April 14, 2010

When the brand's bigger than the player

Yuvraj Singh's celebrity is disproportionate to his achievements on the field, and his recent sulk brought that truth into focus

It was a surreal sight. As victory was sealed, the bench erupted, joy and relief suddenly jostling for supremacy on those rows of hitherto tense, sweaty faces. Every man was on his feet exulting, with one exception. There was a moment when his knees flickered, impelled by long-honed instinct to hoist their owner in solidarity, but Yuvraj Singh's head and heart were in no mood to be dictated to by mere force of habit. He stayed put.

Punjab had just shrugged off their listlessness by beating Mumbai, delaying their victims' qualification for the IPL semi-finals, yet Yuvraj was plainly a man apart, a man alone, his glazed eyes turned inward. Had he forgotten he was playing a team game? The evidence seemed incontrovertible.

Here in Britain, on ITV4, the studio pundits were having trouble suppressing their gall. John Emburey, the epitome of the gnarled, old-fashioned pro, was seething: it was well out of order, simply wasn't on. Graeme Hick, who drew even more affection from his dressing-room confreres, was gentler, yet still made his feelings clear: you must enjoy your co-workers' successes if you want to play a team sport, he reasoned. After all, you won't always play a significant role yourself.

Not that Yuvraj is the only member of a prominent sporting team to have his community spirit questioned this month. Two Saturdays ago, the footballer Kevin McDonald, who plays for Burnley in the English Premier League, stoutly resisted the conventional responses to being substituted. At the time, Burnley were 0-5 down to Manchester City and being thoroughly shamed in front of their home crowd, albeit by opponents infinitely richer in resources; McDonald's embarrassment was personal as well as collective. He was livid with his manager for taking him off. So, instead of marching stoically from the field, or ripping off his shirt and flinging it over the touchline in a fit of understandable pique, he decided to leave the ground altogether. And head for the pub. (In mitigation, at least he chose one that was broadcasting the game.)

Two days later McDonald was fined a fortnight's wages. Repentance was fulsome. "I now realise it was naïve, disrespectful and totally wrong of me. It was a gross misjudgement and instead I should have remained… to support my club and team-mates. I acknowledge that I also showed a serious lack of respect to all the fans who were at the ground and who pay good money to watch their team play... I would like to reassure all supporters that I am fully committed to helping the team as we fight to stay in the Premier League."

As I write, two days after that Mumbai match, Yuvraj has yet to acknowledge anything, much less express contrition. By the time these words are read he may well have followed McDonald's example, though the signs are inauspicious. With attention focused on the middle, perhaps he imagined that nobody saw his (non) reaction to the victory. But while his misdemeanour may not have been apparent to the spectators, television viewers saw all. And he was arguably even more culpable than McDonald. At least every other member of that Burnley team felt as fed up as the latter did (they ultimately lost 1-6). Yuvraj, though, seemed in no shape to share in anything. Would he have behaved thus had he been representing a nation rather than a business concern? It is desperately difficult to believe he would.

IT DIDN'T HELP, OF COURSE, that, according to a story in the Times of India on April 2, Yuvraj would have preferred to have been playing for another franchise, having been ditched as Punjab captain in favour of Kumar Sangakkara. Purportedly refusing to play ball, Kings XI co-owner Ness Wadia, suspecting that Yuvraj might not lend quite all his might to the cause, was said to have urged the BCCI to have a quiet word. If the board did so (and they denied having received a complaint), the fruits have been undetectable to the point of invisibility.

Yuvraj, who has attributed his poor returns to the strain of returning from injury, vented his spleen via Twitter: "I am disgusted and horrified that a news reporter can stoop down to such a level. I, in all my career, haven't seen such a disgusting piece of news." No player, he reckoned, more than a little risibly, "underperforms at will".

Preity Zinta, Punjab's other co-owner, also expressed disgust and horror; Gautam Gambhir, too, sprang to Yuvraj's defence. You would therefore have been forgiven, after all that, for expecting him to join those Kings XI celebrations, however confused or unhappy he may have felt. As Alan Price sings in Lindsay Anderson's magnificent career-defining movie O Lucky Man:

Smile while you're making it
Laugh while you're taking it
Even though you're faking it
Nobody's gonna know…

Fortunately, the impending World Twenty20 in the Caribbean offers him a swift opportunity to atone, to remind us, not what Brand Yuvraj can do, but what Cricketer Yuvraj can

On the other hand, if Yuvraj truly cared about the bigger picture and the greater good, he certainly did an exemplary job of disguising it.

If the Times story is true, Wadia would have been better off cutting his losses and letting Yuvraj go. After Mark Ramprakash was relieved of the Middlesex captaincy in 1999, he grew increasingly disillusioned with the club and, the following year, resolved to leave. Middlesex were equally determined to make him stay, and had the contract to do so. Discussing the matter with Angus Fraser and Vinny Codrington, the county secretary, I implored them to be pragmatic: what was the point in trying to keep someone who didn't want to be there? The odds on the team benefiting, after all, were anything but promising. Soon afterwards, Ramprakash was released from his obligations. Given how little Yuvraj has done for him lately, Wadia would have been better advised to do likewise.

As it is, Yuvraj's pitiful, almost pitiable form, culminating in last Friday's non-jubilation, could so easily be interpreted as the hallmarks of a spoilt, sullen, stroppy teenager immersed in an interminable sulk. It would be easier to sympathise if he hadn't just signed to play the lead in an animated movie with the rather optimistic title of Captain India.

The plot, according to the publicity, finds Yuvraj growing up in Mumbai and discovering a magical multi-purpose "cricket stick", one that not only enables him to help India win the World Cup but also to battle crime. The film is co-produced by Cornerstone Sports and Entertainment Pvt Ltd, a management company whose clients include… Yuvraj. "Cornerstone has always made best efforts to promote brand Yuvraj as uniquely as possible," explained the press release helpfully. "This project is one such opportunity for Yuvi to reach out to the millions of children across the countries who aspire to be like him one day."

"Brand Yuvraj"? Maybe that's the problem. The cricketer has become the brand. In any event, if Cornerstone can claim that their client is a role model for "millions of children across the countries", one can only wonder what this says about their market research.

The sadness is the waste. "Yuvi" has so much to give. Already one of the planet's most destructive 50-over batsmen, those six sixes off one Stuart Broad over in the inaugural World Twenty20 three years ago elevated him to a rarefied plane. Now he was up there with Sachin and Mahendra Singh, potentially the most glittering star of the next decade, one of those for whom surnames are superfluous. Now that next decade has come and he has not really progressed; has not, crucially, become a five-day champion. Discerning judges, noting his impatience and impetuosity, will not be altogether surprised.

In December 2007 he made a fabulous career-best 169 against Pakistan in Bangalore, his first Test knock after those half-dozen fence-clearers, dwelling more than four hours at an international crease for the first time. His 20 subsequent innings have seen a rapid return to modesty: no centuries, more single-figure scores than fifties (six to five), 13 dismissals for under 30 and, all told, 583 runs at 32. Now younger men are being preferred. He is clearly not where he believes he could be, should be. Yet still the rewards flow, and still the celebrity grows. Grappling with that little irony takes some doing.

Fortunately, the impending World Twenty20 in the Caribbean offers him a swift opportunity to atone, to remind us, not what Brand Yuvraj can do, but what Cricketer Yuvraj can. The difference, on this occasion, is that he will be playing for his country, not an unloved franchise. There will be no suspicion of divided loyalties, no team for whom he would allegedly rather be playing. That's why, for the foreseeable future, international cricket will remain the best brand in town.

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Alok on April 17, 2010, 9:04 GMT

    Comes from the horse's mouth, pls read: http://www.yuvrajsingh.co.in/blog.php?blogid=28 Rob, I trust you will find it to be an enlightening read, and hopefully you will not have to wear your psychologist's cap! Rob, precocious talents have to be handled! They seem to do things that appear immature, whereas, in fact, they are more committed than what meets the eye. Yuvraj has a lot of cricket left in him, and i will not hasten to believe that his best days are behind him. BTW, did you observe Andrew Symonds' lack of expression of delight when DC overcame KXIP last night. While DC dugout was delirious with joy, Symonds seemed nonplussed. It appeared strange in view of his now kaput Australian career- his best cricketing days ride on the success of DC. Different people express joy, and despair, in different ways.

  • Dummy4 on April 17, 2010, 4:58 GMT

    i think Yuvraj has a problem with the team. so i think he should dropped from the team. he may be the icon of the team. but sometimes you have to drop icons as well. so i think Yuvraj should dropped. may be its too late. because panjab has only 1 game left. Im a big fan of Yuvraj. but i think he has some attitude problem and he think he is THE man, which he isn't. Panjab doesn't need him to win matches, he may help to wiin but they need a good bowling attack. If they want to win next IPL they need to buy some good bowlers for them. Yuvraj has talent, but he is not a good captain like mahela or like sanga (I think mahela would be the best captain for panjab) . so he has to live with it. if he cant makeup his mind then i think it is better to remove him from the team. it will bring good to the team. then team will play as a unit. this is my idea. i'm really sad abt the panjab and Yuvraj. but nothing to do. Team is more important than a player.

  • Hanu on April 16, 2010, 6:59 GMT

    What the hell is your problem! Leave Yuvraj as he is. He is a good player when he gets going!

  • BillyBlue on April 16, 2010, 4:57 GMT

    LOL Rooboy and Whiskas must surely be from Auz. Its the most hilarious case of a tiger claiming to be a victim of sheep attack I have ever heard. My stomachs hurting to bad and can't hold back the tears from rolling back, I am laughing so hard. I just have 1 point to make. Everyone knows Yuvi is a fringe player in the Indian Test side who future is highly questionable at the best, but what is Pointing's excuse for the way he behaves????

  • Hanu on April 16, 2010, 3:06 GMT

    I will be very happy for Yuvraj to go to another team. I wish he goes to Mumbai Indians.

  • Nathan on April 16, 2010, 1:10 GMT

    Isn't Yuvraj's attitude just symptomatic of most indian cricketers in general? There are some guys in the indian team, Dravid for example, who are pure class, but most of them play the game with the attitude of over-indulged children. 'Give us the pitches we want, give us the umpires we want, allow us to racially vilify our opponents and get away with it, and if you don't, we'll take our bat and ball and go home'.

  • mick on April 16, 2010, 0:57 GMT

    He aint the only Indian player who acts like this

    The way I see it down in australia

    All Indian players except maybe sachin act the same way

    The Indian cricket team is a spoilt bunch of brats who always choke in world cup finals when it matters

    I love it!!!!!!!!

  • bella on April 15, 2010, 23:19 GMT

    @Psyc_s - dude, firstly, yuvraj wasnt bought! he was the icon player for punjab and that exactly is the deal. the fact that he cannot leave his home team even if he wants to. what makes you thinnk yuvi didnt try to leave? what if they didnt want him to leave? he is not fake, and definitely isnt happy and it shows. he is still playign though. still trying to score runs for his team isnt he? now the fact that he is happy or not due to winning is not supposed to be the question. he is true to himself and to the fact that he tries. what the debate is- is the fact that he wasnt as ecstatic as the others were after winning. that's the whole deal, and i dont think i am buying it. yuvraj was not happy, but still tried and it ends there. as for the media, the love picking on him, and it is obvious. Yuvi is just not feeling as important as he used to and that is probably making him insecure. he'll snap out of it - hopefully, and eventually...

  • rajiv on April 15, 2010, 23:07 GMT

    I find people speaking about yuvraj that he is not as talented as players like badrinath and venugopal rao who are not even worth of playing as local players in their corresponding teams in ipl . I agree with the point that yuvraj is a bit arrogant and out of form and at times does not give his best. But i strongly disagree that he is not talented. He is very talented cricketer and proved himself many times by winning matches for india. He has been taken away from game by his increasing fame and earnings.

  • Vineet on April 15, 2010, 13:32 GMT

    I fully agree with Rob, youvraj is a spoiled brat by media, money and fame. But I want to mention one more thing, taking Mahendra Singh Dhoni name in the same breath as Sachin is a disgrace to later. I mean come on it will take another 100 years for Dhoni to be in same league as Sachin. He is more of a politician who knows what to say and do in public.

  • No featured comments at the moment.