| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
India's current openers have performed exceptionally at the top of the order, producing numbers that suggest India may have found a long-term combination
October 24, 2008
![]()
| |||
In a land blessed with outstanding middle-order batsmen, quality openers have been unusually hard to find, but in Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir, India might have finally found a long-term solution. Since they came together for the series in Sri Lanka earlier this year, the two have been in sparkling form and more often than not have given the team an excellent platform to build on.
In ten innings during this period, they've been consistency personified: seven times they have added more than 50, and in their three other innings, only once were they separated before 25. Admittedly all these stands have come in matches played in the subcontinent, but the manner in which the two have gone about their jobs suggests they should be able to handle tougher assignments too.
The opening pair's performances have been among the standout features of the two Tests against Australia so far. The visitors have been outclassed in most departments, but perhaps most convincingly in the opening acts with both bat and ball. Gambhir and Sehwag have strung together partnerships of 70, 16, 70 and 182. Compare that with Australia's opening stands - 0, 21, 0, 49 - and it's clear that India have had the early advantage.
Just how well does this opening pair compare with the best that India has produced? As the table below indicates, their numbers are better than anyone else's. Admittedly, they've played less than half as many games as Sunil Gavaskar and Chetan Chauhan did, and they haven't yet been tested on bouncier pitches, but so far their stats are spectacular - they are already the second-most prolific Indian opening pair. (Click here for the entire partnership list.)
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Average | 100/ 50 stands |
| Gambhir-Sehwag | 29 | 1771 | 63.25 | 4/ 11 |
| Vinoo Mankad-Pankaj Roy | 16 | 868 | 57.86 | 3/ 1 |
| Chauhan-Gavaskar | 59 | 3010 | 53.75 | 10/ 10 |
| Chopra-Sehwag | 19 | 897 | 47.21 | 4/ 2 |
| Das-Ramesh | 19 | 836 | 44.00 | 2/ 6 |
| Gavaskar-Srikkanth | 34 | 1469 | 43.20 | 3/ 9 |
| Jaffer-Sehwag | 28 | 1031 | 36.82 | 3/ 4 |
| Gaekwad-Gavaskar | 49 | 1722 | 35.87 | 4/ 9 |
| Contractor-Pankaj Roy | 26 | 852 | 32.76 | 1/ 4 |
In fact, their numbers are amazing even if you expand the comparison to all opening pairs around the world. Among pairs who have put together at least 1500 runs, Gambhir and Sehwag's average has been bettered only by the legendary pair of Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe, who averaged nearly 88, with 25 stands of 50-plus in 38 innings. The one thing the Indian pair can learn from Hobbs and Sutcliffe is to convert starts into significant stands: out of 15 stands of over 50 in 29 innings, Gambhir and Sehwag have only converted four into century partnerships; the conversion percentage is much lower than that for England's pair.
Gordon Greenidge and Desmond Haynes have the most runs for any pair, but they scored their runs at an average of 47.31, which puts them in 18th place among the openers.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Average stand | 100/ 50 stands |
| Hobbs-Sutcliffe | 38 | 3249 | 87.81 | 15/ 10 |
| Gambhir-Sehwag | 29 | 1771 | 63.25 | 4/ 11 |
| Hobbs-Rhodes | 36 | 2146 | 61.31 | 8/ 5 |
| Lawry-Simpson | 62 | 3596 | 60.94 | 9/ 18 |
| Hutton-Washbrook | 51 | 2880 | 60.00 | 8/ 13 |
| Atherton-Gooch | 44 | 2501 | 56.84 | 7/ 12 |
| Barlow-Goddard | 34 | 1806 | 56.43 | 6/ 11 |
| Gibbs-Smith | 56 | 2983 | 56.28 | 7/ 10 |
| Franklin-Wright | 28 | 1543 | 55.10 | 5/ 5 |
| Fredericks-Greenidge | 31 | 1593 | 54.93 | 5/ 5 |
| de Villiers-Smith | 30 | 1646 | 54.86 | 4/ 6 |
| Chauhan-Gavaskar | 59 | 3010 | 53.75 | 10/ 10 |
With Gambhir and Sehwag, though, the story isn't just the number of runs they score; it's the rate they score them at. Both are attacking batsmen capable of piercing the field on both sides of the wicket and going over the top, but they are also equally adept at tapping the ball into the gaps or short of fielders and running the quick singles. The ability to do all this well was evident in their most recent partnership, when they smashed 182 runs in a mere 39.1 overs.
Overall, Gambhir and Sehwag have scored their runs at more than four-and-a-half an over, making them easily the fastest-scoring pair. (This is only among pairs whom Cricinfo has recorded as having faced at least 1500 deliveries. The balls-faced data wasn't available regularly for matches played more than 15 years ago; hence the data for some pairs isn't complete.) Wasim Jaffer isn't the most quick-scoring batsman around, but when he has opened with Sehwag the runs have come pretty quickly too, at a rate of 4.07 per over.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Balls | Average | Runs per over |
| Gambhir-Sehwag | 29 | 1771 | 2292 | 63.25 | 4.63 |
| Jaffer-Sehwag | 28 | 1031 | 1519 | 36.82 | 4.07 |
| Gibbs-Smith | 56 | 2983 | 4505 | 56.28 | 3.97 |
| Hayden-Langer | 113 | 5655 | 8917 | 51.88 | 3.80 |
| Hayden-Slater | 25 | 1045 | 1573* | 43.54 | 3.78* |
| de Villiers-Smith | 30 | 1646 | 2730 | 54.86 | 3.61 |
| Trescothick-Vaughan | 54 | 2487 | 4140 | 48.76 | 3.60 |
| Strauss-Trescothick | 52 | 2670 | 4530 | 52.35 | 3.53 |
| Atapattu-Jayasuriya | 118 | 4469 | 6865* | 40.26 | 3.53* |
| McKenzie-Smith | 17 | 1290 | 2193 | 80.62 | 3.52 |
| Chopra-Sehwag | 19 | 897 | 1614 | 47.21 | 3.33 |
| Ganga-Gayle | 49 | 1954 | 3487* | 41.57 | 3.33* |
The one difference between Sehwag's partnerships with Gambhir and Jaffer - apart from the fact that the average runs per dismissal is much lower with Jaffer - is the manner in which the pairs score their runs. When Sehwag bats with Gambhir, the emphasis is much more on rotating the strike and getting the singles, which account for 25% of the total runs scored off the bat by them - of the 1652 bat runs scored by them, 413 are singles. With Jaffer, though, that percentage drops to 19.34 (182 singles out of 941 bat runs), which indicates that the strike isn't rotated as regularly.
| Pair | Innings | Runs | Average | Run rate | Singles (% of balls) | Boundaries (% of runs) |
| Sehwag-Gambhir | 29 | 1771 | 63.25 | 4.63 | 18.01 | 60.77 |
| Sehwag-Jaffer | 28 | 1031 | 36.82 | 4.07 | 11.98 | 60.57 |
The story so far for Gambhir and Sehwag has been terrific, but they'll be the first ones to admit that they have tougher challenges to conquer before they are mentioned among the top pairs ever in Test cricket. Other pairs - Dinesh Karthik and Jaffer, SS Das and Sadagoppan Ramesh - have flourished briefly before floundering, and a final verdict on Gambhir and Sehwag must wait till they pass stiffer ordeals in seamer-friendly conditions outside the subcontinent. The tour to New Zealand early next year should be good test, but the manner in which they've performed so far suggests India may at last have found a long-term answer to a vexing problem.
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Aakash Chopra: Apart from luck, you need to pick your team wisely, get to bat at the top, and have your captain's support
Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
The divine madness of Kevin Pietersen
Jon Hotten: Players like him, when absent, stir a yearning in the spectator that has nothing to do with team loyalty
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Mumbai Indians still have a better head-to-head record against Chennai Super Kings, but once again on the big occasion, they came second
Anderson's magic not to be missed (50)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
A case of peaking too early (41)
Royal Challengers began the season in full steam, but failed to replicate their consistency away from home
"Minimise sixes" - Two words sum up farcical contest (40)
The eight-over dash between Bangalore and Chennai was as close as cricket played on the field can get to cricket played on smartphone apps
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
Coolest Indian pair that I've seen in my life. That's what I feel when I see them batting! The main key about their batting is their understanding. Sehwag, one of my favorite player, has got simple calculations, which helps him a lot while playing. He is such a guy who never minds the bowler who is bowling at him which has a huge advantage for him over any other players. Gambhir on the other hand has got a mixture of aggression and patience. He will stay if Sehwag is on fire. But there are days when they both start to fire simultaneously which is really interesting to watch. Just like the Mohali 2nd Innings. It was so lovely to see them play like that. Hoping that this pair will stay for many more years to come! And also will be a role model to all the openers in India, which was a problem India was facing a few years ago in the late 90s!
Posted by steveoehley on (October 26, 2008, 17:29 GMT)how can disclude the smith-mckensie partnership? they made the qualification over 1500 runs to make the sehwag-gambhir partnership the best opening parnership of today, and yet the smith-mckensie is almost the best of all time in terms of averages.
Posted by _JH_ on (October 26, 2008, 0:15 GMT)To salamkarachi and rowhitk - re: Greenidge and Haynes.
They are indeed amongst the best opening combinations ever, and you'll find were mentioned in the article. However, their stats do not rate a mention in the tables for the following reasons:
Table 1 - Indian opening combinations - obviously N/A. Table 2 - Best opening pairs in Test cricket (by average partnership) - they qualified 18th on the list, having had a lower average partnership than many other pairs. Table 3 - Best scoring rate - As I didn't watch them much, being too young at the time, I cannot say whether they scored their runs quickly or not. However, I'd suggest much of the balls faced data probably isn't available for their matches. Table 4 - Sehwag and Gambhir vs Sehwag and Jaffer - obviously N/A.
Hope this helps
Posted by Deep_N on (October 25, 2008, 19:36 GMT)People... some of the elite openers have been left out here as Rajesh points out they scored their runs at an average less than the ones shown here. No one should argue with the fact that Greenidge-Hayenes & Hayden-Langer pair are less prolific than Sehwag-Ghambir... They have just started and wish they carry on with their hunger to notch up brilliant partnership for India !
Posted by kaushal_mehta on (October 25, 2008, 12:30 GMT)Hey guys!! Just didnt get the right place to put this comment. But a cricket love i just want help from you.. Can someone plz help me to understand how monkey can be racist.. Like common not only because i am Indian but because i am a cricket lover and this racism saga coming back again and again is miserable.. How can be name of an animal be racist.. So careful next time, when you wanna appreciate someone and you call him "LIONheart" :-)
Posted by salamkarachi on (October 25, 2008, 12:04 GMT)Really where are Greenidge and Haynes. They must be the best among mentioned. Have they been left out delibrately or there is an error?
Posted by Yankee_cricket on (October 25, 2008, 2:16 GMT)Mr. Rajesh, I loved your article on Sehwag and Gambhir. May I suggest one "correction." I'm on a campaign on this one. Please, in future, use the word "foundering" instead of "floundering." Do so and then pass the favor on to others. Together we will correct this repeated error. Then, we can both attack the US Republican administration's use of the fabricated word "Neucular." Please give my regards to Jamie Alter. Regards, Paul Skillicorn (skillicorn@yahoo.com).
Posted by rowhitk on (October 24, 2008, 22:15 GMT)Haynes-Greenidge don't make it to this list ??
Posted by ravic18 on (October 24, 2008, 17:59 GMT)chak de sehwag and gambhir, this is a proper indian opening pair and this should stick for long time.
Posted by cricket_DD on (October 24, 2008, 17:45 GMT)It is too early to say if they are long term solution or the best pair of all times, the real test will come in the series outside the subcontinent. If they can handle the bouncy tracks of SA or Aus then we would have a long term solution. Even Jaffer had a good stretch at one time and then eveyone knows what happened in Aus. Gambhir looks a better player and has no obvious weakness in his game.. and is a perfect partner for Sehwag. Lets hope they keep doing well..