June 22, 2012

Test cricket, we have a problem

There's no use pretending the premier format will be able to muddle through when it's clearly in serious trouble

For years we thought India's batting would be fine, that one of the many young fellows routinely knocking runs in domestic cricket would become the next Dravid or Laxman. It's the bowling, we thought, that will be the issue. Now it turns out we have a problem with our young batsmen too, none of whom really made an impact against a West Indies side that consisted of those who didn't make it to the team that is disappointing many in England!

As a great fan of Test cricket it worries me enormously, and I know that fingers, like cowardly guns, will be pointed towards easy targets. But is it India alone, possessor of the world's most popular whipping boy, that is the only country in peril? Or is the cricket world at large in some kind of batting recession?

I called up my friend Mohandas Menon and sure as ever the numbers came tumbling out. Test cricket had an outstanding crop from 2004 to 2006. England provided Andrew Strauss, Alastair Cook, Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell; India had Gautam Gambhir; from Australia emerged Michael Clarke and Michael Hussey; and the South Africans threw up AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla. Since then, only one batsman in Test cricket has laid claim to being world class, and that is Jonathan Trott, who appeared in 2009. One from nine Test-playing countries in six years. These are scary numbers.

You could argue that it takes a few years for a player to feel at home in international cricket, but you could safely assume that a player can play in 30 Tests in six years and that is good enough, as Trott has shown, or indeed as most of those in that list above did.

Since then, there have been many who have promised but none who kept their word. Australia tried Phil Hughes, Usman Khawaja, Marcus North and Shaun Marsh; England, the most blessed (or maybe the most organised?) only needed Eoin Morgan and now Jonny Bairstow. New Zealand perhaps promised the most, with Ross Taylor, Martin Guptill, Jesse Ryder and Kane Williamson, but it was also a phase when Dan Vettori was their best batsman (averaging, at one point, ten more than the next best). You could go on. India, the possessor of the most stable line-up tried Suresh Raina, Murali Vijay, Abhinav Mukund, and are hopeful that Virat Kohli and Cheteshwar Pujara will be the real thing.

The bowlers, interestingly, seem to do better. But you'd expect that. Like women in this supposedly liberated world, they have to try harder, they have to be smarter, and they learn to survive. Morne Morkel and Vernon Philander are doing well with Dale Steyn from the 2004 batch. Stuart Broad, Graeme Swann (ignore that first tour) and Tim Bresnan are established, and surely Steven Finn will be. Elsewhere Saeed Ajmal and Kemar Roach have had their moments, and already we have seen what James Pattinson and Peter Siddle are capable of.

So what happens in a few years, when the batch of 2004-06 starts moving on? Which are the young players on the horizon who will light up Test cricket? Kohli? JP Duminy? Angelo Mathews? Darren Bravo? Umar Akmal, maybe?

England look good at the moment (but in Asia, ah well!), and Australia might revive. South Africa look strong but West Indies are still in disarray. Pakistan are good on some surfaces, as are Sri Lanka. New Zealand can't find a batsman to average over 40

You could look at this trend and do the predictable: scream at the brash nouveau-riche kid in town and paint him in every dark shade you can think of. Or you could stop looking at cricket from a hopelessly romantic angle and bring a touch of realism, maybe look at things a little more pragmatically. Or you could do worse: you could weaken one-day cricket through constant tweaking in order to prop up Test cricket. Hurting one doesn't make the other strong.

Everywhere I go, I hear people say Test cricket will survive, and I pray they are right. Indeed, I said it myself till recently. I also heard, in recent years, when India's economy survived the global crisis, that everything would be fine. Through paralysis, India's economy is stumbling. I fear the same with Test cricket unless we do something. I find that people's concern for Test cricket is a bit like India-Pakistan friendship - it stops at romance, at pretty words.

World cricket cannot live in denial. You cannot close your eyes and say, "My son is the best," when he gets 58% in his exams. England look good at the moment (but in Asia, ah well!), and Australia might revive. South Africa look strong but West Indies are still in disarray. Pakistan are good on some surfaces, as are Sri Lanka. New Zealand can't find a batsman to average over 40. And the last eight Tests that India played overseas… And we aren't even talking about Bangladesh and Zimbabwe.

Test cricket needs to take a hard look at itself and, for a start, accept that it is a patient that needs attention. The solution isn't to start firing in all directions - at one-day internationals and at T20. That would be easy, would result in dramatic prose and achieve nothing.

Maybe the solution lies in playing less cricket, maybe in asking some countries if they really are committed to Test cricket. There are many sharp minds who can come up with possible solutions, but first they must admit that Test cricket, as it stands now, is on weak ground. If you do nothing, if you don't see the signs, even General Motors can go bankrupt.

Harsha Bhogle is a commentator, television presenter and writer. His Twitter feed is here

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Muhtasim on June 25, 2012, 18:13 GMT

    @Electrifying Thunder, when was the last time Tamim or Shakib helped Bangladesh win a Test match? It was 3 years ago against a second choice West Indies team. Regardless of the ICC rankings, they are simply not world class players. So they simply cannot be compared with players like Trott, Clarke, Hussey & Pietersen. and just because Tamim won the Wisden award, it doesn't make him a world class player. Even Ryan Sidebottom had won the award once, but he's not a world class player, is he?

  • Harsh on June 25, 2012, 17:27 GMT

    Test cricket has deteriorated and we are virtually losing all the great players.Today we hardly have great fast bowlers,nor fast wickets which assist them.Run-making has been made too easy for the batsmen.After Tendulkar, Ponting,Jayewardene and Sangakaara,bar Kallis or Sehwag we are barely left with any great batsmen.There is no outstanding,champion test team.

    However I must mention that some of the best fought test matches have taken pace in recent years,and test series.Remember the classic S.Africa -Australia test matches and series last year and their previous 2 series and the India -West Indies series at home.Almost all test matches have results unlike previous eras.Run-rates have virtually doubled.Many more results take place on the sub-continent.

    What is needed is to reduce the amount of cricket played which is killing cricket.We need to re-create a new generation of cricketers.

  • Santosh on June 25, 2012, 13:58 GMT

    Stands have gone empty during a test match for many years now. But as was pointed out by the great Rahul Dravid in his orration in Australia, the Test cricket is being 'followed' all the time. Though not necessarily being 'watched live'. Test cricket has that charm to keep the 'followers' engaged not only when the game is 'live' but for years to come. So, we must realise that the traditional way of marketing test cricket is not working. Let the 'follower' enjoy the glorious game when he wants it; either 'live' or otherwise. For example, Indian classical music was never meant to attract a stadium full of music lovers for a concert. A ''rock concert' might be successful in doing that. That has not led the classical music to extinction. Test cricket is now a 'classical' version of the game and must be delivered that way. Harsha, we feel your pain! But don't lose heart. May be you are in a position to be one of the best minds in the buisness to see how the 'classic' is delivered.

  • Aswin on June 25, 2012, 7:28 GMT

    Another typical article of Harsha Bhogle: stating the truths but completely irrelevant. First of all cricket is a team game so it is stupid to analyse the no of good PLAYERS comiun =g through and then blaming the format fot lack of good players.

    To be honest test cricket is healthy at the moment simply because there are 3 very good teams in Eng, SA and Aus competing for the no.1 spot and some other good teams who will improve if their selection committees develop sound brains.

  • Jay on June 25, 2012, 2:25 GMT

    Harsha - Bad analogy: GM's bankruptcy (& many other firms like Chrysler) was triggered by the 2008 economic meltdown of big Wall Street financial institutions (Lehman, Bear Stearns, AIG, etc). It was a Black Swan event: Nobody saw it coming. Only Uncle Sam's massive bailouts stemmed a national & global calamity. Still, GM never lost its No.1 US sales position even in bankruptcy. It even claimed the top sales spot in the world last year! That said, I understand where Harsha is coming from. Yes, cricket has a problem. But it's not insurmountable. Nor is Test cricket on weak ground. There are solutions available: One is repurposing & reinventing of Test cricket. Like GM, it can survive & thrive. Another is optimal scheduling: prioritising & rebalancing all 3 formats. Harsha talks about Ind-Pak friendship. Why not revive the series asap? That's a quick & effective solution! Good for the stumbling economy too!!

  • Dummy4 on June 23, 2012, 19:37 GMT

    @Samir something :- Yes my friend, Wisden player of the year. You perhaps know what that is :)

  • Sameer on June 23, 2012, 19:10 GMT

    @Electrifying Thunder: Tamim Iqbal - world class test batsman? :)

  • Dummy4 on June 23, 2012, 16:44 GMT

    You have forgotten the Wisden Cricketers of the past 2 years-Tamim Iqbal & Shakib Al Hasan. Tamim debuted in early 2008 & Shakib in mid 2007. Clearly you are watching too much of IPL. Just because the upcoming brand of Indian batsmen are not good enough to play anything outside India doesn't mean the rest of the world is not focussing on test cricket. Give the new players some time. the likes of Pietersen, Strauss & Clarke did not become big brands instantly. Would you have named them 2/3 years back ? Give David Warner some time; see where he ends up. & watch some meaningful cricket please.

  • vivek on June 23, 2012, 13:43 GMT

    Cricket formats like art forms don't need support. The true artist never cares about money. Oscar Wilde once wrote in his time, that the reason why England has so many great poets is because the public don't pay any attention to it. Lets hope Test cricket will be like that.

  • Dummy4 on June 23, 2012, 9:38 GMT

    All harsha wants to say is test cricket is dying because india is playing poor!!! Saf,england,aus are doing very well, pakistan and srilanka are average as they always were,west indians were always pathetic after the greats retired, only india declined to the worst.

  • No featured comments at the moment.