1st Test: Old failings return to haunt England (25 November 1998)
WE ARE now beginning to lose count of the number of Ashes series that have begun with a renewed surge of optimism but it rarely takes long for reality to strike home
25-Nov-1998
25 November 1998
1st Test: Old failings return to haunt England
By Martin Johnson
WE ARE now beginning to lose count of the number of Ashes series
that have begun with a renewed surge of optimism but it rarely
takes long for reality to strike home. The plain truth of the
matter is that England remain the kind of cricket team more than
capable of giving Australia a bloody nose on one day and barely a
match for Brisbane Girls' High School the next.
Furthermore, whoever penned the old proverb about practice making
perfect could not have been much of a cricket buff, as no side
gets more practice at attempting to save Test matches than
England, with no discernible evidence that they are getting any
better at it. When yesterday's tropical storm arrived, lighting
up the Gabba like Castle Dracula, the only people who would have
given England any chance of avoiding defeat would have been
eating their meals with plastic cutlery from the inside of a
padded cell.
As angry shafts of forked lightning knocked out the Channel 9
communications centre (which in terms of sophistication makes the
deck of the Star Ship Enterprise look like a Morris Minor
dashboard) there was something of a contrast in voltage from an
England dressing room that would barely have powered an electric
toaster.
There was, as ever, talk about "taking the positives" out of the
game, although just at this moment nothing seems more positive
than Australia making it six consecutive Ashes victories by the
end of this winter. There were certainly good individual
performances - not least from Mark Butcher and Alan Mullally -
but then again England have always been good at producing
posthumous VCs. As ever, in the collective scheme of things,
Australia are the side who pull together when the hand-to-hand
fighting hits the battlefield.
There is never a moment when experienced England watchers feel
safe, not even if they should ever get to 300 for none. Graham
Gooch is already imploring England's lower order to put a higher
price on their wickets, after respective batting performances in
which one side's price tag came from Harrods, and the other from
Woolworths. Australia's last five yielded 307 runs and England's
last five, 60.
Before this series began, Gooch curiously said that England would
be unhappy if Shane Warne was not fit to play, yet if a fully fit
Warne had been playing, this Test match would have been over long
before yesterday's tropical storm turned the Gabba into a more
appropriate venue for wallowing hippos.
Even so Warne's apprentice, Stuart MacGill, would probably have
finished the job had the weather not intervened and thereby
caused - not for the first time - a certain amount of
embarrassment for the England coach. When England were 299 for
four at stumps on the third day, David Lloyd could scarcely
disguise his glee as the team downed a couple of (then)
well-earned beers back at the hotel. "Stuart MacGill?" he
chortled, dismissively. "Stuart Bloody MacGill?"
Dangerous stuff. Lloyd is an emotional character and while his
devotion to his team does him much credit, his apparent
unwillingness to embrace dispassionate analysis occasionally
bubbles over into near Barmy Army-style allegiance. It is
doubtful whether, on the following night, Lloyd was heard
chuntering: "Dominic Cork? Dominic Bloody Cork?"
Cork's first-innings batting performance against Glenn McGrath
marked him down either as a cricketer short of the required
intelligence at this level, or else as someone so immersed in
projecting a Clint Eastwood-style machismo that it verged on the
pathetic. McGrath was unable to get at him in the second innings
because of the fading light but the thought of Cork as a Test
match No 7 has already nailed down policy for Perth next week:
John Crawley as the extra batsman, and cheerio Robert Croft.
Top marks here, though, for Butcher, who came into the match with
less first-class runs behind him than the 10 stitches he had
inserted in his head wound, and to Mullally, whose aggression is
something the Australians find a good deal less hilarious than
Cork's.
There was, however, an unsettling contrast between the two
captains here, with Mark Taylor making all the positive moves.
For some reason Alec Stewart has been portrayed as some kind of
tactical D'Artagnan, but his dad was never one to embrace the
cavalry charge, and if Alec is not quite a chip off the old
block, he is at least a sliver.
England have not won a Test in Brisbane since 1986, so the locals
have time to practise their jokes. Yesterday's winner of the
Channel 9 crowd banner competition was: "What Do You Call a Pom
Who Makes Five Runs?" Answer: "In Form." England's cricket team
are a national mickey-take over here and sadly show no sign of
running out of steam just yet.
Source :: Electronic Telegraph (https://www.telegraph.co.uk)