O'Brien's stunner and the closest World Cup final
A look at the best batting, bowling, allround, and team performances of the 2011 World Cup

Mahela Jayawardene's century against India is the only one to come in a losing cause in the World Cup finals. • AFP
A brief introduction into the methodology of Performance Analysis.
The Batting Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Runs scored, Balls faced, Next highest score (if this is the highest score), % of Team score, Innings status at entry, Bowling quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target score in front, Match location, Result and Match importance. These parameters are given appropriate weights. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a mind-blowing and match-winning score of 200 in 150 balls in a WC final.
The Bowling Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Wickets captured, Quality of batsmen dismissed, Scores at which batsmen were dismissed, Bowling accuracy, Batting quality, Pitch information, Team strengths, Target being defended, Match location, Result and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to a magnificent and match-winning analysis of 10-2-15-6 in a WC final.
The Player Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Batting Rating points, Bowling Rating points and the Fielding Rating points, which is a combination of catches and stumpings. There are minimum criteria for batting and bowling stints to ensure that these are genuinely all-round performances.
The Team Performance Ratings analysis takes into account the Result, Margin of win, Resources utilized, Team strengths, Match location and Match importance. The calculations are done in such a way that Rating points of 1000 would be allotted to an overwhelming win by 150 runs or 8 wickets in a WC final.
Let us move on to the Performance Analysis tables for 2011.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Batsman | For | Vs | Runs | Balls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 523 | 2011 | 3100 | V Sehwag | India | Bng | 175 | 140 |
2 | 485 | 2011 | 3110 | AJ Strauss | England | Ind | 158 | 145 |
3 | 457 | 2011 | 3148 | DPMD Jayawardene | Sri Lanka | Ind | 103* | 88 |
4 | 443 | 2011 | 3123 | LRPL Taylor | New Zealand | Pak | 131* | 124 |
5 | 422 | 2011 | 3114 | KJ O'Brien | Ireland | Eng | 113 | 63 |
6 | 404 | 2011 | 3148 | MS Dhoni | India | Slk | 91* | 79 |
7 | 372 | 2011 | 3148 | G Gambhir | India | Slk | 97 | 122 |
8 | 358 | 2011 | 3125 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Zim | 144 | 131 |
9 | 346 | 2011 | 3137 | KC Sangakkara | Sri Lanka | Nzl | 111 | 128 |
10 | 345 | 2011 | 3104 | RN ten Doeschate | Netherlands | Eng | 119 | 110 |
Virender Sehwag's stupendous knock of 175 in the inaugural match of the World Cup leads the batsman performance table. This was not a match against Namibia in a neutral location. This was in an away match against Bangladesh. So it was a tough innings. It is difficult to ignore the size of the innings. The second placed innings is the excellent Andrew Strauss essay in the tied match. This would have been the top innings if England had won the match. The huge size of the target played its part.
Mahela Jayawardene's hundred in the final is only one, of six hundreds, in World Cup finals to have finished on the losing side. It was a beautifully paced innings and along with Thisara Perera, Jayawardene helped Sri Lanka post a very good total. Maybe if Jayawardene had been the captain, Sri Lanka would have won the match. Ross Taylor's blitz against Pakistan is placed next. This innings of New Zealand was somewhat similar to the recent South African innings against West Indies. The last five overs yielded exactly 100 runs, out of which Taylor scored 60 runs.
Finally we come to Kevin O'Brien's breath-taking 113 for Ireland against England. The target: 328. The score, 111 for 5 in 25 overs. No hope at all. Throw one's bat around and hope to score a few. What does O'Brien do? He scores 113 in 63 balls, adds 162 in 15 overs with Alex Cusack and paves the way for the unlikeliest of wins. The reason why this is not placed higher is the undeniable fact that the Bangalore pitch was an out-and-out batsman's paradise.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Bowler | For | Vs | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 565 | 2011 | 3147 | Wahab Riaz | Pakistan | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 46 - 5 |
2 | 479 | 2011 | 3110 | TT Bresnan | England | Ind | 10.0 - 1 - 48 - 5 |
3 | 437 | 2011 | 3120 | SCJ Broad | England | Saf | 6.4 - 0 - 15 - 4 |
4 | 417 | 2011 | 3141 | R Rampaul | West Indies | Ind | 10.0 - 0 - 51 - 5 |
5 | 390 | 2011 | 3137 | M Muralitharan | Sri Lanka | Nzl | 8.0 - 0 - 25 - 4 |
6 | 389 | 2011 | 3144 | NL McCullum | New Zealand | Saf | 10.0 - 1 - 24 - 3 |
7 | 379 | 2011 | 3109 | Shahid Afridi | Pakistan | Slk | 10.0 - 0 - 34 - 4 |
8 | 347 | 2011 | 3139 | B Lee | Australia | Pak | 8.0 - 1 - 28 - 4 |
9 | 343 | 2011 | 3138 | RJ Peterson | South Africa | Bng | 7.0 - 3 - 12 - 4 |
10 | 339 | 2011 | 3103 | MG Johnson | Australia | Zim | 9.2 - 2 - 19 - 4 |
Wahab Riaz's 5 for 46 included the key wickets of Sehwag, Virat Kohli, Yuvraj Singh and MS Dhoni. Despite the awful Pakistani fielding, Riaz helped Pakistan restrict India to a potentially chase-able total. That they messed up the chase is another story. But Wahab Riaz could not have done more. Then comes Tim Bresnan's excellent spell against India. But for this spell India would have gone past 350 and won the match. As it turned out, it was a tie.
Ravi Rampaul's spell was like Wahab Riaz's. He captured 5 for 51 (including Gautam Gambhir, Sachin Tendulkar and Kohli) and restricted India to 268. But the West Indian batsmen failed. They slid from 154 for 2 to 188 all out. The fifth placed bowling effort was the swansong quality performance of Muttiah Muralitharan. He bowled beautifully, as he only can, and took four top New Zealand wickets for 25, taking Sri Lanka to a big win, and the quarter-final.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Player | For | Vs | Runs | Balls | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 591 | 2011 | 3125 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Zim | 144 | 131 | 3.0-1- 4-4 |
2 | 473 | 2011 | 3104 | RN ten Doeschate | Netherlands | Eng | 119 | 110 | 10.0-0-47-2 |
3 | 471 | 2011 | 3142 | Mohammad Hafeez | Pakistan | Win | 61* | 64 | 10.0-3-16-2 |
4 | 407 | 2011 | 3121 | Yuvraj Singh | India | Ire | 50* | 75 | 10.0-0-31-5 |
5 | 404 | 2011 | 3136 | PR Stirling | Ireland | Net | 101 | 72 | 10.0-0-51-2 |
6 | 393 | 2011 | 3145 | TM Dilshan | Sri Lanka | Eng | 108* | 115 | 6.0-1-25-1 |
7 | 379 | 2011 | 3135 | AD Russell | West Indies | Eng | 49 | 46 | 8.0-0-49-4 |
8 | 378 | 2011 | 3123 | Umar Gul | Pakistan | Nzl | 34* | 25 | 10.0-1-32-3 |
9 | 358 | 2011 | 3114 | JF Mooney | Ireland | Eng | 33* | 30 | 9.0-0-63-4 |
10 | 355 | 2011 | 3143 | Yuvraj Singh | India | Aus | 57* | 65 | 10.0-0-44-2 |
Tillakaratne Dilshan opened the batting against Zimbabwe and his belligerent 144 took Sri Lanka to 327. Then he must have felt that he had not done enough. He took the ball and captured 4 for 4 in 18 balls. This is the player performance of the World Cup. Ryan ten Doeschate almost single-handedly carried Netherlands to a famous win against England. His quick 119 took them to a huge total of 292. Then ten Doeschate bowled ten overs capturing the wickets of Jonathan Trott and Ian Bell. England could only win in the 49th over.
Mohammad Hafeez opened the bowling against West Indies and was virtually unplayable. He bowled 10 overs and conceded only 16 runs while capturing 2 wickets. Then he scored 61 in their ten-wicket win. Yuvraj Singh, who had an outstanding tournament, captured 5 for 31 with his crafty left arm spin and then when things looked dicey for India, scored 50 to cement a tough win against Ireland. Paul Stirling's 101 and 2 for 51 rounds off the top five positions.
SNo | Rating Pts | Year | ODI# | Team | Own score | Vs | Other score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 774 | 2011 | 3101 | New Zealand | 72 for 0 in 8.0 | Ken | 69 for 10 in 23.5 |
2 | 770 | 2011 | 3118 | West Indies | 59 for 1 in 12.2 | Bng | 58 for 10 in 18.5 |
3 | 765 | 2011 | 3142 | Pakistan | 113 for 0 in 20.5 | Win | 112 for 10 in 43.3 |
4 | 756 | 2011 | 3138 | South Africa | 284 for 8 in 50.0 | Bng | 78 for 10 in 28.0 |
5 | 705 | 2011 | 3115 | South Africa | 351 for 5 in 50.0 | Net | 120 for 10 in 34.5 |
6 | 704 | 2011 | 3112 | West Indies | 330 for 8 in 50.0 | Net | 115 for 10 in 31.3 |
7 | 703 | 2011 | 3148 | India | 277 for 4 in 48.2 | Slk | 274 for 6 in 50.0 |
8 | 680 | 2011 | 3140 | Zimbabwe | 308 for 6 in 50.0 | Ken | 147 for 10 in 36.0 |
9 | 679 | 2011 | 3117 | New Zealand | 166 for 0 in 33.3 | Zim | 162 for 10 in 46.2 |
10 | 674 | 2011 | 3111 | Zimbabwe | 298 for 9 in 50.0 | Can | 123 for 10 in 42.1 |
New Zealand had 42 overs and 10 wickets to spare when they defeated Kenya. This was the most overwhelming performance of the World Cup. West Indies' win was nearly as emphatic. They needed four overs and one more wicket.
Pakistan had an easy win over West Indies. Similarly South Africa's win over Bangladesh and Netherlands are in the top five. India's win over Sri Lanka in the final was very close and that pushed the match into seventh place. The fact that they won only in the 49th over was significant. It is safe to say that this match was the closest of all the 10 World Cup finals.
This was a World Cup of two teams: for contrasting reasons. India, because, they won the cup after a long gap of 28 years. The expectations of many millions was an albatross hanging around their neck. They had to deliver. Else the repercussions would have been enormous. From the quarter-final onwards, they played three tough matches, and won all. It is a fact that India could have lost any of these three.
If Australia had played the middle overs more forcefully and had some luck while bowling the middle overs, they could have won. If Pakistan had even caught half the catches they dropped, they could have won. If Sri Lanka had made proper bowling changes and kept for a slip for Lasith Malinga when he came back, they could have won. But India weathered all storms, and their very effective and powerful middle-order batting carried them through to a well-deserved win.
England produced some of the most amazing matches of the tournament. They moved from the sublime to the ridiculous, at the drop of the trilby. They almost lost to Netherlands. Then managed to snatch a tie from India, matching India's 338. After scoring 327, they lost the match against Ireland. And then they defended a low total of 171 against the mighty South Africans. Finally, as if to compensate for this magnificent performance, they lost to Bangladesh, by conceding a ninth-wicket partnership of 58. Finally, to crown all these, they lost by 10-wickets to Sri Lanka in the quarter-final, after posting a respectable 229. What a World cup for England!
The match of the tournament had many candidates. Finally I have selected Ireland's win over England. There have been upsets galore through the 40 years of World Cups. But there has never been a chase of this magnitude by an associate country. That too, after being 111 for 5, still in arrears by over 200 runs. O'Brien played the innings of the lifetime of many Irishmen.
The bowling spell of the tournament was Wahab Riaz's 5 for 46 in the semi-final against India. It should have been a match-winning one, but for the butter fingers of the Pakistani fielders. Very close contender to this effort was Stuart Broad's 4 for 15, a spell which converted a certain loss for England to a totally amazing win.
The innings of the World Cup 2011, for me, is a toss-up between Dhoni's match-winning 91 in 79 balls and Kevin O'Brien's 113 in 63. I might have gone with O'Brien's innings but for the fact that Dhoni delivered in the final, both as a captain and batsman. Another 51-49 decision.
Anantha Narayanan has written for ESPNcricinfo and CastrolCricket and worked with a number of companies on their cricket performance ratings-related systems