April 5, 2010

'If you hit in the air against SA, expect to be caught'

Every South African fielder has had a role model to look up to: Jonty Rhodes, Peter Kirsten and Sybrand Engelbrecht explain why the country has never lacked fielding talent
14





When AB de Villiers soared into the Bangalore night to snuff out Praveen Kumar's innings for the Royal Challengers 10 days ago, he wasn't only making a seemingly impossible catch spectacularly possible. He was also continuing a tradition of South Africans daring to go where no other fielders, except those from Australia, have regularly gone before.

By any standard, de Villiers' effort shimmered with brilliance. Praveen pulled lustily at the first ball he faced, a short delivery from the Delhi Daredevils' Umesh Yadav, and sent it arcing towards the long-off boundary. De Villiers scrambled backward and launched his leap with perfect timing. He snared the wannabe six high above his head in his right hand and hung onto the ball as he crashed to earth a foot inside the rope.

"Awesome," was Jonty Rhodes' description of de Villiers' catch, and he should know. From 1992 to 2003, Rhodes dazzled opponents and delighted crowds with the kind of catching and fielding that would have won him star billing in PT Barnum's Big Top. Rhodes was the epitome of the gritty middle-order batsman, and a more treasured team man will never exist. But he will forever be remembered for diving headlong into the stumps to run out Inzamam-ul-Haq at the 1992 World Cup.

Click on the first mention of Rhodes' name in this story, and you will be taken to a profile page illustrated not with a photograph of him playing a fine stroke, but of him flying through the air with the greatest of ease to take another of those impossible catches.

This thread can be traced back more than 50 years, at least, in South Africa's cricket history. Before Rhodes, Peter Kirsten was South Africa's angel of death in the field. Before Kirsten, Colin Bland, "the Golden Eagle", preyed on hapless batsmen.

"Youngsters tend to look up to their cricketing idols, and in my case that was Colin Bland," Kirsten said. "Hopefully that means that Jonty was watching me!" Indeed, he was. "Peter Kirsten was my hero," Rhodes said, unprompted.

The modern mantle might just belong to Sybrand Engelbrecht, a 21-year-old blond ghost who haunted backward point with enthusiasm as memorable as his athleticism at the 2008 Under-19 World Cup. He took five catches, some of them positively Rhodesian, in the three matches he played, and added to his value by hurrying and harrying batsmen into and out of singles. If the ball was being hit somewhere he wasn't, he was in the captain's ear, nagging to be moved to the hot spot.

And Engelbrecht's hero? "Without a doubt, definitely Jonty. He's been my role model," he said.

But, according to Rhodes, South Africa's fielding prowess is more than the preserve of a few shining individuals. "We were untested as an international team when we went to the 1992 World Cup," Rhodes said. "But [former South Africa captain] Kepler [Wessels] told us there were two areas in which we could dominate: fitness and fielding.

"We had Fanie de Villiers out on the boundary and Brian McMillan and Kepler in the slips. They were all excellent fielders. Fielding was something we could compete at even without international experience." Eighteen years of international experience later that remains true: "You can judge a good fielding side by the fact that they don't have to hide anyone. That's the case with South Africa."

Rhodes thinks the reason for that goes down to grassroots level, and he says he has the evidence to back up his claim. "Our fields are just so good and so well-maintained. I wish I could show you the video clip of my son playing in his first outdoor cricket match. There he was, diving and sliding all over the place. And he was five years old!

"Fields in Australia are pretty much the same as they are in South Africa, and I think it's fair to say that those two countries have been at the forefront of fielding over the years."

In other countries, cricket and cricketers could be considered less fortunate. For instance, in India, where Rhodes is part of the Mumbai Indians' coaching staff in the IPL. "You just don't get much grass in this part of the world. I was talking to Mark Boucher and he said he can feel the strain on his knees even through his wicketkeeping pads. That's an indication of how hard the fields are here."

For Engelbrecht, practice makes perfect. "Fielding is about hard work and confidence, and catching hundreds of balls in training," he said. "People look at someone like Richard Branson and how he makes building a business empire look so easy. What they don't see is how much time and effort he has put in behind the scenes to make it look so easy."

Rhodes and Engelbrecht belong to a generation of cricketers who don't need to be convinced of the advantages to be had from superior conditioning and a more intense focus on skills training. Not so Kirsten, who began to make his way in the game when cricket was still something of an amateur pursuit in South Africa. However, early in his career he encountered the forward-thinking Eddie Barlow, who was among the earliest believers in fitness and better training methods for cricketers.

"You can judge a good fielding side by the fact that they don't have to hide anyone. That's the case with South Africa"
Jonty Rhodes

Kirsten also suffered a serious knee injury that required long, lonely hours of rehabilitation. "I used to train hard individually in the 70s and 80s. That made the difference for me," Kirsten said.

"South Africans are naturally athletic people, and since the 90s fitness levels have improved. These days there is also plenty of sports science around for us to make use of."

But certain aspects of fielding would seem to remain in the realm of instinct. "Anticipation is very important, as is peripheral vision," Kirsten said. "It's vital to be able to read the batsman. I suppose there are some things you just can't coach." Kirsten held more than his share of unforgettable catches, but his trademark as a fielder was the fluid pick-up-and-throw from the covers that cut down many batsmen short of their ground. He was mercury in motion, and just as deadly. Who knows how many run-outs he would have effected had his career fallen more squarely into the age of electronic umpiring?

Bland bestrode the covers from the 1950s to the 70s, a lean, grim reaper. He threw down the stumps almost at will, his reward for endless hours spent in solitary practice sessions, and intimidated batsmen with his sheer presence. "He was brilliant in certain positions," remembered Trevor Goddard, Bland's captain in 12 of the 21 Tests he played in the 1960s. "We also fielded him at mid-on a lot of the time, and he was so accurate when throwing at the stumps. When he was patrolling the boundary, he would send these underarm throws whistling in. The batsmen wouldn't dare take two to him."

Goddard recalled the bleak observation made by former England captain Peter May after a 1956-57 rubber in which he was caught seven times in 10 innings and recorded his lowest Test series average, 15.30. "He said that if you hit the ball in the air when you were playing against South Africa, you should expect to be caught."

Praveen Kumar won't argue with that.

Telford Vice is a freelance cricket writer in South Africa

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Quazar on April 6, 2010, 7:44 GMT

    Jonty Rhodes...YOU were AWESOME...the demigod of fielding! The greatest fielder (non-slip) in the modern game by far!

  • Shunya on April 6, 2010, 2:34 GMT

    true, the yawning gap in fielding standards between subcontinent teams and the rest can be put down to the ground conditions to an extent. This can be seen from the improving fielding standards displayed by some of the younger generation cricketers in india as the grounds across the country have started to look greener lately. But then, diving and sliding are only a means to an end. A nimble footed fielder at point or a swift player manning the cover region or a thirdman with a strong arm can be as effective in turning the game on its head. Likewise, good conversion rates in effecting run outs and pouching high catches can be game changers as well, which do not require any ground assistance. Failure by the subcontinent teams (barring SL perhaps) to lift this side of their game for such a long time only highlights the apathy they carry towards fielding.

  • BillyCC on April 6, 2010, 2:25 GMT

    I agree with sudzz71 that fielding requires a work ethic and an attitude just like batting and bowling. The current crop of sub-continental players, West Indian players and English players are on average much worse than their counterparts in Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. The sub-continental players have an attitude problem when it comes to fielding, the West Indians have a work ethic problem and English players have an overall skill problem, since I actually think their work ethic and attitude as cricketers are quite good.

  • jonesy2 on April 6, 2010, 0:52 GMT

    aussies are head and shoulders above anybody when it comes to all aspects of fielding. as with most things really

  • knowledge_eater on April 5, 2010, 21:30 GMT

    When ppl. ask you what batsman you want to be like ? there many names in many country, when they ask you what kind of bowler you want to be ? there are again many names. BUT when they ask what fielder you want be ? "The Jaunty" It was great when in young years, we use to call names. "Hey you bat like such and such" I had honor once, when ppl. gave me nick name of "Jaunty", but over years I have been tagged differently. However, it is great when gully friends tag you with such a caliber name. I reckon if that calling names in gully cricket still exist. I am sure when someone dives and field better than everyone in neighborhood, they must have been calling them "Jaunty". I think he is superman in disguise. I still remember the catches I use to take in slip fielding in blink of an eye. I don't have so called gene of athletics but as Kirsten said "Anticipation is very important, as is peripheral vision,It's vital to be able to read the batsman." MI and Indian team are lucky with these two

  • sudzz71 on April 5, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Fielding among all others aspects of the game relies more on fitness and muscle memory as compared to batting and bowling.

    One cannot become a top fielder very easily if one is not physically tuned to it and coached properly as well. The key to good fielding is willingness to get hurt and ability to practice for endless hours each day probably for not much glory as compared to mainline skills of batting and bowling.

    Especially in India there is a potent combination of very hard grounds, inherent inability/lack of fitness levels coupled with fielding being a distant third as compared to batting and bowling.

    Lets look at a different corollary when most Indian's are batting they prefer hitting boundaries to running singles and twos, when most Indian's are bowling they prefer bowling medium fast or spin bowling fast or running between the wickets depend on how good an athlete you are.

  • Hamayoun on April 5, 2010, 13:07 GMT

    Come on, how can you forget Derek 'Arkle' Randall?

  • Godof86 on April 5, 2010, 12:03 GMT

    I remember a few one-dayers where the SA off-side lined up as Boucher, Kallis at slips, Rhodes, Gibbs, Crookes and Cronje (with Donald and his flat throws at third man). Now that was impossible to pass !

  • jonkerr7 on April 5, 2010, 10:52 GMT

    Fielding is an exciting art of the game isn't it? From someone who saw the West Indies regulary in Australia in their heyday, Clive Lloyd, Viv Richards, Gus Logie, Richie Richardson and Roger Harper were all the equal if not better than Rhodes, Herschelle Gibbs, AB DeVillers (didn't see much of Peter Kirsten). Of the Australians, Allan Border was fantastic, Dean Jones, Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke and Andrew Symonds all spectacular. I'd like to see the subcontinent guys really pick this part of the game up - they have the athleticism and certainly the hand eye coordination. I think playing in the IPL where it is so important will probably force this to happen.

  • kdcricket on April 5, 2010, 9:19 GMT

    A very valuable learning from this article would be for the non test playing nations. As Kepeler Wessels had said, fielding is the aspect in which they can catch many teams off guard and unprepared, because initially they are going to struggle in batting and bowling relative to established nations. I agree with _NEUTRAL_Fan_ about the fielding prowess of Aussies, NZ and Proteas. Jonty has got a valid point, when he says that in the dry, arid regions of subcontinent, it is difficult to have naturally athletic fielders, due to their upbringing on hard coarse grounds. The players mentioned here are truly fielding "greats" and they have made fielding to an art form with their dazzling displays. Still remember the Inzamam run out....It made me a cricket fanatic back in 1992, when I was just beginning to watch cricket.

  • Quazar on April 6, 2010, 7:44 GMT

    Jonty Rhodes...YOU were AWESOME...the demigod of fielding! The greatest fielder (non-slip) in the modern game by far!

  • Shunya on April 6, 2010, 2:34 GMT

    true, the yawning gap in fielding standards between subcontinent teams and the rest can be put down to the ground conditions to an extent. This can be seen from the improving fielding standards displayed by some of the younger generation cricketers in india as the grounds across the country have started to look greener lately. But then, diving and sliding are only a means to an end. A nimble footed fielder at point or a swift player manning the cover region or a thirdman with a strong arm can be as effective in turning the game on its head. Likewise, good conversion rates in effecting run outs and pouching high catches can be game changers as well, which do not require any ground assistance. Failure by the subcontinent teams (barring SL perhaps) to lift this side of their game for such a long time only highlights the apathy they carry towards fielding.

  • BillyCC on April 6, 2010, 2:25 GMT

    I agree with sudzz71 that fielding requires a work ethic and an attitude just like batting and bowling. The current crop of sub-continental players, West Indian players and English players are on average much worse than their counterparts in Australia, South Africa and New Zealand. The sub-continental players have an attitude problem when it comes to fielding, the West Indians have a work ethic problem and English players have an overall skill problem, since I actually think their work ethic and attitude as cricketers are quite good.

  • jonesy2 on April 6, 2010, 0:52 GMT

    aussies are head and shoulders above anybody when it comes to all aspects of fielding. as with most things really

  • knowledge_eater on April 5, 2010, 21:30 GMT

    When ppl. ask you what batsman you want to be like ? there many names in many country, when they ask you what kind of bowler you want to be ? there are again many names. BUT when they ask what fielder you want be ? "The Jaunty" It was great when in young years, we use to call names. "Hey you bat like such and such" I had honor once, when ppl. gave me nick name of "Jaunty", but over years I have been tagged differently. However, it is great when gully friends tag you with such a caliber name. I reckon if that calling names in gully cricket still exist. I am sure when someone dives and field better than everyone in neighborhood, they must have been calling them "Jaunty". I think he is superman in disguise. I still remember the catches I use to take in slip fielding in blink of an eye. I don't have so called gene of athletics but as Kirsten said "Anticipation is very important, as is peripheral vision,It's vital to be able to read the batsman." MI and Indian team are lucky with these two

  • sudzz71 on April 5, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Fielding among all others aspects of the game relies more on fitness and muscle memory as compared to batting and bowling.

    One cannot become a top fielder very easily if one is not physically tuned to it and coached properly as well. The key to good fielding is willingness to get hurt and ability to practice for endless hours each day probably for not much glory as compared to mainline skills of batting and bowling.

    Especially in India there is a potent combination of very hard grounds, inherent inability/lack of fitness levels coupled with fielding being a distant third as compared to batting and bowling.

    Lets look at a different corollary when most Indian's are batting they prefer hitting boundaries to running singles and twos, when most Indian's are bowling they prefer bowling medium fast or spin bowling fast or running between the wickets depend on how good an athlete you are.

  • Hamayoun on April 5, 2010, 13:07 GMT

    Come on, how can you forget Derek 'Arkle' Randall?

  • Godof86 on April 5, 2010, 12:03 GMT

    I remember a few one-dayers where the SA off-side lined up as Boucher, Kallis at slips, Rhodes, Gibbs, Crookes and Cronje (with Donald and his flat throws at third man). Now that was impossible to pass !

  • jonkerr7 on April 5, 2010, 10:52 GMT

    Fielding is an exciting art of the game isn't it? From someone who saw the West Indies regulary in Australia in their heyday, Clive Lloyd, Viv Richards, Gus Logie, Richie Richardson and Roger Harper were all the equal if not better than Rhodes, Herschelle Gibbs, AB DeVillers (didn't see much of Peter Kirsten). Of the Australians, Allan Border was fantastic, Dean Jones, Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke and Andrew Symonds all spectacular. I'd like to see the subcontinent guys really pick this part of the game up - they have the athleticism and certainly the hand eye coordination. I think playing in the IPL where it is so important will probably force this to happen.

  • kdcricket on April 5, 2010, 9:19 GMT

    A very valuable learning from this article would be for the non test playing nations. As Kepeler Wessels had said, fielding is the aspect in which they can catch many teams off guard and unprepared, because initially they are going to struggle in batting and bowling relative to established nations. I agree with _NEUTRAL_Fan_ about the fielding prowess of Aussies, NZ and Proteas. Jonty has got a valid point, when he says that in the dry, arid regions of subcontinent, it is difficult to have naturally athletic fielders, due to their upbringing on hard coarse grounds. The players mentioned here are truly fielding "greats" and they have made fielding to an art form with their dazzling displays. Still remember the Inzamam run out....It made me a cricket fanatic back in 1992, when I was just beginning to watch cricket.

  • sheethalmech on April 5, 2010, 9:10 GMT

    No doubts that team SA has shown the world that matches can also be won by great fielding, and not just by great batting/bowling..!! I am still waiting when India can start doing this.. :(

  • Nuxxy on April 5, 2010, 8:50 GMT

    What many people didn't realise about Jonty was just how close to the bat he was by the time the ball reached the batsman. He didn't wait on the circle and then dive. He was always walking in. I also loved how he often went for the ball with both hands. And the big advantage he had with runouts was how quickly he got to his feet again. Even Jesse Ryder makes some great stops and catches cover, but he won't emulate Rhodes' bounding. The other best fielder I've seen is Ponting, mainly for his accuracy in hitting the stumps. That's the one thing Jonty lacked.

  • marutijha on April 5, 2010, 8:06 GMT

    For me the bench mark of fielding skill is definitely rhodes but not many know that he is one player to have represented SA in two sports , apart from cricket , hockey as well . This pretty much explains where fitness of this standard comes from , imagine a guy who is pretty fit to play football comes out to chase a smaller ball i guess he can do wonders , so as a kid one should always pick two sports , and then try to be master of one and slave of the other, which should give a better chance of success than being master of none , which most of us remain so. Sports as a hobby is different story but when it comes to games it should always be considered a matter of death and life . coming to the topic of fielding par excellence , this can be inculcated as a habit in very early child hood when they are not afraid or embarrassed to fall down , just dust themselves and pick up the next ball coming to them , later as we age we start thinking more in materialistic ways .

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on April 5, 2010, 5:16 GMT

    If their is one team I would watch for their fielding alone, it would have to be SA! (when their not choking of course lol). I've seen a decent bit of Rhodes and most of AB's brilliance and based on that, I honestly think their is little to choose between the 2. AB's run-out of SIMON KATICH (watch it on youtube) is legendary, to be able to get the ball anywhere near the stumps whilst tumbling is phenomenal. His great fielding+batting in all 3 formats made it an absolute bewilderment as to why he was not short-listed for ICC player of the yr....so much for credibility. Also surprised that the NZ team wasn't mentioned, their right up there with AUS and SA. The best fielders I've seen (that come immediately to mind) are: Rhodes, AB, Ponting, Bravo, Gibbs and Collingwood. David Hussey and Kaif come close as well.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on April 5, 2010, 5:16 GMT

    If their is one team I would watch for their fielding alone, it would have to be SA! (when their not choking of course lol). I've seen a decent bit of Rhodes and most of AB's brilliance and based on that, I honestly think their is little to choose between the 2. AB's run-out of SIMON KATICH (watch it on youtube) is legendary, to be able to get the ball anywhere near the stumps whilst tumbling is phenomenal. His great fielding+batting in all 3 formats made it an absolute bewilderment as to why he was not short-listed for ICC player of the yr....so much for credibility. Also surprised that the NZ team wasn't mentioned, their right up there with AUS and SA. The best fielders I've seen (that come immediately to mind) are: Rhodes, AB, Ponting, Bravo, Gibbs and Collingwood. David Hussey and Kaif come close as well.

  • marutijha on April 5, 2010, 8:06 GMT

    For me the bench mark of fielding skill is definitely rhodes but not many know that he is one player to have represented SA in two sports , apart from cricket , hockey as well . This pretty much explains where fitness of this standard comes from , imagine a guy who is pretty fit to play football comes out to chase a smaller ball i guess he can do wonders , so as a kid one should always pick two sports , and then try to be master of one and slave of the other, which should give a better chance of success than being master of none , which most of us remain so. Sports as a hobby is different story but when it comes to games it should always be considered a matter of death and life . coming to the topic of fielding par excellence , this can be inculcated as a habit in very early child hood when they are not afraid or embarrassed to fall down , just dust themselves and pick up the next ball coming to them , later as we age we start thinking more in materialistic ways .

  • Nuxxy on April 5, 2010, 8:50 GMT

    What many people didn't realise about Jonty was just how close to the bat he was by the time the ball reached the batsman. He didn't wait on the circle and then dive. He was always walking in. I also loved how he often went for the ball with both hands. And the big advantage he had with runouts was how quickly he got to his feet again. Even Jesse Ryder makes some great stops and catches cover, but he won't emulate Rhodes' bounding. The other best fielder I've seen is Ponting, mainly for his accuracy in hitting the stumps. That's the one thing Jonty lacked.

  • sheethalmech on April 5, 2010, 9:10 GMT

    No doubts that team SA has shown the world that matches can also be won by great fielding, and not just by great batting/bowling..!! I am still waiting when India can start doing this.. :(

  • kdcricket on April 5, 2010, 9:19 GMT

    A very valuable learning from this article would be for the non test playing nations. As Kepeler Wessels had said, fielding is the aspect in which they can catch many teams off guard and unprepared, because initially they are going to struggle in batting and bowling relative to established nations. I agree with _NEUTRAL_Fan_ about the fielding prowess of Aussies, NZ and Proteas. Jonty has got a valid point, when he says that in the dry, arid regions of subcontinent, it is difficult to have naturally athletic fielders, due to their upbringing on hard coarse grounds. The players mentioned here are truly fielding "greats" and they have made fielding to an art form with their dazzling displays. Still remember the Inzamam run out....It made me a cricket fanatic back in 1992, when I was just beginning to watch cricket.

  • jonkerr7 on April 5, 2010, 10:52 GMT

    Fielding is an exciting art of the game isn't it? From someone who saw the West Indies regulary in Australia in their heyday, Clive Lloyd, Viv Richards, Gus Logie, Richie Richardson and Roger Harper were all the equal if not better than Rhodes, Herschelle Gibbs, AB DeVillers (didn't see much of Peter Kirsten). Of the Australians, Allan Border was fantastic, Dean Jones, Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke and Andrew Symonds all spectacular. I'd like to see the subcontinent guys really pick this part of the game up - they have the athleticism and certainly the hand eye coordination. I think playing in the IPL where it is so important will probably force this to happen.

  • Godof86 on April 5, 2010, 12:03 GMT

    I remember a few one-dayers where the SA off-side lined up as Boucher, Kallis at slips, Rhodes, Gibbs, Crookes and Cronje (with Donald and his flat throws at third man). Now that was impossible to pass !

  • Hamayoun on April 5, 2010, 13:07 GMT

    Come on, how can you forget Derek 'Arkle' Randall?

  • sudzz71 on April 5, 2010, 13:57 GMT

    Fielding among all others aspects of the game relies more on fitness and muscle memory as compared to batting and bowling.

    One cannot become a top fielder very easily if one is not physically tuned to it and coached properly as well. The key to good fielding is willingness to get hurt and ability to practice for endless hours each day probably for not much glory as compared to mainline skills of batting and bowling.

    Especially in India there is a potent combination of very hard grounds, inherent inability/lack of fitness levels coupled with fielding being a distant third as compared to batting and bowling.

    Lets look at a different corollary when most Indian's are batting they prefer hitting boundaries to running singles and twos, when most Indian's are bowling they prefer bowling medium fast or spin bowling fast or running between the wickets depend on how good an athlete you are.

  • knowledge_eater on April 5, 2010, 21:30 GMT

    When ppl. ask you what batsman you want to be like ? there many names in many country, when they ask you what kind of bowler you want to be ? there are again many names. BUT when they ask what fielder you want be ? "The Jaunty" It was great when in young years, we use to call names. "Hey you bat like such and such" I had honor once, when ppl. gave me nick name of "Jaunty", but over years I have been tagged differently. However, it is great when gully friends tag you with such a caliber name. I reckon if that calling names in gully cricket still exist. I am sure when someone dives and field better than everyone in neighborhood, they must have been calling them "Jaunty". I think he is superman in disguise. I still remember the catches I use to take in slip fielding in blink of an eye. I don't have so called gene of athletics but as Kirsten said "Anticipation is very important, as is peripheral vision,It's vital to be able to read the batsman." MI and Indian team are lucky with these two