Martin Crowe
Martin Crowe Martin CroweRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former New Zealand batsman and captain

No mystery but an artist all the same

Swann doesn't have a doosra but he has beautiful variations. And even if batsmen have begun to work him out, he's smart enough to keep adjusting

Martin Crowe

February 25, 2013

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A

Graeme Swann claimed three wickets, India A v England XI, tour match, Mumbai, 1st day, October 30, 2012
Graeme Swann: fluent and in sync © Getty Images
Related Links
Series/Tournaments: England tour of New Zealand
Teams: England

Graeme Swann flew into New Zealand last week having not played for two months. Coming straight out of a cold winter, you would expect his feathers and fingers to be stiff and a little raw. Alas for New Zealand, the first ball to Kane Williamson in the first ODI in Hamilton, was beautifully flighted, drifted a touch, landed on a dime, spun a fraction, and called for a searching, hurried stroke. One ball into the tour and I was hugely impressed, again.

I have been thinking about Swann a lot lately, while undertaking and enjoying the task of selecting my personal greatest 100 Test players of all time for my new book. Swann was highly considered but just missed out to many a fine bowler. He came close because he is a genuine artist in an era of camouflaged fools who need degrees of protraction and new laws to serve up their slow stuff. Swann serves up grace, integrity and honest endeavour. He bowls the old-fashioned way, with clever flight and guile.

Firstly, I thoroughly enjoy his movement; his initial practice of the wrist release before he runs in with his smooth rhythmical flow, then the busy body action to generate energy on the ball as it's released. Overall it's fluent and in sync.

He doesn't bowl the doosra, so he doesn't pretend to be two bowlers. Instead, he appears proud and fully equipped to be an orthodox Test offspinner, with beautiful variations to make the ball skip on or drift away or swing slightly towards slip. Above all, he is a resolute, intelligent character.

Swann knows he has to work hard, especially to right-handers, with the ball predominantly turning into the pads. Patience, subtlety, disguise and applying pressure come into the picture. He has to hit that dime. To his credit he has, since he debuted for England in Chennai in late 2008, although he came up against the mighty Sachin Tendulkar as India chased down a boatload. Still, capturing Gautam Gambhir, Rahul Dravid, Virender Sehwag and VVS Laxman in your first Test is a solid indication that you have the goods, and the gumption.

From there, he has been nothing but consistent. In 50 Tests he has 212 wickets at 29 apiece, striking every 59 balls; a significant return in the day of bigger bats, smaller grounds and flatter pitches.

I sense, though, that Swann will from here on struggle to maintain that form and return. It's not that he is losing any of his ability or control, but simply because I feel that the opposition are starting to work out his limitations. Without a doosra he will be an easier task mentally for the batsmen. The schedule will not assist him either. By having three formats to accommodate, of which he really only plays in one and a half, Tests being his mandatory game, he will find it tough to get enough top cricket to stay in top form.

I sense that Swann will from here on struggle to maintain his form and return. It's not that he is losing any of his ability or control, but simply that the opposition are starting to work out his limitations

His focus, and England's, will be the two Ashes over the next 12 months. Michael Clarke will be the biggest threat to his performance. If Swann can find his best drift and loop and keep Clarke guessing when on the charge, then he may be the trump card that helps England retain the urn. Get to Clarke and you get inside the nervous twitch of Australia.

On paper, over the next month he should dominate New Zealand in the three-Test series. However, it has been noticeable how Williamson, Ross Taylor and Brendon McCullum have played him in the one-day series. They have all batted on off stump and got their right eyes in line with the ball, adjusting off the trustworthy pitches to spin and or drift, accumulating nicely without undue risk. If they are smart they will continue that way in the Tests, getting that right eye in line.

Knowing how smart Swann is, he will already be working out ways to combat those three batsmen. One adjustment might be to bowl a touch wider on the crease, taking the line outside the right eye, even if by just an inch or two. The other will be constantly shifting between delivering over and around the wicket, to try confusing the batsmen, taking them into a conscious mode rather then an automatic one.

England is hugely reliant on Jimmy Anderson for this series ahead, and he looks in top shape and form. Steven Finn is perhaps coming into some better form following his run-up adjustment, but Stuart Broad looks plain awful. Surely Graham Onions will be considered a better ingredient, but what form does he have of late?

New Zealand will hope that England retain a bit of winter rustiness for a bit longer. The hosts are undermanned at the top of the order and will rely heavily on Williamson, Taylor, Dean Brownlie and McCullum to keep the bike stand from toppling over. BJ Watling will keep and bat seven. History tells us he scores well as keeper, as opposed to when he isn't.

The Kiwi bowling has potential in three young swing bowlers but it isn't going to be a threat to an England side that has the nous, the guns and the ammunition to post massive scores on easy-paced wickets. After all, with Dan Vettori injured, New Zealand don't even have a left-arm spinner to tease Kevin Pietersen with, nor do they have a Swann.

England should swan through the Test series with grace and calm.

Martin Crowe, one of the leading batsmen of the late '80s, played 77 Tests for New Zealand

RSS Feeds: Martin Crowe

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ultrasnow on (February 28, 2013, 10:31 GMT)

Indian fan here. I grudgingly and belatedly give my (unworthy) stamp of approval to both Swanny and Monty for their success against our batsmen. What bowlers like Warne could not do, this duo has done with distinction. Not a small achievement against batsmen who can play spin in their sleep with one hand. For an Indian fan my ego just got hit for a towering six. I never imagined two english spinners playing havoc in our own backyard. A belated and grudging well played England.

Posted by cric_J on (February 27, 2013, 16:04 GMT)

I have always believed that it is better to have a classical off spinner in your team than a "mystery spinner" because the mystery surrounding these bowlers is cracked sooner or later and then they find it a mystery to bowl to the opposition without being hit !And Swannproves this just why.The man has no frills like the doosra ,teesra or the carrom ball.All he does is that he BOWLS WELL ,proper line ,length and with some of the best variations in the game. but I agree with the author that his biggest strength is his forever up for it cricketing brain and a never say die attitude.He easily is one of the cleverest bowlers in world cricket and thus achieves success even with his limitations.And trust me he would have a longer succcessful period in his carreer than any of the Mystery Men!

Posted by PPD123 on (February 26, 2013, 21:33 GMT)

While I agree with Crowe's assessment that Swann is a good bowler - an artiste as he calls him - but I think it is unfair on his part to label people like Murali, Ajmal and Harbhajan as Camouflaged fools. I think it takes a lot of skill to do what these guys have done over a long period of time. For me Ajmal is the best spinner in the world right now. With regards to rules being bent or changed, well I think cricket has changed enourmously from the time Crowe played. Rules have been changed through the eras to accomodate not only bowlers, but more so batsman. take for example - the limit of 2 bouncers per over, improved and bigger bats, smaller boundaries, leg side wide (even if it misses the batsmen by an inch) & he can play a proper cricket shot, the front foot no-ball rule vs back foot no balls earlier, covered pitches vs wet uncovered pitches. Now question for Mr Crowe is does he have any less respect for batting legends like Lara, tendulkar, Ponting & Kallis?

Posted by former_aussie on (February 26, 2013, 18:14 GMT)

Swann has an excellent record; especially as wickets don't tend to break up as they often did in the past. He is a beautiful bowler and with a lovely action and a great ability to make the ball dip into left-handers. Is is interesting to watch hime side-on - not a kink to be seen - unlike a number of other off spinners one could name!

Posted by nareshgb1 on (February 26, 2013, 17:01 GMT)

Totally agree with the sentiment in this article - but I disagre with the title. "artist without mystery"? come on - what is the mystery with those "dossra" peddlers? we all know how they do it. The artistry is to NOT do what thy do (i.e. bend it like - ok we will leave out names). I absolutely love Swann's bowling an dlook foreward to watch him and we need more like him. AND the bent arms gotta go out of the game.

As for "reverse swing being now considered art form" - well nobody bent an arm for that. so lets not draw meaningless paralllels just because the current poster boy of doosra happens to be from the land of reverse.

Posted by Nutcutlet on (February 26, 2013, 12:13 GMT)

Swann is very much in the mould of JC Laker (and that's a major compliment!) - a classical off-spinner with a full range of variations. Of course, just being able to spin the ball into the RHB doesn't make him (or any good technician) a great bowler, even if an immaculate line & length are a given; it's the ability to work a batsman out, to plan his destruction (sometimes self-destruction!) & this is where Swann has the vital edge on all of his contemporaries, bar Ajmal. It's Swann's cricketing brain that's as special as his bowling. The offie that relies on the doosra/carrom can become caught up in his own cleverness & the control of his stock ball, or his doosra/carrom, or both, can suffer. When that happens he becomes a very ordinary bowler indeed. The case in point is Ashwin in the Tests v Eng. Ashwin, however, is a clever bowler & an intelligent man & v Oz his bowling was far more tightly controlled & the variation used sparingly. Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery!

Posted by   on (February 26, 2013, 9:20 GMT)

"he is a genuine artist in an era of camouflaged fools who need degrees of protraction and new laws to serve up their slow stuff."

"He doesn't bowl the doosra, so he doesn't pretend to be two bowlers."

Wow, I don't think that's fair Mr. Crowe. Sounds bitter to me, if a bowler is bowling legally today with some degree of straightening and has the variance of a doosra then he is a "fool" and "pretending to be two bowlers?"

Posted by din7 on (February 26, 2013, 7:26 GMT)

undoutedly always loved to watch him bowl, swan doesnt have doosra but he's such a clever bowler he will get u no matter how much u read him as he did in india, despite not havin doosra indian batsman stugglrd to play him , this is what aus needs as they dont allow their offspinner to bowl doosra they need a swan, surprised eng picked him too late.

Posted by landl47 on (February 26, 2013, 2:48 GMT)

Sorry, Deckchairandsixpack, but if you think conditions were in Swann's favour in the series against SA last year then your hat must have slipped over your eyes. In a wet summer, with the pitches so hard they would have been good for a 10-day game, none of the spinners could turn the ball at all. Try looking at the Indian series where Swann took 20 wickets in 4 games, or the Sri Lankan series in early 2012 where he took 16 wickets in 2 games, and you'll see what Swann does when wickets really are in his favour.

I don't expect him to have great figures in the NZ series; the wickets are far too easy-paced and only real pace or swing are likely to be effective. If England has a Summer with a bit of sun and there are some wickets which assist spin, he'll thrive (look at his 9-208 against India in 2011 at the Oval, while Mishra got 0-170).

In the meantime, look at his 212 wickets in 50 games and research how many spinners outside Asia have done better. You'll be surprised.

Posted by Cricket_theBestGame on (February 26, 2013, 2:28 GMT)

you prbably said the same thing about reverse swing. thats its cheating blah blah it became art when everyone else started to do it! so i've no doubt when NZ one day produces a offie who can bowl doosra will be hailed as an arties, most probably by you!

"The initial reaction to all this was of suspicion, and perhaps further ignorance. Lawsuits have been filed, dirt has been carried in pockets, a Test has been called off, bottle caps have been credited, lozenges have been thought of as cricketing equipment… Whether the ball used to be tampered with or not, whether Pakistan alone did it or not, we will never know, but it will be pointed out - not without merit - that it all became kosher when Zaheer Khan and James Anderson and Brett Lee began to do it too. "

Posted by Trickstar on (February 26, 2013, 2:26 GMT)

@jmcilhinney The ECB have definitely got Tremlett in their sights again and have had him over in SA for winter training just recently. I don't know if they see him being fit for this summer against Aus but if he gets off to a good start for Surrey and looks 100% fit I don't see any reason why not. What I do think Flower etc want him for is the Winter Ashes tour in Aus, they see him has been a vital cog in us being successful over there, along with Anderson and the new & improved Finn, it would be an awesome attack.

Posted by Cricket_theBestGame on (February 26, 2013, 2:26 GMT)

had more respect for you before this article

on one hand you are basically trashing all the bowlers who can bowl doosra

"He doesn't bowl the doosra, so he doesn't pretend to be two bowlers. "

on the other you are admitting doosra is an art which is necassity for an offie this day and age!

"I feel that the opposition are starting to work out his limitations. Without a doosra he will be an easier task mentally for the batsmen. "

make up your mind mate!

Posted by Trickstar on (February 26, 2013, 2:21 GMT)

Didn't look like the batsmen had begun to work him out on the Indian tour recently ;). There's no doubt though that he's a class act, all you have to do is look at his stats playing in the sub continent, where traditionally bowlers from England, Aus and SA have gone so well. Swann though has been excellent taking 73 wickets @ 25 a piece which is amazing. Even though he doesn't bowl a doorsa, his arm ball enables him to beat the bat on both sides anyway.

The reason Swann has had the occasional poor test is down to his elbow, it's been widely reported & he's talked about it himself, sometimes it feels OK and other times it hurts. It's the reason why the ECB is giving him more series off than before, been keeping him fit for Test series. Watching him bowl last summer against WI & SA you could clearly see he wasn't going through with his action correctly. He looked at times like he was bowling in the nets & wasn't putting his usual amount of elbow and body power into each delivery.

Posted by jmcilhinney on (February 26, 2013, 2:17 GMT)

@DeckChairand6pack on (February 25, 2013, 13:12 GMT), I take your point but I don't think that it's fair to say that any spinner ever has conditions in their favour in England. It's exactly the fact that he has played half his cricket in England that makes his record so impressive.

Posted by soorajiyer on (February 26, 2013, 1:42 GMT)

Lovely smooth action, good slip fielder, decent batsman - a complete package in my opinion. I would stop short of saying he is better than Ajmal, but as a traditional bowler he is country miles ahead of anyone in the last twenty years.. Again Saqi wasnt a traditional offspinner! A big fan of Swann I am from India :)

Posted by plow on (February 26, 2013, 0:01 GMT)

oh yeah, cant wait for the book!

Posted by plow on (February 25, 2013, 23:57 GMT)

Fantastic article Hogan. Jeepers mate your brain is so to the point of what makes great cricketers. No wonder you made batting look so easy. I hope one day you can really contribute to NZ cricket again, in a batting/coaching/leadership role. The current tactics of Hesson/MCullum seems to be lacking one simple ingredient.... intelligence. Love McCullum as captain as he is a leader by nature but he needs some tactical advice. Hesson/MCullum combo seem to have missed some basic stuff like bowling full to a straight Eden Park Boundary, chip 6, chip 6, chip 6. No more allowing Eng bowlers to dominate the first 15 overs, we handed the one day series to them on a plate.

Posted by warneneverchuck on (February 25, 2013, 20:58 GMT)

Swan is the best off spinner of modern era after saqualin mustaq with a simple action unlike many others who claimed to b great

Posted by hhillbumper on (February 25, 2013, 20:39 GMT)

swann can bowl there is no doubt about that. He keeps taking wickets and lets face it the pitches at home are hardly conducive to much spin.

Posted by mikey76 on (February 25, 2013, 18:08 GMT)

Let's hope Onions gets a good run out in the practice match, after such a brilliant season for Durham he deserves a spot alongside Finn and Anderson. If he hits his straps I could see him doing some real damage.

Posted by mikey76 on (February 25, 2013, 18:02 GMT)

@Deckchairandsixpack. Swann was carrying an elbow injury during the South African series. He should never have played. He's a superb bowler as he showed in India.

Posted by Hardy1 on (February 25, 2013, 14:14 GMT)

I love ESPN's choice of pictures.

Posted by DeckChairand6pack on (February 25, 2013, 13:12 GMT)

The Proteas showed how to play him last year where he went for an absolute lorry load of runs and was as impotent as an inspector for the Food Standards Agency. He had home ground advantage and conditions in his favour and even Imran Tahir outbowled him. One thing I do admire him for is that he bowls classic, orthodox and with a straight arm. So I get Martin Crowe's point on that. But as for being considered in a top 100 list, I hope that was said tongue in cheek!

Posted by itsthewayuplay on (February 25, 2013, 12:56 GMT)

Lovely article with one omission - Swann's biggest asset when fully fit is his ability to turn the ball at pace. Too many commentators, and it's mostly former players, keep going on about the mystery spinners when what you really need are wicket-taking spinners. @cricketcricket1987 No question Swann and Panesar outbowled their Indian counterparts but there's no way any of them can be called mystery spinners. In fact following that series, some people said you couldn't even them spinners.

Posted by ashlatchem on (February 25, 2013, 12:33 GMT)

Yet another fantastic article from Crowey! Thanks Martin!! Good to see another article from you. Keep em coming! You're a legend Crowey! I think I can safely talk for all NZ cricket fans when I say thanks for all the memories and keep your head up! We are with you brother!!

Posted by   on (February 25, 2013, 11:30 GMT)

@anotherlostleader I don't understand your point, the DRS system in place merely makes sure that bowlers get the wickets they deserve and the batsman get reprieves from incorrect decisions. So if I'm reading your comment properly then you are saying that Swann has benefitted from having a system in place that is meant to deliver the right decision. The DRS system has not changed cricket like covered pitches or the 1 or 2 bouncers an over, it has just improved the standard of decision making for umpires meaning they are delivering better performances. I think your point would have better if Swann was benefitting from poor decisions rather than correct ones.

Posted by cricketcricket1987 on (February 25, 2013, 10:30 GMT)

Completely disagree with the line "Without a doosra he will be an easier task mentally for the batsmen". Swann has consistently performed in the last 4 years buy using patience, drift and guile. He hasn't needed the 'doosra' to cause teams trouble and teams across the world see him as a major threat. He completely out bowled the mystery Indian spinners in the recent series, not through balls turning the other way, but by builidng pressure with great accuracy and giving the ball a big rip to go with it. I suspect a holding role for Swann at one end on days 1,2,3 and then he'll come into his own on days 4 and 5. New Zeland line up looks very weak and Engalnd will dominate the series.

Posted by JG2704 on (February 25, 2013, 9:18 GMT)

Hello Mr Crowe - I hope you're managing to stay on top of your illness sir. I think everyone will echo this. As I have mentioned on another thread , I met you and Wrighty after a 40 over game between Somerset and Derbyshire and as a kid back then you were both very warm and accomodating.

Re your Swann article , I don't think there's much to disagree with here. As another poster put he may have been helped in a DRS era but so have other bowlers in today's era and Swann's home tests are mostly played on non turners. Another point that Swann's deliveries would have been legal in any era. But I think your points about Swann's guile and mental strengths are spot on. In shorter formats he could go for a number of runs in 1 over and then if trusted to bowl again an over later he often comes back very well.

Posted by RichDeGroen on (February 25, 2013, 8:03 GMT)

Hi Martin, I guess you've got too much class to play the 'I told you so' game, so let me do it for you. McCullum sneaking down the order to bat 5... you told him so. Unfortunately he's now wasted several of his prime batting years doing a pantomime of test opening. A shame to see a guy of his obvious ability now 70 tests into a career and still not having any method for constructing a test innings, or even an idea of where he should bat. If only he hadn't 'stopped listening to you years ago'.

Posted by paps123 on (February 25, 2013, 7:55 GMT)

Swann's a far better bowler in all conditions as compared to Kumble who was non existent away from home in the first 10 years of his career. Swann is only second to Warne in terms of class and legality of bowling action is an aspect we tend to ignore unfortunately.

Posted by anotherlostleader on (February 25, 2013, 7:53 GMT)

I agree with the summary on Swann, apart from one point. More than any other bowler in recent years he has been hugely helped by a new law, DRS. Without this he would have a fraction of the wickets he has. This does not make him any less 'good' but should make one question his apparent brilliance. He is a good bowler but not a great bowler.

Posted by analyseabhishek on (February 25, 2013, 4:31 GMT)

I suspect that just like Anil Kumble, who also relied on subtle variations, accuracy and a canny assessment of the situation, Swann will also keep taking wickets. The problem with these types of bowlers is that they take wickets even you don't expect them to- and precisely due to that very reason! Having able bowlers, including an able left arm spinner, will also help Swann.

Posted by jmcilhinney on (February 25, 2013, 4:28 GMT)

@DrArjun Raj on (February 25, 2013, 3:46 GMT), he's only just coming back from a long spell of injuries. If he was able to get back to his best then I'm sure that he'd pique the selectors' interest again. That said, considering his age and his recent injury history, they may be loathe to take the risk.

Posted by   on (February 25, 2013, 3:46 GMT)

What About Chris Tremlett??They have completely forgotten this lad!!

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Martin CroweClose

    Worst keepers, and honours at Lord's

Ask Steven: Also, most keeping dismissals on debut, seven-for at HQ, and youngest ODI centurions

    From swinging London to Maco country

Diary: Our correspondent walks and buses the streets of the English capital, and then heads for the coast

    When Pidge strayed

My Favourite Cricket Story: Brett Lee remembers how Australia nearly lost the Old Trafford Test in the 2005 Ashes

    How we misunderstand risk in sport

Ed Smith: Success, failure, innovation - they are all about our willingness to take risks and how we judge them

When Jesse went pongo

Beige Brigade: The boys discuss the throbbing excitement of the World Cup, spot slow Bodyline in England, and attack the TV coverage's technology

News | Features Last 7 days

Vijay rediscovers the old Monk

The leave outside off stump has been critical to M Vijay's success since his India comeback last year. Contrary to popular opinion, such patience and self-denial comes naturally to him

Ridiculed Ishant ridicules England

Ishant Sharma has often been the butt of jokes, and sometimes deservedly so. Today, however, the joke was on England

England seem to have forgotten about personality

They have to see a glass that is half-full, and play the game as if it is just that, a game; and an opportunity

Bhuvneshwar on course for super series

Only 15 times in Test history has a player achieved the double of 300 runs and 20 wickets in a Test series. Going on current form, Bhuvneshwar could well be the 16th

Ishant's fourth-innings heroics in rare company

In India's win at Lord's, Ishant Sharma took the best bowling figures by an Indian in the fourth innings of a Test outside Asia. Here are five other best bowling efforts by Indians in the fourth innings of Tests outside Asia

News | Features Last 7 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!