Harsha Bhogle
Harsha Bhogle Harsha BhogleRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Commentator, television presenter and writer

Revenge is not the answer

India must play to their strengths against England, but not at the cost of forgetting their long-term goals

Harsha Bhogle

November 2, 2012

Comments: 83 | Text size: A | A

Alastair Cook drives through the covers, India A v England XI, tour match, Mumbai, 2nd day, October 31, 2012
A better approach to the practice match in Mumbai would have been to pick the lower-ranked spinners and let them have a go at the England batsmen © Associated Press
Enlarge
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: England tour of India
Teams: England | India

The word "revenge" keeps cropping up in the build-up to India's series against England, like a whiff of malodorous air on a pleasant evening. I don't like the word. It has the wrong intent. It can produce very short-term goals and can be counter-productive in the long run. Revenge is inevitably clothed in anger, and that is a terrible way to play sport. I fear, too, that the desire to seek revenge can come in the way of the quest for excellence, a far better objective to possess.

Against England, for example, revenge could mean preparing rank turners and unleashing spinners (or more pertinently, helping your batsmen, who can play their spinners better). Rank turners are as bad as trampolines, where the ball bounces from stupid lengths, make batting dangerous, and produce an unequal contest.

I don't mind the producing of pitches that aid spinners, where the ball grips the surface and turns, where batting requires great skill to overcome the bowling. That is fair and is part of the home advantage host teams are entitled to. It is also an essential part of touring and of playing in away conditions.

Preparing dust tracks will give India an inflated opinion of their own spinners and will tell the country's young fast bowlers that when the time comes to step up, they will be the first casualties. When India tour overseas, the fast bowlers will have to be dusted off and the spinners will look inadequate. A short-term goal might be served but in the long-term India will be weakened.

To be fair, India haven't produced too many dust tracks in recent times. Mumbai 2004 was an aberration. It was bad, but only as bad as the pitches for India in New Zealand in 2002 and in Durban in 1996. In fact, New Zealand 2002 is a good example. They produced terrible wickets and won the series with bowlers like Daryl Tuffey and Jacob Oram looking nearly unplayable, but their cricket went nowhere thereafter.

India should back themselves on good turning tracks where skilled batsmen have the opportunity to score runs. They shouldn't have to produce anything worse.

The spirit of revenge will also mean an obsession with a 4-0 scoreline, and that is too far in the distance. Sport often tells you that you need to take one step at a time. You can't think of winning the third set when you are still playing the first. India need to think of winning the first Test, only then contemplate the second, and not think of the fourth till three have been played.

Indeed, the first Test will give them an idea of how good the team really is, for there are problems within it - of form and longevity of key cricketers, for a start. Indian cricket is in a state of flux. Two key batsmen have retired and one key spinner - Harbhajan Singh - has gone off the radar. The openers need to convince everyone that they can put together long partnerships again. India will do well to try to win the first Test and think of the next thereafter.

I suspect, though, that beneath this veneer of great confidence lies a slightly troubled outlook. Not playing a frontline spinner against England in a tour game is an acceptable tactical move but a slightly defensive one. If indeed India plan to waylay England with spin on turning tracks, the more aggressive option would have been to play the spinners ranked Nos. 6, 7 and 8 on the selectors' shortlist, backing them to run through the visitors on a proper spinner's deck in Mumbai. That would be the subcontinental version of what the Aussies often did to touring sides: start at Perth on a fiery track with good first-class quicks, dismantle the visitors before they could adjust, and direct them to the first Test in Brisbane with thoughts of having to play superior bowling on a bouncy pitch. Rather than hide their weapons, the Australians attacked early with them.

I got the impression India weren't too confident of their spin-bowling resources to follow that strategy, but it would still have been a good approach.

I think the opposition England provide will depend largely on how they rate themselves. Too many English teams have arrived in India eager to find traps: food, dust and spin. But now the grounds are nice, the hotels are outstanding (they all serve quality international cuisine), and playing in India isn't really that difficult. Teams with players in the IPL already display the comfort factor, but not many Englishmen have played here. If they search for reasons to fail, they will find them. But if they back themselves, embrace India and look forward to the next morning, I believe they can be more than a handful.

Harsha Bhogle is a commentator, television presenter and writer. His Twitter feed is here

RSS Feeds: Harsha Bhogle

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by jay57870 on (November 5, 2012, 2:51 GMT)

Harsha's embracing the "one step at a time" approach is welcome. Cricket is cyclical with ebbs & flows. India's been in a down cycle since the 2011 WC triumph. Now's the time to buckle up & move on. The focus is on NOW. It's futile to talk about SA in 2013 or WCT20 in 2014. Who'd have imagined No.1 India to fall off the Test cliff so abruptly? Reality: Competition is more even, more parity among the top 5 teams. It's so difficult to win on the road. That's why India must leverage fully its home advantage. And field the best players available now. Advance one game at a time. As Sachin says: "I'm looking at it series by series. As long as I feel that I can deliver, I will continue playing"! His reassuring presence is inspiring. Remember his dedicating India's Test win in Chennai to his fellow Mumbaikars in the aftermath of the 2008 terror attacks? Also the English side's sporting spirit to resume the tour at that difficult time? Agreed: It's time for India's comeback, not payback!

Posted by jay57870 on (November 5, 2012, 2:35 GMT)

Harsha - It's about Redemption, not Revenge! It's Team India's shot to get over that horrendous last trip to England, to show resilience & bounce back. With the way that tour went - key injuries, awful weather & zombie replacements - they're going to be motivated to redeem themselves. And they're going to be tested early & often. That's where they'll find out quickly who they are as a team in the face of adversity. Yes, Team India is in transition. But there's no need to overreact with drastic moves or knee-jerk actions. That's where senior leadership comes in, especially "Captain Cool" Dhoni: to channel the players' ("hurt") feelings into positive energy & boost the team's confidence. They've tasted the good champagne before. Here's an opportunity to taste it again, only one game at a time. That's how comebacks happen. Peter Roebuck put it best in explaining the secret to Sachin's renewal success: "Always stay focused on the next ball"! Just what Team India needs to do!

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (November 4, 2012, 0:58 GMT)

@MattyP1979: Oh and one more thing. You say India won't humiliate England. Now, I know India are not a good test team compared to England BUT what makes YOU say that ? Are you a soothsayer ? What if England do get whitewashed by this underdog Indian side ? Why is it that people always over look Indian cricket ? Our domestic teams are giving England so much trouble. Please follow the news. Oh and there is NOTHING wrong for India to prepare rank turners. That's what is known as home advantage. It's their prerogative. It's up to England to adapt, master, and survive the conditions. If England are really good, they shouldn't have any problem now would they ? Also, you claim there aren't bigger lambs away from home than India. You have been ignorant enough to overlook almost 10 good years of Indian test cricket overseas. India have had so much success ever since Ganguly took over as captain. So many wins and draws overseas than losses. Please check your facts. 2011 was just 1 bad year.

Posted by Cpt.Meanster on (November 4, 2012, 0:46 GMT)

@MattyP1979: Your theory is pure rubbish. So it's OKAY for teams like England, SA, and Australia to lose in India while it's cardinal SIN for India to lose away from home ????? I am not trying to butter up India's obvious fallacies while playing overseas but the fact remains that MOST teams are LAMBS abroad. I don't care about score lines, it's about winning or losing. So even if England or Australia lose 1-0 or 2-0 as opposed to 4-0, it's STILL losing ! While I am frustrated at India's lacklustre ability overseas, it's also heartening to know that almost EVERY other team are equally HOPELESS overseas. Case closed.

Posted by TheBengalTiger on (November 3, 2012, 21:30 GMT)

For all those saying they can't have been green tops because England scored loads. What about the pitches were India scored loads and skittles opposition out for small scores? they were rank turners. difference is, india have quality players of spin, whereas other teams don't. Likewise, in England, the pitches were 100% green tops. Just because England scored on them doesn't mean they weren't.

Posted by MattyP1979 on (November 3, 2012, 19:57 GMT)

Revenge shouldn't be the answer for Ind. 1. Becasue they will not humiliate Eng as they were, and 2. because this method of play has and will continue to ruin any chances they have outside the sub. Howver since they are playing 4 out of 5 years in the sub this second point might not matter. Lions at home has ben carted at many teams of late, but their a fewer bigger lambs away than Ind.

Posted by Feroz9700 on (November 3, 2012, 17:10 GMT)

Harsha is right this time. It's alright to play to win but also we should play fair and with sportsman spirit. Cricket is a gentleman's game and not playing a spinner in a warm up game is only going to strain relations with the visiting side. In that way they should not even had a warm up game for the visiting side and got them to play official test right away.

Posted by   on (November 3, 2012, 15:47 GMT)

Good article but it fails to identify that has been Indian policy since ages that is why they have struggled despite having high quality batsmen it would be better if they play green wickets. Which can turn from day three this would also help their batsmen

Posted by Abrars on (November 3, 2012, 13:37 GMT)

I,am a raina fan ..lol so I loved

Posted by Trapper439 on (November 3, 2012, 13:03 GMT)

Revenge? What have India got to be vengeful about? Vengeance is a word that implies that you've been wronged in some way. India has no wrong to right, they were simply obliterated 4-0 by a better team when they toured England.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Harsha BhogleClose
Harsha Bhogle Harsha Bhogle is one of the world's leading cricket commentators. Starting off as a chemical engineer and going on to work in advertising before moving into television, he is also a writer, quiz host, television presenter and talk-show host, and a corporate motivational speaker. He was voted Cricinfo readers' "favourite cricket commentator" in a poll in 2008, and one of his proudest possessions is a photograph of a group of spectators in Pakistan holding a banner that said "Harsha Bhogle Fan Club". He has commentated on nearly 100 Tests and more than 400 ODIs.

    'The guy you want to go to war with'

My XI: Martin Crowe on the gritty approach that turned Allan Border into a run-machine

    What good is a nightwatchman?

Rob Steen: In modern times, a few tailenders have thrived higher up the order, but the psychological advantage it gives the opposition can't be discounted

    Together they fall

Jarrod Kimber: England rose to No. 1 with a machine-like efficiency but the signs of an impending breakdown were quickly apparent

    Four in four, and stands by Nos. 10 and 11

Ask Steven: Also, most balls faced in a T20, highest limited-overs score at Lord's, and long lives after Test debut

A strange, brutal magic

Jon Hotten: As Ishant Sharma showed at Lord's, short-pitched bowling can open old wounds and create sudden uncertainty

News | Features Last 7 days

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Bigger concerns for England than Lord's pitch

While the pitch took most of the blame at Trent Bridge, at Lord's England will need to get more controlling overs from their spinners. The reality is there is no quick fix

Another battle, another defeat on Planet Al

Alastair Cook has got used to feeling of the axe hanging over him. Only his team-mates can save England now

'Even the bluddy Nawab!'

Pataudi Jr caught a young English fan's fancy for his princely ways and his heroic batting

News | Features Last 7 days