Let there be life after featherbed bore
In the end, the rain was a mercy. In theory a miracle was still possible, with England's lead only slender, but no-one truly believed it was possible, not even Muttiah Muralitharan
Andrew Miller in Colombo
13-Dec-2007
![]() |
![]()
|
"That was a very, very comfortable draw," said England's captain,
Michael Vaughan. "I've been in the England side for a long time, and
I've not been involved in that many comfortable draws. We usually have
a panic somewhere, but not this time, which is a tremendous effort
from the team. Especially after going into day four when it looked
like we'd be under a lot of pressure. "
In the corresponding fixture four years ago, in not dissimilar
conditions, England tumbled to defeat by an innings and 215 runs -
their third heaviest in history. But there was never any danger of a
similar capitulation this time around, as each of England's top three
got themselves in on a wicket that was offering nothing to the
opposition bowlers. "That wicket for a fourth- or fifth-day surface
was very very flat," said Vaughan. It's already a tedious topic, but
unfortunately, it is the only significant talking point of the Test
Overnight, the Sri Lankan newspapers found an alternative topic of
conversation - the delayed declaration that allowed England to eat
precious overs out of the game. But as far as Sri Lanka's captain,
Mahela Jayawardene, was concerned, the only mistake he made in his
tactics was not being out in the middle himself to chivvy the scoring
along. His unexpected dismissal for 195 sounded the death knell for
his team's ambitions, because none of the remaining batsmen would be
as adept at forcing the pace.
"If I'd been around with Prasanna [Jayawardene], we probably should
have pushed for a few more runs," said Jayawardene. "But I knew the
wicket was slow so I was trying to play a mind game with them - the
only way to put pressure on them was to make a bigger total, so that
even if they had batted for two sessions, they wouldn't be able to get
to our lead. I wanted to see if we could pick up four or five wickets
before they got to our total."
It wasn't to be for Sri Lanka, although when Ian Bell fell to a loose
lofted drive for 54, England were effectively 7 for 3, and a smidgeon
of an opportunity presented itself. But Jayawardene was already
resigned to the draw, and summed up the state of the game with a
reference to one of his own players. "They couldn't even get Dilhara
[Fernando] out on that wicket," he said, after Fernando, the No. 10,
had more than doubled his previous Test-best of 16. "As soon as they
got to our total, I knew they'd be relaxed and just bat through."
For Vaughan, it was satisfying still to be in with a chance of
squaring the series, although he accepted that England have a bit of
an issue among their batsmen, none of whom has yet reached three
figures in four attempts. "I'd like to see us getting more hundreds
and big hundreds," said Vaughan. "A couple, including myself, got set
but we were a little unfortunate with our dismissals. Even so, the
bowlers are going to put you under a lot of pressure throughout an
innings, and you just have to make sure you're mentally tough enough
to go on."
There were no such concerns about England's seam attack, however, all
of whom came through a tough contest with admirable resolve. "On a
wicket like that I can't ask more from my set of bowlers, to give as
much as they did on that kind of surface," said Vaughan, "To keep
running in on that kind of deck for 35 to 40 overs took a lot of
desire and effort, and they can take a lot of credit for the way that
they kept going. As Sri Lanka showed today, to force a result is very
difficult."
To bounce two of their batsmen out on a very slow pitch is very promising, and if we can somehow get to Galle and find a bit of bounce, I'm sure their batsmen won't look forward to facing him - Michael Vaughan on Steve Harmison | ||
Vaughan had particular praise for Steve Harmison and Stuart Broad, his
two hit-the-deck specialists, who pounded in with great resolve
throughout. "Harmy bowled very very well to get the bounce he did on
that kind of wicket," said Vaughan. "To bounce two of their batsmen
out on a very slow pitch is very promising, and if we can somehow get
to Galle and find a bit of bounce, I'm sure their batsmen won't look
forward to facing him. I thought he troubled all their players so it's
a real good sign."
As for Broad, his 36-over stint included the solitary scalp of
Chaminda Vaas, but at the age of 21, Vaughan predicted he would have a
great international future. "He was impressive, and he's definitely
got something," said Vaughan. "He'll be a fixture around the England
team for many years if he can continue just to do what he does now,
and improve as he gets more experience. He can be a real good player
for England."
In the short term, he might find himself having to wait for his next
opportunity, however. The signs are that England's senior seamer,
Matthew Hoggard, is regaining fitness after taking a full part in
training. Vaughan said that he would continue to be monitored when the
team moves down to Galle, but added, tellingly: "Having Hoggard fit
would be a big bonus."
The Galle Test, of course, will be about more than just the cricket.
This will be the first fixture played on the ground since the tsunami
of December 2004, and Vaughan was expecting an historic occasion. As
far as the wicket goes, however, it is largely an unknown quantity. A
two-day practice match took place on the ground this week and the
reports were that the pitch was once again slow, but Vaughan felt that
it could be more conducive for a result.
"After the pitch they produced here, whatever seamers we picked
wouldn't have made any difference," said Vaughan. "The crucial thing
at Galle is to assess the wicket properly. We need to win and go home
with a series draw, because that would be a great effort for the
team."
Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo