England v Australia, 1st Investec Test, Trent Bridge, 5th day July 14, 2013

World changes for Ashton and Australia

Ashton Agar strode out on debut at No. 11 with his team reeling and transformed the series in just over an hour of batting

In one hour at Trent Bridge on Thursday morning, the world changed. Or, if that is an exaggeration, the world of cricket in which we all revolve shifted on its axis a little. It was midday when Ashton Agar came to crease, his team reeling from a scoreboard that read 117 for 9. The witches who had stirred their pot to predict 10-0 in the coming months looked on with sadistic anticipation.

By 1pm, the pre-written storyboards were in the bin. There was a new tale to tell: the tale of a 19-year-old Australian, born in Melbourne to a Sinhalese mother, slaying Goliath. Unheard of, unseen and unbelievable - Ashton took us to Disneyland.

Because Australia were nine wickets down, lunch was delayed by half an hour - a new wheeze from the ICC that took us all by surprise - and so the fantasy continued: dazzling cuts, pulls and drives that smashed record after record along the way. From that point on the match, and the series, was alive.

Australia needed something, or someone, like this. Not just the blokes here at Trent Bridge but the blokes and the Sheilas back home. It is a proud land and requires its sporting heroes to front up. That Agar looked good was okay, that he played good was magic.

Inspired, the Channel Nine viewing figures have gone through the roof and the network are comfortable that their cricket gamble will pay off. Kerry Packer's erstwhile channel spent handsomely for the rights a month or so back. Had Brad Haddin and James Pattinson managed 15 more runs on Sunday, the celebrations at Nine HQ would have matched those at Cricket Australia, where the rehab of the team is on everyone's lips.

The fact is that Australia loves and cares about cricket. The folk at the Nottingham hotel told stories of friends and family sitting up through the night and of expats glued to their 50-inch screens in Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur and the like. They said that Nine was cricket's home in Oz and that Michael Clarke was winning friends that he never thought he would have.

Clarke gave a marvellous interview at the post-match presentation, as did Alastair Cook - both men relieved but for very different reasons. Cook directed a team that conceded 228 runs in the match to the Australian tenth wicket. That is bad karma. Had it led to defeat, the nights ahead would have been long. Clarke saw his team go to the wire without a significant contribution of his own. And he saw Agar put out a marker. There you go boys, he might be saying, a kid from the west got under England's skin. It is not just me, it is him, and it is also you who can resist them. Play the ball, not the man, and enjoy it for what it is, an upscale game of cricket.

Having said that, it was an especially hard match: a match that needed patience and clear thinking. The umpiring and decision review moments threatened to overwhelm the cricket itself but, though the DRS had the final say, the tension and thrills created by the players won through.

It is too simplistic to say that the DRS should be taken out of the hands of the players and left to the umpires. The principle is strong enough but the reality is that no on-field umpire will risk a decision without referring it to his mate indoors, who has the considerable advantage of television replays at his fingertips. Why would he?

Even in defeat, the Australians are in a better place than they could have dared hope at midday on Thursday

Morality, what remains of it, would be replaced by technology as the minutiae of the game. Every decision will go upstairs; it will have to. And when it does, the technology will be proved almost as fallible as the umpire. Ask Jonathan Trott. What's more, all decisions will take forever and the game's natural rhythm will be lost.

The DRS is not a mile away from fulfilling its responsibility. Maybe the teams should be allowed one option rather than two, and that way they can pretty much forget about it until they know they have been wronged.

To satisfy the moments that are obvious enough after the event, allow the third umpire to intervene when it is immediately clear to him that a serious mistake has been made. In other words, give both player and third umpire a piece of the pie but leave the fellows on the field to do their job up until the point of extreme misjudgement.

Finally on this subject, the ICC must take responsibility for decision-making technology. The broadcaster is providing for its audience not for the administration of the game. Over these past five days we have been reminded just how emotionally charged cricket has become, particularly in Ashes cricket, and we would see it too if India were to play Pakistan.

The crowd is wound up by the daily anthems and, mostly, the players wear their hearts for all to see. They are under the glare of a demanding audience in a game needing to hold its place in a changing world order. The ICC can help by ensuring that the manageable controversies are kept to a minimum.

For all that, and even in defeat, the Australians are in a better place than they could have dared hope at midday on Thursday. Though Clarke would not have it, they are also in a better place than before the series began. They have seen that England are vulnerable and that the theatre of the Ashes is as challenging for old hands as for new.

The brilliant selection of Agar should now be matched by a volte face on David Warner. If he is at Heathrow, heading for an Australia A game in Zimbabwe, send a taxi to bring him back. Warner has talent - with bat, ball and in the field - and attitude. Channel that attitude to the cricket at Lord's; it is a stage that might make him. There is no time for Australia to waste.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Richard on July 17, 2013, 12:33 GMT

    Australia take all the positives from the first match. England have lost the advantage.

  • H on July 16, 2013, 9:58 GMT

    @Aidan Taylor I didn't say Agar's innings was of less importance though, did I? I'm saying that without Haddin's knock, which was under far more pressure, they'd have lost by a bigger margin. Agar came out with zero expectation, was probably out for 6 (and lots of Aussie fans have agreed with that) and played with a lot of freedom.

    It was wonderful to see, and as a spectator it was probably the most enjoyable bit of the Test match, even though I'm an England fan and knew it was hurting us. But Haddin's knock was a better one, in my view, because it was under pressure. If you don't think so then why did so many call Bell's hundred his best? It wasn't the runs he scored (he's got several bigger scores than that) or the shots he played (it was not a particularly pretty innings). It was the pressure he played under.

    For Haddin it must have been torture as the target got closer and closer. Do I play another big shot? Do I just look for singles and trust Pattinson (who can bat)?

  • Dummy4 on July 16, 2013, 9:08 GMT

    @H_Z_O - I think you might have your binoculars the wrong way round. Without Agar's superb 1st innings performance, Australia would have needed 98 more runs more to win. Agar's achievement is precisely what gave Brad Haddin (and James Pattinson) the chance to get as close as they did, both numerically and psychologically. Agar's innings was of huge importance.

  • Dummy4 on July 16, 2013, 9:00 GMT

    The magic of Agar is in the mix of the two gene pools. The way he came to bat, there was no lack of stability and he was sure footed, knew when and where to hit the ball. He looked absolutely at ease in the middle. Time will tell how he will prosper

  • nuwan on July 16, 2013, 4:33 GMT

    Agar certainly has a cricketing pedigree. His grandfather is a bit of a cricketing legend in our school in Sri Lanka. I've heard that the trophy for the annual big match played between Trinity College (Kumar Sangakkara's school) and Dharamaraja college is named after his grandfather.

  • sam on July 16, 2013, 3:20 GMT

    @salazar555 Ok fine. It tells me you don't understand cricket. He bats like Brian Lara and Yuvraj Singh and times the ball nearly as well as them. And you think he can "swing" the bat. He normally bowls with more side spin but because of injury was bowling with over-spin did pretty well even with that. His bowling is far from the finished article but if he is as successful as Vettori as an all-rounder in 10 years time admit that you made a mistake judging talent.

  • James on July 15, 2013, 23:56 GMT

    Warner rarely knuckles down to the task. The game is not going to adapt to him. Praising him doesn't help. If I could see him bat for an hour and not score a run I might have more faith in him. I would not like him in my team the way he is because, contrary to his image, he is too fragile.

  • Dummy4 on July 15, 2013, 21:02 GMT

    I'm not a big fan of Cowan and I think that he has had ample chances to prove himself while Khawaja has been waiting on the sidelines. In fairness to Cowan, though, he was ill for much of that game.

    I'm undecided about whether Cowan deserves another chance but with Warner short on match practice and unimpressive in the lead-up to the Ashes anyway, I'm not nearly so sure that he (Warner) should make a u-turn from Heathrow.

  • Mark on July 15, 2013, 17:08 GMT

    While everyone is singing the praises of Agar. Rightly so. Everyone has forgotten Phil Hughes great knock in support of Agar. Surely after that last wicket pairing. Phil Hughes and Ashton Agar have justified themselves from now on as permanent fixtures in the Australian team with the Aussie selectors. I think Australia finally has about 6 or 7 permanent guys that could make a pretty good Ozzie team for the future. Certainly will never reach the 1990s Mcgrath Warne era, but the talent is there for a pretty good Aus side for the near future. If the selectors choose wisely. Certainly Phil Hughes and Ashton Agar have justified there spots form permitting for the next five years.