Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell Ian ChappellRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Australia captain, now a cricket commentator and columnist

Make captains allies in the fight against corruption

Administrators must be prepared to allow fixers back into the fold, provided they are ready to be held up as examples of what not to do

Ian Chappell

March 25, 2012

Comments: 18 | Text size: A | A

Mohammad Amir arrives for his sentencing process, London, November 2, 2011
The public may feel sympathy for Mohammad Amir but cricket administrators can't afford to do the same © AFP
Enlarge

Life bans are imperative for any player or official involved in fixing - no questions asked. That's because fixing is the one vice that could bring cricket to its knees.

There has been a lot of sympathy for Mohammad Amir, the young Pakistan fast bowler who has just been released after serving half of his six-month custodial sentence. The sympathy is not surprising; he's still a teenager and he's also an extremely talented cricketer, but as Imran Khan observed when Amir was charged: "At 18 you're old enough to know right from wrong."

It's fine for the public to express their sympathy, but in such a high-stakes battle, cricket's officials can't afford any similar emotions. With one exception (discussed below), Amir and all other convicted fixers must be handed life bans from the game and not be able to hold an official position in cricket thereafter.

The crooks certainly don't have any sympathy for cricket. They have displayed an utter disregard for the game and have targeted international captains, the men charged with the authority and duty of influencing young players under their command. Until fixing reared its ugly head it was generally assumed a captain's influence would be positive, or at least not negative.

The fact that four prominent international captains, Mohammad Azharuddin, Saleem Malik, Salman Butt and the late Hansie Cronje, have in the past been found guilty of fixing offences is a worrying trend. It could also confirm the suspicion that to enact a major fixing scam the captain has to be involved.

In order to build a barricade around the game the administrators need to explore ways to ensure team captains are allies in the fight against fixing rather than some being tempted to side with the crooks. And despite employing a zero-tolerance policy the officials should be prepared to make exceptions and invite convicted fixers back into the fold on one condition. If the wrongdoers are truly repentant and prepared to stand up publicly and admit their guilt and speak about the humbling experience, then they could be employed to tell their story to young cricketers to dissuade them from taking the road to self-destruction. It would be a sort of cricketing equivalent of the justice system's hours of community service. When he's ready for the ordeal, this could be a task for a player like Amir.

Cricket is in a life-or-death struggle with the crooks who run the fixing scams. At the moment the bout is lopsided; one contestant is following Marquess of Queensberry rules and the other is a bare-knuckle streetfighter who does not acknowledge any restrictions.

The administrators should inform their anti-corruption officers that in addition to following phone and financial records aggressively, they shouldn't be afraid to rattle the cages of players who they think are acting suspiciously. They should think of it like a cricket match - if you're up against a tough opponent and don't do something to provoke a mistake from the opposition, you're going to lose.

While officials have to be extremely tough in the punishment they mete out in order to send a strong message to the crooks, they also have to make the players fully aware that they intend to eradicate fixing.

It's hard not to feel sympathy for Amir and anger towards Butt, but the administrators can't afford that luxury - for them it has to be a one-size-fits-all situation. However, it's difficult to have any sympathy for the officials - if they had taken notice of some recommendations in the 1999 Qayyum Report, then they might not have had so many problems with the Pakistan team.

Former Australia captain Ian Chappell is now a cricket commentator and columnist

RSS Feeds: Ian Chappell

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (March 27, 2012, 9:01 GMT)

I dont think anything was ever proven against Azharuddin! Due to this 'apparent' reticence and 'proximity' to Pakistan cricketers, we are led to believe that he has to be involved in betting. Nothing was ever proved and the BCCI just played to the gallery, forget sentiments :( It is because we/media wants players to behave in a particular way, even off the field.

Posted by Khairul101 on (March 27, 2012, 3:26 GMT)

I think he carry lot of punishment. Now need him to go cricket for his fan and enjoyable cricket by him. We wait for him..........

Posted by shahzaibq on (March 27, 2012, 0:38 GMT)

I don't think that leniency is the way to go with Amir, or any fixers. On the other hand, I don't think that a life ban is required either. I think a standard five year ban for first time offenders, who plead guilty is appropriate. For younger players like Amir, it gives them enough time to realize the seriousness of their offense, yet gives them a chance at redemption. For older players, who supposedly are more mature and intelligent, it leaves them a zero to none chance. For repeat offenders, or those who plead not guilty and are convicted, a life ban is appropriate.

Posted by   on (March 26, 2012, 17:54 GMT)

I disagree - I think he should be allowed to play & utilize his experience to help other young players stay out of fixing.

Posted by igorolman on (March 26, 2012, 17:14 GMT)

@Imran Ahmed: There will always be more talent. There won't be another game - which we all love - if fixing is allowed to continue.

Posted by hulk777 on (March 26, 2012, 15:58 GMT)

What about the cricket boards, I am sure in some cases they are protecting their players

Posted by listen_2_ur_father on (March 26, 2012, 11:01 GMT)

lets not play god by deciding one's fate, ethically he must be given another chance.

Posted by nasir731 on (March 26, 2012, 7:55 GMT)

Aamir deserve second chance there is no question about that.Very sad to read such articles

Posted by Rajdev on (March 25, 2012, 21:41 GMT)

Leniency for Amir could set a dangerous precedent. No one is greater than the game, no matter how talented. There may be other ways to nurture Amir's talent and serve the ban (technically) at the same time. Let the PCB come up with a creative solution that is acceptable to the ICC. Rajan

Posted by   on (March 25, 2012, 20:41 GMT)

I would disagree. I think as human beings we are bound to make mistakes. Now we have to look at preventing the damage. Cricketers like him should be given a second chance. Allow him to suffer, yes but let him teach and guide other youngsters. A guy who has done it, denied it, confessed it later can have so much to tell to young guys. He can stop them from becoming a victim all over again. I disagree not being emotional but being realistic.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Ian ChappellClose
Ian Chappell Widely regarded as the best Australian captain of the last 50 years, Ian Chappell moulded a team in his image: tough, positive, and fearless. Even though Chappell sometimes risked defeat playing for a win, Australia did not lose a Test series under him between 1971 and 1975. He was an aggressive batsman himself, always ready to hook a bouncer and unafraid to use his feet against the spinners. In 1977 he played a lead role in the defection of a number of Australian players to Kerry Packer's World Series Cricket, which did not endear him to the administrators, who he regarded with contempt in any case. After retirement, he made an easy switch to television, where he has come to be known as a trenchant and fiercely independent voice.

'Smith's record in India is an aberration'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Graeme Smith's terrific record in different conditions

    A hole in England's bucket

Jarrod Kimber: Overworked bowlers, poor selection, and plenty of business jargon - England's cup of woe is full

    England don't need a visible coach

Martin Crowe: The team now consists of two halves: a burnt-out one and a fresh one

    'The guy you want to go to war with'

My XI: Martin Crowe on the gritty approach that turned Allan Border into a run-machine

Battling the fear of defeat

Samir Chopra: A fourth-innings chase can be brutally unforgiving; every wicket can lead to acute anxiety

News | Features Last 7 days

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

News | Features Last 7 days