realise that in the first year or two, the tournament may not be economically viable for them. But because they are cricket lovers, they want to be part of the whole process."

Despite the unavailability of Indian players (this time around because of a scheduling clash with New Zealand's tour of India) the major financial clout for the SLPL, comes from India. Five of the seven franchises are owned by Indian corporates, most of whom currently operate, or are intending to begin business in Sri Lanka. The Indian title sponsor also sees the country as a key market.

The SLPL is the latest in business-driven, domestic Twenty20 tournaments vying for global attention, but at home, it is the only cricketing outlet that caters for the entire population, and one of the few sizeable windfalls for an impoverished board. It's dividends, both for invested businesses and for cricket in Sri Lanka may be years in coming, but for now it is fueled by potential, and for that reason, Sri Lanka can hardly afford for it to do badly.

Andrew Fernando is ESPNcricinfo's correspondent in Sri Lanka

RSS Feeds: Andrew Fidel Fernando

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (August 12, 2012, 21:17 GMT)

@Cpt.Meanster... Please remember ICL is the first league of this kind in India.. After ICL, BCCI launched IPL...

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (August 11, 2012, 14:18 GMT)

@Ashkey Enoon: Well the IPL deserves to get bossy because it's SPECIAL. It's the first league of its kind. How about we keep the anti-IPL and anti-Indian talk away from this forum please ? As an Indian I wish good luck to this SLPL.

Posted by   on (August 11, 2012, 9:46 GMT)

Short and a loving friendly tournament.. I hope this tournament doesn't get bossy like IPL and Indian cricket in general.. Srilankans are fun loving people, Win or lose we accept it and dance like there is no other place in the world. ALL THE BEST SLPL!

Posted by KEVINSL on (August 11, 2012, 5:56 GMT)

CONGRATS MY SRI LANKA!!! WE CAN SHOW OUR PRIDE TO THE WORLD!!!

Posted by   on (August 11, 2012, 5:36 GMT)

The perfect amount of matches for a PL B-)

Posted by Uppercut07 on (August 11, 2012, 4:58 GMT)

am normally a fan of andrew's work, but wow this article, U might as well as put a billboard andrew saying "SLPL SUCKS, NO POINT WATCHING" to da fans. =D

Posted by   on (August 11, 2012, 3:00 GMT)

as far as i see only india have any say in world cricket today and the fact that there teams have demanded that the trinidadian players represent them clt20 shows that they only care about themselves and nobody else,everybody should boycott the ipl and then they might start being fair

Posted by Htc-Android on (August 11, 2012, 1:48 GMT)

i am afraid this slpl might be failure. reasons. 1. Everyone is focussed on watching olympics. 2. some big names pulled out in the last minute(sanga,shakib,gayle) and there is more NZ and SA players are likely to miss the series due to the current tours with IND and ENG. 3.Only two grounds are used to host the series. the crowds will be bored if it is repeatedly host in the same ground. they may lose intereset in the later stage of the tournament. the reason why IPl and BBl were successfull is because of they were hosted in many grounds . so they were able to get more crowds.

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (August 10, 2012, 21:15 GMT)

@ ස්තාපල් ජංගිසිරා: The IPL is one of its kind. All the other leagues are based on the IPL's concept. The IPL has sheer financial, economic, and political clout behind it. In addition, the IPL is supported by Indian celebrities to a large extent. The SLPL on the other hand is different. It's still a Sri Lankan domestic tournament with a new flavour. This is just the first year so it's still a 'baby'. No body knows how it will turn out. As an Indian fan, I wish it good luck. This tournament has a good chance to unearth some raw Sri Lankan talent to the world. Who knows how many Malingas and Muralis are hiding in there ?!!I am sure the IPL will also have one eye on this league. A good performance here could fetch a hefty IPL contract next season for any of the players. Good luck.

Posted by   on (August 10, 2012, 21:08 GMT)

IPL is popular due to its mass audiences in India. IPL do not depend on other countries as Indians are enough to make it profitable. SLPL can only work if SL audience is enough to make it profitable which I doubt it is but I can be wrong too.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew Fidel FernandoClose
Tournament Results
Uva Next v Nagenahira at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 31, 2012
Uva Next won by 19 runs (D/L method)
Nagenahira v K Warriors at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 29, 2012
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
Wayamba U v Uva Next at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 28, 2012
Uva Next won by 20 runs
Uva Next v Nagenahira at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 27, 2012
Nagenahira won by 6 wickets (with 5 balls remaining)
Ruhuna Ryls v Wayamba U at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 26, 2012
Wayamba U won by 14 runs
Nagenahira v Uthura at Colombo (RPS) - Aug 26, 2012
Uthura won by 15 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days