England v Australia, 1st Investec Test, Trent Bridge, 1st day July 10, 2013

No surprises from Siddle

The selectors pulled one out of the hat with Ashton Agar's inclusion but they were wise to stick with the reliable Peter Siddle
14

Ho, hum, they chewed selectorial gum. John Inverarity, Rodney Marsh, Darren Lehmann - three wise men in search of something hitherto unseen for a half dozen years, a team to beat the English. And boy did they come up with a bolter, a fellow so wet behind the ears that most of crowd didn't know he was born.

Who?

Agar, Ashton Agar.

Who?!

Agar.

What, say that again would you, Agar's Plough was it?

No, that's a cricket field at Eton College but it is a cricket reference, which is a start. No, this is a young man's name, Ashton Charles Agar, and he is playing for Australia today.

Really? Two spinners, wow the Aussies haven't done that since Warney and McGiller were at each other's throats.

No, no, just one spinner, Agar.

You jest. What about, er, you know, thingamajig, Xavier is it? Xavier Doherty. No wait, I've got it, Nathan, Nathan Hauritz, isn't it?

No, he's long gone. It's Nathan Lyon you're thinking of.

That's it. Nathan Lyon - 76 wickets at 33 - that's the one. Not bad either.

They dropped him. They picked Ashton Agar, who is 19 years old.

Blimey.

And they did. Australia picked a second-generation Aussie of a Sri Lankan mother and an Australian father. Tall, slim, with a handsome look and a charming smile, he was given his cap in a team huddle by Glenn McGrath. Nice touch. At least they could look at each other eye to eye. Agar plays for Western Australia. He is a real talent with the ball and can bat and field too. Definitely a good choice. But not necessarily now. Now was a risk. A few long hops in the middle of the afternoon session betrayed as much. Michael Clarke stood at slip wondering if he had cocked up his decision to abdicate the selection panel.

When Agar was first tossed the ball, desperation was in the air. Alastair Cook had wafted at a wide one but Joe Root and Jonathan Trott were smacking boundaries. That was from the balls they could reach. Mitchell Starc sprayed it around like a greenhorn. There is something reticent about Starc. It is as if the enormity of the occasion overwhelms him. The captain might do well to tell him to bowl fast and damn the consequences. Some times that releases the devil in a man. At worst, it means he will get through his action.

James Pattinson had been better but not by a mile. Pattinson's good deliveries are beauties but his bad ones are ugly in the extreme. In contrast to Starc, the trick with Pattinson is to get him to slow himself down, so that rhythm rather than force controls his bowling. Perhaps the amphetamines and beta blockers were put under the wrong door.

But the real surprise was Peter Siddle. He never sprays it around but he did this morning. One ball to Trott was memorable for it awfulness, so wide was it of leg stump and on half-volley length. Trott is good there, the legs, so it went the way of many others, for four. At lunch England had 98 and though Root had fallen to a surprise straight ball, Kevin Pietersen was all confidence and evident concentration. Had someone said that 12 wickets were about to fall, they would have been consigned.

Siddle got four of them, to go with the straight one to Root. Immediately after lunch he drew Pietersen into a mistake. Good bowling rather than bad batting. Suddenly he found his line and,in that hustle and bustle way of his, the magic returned. From wide on the crease, he conned Trott into a shocker. From close to the stumps, he found Ian Bell's outside edge. He had a hat-trick in Brisbane the last time the teams met in an Ashes series, so there are no illusions. Matt Prior was amongst that hat-trick and now he collared Prior again, caught at cover of all places, to complete a mighty quintet - Root, Trott, Pietersen, Bell, Prior. Great job, mate.

Put simply, there is nothing that substitutes for a big heart. The worse the situation, the more likely big-hearted "Sid" will do something about it. There isn't much to it, he just keeps coming, each ball a verification of the one previous. There's a huff and a puff and occasionally a house is blown down but in the main he is a shire horse, one for the hard yards. The flatter the pitch, the more you want "Sid" on your side. He is neither a swing bowler nor an extravagant seamer of the ball. He is steady though not pinpoint accurate and he is sharp enough but not quick. In Adelaide last November, he almost beat South Africa single-handedly. Throughout a long, hot day and on the kindest surface to batsmen, Australia were a seamer light after injury to Pattinson. There was no swing, seam or spin but the strong Victorian never yielded, to pitch or opposition. After the final ball of the match and with the draw secured by Faf du Plessis, Siddle sunk to his haunches, foam at his mouth, body drenched and done.

Before play today, a story floated that the three wise men were to leave him out of the team. He had started the tour slowly and Jackson Bird was in good form. The rumour was exaggerated with the Agar news and the notion that two spinners were a runner. But the selectors are wiser than wise. Siddle played and acknowledged their faith. By his own admission he started poorly - "four overs of dross" he said - but a change of ends, a bit of luck and a wicket soon had him sorted. He will probably make a few runs too. He is that sort.

If Agar needed a lesson in Test match cricket he got it today. In part from the absurdity of the scoreboard and in part from his colleague, Peter Siddle. It is a game of small margins, little sympathy and unpredictable swings in fortune. The best you can do is narrow it down, stay patient and give it everything you have - leave nothing out there, as they say. It may be that Agar has a lifetime of it to come. It may be that his 15 minutes is here at Trent Bridge. Either way, he will not forget his first day as a Test match cricketer and the Herculean example set by the bloke who knows nothing more than a hard day's work and the reward it can bring.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Nutcutlet on July 11, 2013, 4:48 GMT

    Anyone who has an eye for the genuine article when it comes to professional medium quick bowlers needs to look no further than Peter Siddle. As you say, Mark, he is the one for the hard yards and must be so often the answer to his captain's prayers. Tim Bresnan is another such, although TB isn't playing here. With a squad of quicks available to Oz, I'm tempted to think that PS was the first name on the selectors' team sheet. As it is, he must take the plaudits for the first of 50 days of Ashes cricket; his contribution has made Australia competitive thus far. I also like the look of young Ashton Agar. The thinking behind his selection has everything to do with England's predominance of right handers & the ball turning away (or looking as if it might!) is always going to pose problems on a dry pitch. He'll snare KP sooner rather than later, I think.

  • on July 16, 2013, 15:42 GMT

    @Mitty2: Statistically Siddle is better than Anderson? I will take your word for it, but to me, that just tells you the inadequacies of purely statistical analyses are, than whether Siddle is a better bowler. Siddle is a bowling machine. He runs in and bowls the same ball 4-5 times an over at the same pace and same line and length (more or less), and a bouncer or 2 to go with it. Doesn't use his brain, doesn't have any soft skills to prise the batsman out. Bowl it there on good line and length, if the pitch offers seam movement and good bounce he gets wickets, like in Australia and on day 1 in England, when the pitch was helpful. But when the pitch has nothing on offer like in the 2nd innings of this test or the matches in India, he is easily dealt with by a patient batsman and is largely ineffective. Anderson on the other hand is an artist. Swings the ball both ways and gets 5 wicket hauls on the flattest decks. Lots of variations. You can replace Siddle with a bowling machine

  • ScottStevo on July 11, 2013, 13:11 GMT

    They mightn't have known who he was yesterday (although I'm sure most who follow the sport would've had an idea after being named in the squad, included in the A tour and in the warm up), THEY DO NOW!!!!! I want to adopt this kid and raise him as my own! Looking at this innings, he could slot right in at 3 - thanks!!!!

  • Alexk400 on July 11, 2013, 9:55 GMT

    Less skill , more heart thats is siddle. He bowls like machine as always. Put every ounce of his energy.

  • GRVJPR on July 11, 2013, 9:37 GMT

    A very ordinary day of cricket. Batsmen show club level technique to handle a little swing. Very ordinary watching day.

  • on July 11, 2013, 6:36 GMT

    @Nutcutlet, not just KP but he made Trott look really awkward at times, getting leading edges and inside edges a few times, just that none of them popped up as catches.

  • YogifromNY on July 11, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    Fantastic article, Mark, on a really, really good fast bowler. He has the heart, the willingness to work hard, and the temperament to take a few blows - and then walk back to his runup and steam back in. And by his own admission, his becoming a complete vegetarian over the past 1 year or more has boosted his stamina even more. Hats off to this lion-heart. - From a US-based Indian supporter.

  • Beertjie on July 11, 2013, 2:56 GMT

    A superb article: just a treat to read with perfect contrasts and nuances. On Agar's selection, as an Aussie fan, I hope he's there when the winning runs are struck, but I'd still replace him. His was a true left-field pick, but how will Lyon respond to this second slap in 2013?

  • Mitty2 on July 11, 2013, 0:52 GMT

    Very, very lucky that we didn't go with an attack without siddle as many wanted. Siddle now has the third best strike rate of an overseas bowler in England (who's taken more than 25 wickets), is the most experienced, is our only quick in the top 20 of the ICC bowling rankings, has proved himself to statistically be a superior bowler to James Anderson who is supposedly better than steyn (lol), and adds grunt and the ability to take wickets when the chips are down which so far the likes of starc and even Lyon have failed to do... For people to suggest he should be excluded considering his success in the last two years is ridiculous. Now, to complete the bowling line up, put bloody Lyon back in (most ridiculous selection, would've preferred any of beer, Doherty or maxwell ;)) and get bird in for starc.

    Oh and Nicholas, your last two article have been much better, keep it up

  • Chris_P on July 10, 2013, 23:35 GMT

    You're right Mark, there is no substitution for heart. Siddle knockers seemed to have forgotten that. Not sure if Agar is ready or not, talk about being tossed into the deep end.

  • Nutcutlet on July 11, 2013, 4:48 GMT

    Anyone who has an eye for the genuine article when it comes to professional medium quick bowlers needs to look no further than Peter Siddle. As you say, Mark, he is the one for the hard yards and must be so often the answer to his captain's prayers. Tim Bresnan is another such, although TB isn't playing here. With a squad of quicks available to Oz, I'm tempted to think that PS was the first name on the selectors' team sheet. As it is, he must take the plaudits for the first of 50 days of Ashes cricket; his contribution has made Australia competitive thus far. I also like the look of young Ashton Agar. The thinking behind his selection has everything to do with England's predominance of right handers & the ball turning away (or looking as if it might!) is always going to pose problems on a dry pitch. He'll snare KP sooner rather than later, I think.

  • on July 16, 2013, 15:42 GMT

    @Mitty2: Statistically Siddle is better than Anderson? I will take your word for it, but to me, that just tells you the inadequacies of purely statistical analyses are, than whether Siddle is a better bowler. Siddle is a bowling machine. He runs in and bowls the same ball 4-5 times an over at the same pace and same line and length (more or less), and a bouncer or 2 to go with it. Doesn't use his brain, doesn't have any soft skills to prise the batsman out. Bowl it there on good line and length, if the pitch offers seam movement and good bounce he gets wickets, like in Australia and on day 1 in England, when the pitch was helpful. But when the pitch has nothing on offer like in the 2nd innings of this test or the matches in India, he is easily dealt with by a patient batsman and is largely ineffective. Anderson on the other hand is an artist. Swings the ball both ways and gets 5 wicket hauls on the flattest decks. Lots of variations. You can replace Siddle with a bowling machine

  • ScottStevo on July 11, 2013, 13:11 GMT

    They mightn't have known who he was yesterday (although I'm sure most who follow the sport would've had an idea after being named in the squad, included in the A tour and in the warm up), THEY DO NOW!!!!! I want to adopt this kid and raise him as my own! Looking at this innings, he could slot right in at 3 - thanks!!!!

  • Alexk400 on July 11, 2013, 9:55 GMT

    Less skill , more heart thats is siddle. He bowls like machine as always. Put every ounce of his energy.

  • GRVJPR on July 11, 2013, 9:37 GMT

    A very ordinary day of cricket. Batsmen show club level technique to handle a little swing. Very ordinary watching day.

  • on July 11, 2013, 6:36 GMT

    @Nutcutlet, not just KP but he made Trott look really awkward at times, getting leading edges and inside edges a few times, just that none of them popped up as catches.

  • YogifromNY on July 11, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    Fantastic article, Mark, on a really, really good fast bowler. He has the heart, the willingness to work hard, and the temperament to take a few blows - and then walk back to his runup and steam back in. And by his own admission, his becoming a complete vegetarian over the past 1 year or more has boosted his stamina even more. Hats off to this lion-heart. - From a US-based Indian supporter.

  • Beertjie on July 11, 2013, 2:56 GMT

    A superb article: just a treat to read with perfect contrasts and nuances. On Agar's selection, as an Aussie fan, I hope he's there when the winning runs are struck, but I'd still replace him. His was a true left-field pick, but how will Lyon respond to this second slap in 2013?

  • Mitty2 on July 11, 2013, 0:52 GMT

    Very, very lucky that we didn't go with an attack without siddle as many wanted. Siddle now has the third best strike rate of an overseas bowler in England (who's taken more than 25 wickets), is the most experienced, is our only quick in the top 20 of the ICC bowling rankings, has proved himself to statistically be a superior bowler to James Anderson who is supposedly better than steyn (lol), and adds grunt and the ability to take wickets when the chips are down which so far the likes of starc and even Lyon have failed to do... For people to suggest he should be excluded considering his success in the last two years is ridiculous. Now, to complete the bowling line up, put bloody Lyon back in (most ridiculous selection, would've preferred any of beer, Doherty or maxwell ;)) and get bird in for starc.

    Oh and Nicholas, your last two article have been much better, keep it up

  • Chris_P on July 10, 2013, 23:35 GMT

    You're right Mark, there is no substitution for heart. Siddle knockers seemed to have forgotten that. Not sure if Agar is ready or not, talk about being tossed into the deep end.

  • on July 10, 2013, 21:18 GMT

    Good luck to this kid. Still, I feel he's been thrust into the wolves den. It won't be easy for him to prove himself in England, especially with the opposition's spinner (Swann) being a proven match winner. But it's nice to see Australia putting faith in the youngster. He's only 19 and there are many more years to go.

  • on July 10, 2013, 20:48 GMT

    Agar may just end up doing more in this match with the bat than the ball, but he does looks like he gets good bounce and decent turn, the talent is there.

    I said in the preview that the strength of Siddle is to get the ball up there with just that bit of nibble that makes things difficult for the batsmen and that's exactly what he did today. He has improved out of sight as a bowler since being under McDermott's tutelage. Plenty more of the same throughout the series I hope. Patto too I thought was okay, he certainly got his length right. Starc still isn't getting it but he is on the improve at least, no matter how slowly.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on July 10, 2013, 20:23 GMT

    Amazing how badly Siddle bowled. He was dreadful. But England's batsmen are so used to beating Australia just for fun these days that they thought they'd have a bit of fun getting themselves out cheaply first. Some of the balls Siddle bowled for his wickets were some of the worst I've ever seen in an Ashes series. Compare that to Andseron, who bowled the ball of the century to bowl Clarke. There's no comparison. Anderson's delivery was truly a ball that will be talked about for years to come.

  • Batmanindallas on July 10, 2013, 20:22 GMT

    Well written..Funny the aussie selectors have goofed on spinners so many times in the recent past. Every young man or new man they seem to be looking for a Warnie. Bowlers like that come once in a lifetime. Agar is a mistake, xavier was a mistake, even Smith when he was picked as a spinner was a mistake. They have ignored a steady descent guy like Nathan in their search for next wonder kid. I am not sure it helps with Nathans confidence, when he is dropped after a decent Indian tour.

  • Batmanindallas on July 10, 2013, 20:22 GMT

    Well written..Funny the aussie selectors have goofed on spinners so many times in the recent past. Every young man or new man they seem to be looking for a Warnie. Bowlers like that come once in a lifetime. Agar is a mistake, xavier was a mistake, even Smith when he was picked as a spinner was a mistake. They have ignored a steady descent guy like Nathan in their search for next wonder kid. I am not sure it helps with Nathans confidence, when he is dropped after a decent Indian tour.

  • Front-Foot-Lunge on July 10, 2013, 20:23 GMT

    Amazing how badly Siddle bowled. He was dreadful. But England's batsmen are so used to beating Australia just for fun these days that they thought they'd have a bit of fun getting themselves out cheaply first. Some of the balls Siddle bowled for his wickets were some of the worst I've ever seen in an Ashes series. Compare that to Andseron, who bowled the ball of the century to bowl Clarke. There's no comparison. Anderson's delivery was truly a ball that will be talked about for years to come.

  • on July 10, 2013, 20:48 GMT

    Agar may just end up doing more in this match with the bat than the ball, but he does looks like he gets good bounce and decent turn, the talent is there.

    I said in the preview that the strength of Siddle is to get the ball up there with just that bit of nibble that makes things difficult for the batsmen and that's exactly what he did today. He has improved out of sight as a bowler since being under McDermott's tutelage. Plenty more of the same throughout the series I hope. Patto too I thought was okay, he certainly got his length right. Starc still isn't getting it but he is on the improve at least, no matter how slowly.

  • on July 10, 2013, 21:18 GMT

    Good luck to this kid. Still, I feel he's been thrust into the wolves den. It won't be easy for him to prove himself in England, especially with the opposition's spinner (Swann) being a proven match winner. But it's nice to see Australia putting faith in the youngster. He's only 19 and there are many more years to go.

  • Chris_P on July 10, 2013, 23:35 GMT

    You're right Mark, there is no substitution for heart. Siddle knockers seemed to have forgotten that. Not sure if Agar is ready or not, talk about being tossed into the deep end.

  • Mitty2 on July 11, 2013, 0:52 GMT

    Very, very lucky that we didn't go with an attack without siddle as many wanted. Siddle now has the third best strike rate of an overseas bowler in England (who's taken more than 25 wickets), is the most experienced, is our only quick in the top 20 of the ICC bowling rankings, has proved himself to statistically be a superior bowler to James Anderson who is supposedly better than steyn (lol), and adds grunt and the ability to take wickets when the chips are down which so far the likes of starc and even Lyon have failed to do... For people to suggest he should be excluded considering his success in the last two years is ridiculous. Now, to complete the bowling line up, put bloody Lyon back in (most ridiculous selection, would've preferred any of beer, Doherty or maxwell ;)) and get bird in for starc.

    Oh and Nicholas, your last two article have been much better, keep it up

  • Beertjie on July 11, 2013, 2:56 GMT

    A superb article: just a treat to read with perfect contrasts and nuances. On Agar's selection, as an Aussie fan, I hope he's there when the winning runs are struck, but I'd still replace him. His was a true left-field pick, but how will Lyon respond to this second slap in 2013?

  • YogifromNY on July 11, 2013, 4:03 GMT

    Fantastic article, Mark, on a really, really good fast bowler. He has the heart, the willingness to work hard, and the temperament to take a few blows - and then walk back to his runup and steam back in. And by his own admission, his becoming a complete vegetarian over the past 1 year or more has boosted his stamina even more. Hats off to this lion-heart. - From a US-based Indian supporter.

  • on July 11, 2013, 6:36 GMT

    @Nutcutlet, not just KP but he made Trott look really awkward at times, getting leading edges and inside edges a few times, just that none of them popped up as catches.

  • GRVJPR on July 11, 2013, 9:37 GMT

    A very ordinary day of cricket. Batsmen show club level technique to handle a little swing. Very ordinary watching day.