England August 6, 2011

Premature triumphalism? No chance

England wouldn't dream of doing that

Wednesday, 3rd August Last night I was visited by the Spirit of Cricket. He wasn’t in a very good mood. He complained vigorously that the Ian Bell thing had nothing to do with him, that as far as he was concerned, the fellow was dozier than a sloth on sleeping tablets and that if he’d been Dhoni, he’d have waited till Bell got back to the wicket and then rescinded his rescinded appeal, just to teach the blighter a lesson.

After he had calmed down, I told him I was about to post my 200th Long Handle entry and asked what he thought I should write. He thought for a moment, then he said, “Write what you like, it’s only Page 2. But whatever you do, don’t insult Ganguly.”

Thursday, 4th August A realistic view of our place in the great scheme of things is a hallmark of the English nation from Alfred the Great, a failed baker, to David Cameron, who has spent much of his first year as prime minister apologising and publicly changing his mind. We are a moderately sized, oddly shaped, frequently damp island nation whose primary role these days is to bear the brunt of the Atlantic weather for the sake of mainland Europe. We’ve lost an empire but we can still serve as an umbrella.

So just because we happen to find ourselves beating India 2-0, there is zero danger of any flabby complacency or premature triumphalism creeping in. No one would be foolish enough to start loosening champagne corks just because they were leading a big final at half-time. Isn’t that right, Freddie?

“England are the best team in the world already, not just in ranking.”

Actually, not even in ranking, Freddie. Let’s be clear. The ICC rankings table is not drawn up by tabloid editors. As of tea-time today, I regret to inform you that we are not No. 1. To start calling ourselves No. 1 before we are in fact No. 1 would be the highest-profile English case of premature fowl-tallying since King Harold turned to his men on Senlac Hill and said, “Look, I told you, we’ve got real strength in depth behind this shield wall and the Normans were badly underprepared. I’d be astonished if we didn’t win from this position.”

Friday, 5th August Two-nil down and the Indians are fighting back. Not on the pitch, but where it really matters: in the media. Today it was Paddy Upton’s turn to come to the PR party, spinning far more effectively than anything Harbhajan has managed in 70 overs. He isn’t saying that playing an awful lot of cricket is the reason why India are losing the series, but they are losing the series and they have played an awful lot of cricket.

“By giving the players so much cricket there is a potential of diluting the quality of the product. We are possibly seeing the evidence of it now.”

Possibly. But then cricket to the modern international bat-wielding superstar is a bit like dessert. Just because someone keeps putting it in front of you, doesn’t mean you can’t push it away now and again. For example, any of the World Cup heroes could have chosen seven weeks of comfy chairs and light promotional duties after their triumph, but instead they chose to muck about in the IPL. Jolly entertaining for the rest of us, but not the ideal, burnout wise. No, mental fatigue is not quite going to cut it as an explanation; we’ll need something more convincing. Ganguly thinks its lack of preparation. But then what does he know?

Andrew Hughes is a writer currently based in England

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • testli5504537 on August 18, 2011, 8:22 GMT

    Congratulations Andrew.

    Nice article. :-)

  • testli5504537 on August 10, 2011, 13:44 GMT

    Congratulations on the double hundred Andrew. Always enjoy reading your articles.

    And a message for Going South who commented above. The Fat Lady is singing loud and clear today! (and I don't mean me)

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 16:57 GMT

    Andrew, you may want to check out my post on you (in the personal greetings section) on CF. Congrats, mate!

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 16:22 GMT

    Have always enjoyed whatever I have red of Andrew.

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 14:12 GMT

    Hi Andrew, This is Raja from CF. What a fantastic, rollicking piece this is. Had me ROFL from the first sentence. This is your 200th article here? Wow! Congrats! Keep going - thoroughly enjoy your writing and sense of humour. :-)

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 13:56 GMT

    Hearty Congratulations for the double century on long handle. Keep up the good work. As always another wonderful thought provoking post. If not page2, where can we get to insult Ganguly and get to read funny fanatic fan replies? ;) No wonder spirit of cricket is stoned. As per #1 ranking, it aint over until the fat lady sings.

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 12:23 GMT

    You've written 200 of these! God bless you my man.

  • testli5504537 on August 8, 2011, 8:49 GMT

    200? for Real?? think I commented on your very first long handle entry whilst sleep walking. see what it lead to, I should have been more responsible... forgive me O spirit of Cricket!

  • testli5504537 on August 7, 2011, 14:45 GMT

    Thanks all for your comments. It's been a scratchy kind of a double hundred, more KP at Lord's than KP at Adelaide, but having made it through the nervous 190s, I'm determined to play a few more strokes. Whatever that means.

    Clivejw, very wise, best to have a crate of champagne standing by, just in case.

    Raman, I haven't forgotten that excuse and I didn't buy that one either.

    Alok, I hadn't considered that. Perhaps Lakmal and friends would have looked more intimidating had they been wearing Viking helmets.

    Dan, I like the phrase armchair warrior. It has a ring to it. Although to be honest, I'm more of an armchair reservist. And as for contributions to the game, I think I've done my bit. A couple of years ago I purchased a copy of Alastair Cook's autobiography and I even read some of it.

  • testli5504537 on August 7, 2011, 7:43 GMT

    Could it be the fitness or lack there of a reason for Indian's dismal performance? If Dravid could play IPL, WI tour and now Eng tour and do well, how could it be lot of cricket and not fit to play a five day cricket the real cause?

  • No featured comments at the moment.