Ponting's 140* and Bichel's 7-for
A look at the best batting, bowling, allround, and team performances of the 2003 World Cup
Andy Bichel's 7 for 20 against England in the 2003 World Cup is arguably the best bowling performance in ODI history. • Getty Images
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Let us move on to the Performance Analysis tables for 2003.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 616 | 2003 | 1993 | RT Ponting | Australia | Ind | 140* | 121 |
2 | 576 | 2003 | 1945 | A Symonds | Australia | Pak | 143* | 125 |
3 | 526 | 2003 | 1944 | SB Styris | New Zealand | Slk | 141 | 125 |
4 | 473 | 2003 | 1955 | SP Fleming | New Zealand | Saf | 134* | 132 |
5 | 425 | 2003 | 1963 | JM Davison | Canada | Win | 111 | 76 |
6 | 420 | 2003 | 1942 | BC Lara | West Indies | Saf | 116 | 134 |
7 | 408 | 2003 | 1991 | A Symonds | Australia | Slk | 91* | 118 |
8 | 408 | 2003 | 1979 | MS Atapattu | Sri Lanka | Saf | 124 | 129 |
9 | 374 | 2003 | 1982 | PA de Silva | Sri Lanka | Aus | 92 | 94 |
10 | 371 | 2003 | 1982 | RT Ponting | Australia | Slk | 114 | 109 |
The table is headed by Ricky Ponting's defining innings of 140 in the final. There was no hesitation in the way Ponting batted. He was determined that Australia reached an insurmountable total and they did exactly that. Let us also recognise the Indian bowling attack as a very experienced and competent one. Andrew Symonds' innings was similar in numbers but was in a totally different context. Coming in at 86 for 4, against a potent Pakistani attack, Symonds built the innings very well, first with Ponting and then with the late order. He took Australia to a match-winning total of 310.
This was a match New Zealand lost because no one other than Scott Styris did anything with the bat. The situation at 15 for 3, chasing 273, was very tough. But Styris scored 141 out of the 200 plus runs scored by the team. One of the great rear-guard actions in World Cup history. The fact that it was in vain should not take away the lustre. It is interesting to note that all are similar innings in size.
A huge South African first innings score was followed by rain and this resulted in a fair target. Stephen Fleming controlled the chase with a beautifully paced innings of 132 and New Zealand ran comfortable winners. The next innings was also a losing one in which John Davison did a Styris. The result was a foregone conclusion. The collection of immigrant players of Canada against the might of West Indies. Canada did well to score 201. Davison scored 111 out of this, that too in 76 balls. The next highest score was 19. West Indies reached this target in 20 overs.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 788 | 2003 | 1976 | AJ Bichel | Australia | Eng | 10.0 - 0 - 20 - 7 |
2 | 721 | 2003 | 1986 | SE Bond | New Zealand | Aus | 10.0 - 2 - 23 - 6 |
3 | 569 | 2003 | 1969 | A Nehra | India | Eng | 10.0 - 2 - 23 - 6 |
4 | 490 | 2003 | 1965 | CO Obuya | Kenya | Slk | 10.0 - 0 - 24 - 5 |
5 | 459 | 2003 | 1973 | WPUJC Vaas | Sri Lanka | Win | 10.0 - 3 - 22 - 4 |
6 | 445 | 2003 | 1990 | AY Karim | Kenya | Aus | 8.2 - 6 - 7 - 3 |
7 | 422 | 2003 | 1976 | AR Caddick | England | Aus | 9.0 - 2 - 35 - 4 |
8 | 420 | 2003 | 1962 | JM Anderson | England | Pak | 10.0 - 2 - 29 - 4 |
9 | 378 | 2003 | 1985 | J Srinath | India | Slk | 9.0 - 1 - 35 - 4 |
10 | 368 | 2003 | 1970 | GD McGrath | Australia | Nam | 7.0 - 4 - 15 - 7 |
Ah! Andy Bichel. What does one say? England scored 204 for 8 and Bichel captured 7 for 20 in this innings. That too after England started well with 66 for no loss in less than 10 overs. The other bowlers: Glenn McGrath, Brett Lee and Brad Hogg. Arguably the greatest bowling performance in ODI/World Cup history. And later, with the bat: That is another story, to be told later.
Shane Bond's spell of 6 for 23 is in second position. Bond dismissed the first four Australian wickets and then the two allrounders. He did what he had to do. Restricted Australia to 208 almost single-handedly. Then his batsmen went missing and New Zealand was dismissed for 112. A magnificent performance by a truly great fast bowler.
Ashish Nehra had identical figures of 6 for 23 in the match against England. Almost a similar spell like Bond's, but this time for a winning team. Collin Obuya's spell of 5 for 24 was responsible for the upset of the tournament: Kenya defeating Sri Lanka quite comfortably. He dismissed four top wickets and Chaminda Vaas. Vaas' spell of 4 for 22 is in fifth position. He dismissed Chris Gayle, Wavell Hinds, Brian Lara and Ridley Jacobs. This is the sort of performance needed when one is defending a low total, as Sri Lanka did that day at Newlands.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 919 | 2003 | 1976 | AJ Bichel | Australia | Eng | 34* | 36 | 10.0-0-20-7 |
2 | 584 | 2003 | 1973 | WPUJC Vaas | Sri Lanka | Win | 28* | 25 | 10.0-3-22-4 |
3 | 514 | 2003 | 1969 | A Flintoff | England | Ind | 64 | 73 | 10.0-2-15-2 |
4 | 462 | 2003 | 1978 | JF Kloppenburg | Netherlands | Nam | 121 | 142 | 10.0-0-42-4 |
5 | 450 | 2003 | 1949 | AR Adams | New Zealand | Win | 35* | 24 | 9.4-1-44-4 |
6 | 427 | 2003 | 1977 | JM Davison | Canada | Nzl | 75 | 62 | 10.0-0-61-3 |
7 | 388 | 2003 | 1986 | AJ Bichel | Australia | Nzl | 64 | 83 | 5.0-0-15-1 |
8 | 382 | 2003 | 1979 | PA de Silva | Sri Lanka | Saf | 73 | 78 | 8.0-0-36-2 |
9 | 378 | 2003 | 1974 | MO Odumbe | Kenya | Bng | 52* | 46 | 10.0-0-38-4 |
10 | 326 | 2003 | 1984 | CL Cairns | New Zealand | Zim | 54 | 73 | 4.0-0-16-2 |
Now we come back to Bichel. Shades of Gary Gilmour's performance 28 years back. Bichel captured 7 for 20 in this innings. England was restricted to 204. Easy chase, it seemed. But this was South Africa, not India. Andy Caddick went to town and Australia was struggling at 134 for 8. Like Gilmour, Bichel had to step up. Along with Michael Bevan, he added over 70 runs. Bichel's effort leads the table by a huge 320 points.
Vaas, before bowling the match-winning spell of 4 for 22, had scored an excellent cameo of 28 in 25 balls, which had lifted Sri Lanka to 228. This effort takes him to the second position. Then comes Andrew Flintoff's lovely spell of 2 for 15 and a face-saving 64, all in vain since England lost comfortably to India.
The opponents might be Namibia. But when one plays for Netherlands, scores 121 and then 4 for 42, the player's performance needs to be recognized. That excellent dual effort takes Feiko Kloppenburg to fourth position. This is followed by Andre Adam's match-winning spell of 4 for 44 and a timely cameo of 35 in 24 balls.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 797 | 2003 | 1993 | Australia | 359 for 2 in 50.0 | Ind | 234 for 10 in 39.2 |
2 | 743 | 2003 | 1985 | India | 292 for 6 in 50.0 | Slk | 109 for 10 in 23.0 |
3 | 729 | 2003 | 1951 | Australia | 128 for 1 in 22.2 | Ind | 125 for 10 in 41.4 |
4 | 721 | 2003 | 1958 | Sri Lanka | 37 for 1 in 4.4 | Can | 36 for 10 in 18.4 |
5 | 717 | 2003 | 1987 | Kenya | 135 for 3 in 26.0 | Zim | 133 for 10 in 44.1 |
6 | 701 | 2003 | 1986 | Australia | 208 for 9 in 50.0 | Nzl | 112 for 10 in 30.1 |
7 | 699 | 2003 | 1955 | New Zealand | 229 for 1 in 36.5 | Saf | 306 for 6 in 50.0 |
8 | 693 | 2003 | 1970 | Australia | 301 for 6 in 50.0 | Nam | 45 for 10 in 14.0 |
9 | 691 | 2003 | 1962 | England | 246 for 8 in 50.0 | Pak | 134 for 10 in 31.0 |
10 | 690 | 2003 | 1961 | South Africa | 109 for 0 in 12.0 | Bng | 108 for 10 in 35.1 |
Australia's huge win over India is deservedly in top position in the team table. There was one point at which this match could have gone out of Australia's hands. When India was at 125 for 3 and there was rain, the D/L was around 145 for 3 and India could have gone on to get a wholly undeserved win. But rain stayed away and Australia won in a canter.
The next match is India's massive 183 run win over Sri Lanka. This was a dominating win by Indian batsmen, led by Sachin Tendulkar and the Indian pace bowlers. The first four Sri Lankan batsmen were dismissed before they opened their account.
Australia had a win over India during the early stages of the World Cup somewhat similar to their final win four years hence. Jason Gillespie and Brett Lee dismissed India for 125 and Australia knocked these runs off in 22 overs. Similarly Sri Lanka's win was an absolute mismatch. It took the Sri Lankan bowlers 18 overs to dismiss Canada 36. No one reached double figures. Then Sri Lanka crossed this total in 28 deliveries, I repeat, deliveries.
What all happened in South Africa during 2003.
- Canada got dismissed for 36. At the other end, West Indies scored 206 in 20.3 overs.
- Kenya defeated Sri Lanka and qualified for the semi-final.
- No one, who mattered, in South Africa knew the Duckworth-Lewis rules and Mark Boucher, after hitting a six carefully blocked the last ball and out went South Africa.
- Kenya somehow managed to reach the semi-final while South Africa, Pakistan, England, West Indies and New Zealand did not.
However it was Australia all the way. They won 11 matches on the trot in the World Cup. Their average run win margin was 111. Their average wicket margin was 5.75. They had one blip. They were 135 for 8, while chasing 205 against England. Bevan and Bichel added over 70 runs. In the final their win was nearly as comprehensive as their win four years back. Two opponents from the sub-continent vanquished without a trace.
The match of the tournament has to be the tie between South Africa and Sri Lanka, for the many reasons on and off the field and the lesson the match imparted to many captains and managers.
The innings of the World Cup was Ponting's magnificent 140 in 121 balls. The Indian bowling went for over 7 runs per over. On another day, I would have given this accolade to the Symonds' classic or Styris' beauty.
The player performance of the event has to be the Bichel masterpiece against England. He captured 7 for 20 to restrict England to 204 and then scored 34 at a very difficult time. There is only one other performance to match this: Gary Gilmour during the 1975 semi-final.
The bowling spell of 2003 has to be Bichel's. But two other fast bowling efforts come quite close: Bond's 6 for 23 in a losing cause against Australia and Nehra's identical match-winning spell against England.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems