S Rajesh
Numbers Game Numbers GameRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
ESPNcricinfo's stats editor S Rajesh looks at the stories behind the stats

How good is the Sehwag-Gambhir pair?

India's current openers have performed exceptionally at the top of the order, producing numbers that suggest India may have found a long-term combination

S Rajesh

October 24, 2008

Comments: 13 | Text size: A | A


Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir have put together 50-plus stands in seven of their last eight innings © AFP
Enlarge
 

In a land blessed with outstanding middle-order batsmen, quality openers have been unusually hard to find, but in Virender Sehwag and Gautam Gambhir, India might have finally found a long-term solution. Since they came together for the series in Sri Lanka earlier this year, the two have been in sparkling form and more often than not have given the team an excellent platform to build on.

In ten innings during this period, they've been consistency personified: seven times they have added more than 50, and in their three other innings, only once were they separated before 25. Admittedly all these stands have come in matches played in the subcontinent, but the manner in which the two have gone about their jobs suggests they should be able to handle tougher assignments too.

The opening pair's performances have been among the standout features of the two Tests against Australia so far. The visitors have been outclassed in most departments, but perhaps most convincingly in the opening acts with both bat and ball. Gambhir and Sehwag have strung together partnerships of 70, 16, 70 and 182. Compare that with Australia's opening stands - 0, 21, 0, 49 - and it's clear that India have had the early advantage.

Just how well does this opening pair compare with the best that India has produced? As the table below indicates, their numbers are better than anyone else's. Admittedly, they've played less than half as many games as Sunil Gavaskar and Chetan Chauhan did, and they haven't yet been tested on bouncier pitches, but so far their stats are spectacular - they are already the second-most prolific Indian opening pair. (Click here for the entire partnership list.)

India's best opening combinations in Tests (Qual: at least 750 runs)
Pair Innings Runs Average 100/ 50 stands
Gambhir-Sehwag 29 1771 63.25 4/ 11
Vinoo Mankad-Pankaj Roy 16 868 57.86 3/ 1
Chauhan-Gavaskar 59 3010 53.75 10/ 10
Chopra-Sehwag 19 897 47.21 4/ 2
Das-Ramesh 19 836 44.00 2/ 6
Gavaskar-Srikkanth 34 1469 43.20 3/ 9
Jaffer-Sehwag 28 1031 36.82 3/ 4
Gaekwad-Gavaskar 49 1722 35.87 4/ 9
Contractor-Pankaj Roy 26 852 32.76 1/ 4

In fact, their numbers are amazing even if you expand the comparison to all opening pairs around the world. Among pairs who have put together at least 1500 runs, Gambhir and Sehwag's average has been bettered only by the legendary pair of Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe, who averaged nearly 88, with 25 stands of 50-plus in 38 innings. The one thing the Indian pair can learn from Hobbs and Sutcliffe is to convert starts into significant stands: out of 15 stands of over 50 in 29 innings, Gambhir and Sehwag have only converted four into century partnerships; the conversion percentage is much lower than that for England's pair.

Gordon Greenidge and Desmond Haynes have the most runs for any pair, but they scored their runs at an average of 47.31, which puts them in 18th place among the openers.

Best opening pair in Test cricket (Qual: at least 1500 runs)
Pair Innings Runs Average stand 100/ 50 stands
Hobbs-Sutcliffe 38 3249 87.81 15/ 10
Gambhir-Sehwag 29 1771 63.25 4/ 11
Hobbs-Rhodes 36 2146 61.31 8/ 5
Lawry-Simpson 62 3596 60.94 9/ 18
Hutton-Washbrook 51 2880 60.00 8/ 13
Atherton-Gooch 44 2501 56.84 7/ 12
Barlow-Goddard 34 1806 56.43 6/ 11
Gibbs-Smith 56 2983 56.28 7/ 10
Franklin-Wright 28 1543 55.10 5/ 5
Fredericks-Greenidge 31 1593 54.93 5/ 5
de Villiers-Smith 30 1646 54.86 4/ 6
Chauhan-Gavaskar 59 3010 53.75 10/ 10

With Gambhir and Sehwag, though, the story isn't just the number of runs they score; it's the rate they score them at. Both are attacking batsmen capable of piercing the field on both sides of the wicket and going over the top, but they are also equally adept at tapping the ball into the gaps or short of fielders and running the quick singles. The ability to do all this well was evident in their most recent partnership, when they smashed 182 runs in a mere 39.1 overs.

Overall, Gambhir and Sehwag have scored their runs at more than four-and-a-half an over, making them easily the fastest-scoring pair. (This is only among pairs whom Cricinfo has recorded as having faced at least 1500 deliveries. The balls-faced data wasn't available regularly for matches played more than 15 years ago; hence the data for some pairs isn't complete.) Wasim Jaffer isn't the most quick-scoring batsman around, but when he has opened with Sehwag the runs have come pretty quickly too, at a rate of 4.07 per over.

Best scoring-rates among opening pairs (Qual: at least 1500 balls faced*)
Pair Innings Runs Balls Average Runs per over
Gambhir-Sehwag 29 1771 2292 63.25 4.63
Jaffer-Sehwag 28 1031 1519 36.82 4.07
Gibbs-Smith 56 2983 4505 56.28 3.97
Hayden-Langer 113 5655 8917 51.88 3.80
Hayden-Slater 25 1045 1573* 43.54 3.78*
de Villiers-Smith 30 1646 2730 54.86 3.61
Trescothick-Vaughan 54 2487 4140 48.76 3.60
Strauss-Trescothick 52 2670 4530 52.35 3.53
Atapattu-Jayasuriya 118 4469 6865* 40.26 3.53*
McKenzie-Smith 17 1290 2193 80.62 3.52
Chopra-Sehwag 19 897 1614 47.21 3.33
Ganga-Gayle 49 1954 3487* 41.57 3.33*
* The balls faced data isn't complete for these pairs. Hence the run-rate is calculated only for those innings for which balls faced data is available.

The one difference between Sehwag's partnerships with Gambhir and Jaffer - apart from the fact that the average runs per dismissal is much lower with Jaffer - is the manner in which the pairs score their runs. When Sehwag bats with Gambhir, the emphasis is much more on rotating the strike and getting the singles, which account for 25% of the total runs scored off the bat by them - of the 1652 bat runs scored by them, 413 are singles. With Jaffer, though, that percentage drops to 19.34 (182 singles out of 941 bat runs), which indicates that the strike isn't rotated as regularly.

Sehwag-Gambhir v Sehwag-Jaffer
Pair Innings Runs Average Run rate Singles (% of balls) Boundaries (% of runs)
Sehwag-Gambhir 29 1771 63.25 4.63 18.01 60.77
Sehwag-Jaffer 28 1031 36.82 4.07 11.98 60.57

The story so far for Gambhir and Sehwag has been terrific, but they'll be the first ones to admit that they have tougher challenges to conquer before they are mentioned among the top pairs ever in Test cricket. Other pairs - Dinesh Karthik and Jaffer, SS Das and Sadagoppan Ramesh - have flourished briefly before floundering, and a final verdict on Gambhir and Sehwag must wait till they pass stiffer ordeals in seamer-friendly conditions outside the subcontinent. The tour to New Zealand early next year should be good test, but the manner in which they've performed so far suggests India may at last have found a long-term answer to a vexing problem.

S Rajesh is stats editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: S Rajesh

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by thejuskrishna on (October 26, 2008, 18:30 GMT)

Coolest Indian pair that I've seen in my life. That's what I feel when I see them batting! The main key about their batting is their understanding. Sehwag, one of my favorite player, has got simple calculations, which helps him a lot while playing. He is such a guy who never minds the bowler who is bowling at him which has a huge advantage for him over any other players. Gambhir on the other hand has got a mixture of aggression and patience. He will stay if Sehwag is on fire. But there are days when they both start to fire simultaneously which is really interesting to watch. Just like the Mohali 2nd Innings. It was so lovely to see them play like that. Hoping that this pair will stay for many more years to come! And also will be a role model to all the openers in India, which was a problem India was facing a few years ago in the late 90s!

Posted by steveoehley on (October 26, 2008, 17:29 GMT)

how can disclude the smith-mckensie partnership? they made the qualification over 1500 runs to make the sehwag-gambhir partnership the best opening parnership of today, and yet the smith-mckensie is almost the best of all time in terms of averages.

Posted by _JH_ on (October 26, 2008, 0:15 GMT)

To salamkarachi and rowhitk - re: Greenidge and Haynes.

They are indeed amongst the best opening combinations ever, and you'll find were mentioned in the article. However, their stats do not rate a mention in the tables for the following reasons:

Table 1 - Indian opening combinations - obviously N/A. Table 2 - Best opening pairs in Test cricket (by average partnership) - they qualified 18th on the list, having had a lower average partnership than many other pairs. Table 3 - Best scoring rate - As I didn't watch them much, being too young at the time, I cannot say whether they scored their runs quickly or not. However, I'd suggest much of the balls faced data probably isn't available for their matches. Table 4 - Sehwag and Gambhir vs Sehwag and Jaffer - obviously N/A.

Hope this helps

Posted by Deep_N on (October 25, 2008, 19:36 GMT)

People... some of the elite openers have been left out here as Rajesh points out they scored their runs at an average less than the ones shown here. No one should argue with the fact that Greenidge-Hayenes & Hayden-Langer pair are less prolific than Sehwag-Ghambir... They have just started and wish they carry on with their hunger to notch up brilliant partnership for India !

Posted by kaushal_mehta on (October 25, 2008, 12:30 GMT)

Hey guys!! Just didnt get the right place to put this comment. But a cricket love i just want help from you.. Can someone plz help me to understand how monkey can be racist.. Like common not only because i am Indian but because i am a cricket lover and this racism saga coming back again and again is miserable.. How can be name of an animal be racist.. So careful next time, when you wanna appreciate someone and you call him "LIONheart" :-)

Posted by salamkarachi on (October 25, 2008, 12:04 GMT)

Really where are Greenidge and Haynes. They must be the best among mentioned. Have they been left out delibrately or there is an error?

Posted by Yankee_cricket on (October 25, 2008, 2:16 GMT)

Mr. Rajesh, I loved your article on Sehwag and Gambhir. May I suggest one "correction." I'm on a campaign on this one. Please, in future, use the word "foundering" instead of "floundering." Do so and then pass the favor on to others. Together we will correct this repeated error. Then, we can both attack the US Republican administration's use of the fabricated word "Neucular." Please give my regards to Jamie Alter. Regards, Paul Skillicorn (skillicorn@yahoo.com).

Posted by rowhitk on (October 24, 2008, 22:15 GMT)

Haynes-Greenidge don't make it to this list ??

Posted by ravic18 on (October 24, 2008, 17:59 GMT)

chak de sehwag and gambhir, this is a proper indian opening pair and this should stick for long time.

Posted by cricket_DD on (October 24, 2008, 17:45 GMT)

It is too early to say if they are long term solution or the best pair of all times, the real test will come in the series outside the subcontinent. If they can handle the bouncy tracks of SA or Aus then we would have a long term solution. Even Jaffer had a good stretch at one time and then eveyone knows what happened in Aus. Gambhir looks a better player and has no obvious weakness in his game.. and is a perfect partner for Sehwag. Lets hope they keep doing well..

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
S RajeshClose
S Rajesh Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.
Related Links
Numbers Game : Previous column: The Ganguly story in numbers
Players/Officials: Gautam Gambhir | Virender Sehwag
Series/Tournaments: Australia tour of India
Teams: India

    It's not the plan, stupid

Ed Smith: Good performances make all plans look good. The better team on the day always wins, irrespective of what was strategised in the dressing room

    Original hits

ESPNcricinfo XI: A look at some of cricket's most memorable strokes - and their makers

    What is Rohit Sharma's role?

Should India have practised slip catching in the nets? Who will play at the G?

    'I'd like to have faced the West Indies quicks'

Northamptonshire's David Willey picks his ideal partner for a jungle expedition, and talks about his famous dad

The charm of the Boxing Day Test

Jonathan Wilson: It's special not just for the cricket, but also because it satisfies one of the tenets of Christmas - bringing people together

News | Features Last 7 days

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Hazlewood completes quartet of promise

Josh Hazlewood has been on Australian cricket's radar since he was a teenager. The player that made a Test debut at the Gabba was a much-improved version of the tearaway from 2010

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

Vijay 144, Ganguly 144

Stats highlights from the first day of the second Test between Australia and India in Brisbane

News | Features Last 7 days