Guest Column Guest ColumnRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives

Indian women's cricket languishes under the BCCI

While other teams have progressed since the men's and women's cricket boards merged, India continues to lag behind, both on and off the field

Anupriya

August 13, 2014

Comments: 3 | Text size: A | A

The Indian women's cricket scene remains bleak, with a vague pay structure, few tours and poor results © AFP

A cursory glance at the history of Indian women's cricket will tell you that with players like Mithali Raj, Diana Edulji and Jhulan Goswami, the team has never been short of individual brilliance. It once held within its ranks the player with the best bowling figures in women's cricket, Neetu David (8 for 53), and the batsman with the highest individual score, Mithali (214).

After the zenith of appearing in its first World Cup final in 2005, the Indian women's team reached its nadir with a group-stage exit in front of their home crowd in 2013, finishing last in their group, behind traditional powers England and relative minnows West Indies and Sri Lanka.

In 2005 the ICC passed a directive to all its members to merge with their respective women's cricket boards. The BCCI was among the last to do so. Reluctant to accept the merger, the Indian board initially looked to maintain the status quo in women's cricket. A few good measures were introduced, though, like match fees.

The cash-rich BCCI was expected to do much more for the promotion of women's cricket, but that was not to be. In the early years after the merger with the ICC, many boards took the step of scheduling more tours for their women's teams. For example, between 2009 and 2014, the West Indies team, despite their board not being as well off as the BCCI, played 61 ODIs to India's 40.

The overall standard of women's cricket worldwide saw measurable improvement in 2006, and many national teams have gone on to become competitive, but the Indian team has seen a progressive drop in performance in that time. Since appearing in the World Cup semi-finals for the first time in 1997, India made it to the final four in the next three tournaments as well. However, in 2013 they finished seventh out of eight. In the World T20, India finished as semi-finalists in 2009 and 2010, but they were last in their group in 2012, and failed to go past the group stage in 2014, when the number of teams increased from eight to ten.

The West Indies and Sri Lankan teams are examples of women's cricket flourishing after the mergers. Talented players like Deandra Dottin have emerged in that time for West Indies, and after failing to make the final four in the inaugural World T20 in 2009, they have consistently reached the semi-finals of the tournament since 2010.

The Sri Lankan team has benefited from the involvement of the army in the sport, and thus from the prospect of regular jobs for players. After their first appearance at the World Cup in 1997, Sri Lanka achieved their best showing in 2013 by finishing fifth. The margin of improvement has been huge and sharp, considering they finished last in 2009.

 
 
Barely enough data exists about the number of girls taking up the sport in India. Lack of will permeates all levels
 

While writing this, I happened to read an article on ESPNcricinfo by Alison Mitchell on the women's Ashes. The ECB has conducted an extensive study and published data on the growth of the women's game in the country - a notion that seems otherworldly in contrast to the inaction of the BCCI.

To say that the Indian board's attitude towards women's cricket has been indifferent would be sugar-coating it. A brief comparison between the record of the Indian team against other teams before and after 2006 is indicative enough. Until 2009, the Indian team had never lost ODIs to West Indies, Sri Lanka or Pakistan. Since 2009, India has lost ODIs to West Indies and Sri Lanka and lost a T20 to Pakistan for the first time.

It is evident that India's performances in international tournaments have suffered since 2009. The blame for this can largely be assigned to the BCCI's policies and its insistence on doing the bare minimum required to get by. Barely enough data exists about the number of girls taking up the sport in India. Lack of will permeates all levels. While the England and New Zealand cricketers are getting professional contracts from their boards, the pay structure for Indian women cricketers remains unspecified.

Within the corridors of the BCCI, the argument often raised for the lack of adequate financial incentives to women cricketers is that they are not "revenue earners". "Nobody watches girls play," they say. The BCCI's blatant disregard for the sport is evident in the way women's cricket is packaged and marketed. To cut costs, the 2013 World Cup wasn't played across the nation but restricted to Mumbai and Cuttack. The shifting of the World Cup from the Wankhede Stadium to accommodate a Ranji Trophy game sums up the board's attitude to women. And with the decline in the Indian team's performance, the prospects of securing corporate backing are bleak.

This was not the case in 2010. Indian women's cricket was given a golden opportunity to gain national attention when cricket was included in the 2010 Guangzhou Asian Games. India have won all four Asia Cup tournaments. It is fair to say they were favourites for gold at the Asian Games. The men's team probably doesn't need the attention and recognition that an Asian Games medal would have offered, but Indian women's cricket was in dire need of it. However, the BCCI decided against sending a team to the tournament. Pakistan won gold and Bangladesh silver. That Japan picked up bronze was another reminder of the opportunity India missed.

Logic dictates that a team capable of beating England in England can only get better when supported by the vast resources and infrastructure of the BCCI, given that the core of the team has remained the same all these years. Mithali is still India's match-winner, and Goswami their go-to bowler. It's revealing to realise that the cash-strapped Women's Cricket Association of India, which organised its matches in school and university grounds produced world-class talents of the likes of Mithali and Goswami. The BCCI era still awaits its Mithali Raj.

This is part one of a two-part feature on women's cricket in India. Anupriya is a Delhi-based student who is a former state-level cricketer

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by yoogi on (August 14, 2014, 4:44 GMT)

The reason also lies in not having women representatives. Hope one day women has representation on BCCI board as well.

Posted by flypen2 on (August 13, 2014, 17:47 GMT)

Thanks for the article, Anupriya. Keep them coming. I have been a fan of women's cricket for a long time. Loved watching the last world cup. The quality of the game has improved so much over the years for most of the countries...except India. But why? I put the blame squarely on BCCI. When impoverished boards like Sri Lanka and West Indies can support their women's teams in improving, what is holding back BCCI? I do not think it has anyting to do with money, It is the chauvinistic attitude of the powers in BCCI. All they need to spend a couple of millions (peanuts considering their revenue) to improve the training facilities and playing opportunities for the Indian team. And what about contracts? As an Indian fan, I am more than disappointed, actually ashamed that BCCI do not offer central contracts to Indian Women's team. Enough of my rant.

Posted by   on (August 13, 2014, 9:54 GMT)

"Within the corridors of the BCCI, the argument often raised for the lack of adequate financial incentives to women cricketers is that they are not "revenue earners"." And therein lies the central problem with the BCCI. They seem not to understand the idea of putting cricket (rather than revenue) first.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print

Walking up the down escalator

2014 in review: Player strikes, defeats against fellow minnows, and mountains of debt for the board marked another grim year for Zimbabwe

    The first Boxing Day classic

Ashley Mallett: Nearly 150 years ago, the MCG saw the start of a much-loved tradition, with a match starring Aboriginal players

Hangovers and headaches

2014 in review: Embarrassing defeats, a beleaguered captain, a bitter former star, alienating administrators - England's year was gloomy. By George Dobell

Ten years later

Gallery: Efforts by Surrey have helped transform a coastal village in Sri Lanka devastated by the December 26 tsunami

Going for glory and falling just short

Anantha Narayanan: An anecdotal account of close finishes similar to the recent Adelaide Test

News | Features Last 7 days

Watson's merry-go-round decade

In January 2005, Shane Watson made his Test debut. What does he have to show for a decade in the game?

Power to Smithy, trouble for Dhoni

Australia's new captain admirably turned things around for his side in Brisbane, leading in more departments than one

Why punish the West Indies players when the administration is to blame?

As ever, the West Indies board has taken the short-term view and removed supposedly troublesome players instead of recognising its own incompetence

Gilchrist's conscientious moment

In the semi-final against Sri Lanka in 2003, Adam Gilchrist walked back to the pavilion despite being given not out by the on-field umpire

Australia's 50-50 lifelines

Three Australia players made half-centuries on day one at the MCG; for each of them, the innings' meant different things

News | Features Last 7 days