Australia v England, 1st Test, Brisbane, 2nd day November 26, 2010

Anderson leads attack into pivotal third day

It is a mark of both the respect England have been given by their opponents and the tenacity they've shown in the first two days that they are so close to parity despite spending so long chasing the game
16

Slowly but surely England are feeling their way into the series, and it is a mark of both the respect they've been given by their opponents and the tenacity they've shown in two less-than-perfect days that they are so close to parity despite spending so long chasing the game. Judgment on their immediate prospects will have to be deferred until Saturday's first hour is done and dusted, when the second new ball promises a seismic shift in the narrative, but whatever transpires it won't be anything less than compelling.

If this was any Gabba contest of the past 20 years, England would already be out on their feet. From Andrew Strauss's third-ball dismissal to Peter Siddle's hat-trick, and on through a frustrating second morning which began with Simon Katich and Shane Watson's chiselled opening stand and crescendoed with a trio of UDRS knock-backs, the reasons to believe would have been exhausted long ago. If this was 2006, Matthew Hayden would by now have bludgeoned a brutal century, and the series obituaries would be written up already.

But time has marched on for Australia, and they aren't in a position to dominate as they once could. No-one knows that better than their man of the moment, Michael Hussey, whose gutsy 81 not out required a conscious decision to rid his game of doubts, the like of which wouldn't have existed in the first place if the team as a whole were still the champions of old. As a consequence, England's bowlers were given a chance to adapt on the job, a luxury which both Steven Finn and Graeme Swann were especially grateful to receive.

Neither man bowled appallingly, and in Finn's case his post-lunch performance was superb. But like a mortar platoon with a speculative range-finder, there was all manner of adjustment before that perfect length was nailed. Early in his spell, Finn was too full to Shane Watson and paid the price with three crunching drives, while Hussey's assault on Swann was not - he claimed - pre-meditated, but neither did it need to be given how regularly he dropped the ball short.

For all his natural bravado, Swann's worst Test to date was last summer's Ashes opener at Cardiff, when Nathan Hauritz outbowled both him and Monty Panesar, and once again he was showing signs of anxiety when, after four overs, he was nursing figures of none for 34. But instead of allowing himself to be belted out of the attack, Swann rose to the challenge and found a means to respond. He owed much of that, of course, to Australia's new-found fallibility - with Marcus North's tame dismissal following the predictable script of his career - but England deserve credit for willing themselves back into contention.

"They stuck at their tasks really well," said Hussey. "Graeme is an outstanding bowler if he's allowed to bowl and get into a real good groove, so I wanted to be positive, because I do get into trouble if I get tentative or negative. There's a small margin of error on this pitch, so the game is really interestingly poised. It's probably 50-50 at the moment, and the first hour or two tomorrow might be the pivotal point of the match."

For Finn, his first taste of Ashes cricket was the culmination of a stellar rise, and the sort of moment that could hardly have been further removed from his low-key debut in Chittagong back in March, where the crowd consisted of a handful of local fishermen rather than tier upon tier of rapt and raucous Aussies. He was alone among England's bowlers in conceding his runs at four an over, but when his 6'10" frame located that elusive "right area" he was deadly, as Hussey could testify after watching his first-ball snick die inches short of second slip.

"A few times today, it didn't quite go to plan," said Finn. "But I'm young; I'm learning all the time - and it's important that I keep doing that and come back better. We're happy with our day's work as a unit. I thought the other bowlers bowled fantastically well, but that's been the nature of the game so far. It's ebbed and flowed, and I'm sure it will tomorrow."

One man, however, deserves an extra dose of plaudits, because if England had some leeway for experimentation in their lengths, they still required a stalwart to buckle down an end. James Anderson was that go-to man, as he buzzed through his day's work at a notch over two runs an over, with nine maidens out of 21 a testament to his new-found reliability.

Like Ian Bell on the first day, Anderson's maturity came as a shock to Australians who recalled him as the whipping boy from 2006, but it was his pre-lunch defiance that prised apart the opening stand, before the strangulation of Ricky Ponting came along to compensate for his lack of fortune with the review system.

Even he took his time to get into the game - early on he wasn't attacking the crease with anything like the relish he reserved for Pakistan last summer, and one of his deliveries to Watson was the shortest he's dropped all year. But he was also the first to get it right, living up to his billing at England's attack leader; a process that's been in place since the tour of New Zealand almost three years ago.

As David Saker, England's bowling coach, has been stressing all year, the secret for Anderson is to avoid getting cut. That was once his biggest failing, as he'd come into a match with a reputation for prodigious swing, and bang the ball in far too short in a bid to force the issue. Today with the Kookaburra there was some gentle bend on offer, but by attacking the stumps with a determined full length, he kept up the pressure regardless. Like Matthew Hoggard, who took a beating here from Hayden back in 2002, Anderson has grown in the intervening four years, and has returned to Australia ready to prove a point.

"He's definitely a better bowler," said Hussey. "I think he's more experienced, he knows his game very well now, and he trusts his game a lot more than last time he was here. He's generally trying to chirp away whether he's going well or battling away, but having that experience of being here before [is crucial]. You can't really buy experience."

"Jimmy's played 50-odd Tests and taken nearly 200 wickets, so he's obviously a very, very good bowler - and he's been an ever-present in the side for a long time," said Finn. "I look up to him, obviously. To have him and Broady around me who have bowled a lot of balls in Test match cricket, it's great for me to feed off. We're always communicating as a unit. It's not just one bit of advice he's given me; it's spell-to-spell, ball-to-ball that we're always trying to work out a way of getting batsmen out."

That process will continue on Saturday morning in a session that can hardly come soon enough. There's a battle royal developing this summer, and the next few hours of skirmishing will tell us how much England have really learnt.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo.

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • popcorn on November 27, 2010, 7:44 GMT

    Did I read pivotal third day, andrew Miller? Yeah, mate, you're right. Hussey and Haddin made England swing like Finn'e (Arctic) Monkeys!

  • on November 27, 2010, 1:25 GMT

    The biggest story in all this how Swann became Singh....:D

  • mak102480 on November 26, 2010, 23:19 GMT

    Two teams playing mediocre cricket...we need both england and australia to step up and also sa and ind to continue their form of the past 2-3 years.....and adding SL and Pak to that mix, man, it's sure going to be fun few years of TEST cricket (no T20 please...) ahead of us. For the first time in about 30 years, we don't have ONE dominant team and that is good for competition and the fans. TEST cricket is the real deal. I am a neutral observer of the Ashes(I support India) but I love the competition. Lets hope the last few years of Ponting, SRT, Kallis will be great......add to that other world class batsmen like sanga, laxman, sehwag, amla, hussey (yes, he is still great), DeVillers, Yousuf, Younis (thank god both are back), Strauss, Pietersen...and bowlers like Steyn, Zaheer, Swann, Siddle, Gul (too bad about amir and asif...).

  • gazelle79 on November 26, 2010, 21:20 GMT

    Being a fan from India , I find some of the other Indian fans messages a little self centered . Guys , I also feel our team is a deserving no:1 and that Sachin and Dravid are great batsmen , but that is no reason to bring them into every conversation . We are discussing the Ashes here and lets stick to that . We'll end up looking like one track minded people otherwise . Oh , and to the other fans . Criticism of our pitches is justified , at least of some of them like the Motera mattress ; but that takes nothing away from our batsmen . If you don't believe me , compare the batting averages of Dravid , Sachin and Laxman home and away .

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 19:17 GMT

    I just re-read fairfans comments.... can you have Fruedian slips when you write? Let me explain; "Swann will be canon fodder" which means food for the photographers as Canon (with 2 n's) is a type of camera! Now he might have mean't cannon (with 3 n's).... but it's more likely that Swan's humiliiation of the Indian prima-donnas will produce some great photographs! (Canon fodder) COME ON ENGLAND!

  • sharkey11 on November 26, 2010, 17:47 GMT

    I think alot of IND fans on this page have severly talked up there team to much ahead of the clash of SA, we all know that Sa are gonna give them a pasting.Worlds number 1 bowler on his own turf, Dravid , Dhoni and Laxman are sweating now as we speak. INd will get beating and they know they are not the number 1 team as they fail away so many times.As for the ashes well this is simply supberb, i agree alot on what has been said that its about time for some real cricket and winning pitches because cricket was getting bogged down by lifeless pitches recently. Good to see the groundsman making an effort and getting the image of cricket as a competitive sport back on track.

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 17:14 GMT

    I read some of the comments with some degree of incredulty! @Fairfan... in case you still don't understand .... most of the true Test cricket fans don't care about India. Sure they're an OK side with millions of supporters but test cricket is not about number of fans or about highly dubious rankings. Tradition forms so much of this wonderful game and at the pinnacle of all test cricket sits the Ashes.... always has and always will! So PLEASE Indian cricket fans STOP trying to compare your aging team (as good as it may be) to anyone else playing the game! Test match form is cyclical and where will India be in 5 years time? Please stay in the moment, enjoy this wonderful contest and don't make foolish claims about Indian cricket/players. We (the non-Indian majority) will be so relieved...... COME ON ENGLAND!

  • Fifthman on November 26, 2010, 17:06 GMT

    @fairfan Awwww, has the nasty man not mentioned India for five minutes? Totally one-eyed, myopic fan, more like. In case you hadn't noticed, this is the ASHES, chum. Cricket's oldest and greatest rivalry by decades. Nobody gives a hoot about the ageing Indiian flat-track bullies. They'll get taken apart in English conditions next year, anyway. Observe and learn...

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 15:57 GMT

    Fascinating stage in this test. I would put the Aussies VERY SLIGHTLY ahead at present byt it's very close . These next 40 runs and the new ball could well be the key to this game and with it this series. Australia cant afford to lose and England would be delighted and bouyed up by a win! Fortunately the Aussie scoring rate has been slow and the weather has probably helped England. AT present the difference in the sides has been the performance by Peter Siddle, with his history making hat-trick. England wont want to have too much of a deficit when they start batting again and the Ausies wont be relishing having to bat last either this test is really living up to expectations and could turn out to be a classic? COME ON ENGLAND!

  • on November 26, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    The game is obviously evenly poised at the moment and the side that wins will be the one that produces a performance with either bat or ball to match Sidddle's.

  • popcorn on November 27, 2010, 7:44 GMT

    Did I read pivotal third day, andrew Miller? Yeah, mate, you're right. Hussey and Haddin made England swing like Finn'e (Arctic) Monkeys!

  • on November 27, 2010, 1:25 GMT

    The biggest story in all this how Swann became Singh....:D

  • mak102480 on November 26, 2010, 23:19 GMT

    Two teams playing mediocre cricket...we need both england and australia to step up and also sa and ind to continue their form of the past 2-3 years.....and adding SL and Pak to that mix, man, it's sure going to be fun few years of TEST cricket (no T20 please...) ahead of us. For the first time in about 30 years, we don't have ONE dominant team and that is good for competition and the fans. TEST cricket is the real deal. I am a neutral observer of the Ashes(I support India) but I love the competition. Lets hope the last few years of Ponting, SRT, Kallis will be great......add to that other world class batsmen like sanga, laxman, sehwag, amla, hussey (yes, he is still great), DeVillers, Yousuf, Younis (thank god both are back), Strauss, Pietersen...and bowlers like Steyn, Zaheer, Swann, Siddle, Gul (too bad about amir and asif...).

  • gazelle79 on November 26, 2010, 21:20 GMT

    Being a fan from India , I find some of the other Indian fans messages a little self centered . Guys , I also feel our team is a deserving no:1 and that Sachin and Dravid are great batsmen , but that is no reason to bring them into every conversation . We are discussing the Ashes here and lets stick to that . We'll end up looking like one track minded people otherwise . Oh , and to the other fans . Criticism of our pitches is justified , at least of some of them like the Motera mattress ; but that takes nothing away from our batsmen . If you don't believe me , compare the batting averages of Dravid , Sachin and Laxman home and away .

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 19:17 GMT

    I just re-read fairfans comments.... can you have Fruedian slips when you write? Let me explain; "Swann will be canon fodder" which means food for the photographers as Canon (with 2 n's) is a type of camera! Now he might have mean't cannon (with 3 n's).... but it's more likely that Swan's humiliiation of the Indian prima-donnas will produce some great photographs! (Canon fodder) COME ON ENGLAND!

  • sharkey11 on November 26, 2010, 17:47 GMT

    I think alot of IND fans on this page have severly talked up there team to much ahead of the clash of SA, we all know that Sa are gonna give them a pasting.Worlds number 1 bowler on his own turf, Dravid , Dhoni and Laxman are sweating now as we speak. INd will get beating and they know they are not the number 1 team as they fail away so many times.As for the ashes well this is simply supberb, i agree alot on what has been said that its about time for some real cricket and winning pitches because cricket was getting bogged down by lifeless pitches recently. Good to see the groundsman making an effort and getting the image of cricket as a competitive sport back on track.

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 17:14 GMT

    I read some of the comments with some degree of incredulty! @Fairfan... in case you still don't understand .... most of the true Test cricket fans don't care about India. Sure they're an OK side with millions of supporters but test cricket is not about number of fans or about highly dubious rankings. Tradition forms so much of this wonderful game and at the pinnacle of all test cricket sits the Ashes.... always has and always will! So PLEASE Indian cricket fans STOP trying to compare your aging team (as good as it may be) to anyone else playing the game! Test match form is cyclical and where will India be in 5 years time? Please stay in the moment, enjoy this wonderful contest and don't make foolish claims about Indian cricket/players. We (the non-Indian majority) will be so relieved...... COME ON ENGLAND!

  • Fifthman on November 26, 2010, 17:06 GMT

    @fairfan Awwww, has the nasty man not mentioned India for five minutes? Totally one-eyed, myopic fan, more like. In case you hadn't noticed, this is the ASHES, chum. Cricket's oldest and greatest rivalry by decades. Nobody gives a hoot about the ageing Indiian flat-track bullies. They'll get taken apart in English conditions next year, anyway. Observe and learn...

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 15:57 GMT

    Fascinating stage in this test. I would put the Aussies VERY SLIGHTLY ahead at present byt it's very close . These next 40 runs and the new ball could well be the key to this game and with it this series. Australia cant afford to lose and England would be delighted and bouyed up by a win! Fortunately the Aussie scoring rate has been slow and the weather has probably helped England. AT present the difference in the sides has been the performance by Peter Siddle, with his history making hat-trick. England wont want to have too much of a deficit when they start batting again and the Ausies wont be relishing having to bat last either this test is really living up to expectations and could turn out to be a classic? COME ON ENGLAND!

  • on November 26, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    The game is obviously evenly poised at the moment and the side that wins will be the one that produces a performance with either bat or ball to match Sidddle's.

  • fairfan on November 26, 2010, 13:26 GMT

    After reading the admirations from English media about their bowlers how I wish England played agaist India now. Swann will be canon fodder for Sehwag, Gambhir, Raina and Dhoni - without mentioning the greats - Dravid, Tendulkar and Laxman. We saw that when England last visited India couple of years back. My gut feeling is Australia will win this series simply because they had a better preparation by playing against the Indians. Bowling against the current English batsmen will be an easy job compared to facing the Indians. Their main concern is the soft middle order.

  • whoster on November 26, 2010, 13:05 GMT

    Excellent article. Yes, the new England knows how to scrap it out. I feared the worst after such a frustrating opening session, with the UDRS decisions adding to the angst. I'm pleased Anderson has shown he really is a world class bowler these days. He now has patience to go with his control, and he got his rewards in the afternoon. Credit to Hussey for a superb positive knock under severe pressure, when a major collapse was looking possible. The first hour tomorrow with the new ball will be fascinating, and it's great to see that the signs are good for a hard fought and close series. If England can keep Australia below 300, it's game on.

  • Something_Witty on November 26, 2010, 13:03 GMT

    In conditions that were pretty much ideal for bowling, I don't really think that Anderson bowled that well to be honest. He was far too short early on and only just managed to correct that later in the day. He won't get better conditions than these for bowling, so he will want to put in a better performance tomorrow and in the Aussie second innings.

  • Samdanh on November 26, 2010, 12:59 GMT

    Aus team is weaker in batting and bowling compared to one that played in 2006-07. Aus need to bring in some personnel in batting who have flair for counter attacking strokeplay. They need at least two of them. They should be the likes of Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds etc. With the current team, this series is tilted in favour of England, unless Aus take some corrective action-drop Katich, Johnson, North, and bring in Jaques/Hughes, Bollinger, and Ferguson, and start playing beyond their potential. At best the series could be closely fought. England show greater potential, belief, hunger, and above all discipline.

  • postandrail on November 26, 2010, 12:50 GMT

    You'd think reading this that it was the United Nations (also known as England) that was only 35 runs down with five in hand. If you can't beat Australia now with a leader whose captaincy skills match his recent batting form, a bowling coach who can't teach Johnston to bowl on the pitch, or strike bowlers how to bowl to tailenders, players more interested in TV endorsements than their actual ability, Ponting's friend North keeping the Victorian and Australia A captain out of the team you never will! Clarke is like Pietersen, more interested in celebrity than earning it nowadays. There are more than a few Australians who think only an Ashes loss will bring the shakeup we need from Hilditch and Ponting down so that merit and form dictate selection again, not patronage and State bias as is currently the case. What does it say that in the last two years we have tried 66 players across 3 forms of the game? Groping in the dark I think. Yet we are still only 5 down 35 behind. So England?

  • CharlieAlanJakeHarperFamily on November 26, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    YEAH AUS BLOKES YESTERDAY WERE MAKING A LOT OF HOODOO ABOUT THEIR PERFORMANCE YESTERDAY INFACT IT WAS ONLY SIDDLE'S INSPIRATIONAL SPELL WHICH COMES ONCE IN ASHES AND APART FROM HIM EVERYONE LOOKED IMPOTENT.AUS MIDDLE ORDER MALAISE AND VULNERABILITY STRUCK AGAIN KATTO CAN ONLY SHUFFLE WATTO CANT PLAY SWING PONTING KNOWS ONLY ONE WAY TO GET OUT IE HOOKING PUP HAS A DODGY BACK AND BATTLED IN VAIN NORTH HELPS OPPOSITION HUSSEY IS MR.CRICKET BUT NO MR.CONSISTENT I THINK ENG WILL WIN EASILY 4TH INNINGS AUS CHASE?

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • CharlieAlanJakeHarperFamily on November 26, 2010, 11:53 GMT

    YEAH AUS BLOKES YESTERDAY WERE MAKING A LOT OF HOODOO ABOUT THEIR PERFORMANCE YESTERDAY INFACT IT WAS ONLY SIDDLE'S INSPIRATIONAL SPELL WHICH COMES ONCE IN ASHES AND APART FROM HIM EVERYONE LOOKED IMPOTENT.AUS MIDDLE ORDER MALAISE AND VULNERABILITY STRUCK AGAIN KATTO CAN ONLY SHUFFLE WATTO CANT PLAY SWING PONTING KNOWS ONLY ONE WAY TO GET OUT IE HOOKING PUP HAS A DODGY BACK AND BATTLED IN VAIN NORTH HELPS OPPOSITION HUSSEY IS MR.CRICKET BUT NO MR.CONSISTENT I THINK ENG WILL WIN EASILY 4TH INNINGS AUS CHASE?

  • postandrail on November 26, 2010, 12:50 GMT

    You'd think reading this that it was the United Nations (also known as England) that was only 35 runs down with five in hand. If you can't beat Australia now with a leader whose captaincy skills match his recent batting form, a bowling coach who can't teach Johnston to bowl on the pitch, or strike bowlers how to bowl to tailenders, players more interested in TV endorsements than their actual ability, Ponting's friend North keeping the Victorian and Australia A captain out of the team you never will! Clarke is like Pietersen, more interested in celebrity than earning it nowadays. There are more than a few Australians who think only an Ashes loss will bring the shakeup we need from Hilditch and Ponting down so that merit and form dictate selection again, not patronage and State bias as is currently the case. What does it say that in the last two years we have tried 66 players across 3 forms of the game? Groping in the dark I think. Yet we are still only 5 down 35 behind. So England?

  • Samdanh on November 26, 2010, 12:59 GMT

    Aus team is weaker in batting and bowling compared to one that played in 2006-07. Aus need to bring in some personnel in batting who have flair for counter attacking strokeplay. They need at least two of them. They should be the likes of Hayden, Gilchrist, Symonds etc. With the current team, this series is tilted in favour of England, unless Aus take some corrective action-drop Katich, Johnson, North, and bring in Jaques/Hughes, Bollinger, and Ferguson, and start playing beyond their potential. At best the series could be closely fought. England show greater potential, belief, hunger, and above all discipline.

  • Something_Witty on November 26, 2010, 13:03 GMT

    In conditions that were pretty much ideal for bowling, I don't really think that Anderson bowled that well to be honest. He was far too short early on and only just managed to correct that later in the day. He won't get better conditions than these for bowling, so he will want to put in a better performance tomorrow and in the Aussie second innings.

  • whoster on November 26, 2010, 13:05 GMT

    Excellent article. Yes, the new England knows how to scrap it out. I feared the worst after such a frustrating opening session, with the UDRS decisions adding to the angst. I'm pleased Anderson has shown he really is a world class bowler these days. He now has patience to go with his control, and he got his rewards in the afternoon. Credit to Hussey for a superb positive knock under severe pressure, when a major collapse was looking possible. The first hour tomorrow with the new ball will be fascinating, and it's great to see that the signs are good for a hard fought and close series. If England can keep Australia below 300, it's game on.

  • fairfan on November 26, 2010, 13:26 GMT

    After reading the admirations from English media about their bowlers how I wish England played agaist India now. Swann will be canon fodder for Sehwag, Gambhir, Raina and Dhoni - without mentioning the greats - Dravid, Tendulkar and Laxman. We saw that when England last visited India couple of years back. My gut feeling is Australia will win this series simply because they had a better preparation by playing against the Indians. Bowling against the current English batsmen will be an easy job compared to facing the Indians. Their main concern is the soft middle order.

  • on November 26, 2010, 15:45 GMT

    The game is obviously evenly poised at the moment and the side that wins will be the one that produces a performance with either bat or ball to match Sidddle's.

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 15:57 GMT

    Fascinating stage in this test. I would put the Aussies VERY SLIGHTLY ahead at present byt it's very close . These next 40 runs and the new ball could well be the key to this game and with it this series. Australia cant afford to lose and England would be delighted and bouyed up by a win! Fortunately the Aussie scoring rate has been slow and the weather has probably helped England. AT present the difference in the sides has been the performance by Peter Siddle, with his history making hat-trick. England wont want to have too much of a deficit when they start batting again and the Ausies wont be relishing having to bat last either this test is really living up to expectations and could turn out to be a classic? COME ON ENGLAND!

  • Fifthman on November 26, 2010, 17:06 GMT

    @fairfan Awwww, has the nasty man not mentioned India for five minutes? Totally one-eyed, myopic fan, more like. In case you hadn't noticed, this is the ASHES, chum. Cricket's oldest and greatest rivalry by decades. Nobody gives a hoot about the ageing Indiian flat-track bullies. They'll get taken apart in English conditions next year, anyway. Observe and learn...

  • phoenixsteve on November 26, 2010, 17:14 GMT

    I read some of the comments with some degree of incredulty! @Fairfan... in case you still don't understand .... most of the true Test cricket fans don't care about India. Sure they're an OK side with millions of supporters but test cricket is not about number of fans or about highly dubious rankings. Tradition forms so much of this wonderful game and at the pinnacle of all test cricket sits the Ashes.... always has and always will! So PLEASE Indian cricket fans STOP trying to compare your aging team (as good as it may be) to anyone else playing the game! Test match form is cyclical and where will India be in 5 years time? Please stay in the moment, enjoy this wonderful contest and don't make foolish claims about Indian cricket/players. We (the non-Indian majority) will be so relieved...... COME ON ENGLAND!