The joy of Johnson

How one fast bowler gatecrashed several batting tea parties

Andrew Hughes

Comments: 9 | Text size: A | A

Cricket could be described as a collection of people standing around in a field performing elaborate athletic rituals while they wait for something to happen.

This is not a criticism. The standing-around aspect of cricket raises it above most other sports. Football, for example, also consists of people in a field waiting for something to happen, but in football, the people spend all their time running hither and thither in a breathless and frequently undignified pursuit of events. An hour or so of watching people haring about recklessly can drive you to distraction, as anyone who has shared a house with more than one young child can confirm.

Rugby too involves a certain amount of standing, with marginally less running than football, but features considerably more heaving, grunting, punching and bleeding, none of which is conducive to a pleasing viewing experience. The only other sport that comes close to cricket is baseball, but the positive impression created by the lack of meaningful action is spoilt by the players' unhygienic expectorative tendencies.

Newcomers to cricket often complain about the dullness, but if they stick with it, then eventually, like novices meditating under a peepul tree, they get it. In cricket, as in life, nothing happens for long periods of time. Then something happens. Then it stops happening, normality is resumed and we spend the rest of the game remembering the thing that happened, like travellers trudging across the Sahara recalling their last oasis.

Sometimes the thing that happens is an illegal or dubious thing: an aluminium bat, a mouthful of leather, a pocketful of dirt, a finger-wagging stand-up row between two portly gentlemen wearing white, a sheepish underarm, a fat man with a moustache chasing a dog. These things are part of cricket history whilst the games in which they occurred have disappeared into the black hole of memory where most sport ends up.

Occasionally, the players can provide the thrills. But only certain kinds of players are able to do this. Mitchell Johnson is one of them.

I'm not a cricket journalist, so I know nothing about fast-bowling technique, but to the uninitiated, the pleasure of watching Mitchell Johnson bowl is a straightforward one. It may be that what Johnson does these days is incredibly complicated. But it doesn't look complicated. To the outsider it appears that as soon as he ditched all the paraphernalia of the everyday swing bowler, all that humdrum yawnsome stuff about wrist position and seam-angle anxiety, his bowling became gloriously simple.

For 14 years, 21st century batsmanship has been a genteel tea party in which overrated nudgers and blockers have strolled around on soporific pitches, politely taking it in turns to accumulate enormous piles of devalued runs.

Into that cosy set-up, Mitchell Johnson has burst like a caveman, smashed all the cups, emptied the tea pot over the vicar's head, stuffed all the fairy cakes into his mouth and swung from the ornamental light fittings making Tarzan noises.

By reducing his bowling to the basics: a short fast one and a full fast one, he appears to have fulfilled the promise of that idea that we all secretly nurture: that if only we could just cut away all the trivia, the worry, the nuance, the subtlety and the detritus of everyday life, we could live a simpler, happier, altogether more thrilling life. Mitchell Johnson isn't just an entertaining fast bowler, he's a prophet. Sort of.

Andrew Hughes is a writer currently based in England. He tweets here

Tell us what you think. Send us your feedback

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 9 
Posted by Praxis on (February 21, 2014, 22:11 GMT)

Top one, Mr. Hughes. I'm quite sure Mitch won't be doing it for long. Eventually his domination will come to an end. But its quite refreshing to see some fast bowler truly terrorizing the batsmen. I can only see such things in YouTube searches for 80s cricket highlights. I'm sure every true cricket fan is savoring this, even if your team's at the receiving end of it. Nothing is more exciting in cricket than a quick bouncer aimed to decapitate the batsman.

Posted by Insult_2_Injury on (February 20, 2014, 2:00 GMT)

Funny thing perception! See ball, smash ball....ahh this T20 will be the ruination of real cricket! Sling ball, aim at throat....ahh great to see a contest come back to Test Cricket!

Posted by   on (February 20, 2014, 0:21 GMT)

thank you - minimum post length 25 characters! That's outrageous!

Posted by k_r_a on (February 19, 2014, 17:07 GMT)

" I'm not a cricket journalist, so I know nothing about fast-bowling technique .. " very nice touch

Posted by headphonedelephants on (February 19, 2014, 15:23 GMT)

Hughes you're a genius. F off 25 characters. What rubbish. As if all things going around here are meaningful.

Posted by steve48 on (February 19, 2014, 10:38 GMT)

Mitch is not so much the prophet as the one chosen to prove right all the prophets who saw into a future where nobody can really bat, due to the front foot clubbing demanded by 50 and 20 over cricket, and all the pitch and rule changes brought in to facilitate it. Johnson is using the tactics formerly used only to remove handy tail enders to terrorise and dismiss top order modern players. The way modern players no longer know how to play defensively off the back foot, because they hardly ever have to, is causing the alarming cricket we are seeing. McLaren would be dead without his helmet, as would several others recently. Go back and across, young batsman instead of stand and deliver with a forward press, learn to nimble of foot like ABD , don't copy Chris Gayle! Mitch will have his followers coming, be ready!

Posted by HenryPorter on (February 19, 2014, 9:22 GMT)

It's interesting isn't it. When Johnson takes wickets he looks truly joyous (previously "how did I do that?", now "crikey we did it again!"). When Steyn takes wickets he looks angry. When Anderson or Philander take wickets they look smug. The joy is what engages fans, the high-stakes-risk is what keeps them on the edges of their seats. Already I have severe PMT (Pre-Mitch-Tension) ahead of Port Elizabeth. I wonder how many Saffers do too.

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (February 19, 2014, 6:27 GMT)

Johnson is fast and in a purple patch right now . The rest is all hogwash !

Posted by Cricket_Anonymous on (February 19, 2014, 5:56 GMT)

It's always a pleasure reading Hughes.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email this page to a friend Email Feedback Feedback Print Print
RSS FeedAll
Andrew Hughes
Andrew Hughes is a writer and avid cricket watcher who has always retained a healthy suspicion of professional sportsmen, and like any right-thinking person rates Neville Cardus more highly than Don Bradman. His latest book is available here and here @hughandrews73

All Articles »

Andrew HughesClose
Andrew Hughes Andrew Hughes is a writer and avid cricket watcher who has always retained a healthy suspicion of professional sportsmen, and like any right-thinking person rates Neville Cardus more highly than Don Bradman. His latest book is available here and here @hughandrews73
  • ESPN
  • ESPNF1
  • Scrum
  • Soccernet