ICC news August 28, 2012

ICC aiming to assess bowling actions during games

ESPNcricinfo staff
18

The ICC is working on developing technology that will allow the legality of bowlers' actions to be assessed during matches and training sessions. According to an ICC release, it has entered the second phase of an agreement with a consortium of Australian cricket, sports science and sports engineering institutions in order to produce the technology.

The process will include devices known as 'inertial sensors', which employ technology similar to that used in iPads, mobile phones and car crash impact detection systems. The technology is being developed with a view to keep it cost effective, and making the device wearable on the bowler's arm during matches and training, without it hindering performance.

Dave Richardson, the ICC's chief executive, said the technology would be a big step forward for the game. "The ICC is keen to see this technology implemented in elite cricket and believe it will be a significant stride forward in detecting illegal bowling actions in match conditions. We would also like to see the technology used in training environments as a tool to help bowlers correct their flawed bowling action.

"We are encouraged by the progress made so far by the Australian research team and also acknowledge the MCC, who have made a significant financial contribution to the project."

For now, bowlers whose actions are considered suspect are required to attend ICC-approved biomechanics laboratory tests to assess the amount of elbow extension (flex) in their bowling action. In November 2004, the ICC set a uniform 15-degree limit on elbow extension for actions to be considered legal.

The project is being managed on behalf of the ICC by Praxis Sport Science, an Australia-based sports science consultancy company headed by Dr Marc Portus, who was involved with the original research behind the 15-degree tolerance threshold.

This phase of the three-step project is concerned with the technology's measurement methods and precision against current laboratory protocols, and will conclude in late 2013. In 2014, phase three will begin and focus on making the technology more comfortable for players.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Knightriders_suck on August 29, 2012, 5:51 GMT

    Love the idea. Ajmal, Bhajji and every doosra bowler should be worried.

  • factoryard on August 28, 2012, 22:20 GMT

    This is tricky. First of all the ICC must give fairness to all cricketers not just a few. The fairest way is when a batsman is out let him be out or when he is not out let him be not out. The only way this can happen is get the DRS active for all.What about the very obvious legal bowlers who don't get their wickets cuz there is no DRS.So the point is get the DRS in first then get rid of the chuckers. What is the point of getting rid of the chuckers & still the legal guys don't get their wickets or for that matter some get wickets they don't deserve. Some people are against the DRS but even the weak DRS as they call it is better than some umpires.

  • Smithie on August 28, 2012, 17:35 GMT

    A good initiative from the ICC and a concern for some Doosra bowlers. Money well spent by the MCC.

  • bigdhonifan on August 28, 2012, 15:48 GMT

    Waste of time, waste of money. First remove D/L method and start using VJD. then remove David Kendix, who is creating this stupid ICC rankings.

  • on August 28, 2012, 13:46 GMT

    hi

  • D-Train on August 28, 2012, 13:01 GMT

    The problem with labratory testing is that all the blokes who are chucking the ball will make every effort to bowl with a perfectly straight arm during the testing. Which makes it a flawed process. This is a very good idea.

    For all of you saying there's bigger issues in cricket - I think that keeping the legitimacy and fairness in the game is a pretty important issue to be assessing.

  • tinkertinker on August 28, 2012, 12:50 GMT

    Why are so many people against this?

    Finally people will be tested actually during a match and not simply in a meaningless out of competition lab test where they don't use the same action as in game.

    Only people who should be worried are chuckers or people who know their team has chuckers who have been getting away with it.

  • yoohoo on August 28, 2012, 11:34 GMT

    @Dr_Van_Nostrand - You mean all the impractical ideas are backed by Aus, Eng, and NZ.

  • anuradha_d on August 28, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    did they get approval necessayr from various members ?...why does ICC make a fool of themselves by announcing first and then realizing that they are too toothless to implement without approval of member sides

  • on August 28, 2012, 11:10 GMT

    BCCI should oppose this...like DRS!!!

  • Knightriders_suck on August 29, 2012, 5:51 GMT

    Love the idea. Ajmal, Bhajji and every doosra bowler should be worried.

  • factoryard on August 28, 2012, 22:20 GMT

    This is tricky. First of all the ICC must give fairness to all cricketers not just a few. The fairest way is when a batsman is out let him be out or when he is not out let him be not out. The only way this can happen is get the DRS active for all.What about the very obvious legal bowlers who don't get their wickets cuz there is no DRS.So the point is get the DRS in first then get rid of the chuckers. What is the point of getting rid of the chuckers & still the legal guys don't get their wickets or for that matter some get wickets they don't deserve. Some people are against the DRS but even the weak DRS as they call it is better than some umpires.

  • Smithie on August 28, 2012, 17:35 GMT

    A good initiative from the ICC and a concern for some Doosra bowlers. Money well spent by the MCC.

  • bigdhonifan on August 28, 2012, 15:48 GMT

    Waste of time, waste of money. First remove D/L method and start using VJD. then remove David Kendix, who is creating this stupid ICC rankings.

  • on August 28, 2012, 13:46 GMT

    hi

  • D-Train on August 28, 2012, 13:01 GMT

    The problem with labratory testing is that all the blokes who are chucking the ball will make every effort to bowl with a perfectly straight arm during the testing. Which makes it a flawed process. This is a very good idea.

    For all of you saying there's bigger issues in cricket - I think that keeping the legitimacy and fairness in the game is a pretty important issue to be assessing.

  • tinkertinker on August 28, 2012, 12:50 GMT

    Why are so many people against this?

    Finally people will be tested actually during a match and not simply in a meaningless out of competition lab test where they don't use the same action as in game.

    Only people who should be worried are chuckers or people who know their team has chuckers who have been getting away with it.

  • yoohoo on August 28, 2012, 11:34 GMT

    @Dr_Van_Nostrand - You mean all the impractical ideas are backed by Aus, Eng, and NZ.

  • anuradha_d on August 28, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    did they get approval necessayr from various members ?...why does ICC make a fool of themselves by announcing first and then realizing that they are too toothless to implement without approval of member sides

  • on August 28, 2012, 11:10 GMT

    BCCI should oppose this...like DRS!!!

  • bobmartin on August 28, 2012, 10:43 GMT

    My thoughts are this...are all bowlers going to wear these devices... or only the suspect ones... If the former... it's going to be an expensive way of weeding out a few dodgy actions... if it's the latter, then surely, they are already identified and they can be tested using the existing methods and save a lot of unnecessary expense. On the other hand, the ICC could revert back to the Laws of Cricket which at Law 24.3 still requires no straightening of the arm once it has passed shoulder height in the delivery swing. This would cut out all this nonsense about degrees of straightening... which experience has shown does not work in practice but requires expensive and extensive tests to prove..

  • Impactzone on August 28, 2012, 10:40 GMT

    Such old tech. Someone aim them at Zenolink's capabilities where 3D video can be used.

  • on August 28, 2012, 10:38 GMT

    Is this really the biggest problem in cricket right now?! Really ICC, you've missed the bus and will potentially create more problems before solving the bigger issues of the game, which in turn would never get solved... expensive and un-needed, why don't y'all sought out the DRS-Umpire situation or work on reducing player burn-out... how to market Test cricket, Day-Night Test Cricket... there's sooo many bigger issues out there...

  • Meety on August 28, 2012, 10:29 GMT

    @RK204 - nice one. The reality is there is a beleif in those countries (rightly or wrongly) that deliveries like the Doosra can't be bowled without "chucking". This is a great iniative. @Haleos - true, but then the umpires get hung out to dry too! Why put umpires in that position? Anyways, I would imagine Umpires would be involved in first reporting a "suspect" action, then it would be up to a review committee as to whether the player is made to wear the monitor. I wish this was in place ages ago, as I would want to remove any lingering doubt as to whether Doosra's are bowled properly during testing.

  • Haleos on August 28, 2012, 8:59 GMT

    Use your resources for some constructive use ICC. Umpires are there to report suspect action. Why waste money in developing a device?

  • on August 28, 2012, 7:59 GMT

    good idea but a tad expensive. I think there's bigger issues for cricket atm.

  • RK204 on August 28, 2012, 7:51 GMT

    @ Dr_Van_Nostrand u r right...cz this problem mostly seems 2 happen with the spinners ,,as we all know the 3 countries u have mentioned don't have that much of spinners ..so they have no issue 4 not 2 support this...........ha ha ha

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on August 28, 2012, 6:34 GMT

    Sounds great, but like all good ideas at the ICC, it will only have the backing of Australia, England and NZ.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Dr_Van_Nostrand on August 28, 2012, 6:34 GMT

    Sounds great, but like all good ideas at the ICC, it will only have the backing of Australia, England and NZ.

  • RK204 on August 28, 2012, 7:51 GMT

    @ Dr_Van_Nostrand u r right...cz this problem mostly seems 2 happen with the spinners ,,as we all know the 3 countries u have mentioned don't have that much of spinners ..so they have no issue 4 not 2 support this...........ha ha ha

  • on August 28, 2012, 7:59 GMT

    good idea but a tad expensive. I think there's bigger issues for cricket atm.

  • Haleos on August 28, 2012, 8:59 GMT

    Use your resources for some constructive use ICC. Umpires are there to report suspect action. Why waste money in developing a device?

  • Meety on August 28, 2012, 10:29 GMT

    @RK204 - nice one. The reality is there is a beleif in those countries (rightly or wrongly) that deliveries like the Doosra can't be bowled without "chucking". This is a great iniative. @Haleos - true, but then the umpires get hung out to dry too! Why put umpires in that position? Anyways, I would imagine Umpires would be involved in first reporting a "suspect" action, then it would be up to a review committee as to whether the player is made to wear the monitor. I wish this was in place ages ago, as I would want to remove any lingering doubt as to whether Doosra's are bowled properly during testing.

  • on August 28, 2012, 10:38 GMT

    Is this really the biggest problem in cricket right now?! Really ICC, you've missed the bus and will potentially create more problems before solving the bigger issues of the game, which in turn would never get solved... expensive and un-needed, why don't y'all sought out the DRS-Umpire situation or work on reducing player burn-out... how to market Test cricket, Day-Night Test Cricket... there's sooo many bigger issues out there...

  • Impactzone on August 28, 2012, 10:40 GMT

    Such old tech. Someone aim them at Zenolink's capabilities where 3D video can be used.

  • bobmartin on August 28, 2012, 10:43 GMT

    My thoughts are this...are all bowlers going to wear these devices... or only the suspect ones... If the former... it's going to be an expensive way of weeding out a few dodgy actions... if it's the latter, then surely, they are already identified and they can be tested using the existing methods and save a lot of unnecessary expense. On the other hand, the ICC could revert back to the Laws of Cricket which at Law 24.3 still requires no straightening of the arm once it has passed shoulder height in the delivery swing. This would cut out all this nonsense about degrees of straightening... which experience has shown does not work in practice but requires expensive and extensive tests to prove..

  • on August 28, 2012, 11:10 GMT

    BCCI should oppose this...like DRS!!!

  • anuradha_d on August 28, 2012, 11:23 GMT

    did they get approval necessayr from various members ?...why does ICC make a fool of themselves by announcing first and then realizing that they are too toothless to implement without approval of member sides