Bell must keep ringing the changes
Peter English's verdict on the 1st day of the 2nd Test between Australia and England at Adelaide
Peter English at Adelaide
01-Dec-2006
![]() |
![]()
|
Ian Bell is on the verge of something big. It might be
as significant as holding England's batting together
over the next decade. Something in the short-term,
like a game-altering Ashes century, would form an
important stage in his development. He is closing on
maturity but there are still pesky blemishes to
remove.
Two fifties in consecutive matches have shown Bell at
his most determined. Slowly he has become comfortable
with Australia's varied attack, protecting himself
against threats he gave into during the previous
series, and this was his fourth half-century against
them. It is not quite enough.
For Bell to become a complete No. 3 he must resist
giving his wicket away when the seriously difficult
duties have been done. All three England batsmen fell
to soft dismissals but Bell's donation was the most
unnecessary. The problem was started by Andrew Strauss
in Brisbane and has become a catchy concern.
On a pitch tailored for long and patient displays, only
batting mistakes proved capable of ending innings.
Shane Warne tried to upset the plan by gaining severe
turn before lunch but went wicket-less despite some
mesmerising patches. Ricky Ponting set cunningly
defensive fields, forcing the batsmen to make the
pace, but no dismissal was the result of tactical
mastery.
Strauss scooped to midwicket, Alastair Cook edged through and Bell
embarrassed and angered himself with a badly misjudged
hook. England's early progress was hard enough -
relying on a bright push from Kevin Pietersen
and Paul Collingwood's energetic 98 - without the bouts
of self harm.
Bell's error came as he turned briefly from survivor
to dominator. Reading Lee's slower ball, he drove
behind point for a boundary before crunching another
through cover. Both were delightful shots. Instead of
settling himself and seeing out the over, as Pietersen
did to Warne when taking him for 10 from the first
three balls, Bell was overcome by the emotional rush
and demanded another boundary.
The short ball from Lee could have been ducked under
but Bell attempted to strike him into one of the
Chappell stands. His miscue was so great that the top
edge was caught by Lee on the pitch. Not that Bell saw
the take. His head was down and he was already
speeding for the dressing room the instant he felt the
ball miss the middle.
It was a sad end as he had toiled for his
half-century, just as he did in the first innings at
the Gabba before driving airily at Stuart Clark.
Before lunch Bell struggled to understand most things
Warne sent him, but after the break he collected runs
more freely in an essential stand of 113 with
Collingwood.
Bell is only 24 and this is his 20th Test so maybe too
much is expected too soon. He is playing against the
world's best team from a highly vulnerable position
and doing well. He could be doing better. Having
completed the unfashionable work, he needed to
recognise it was time to remain in control so he could
have enjoyed the easier pickings.
Peter English is the Australasian editor of Cricinfo