Most Impactful Bowlers of the Series (Only T20s)The Batting/Bowling Impact is a factor not only of the runs scored/wickets taken/economy rate, but also of the pressure under which these performances happened.
Player | Team | Bowling Impact | BoI/mat | Inns | Wkts | Impact Wickets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI NY | 535.7 | 44.6 | 12 | 15 | 21 | |
| SF | 369.7 | 33.6 | 11 | 18 | 19.5 | |
| SF | 327.7 | 40.9 | 8 | 17 | 17.1 | |
| WSF | 313.3 | 31.3 | 10 | 14 | 15.2 | |
| TSK | 312.1 | 52 | 6 | 14 | 15.3 | |
| WSF | 284.9 | 25.9 | 11 | 14 | 14 | |
| SEO | 283.6 | 31.5 | 9 | 9 | 11.5 | |
| WSF | 268.1 | 24.3 | 11 | 9 | 9.8 | |
| TSK | 260.9 | 23.7 | 11 | 15 | 13.9 | |
| LAKR | 253.7 | 25.3 | 10 | 14 | 17.2 | |
| WSF | 253.1 | 25.3 | 10 | 11 | 10.7 | |
| TSK | 245.8 | 40.9 | 6 | 10 | 10.9 | |
| MI NY | 233.9 | 29.2 | 8 | 11 | 11.6 | |
| SF | 212.6 | 35.4 | 6 | 6 | 8.3 | |
| WSF | 206.3 | 34.3 | 6 | 10 | 11 | |
| LAKR | 204.9 | 25.6 | 8 | 9 | 10.5 | |
| MI NY | 200.6 | 40.1 | 5 | 8 | 10.1 | |
| SF | 196.7 | 19.6 | 10 | 12 | 11.5 | |
| LAKR | 173.4 | 19.2 | 9 | 10 | 10.5 | |
| TSK | 170 | 28.3 | 6 | 8 | 8.6 | |
| LAKR | 166.9 | 27.8 | 6 | 9 | 12 | |
| SF | 166.9 | 33.3 | 5 | 8 | 8.9 | |
| MI NY | 153 | 19.1 | 8 | 5 | 7 | |
| TSK | 137.6 | 17.2 | 8 | 6 | 7.1 | |
| MI NY | 136.8 | 12.4 | 11 | 6 | 6.6 | |
| LAKR | 128.5 | 21.4 | 6 | 3 | 4.1 | |
| MI NY | 127 | 18.1 | 7 | 7 | 8.5 | |
| SF | 126.8 | 14 | 9 | 3 | 4.3 | |
| SEO | 124.7 | 24.9 | 5 | 5 | 5.6 | |
| SEO | 117.2 | 23.4 | 5 | 6 | 6.3 | |
| MI NY | 113.6 | 28.4 | 4 | 6 | 8.7 | |
| LAKR | 113.2 | 113.2 | 1 | 3 | 5.1 | |
| MI NY | 111 | 15.8 | 7 | 5 | 6.7 | |
| SEO | 110.2 | 12.2 | 9 | 5 | 5.4 | |
| SEO | 106.8 | 13.3 | 8 | 3 | 4.3 | |
| WSF | 105.4 | 52.7 | 2 | 3 | 3.8 | |
| SEO | 90.7 | 12.9 | 7 | 5 | 7 | |
| TSK | 83.7 | 10.4 | 8 | 8 | 5.4 | |
| SF | 78.8 | 26.2 | 3 | 3 | 3.7 | |
| SF | 78.8 | 19.7 | 4 | 4 | 4.1 | |
| MI NY | 78.8 | 9.8 | 8 | 4 | 5.2 | |
| SF | 73.1 | 12.1 | 6 | 3 | 3.6 | |
| SEO | 71.1 | 11.8 | 6 | 4 | 4.2 | |
| MI NY | 71 | 23.6 | 3 | 2 | 2.6 | |
| LAKR | 67.6 | 11.2 | 6 | 4 | 4.1 | |
| WSF | 66.3 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 3.9 | |
| WSF | 55.3 | 55.3 | 1 | 1 | 1.8 | |
| SEO | 55.2 | 27.6 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| LAKR | 50.1 | 12.5 | 4 | 5 | 5.3 | |
| LAKR | 50 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 1.9 | |
| MI NY | 44.7 | 22.3 | 2 | 2 | 3.1 | |
| TSK | 35.8 | 35.8 | 1 | 2 | 2.3 | |
| SEO | 25.6 | 6.4 | 4 | 3 | 2.5 | |
| WSF | 13.8 | 4.6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | |
| WSF | 10.7 | 2.6 | 4 | 2 | 1.9 | |
| TSK | 10.6 | 3.5 | 3 | 2 | 1.8 | |
| MI NY | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1.3 | |
| TSK | 4.6 | 1.1 | 4 | 2 | 2.2 | |
| TSK | -1.6 | -0.3 | 6 | 1 | 0.6 | |
| WSF | -4.4 | -4.4 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 |
Developed in partnership with IITM CESSA
Top Wicket Takers
18
Innings: 11Average: 19.77
17
Innings: 8Average: 15.05
15
Innings: 11Average: 22.53
Top Run Scorers
478
Innings: 13Average: 36.76
468
Innings: 10Average: 52.00
373
Innings: 12Average: 31.08
Tournament Fan Ratings
Instant answers to T20 questions