England v Australia, 2nd Investec Test, Lord's, 1st day

Bell and the art of making perfection pay

Ian Bell has always had a textbook technique but now he is turning aesthetic perfection into Ashes hundreds

Jarrod Kimber

July 18, 2013

Comments: 17 | Text size: A | A

Had Mark Waugh beheaded an alien invader with a spork while bombs fell around him, he would have done it gracefully. That was just how he was.

It also meant that had Mark Waugh failed to tame a wayward schnauzer that was running around his bathroom, he would have been called soft. That was just how it works.

Ian Bell is not as effortlessly graceful as Waugh or Gower. And unlike Gower and Waugh he doesn't seem to enjoy it as much. But in modern cricket, there are few who can make every ball seem like it's been bowled in slow motion like Bell. Technically, he is a textbook. A pretty illustrated textbook. If you are a batting purist, watching him reach forward and defend a ball is on its own: a moment of beauty and perfection.

And if you like that, you'll need a cold shower and a lie down after he plays a cover drive.

For the longest time that was all you got, aesthetic perfection, as if all his innings were like a shuttlecock falling serenely to ground, before a racquet comes in and smashes the hell out of it.

You'll no doubt have your favourite Ian Bell "I can't believe he got out" moment. It might be a collection of horror drives to short cover. Maybe it was a breezy chip on the legside. Or anytime he's got confused playing spin in the sub-continent. For me, and I doubt I'm alone, it is the Paul Harris wicket.

Aesthetically they are worlds apart. Ian Bell is stylish and correct. Paul Harris is technically horrible and about as aesthetically unpleasing as any spinner ever. On pure cricket talent, Ian Bell has paddling pools of it, Paul Harris has a thimble's worth. But when Paul Harris came around the wicket, bowled from wide on the crease, and put even less spin on the ball than usual, Ian Bell just left it. He left it gracefully, technically correct and confidently watched it all closely.

He watched the bell so closely, he saw it not just clip the outside of off stump; he saw it hit the inside of off and a bit of middle.


Ian Bell plays a rare cover drive, England v Australia, 1st Investec Test, Trent Bridge, 3rd day, July 12, 2013
Ian Bell, providing a picture for his pretty illustrated textbook © PA Photos
Enlarge

If that one dismissal wasn't a lesson to Ian Bell then he just wasn't taking cricket seriously enough.

Of course, since then, Ian Bell has had more coming of age moments than Kevin Arnold had in The Wonder Years. The English cricket writers have narrated every single lesson that he has learnt, and Ian Bell has aged just as slowly as Kevin did.

Coming into the Ashes he was in a form slide. India was unkind to him. The Kiwis were not that fruitful. He could have been under pressure to maintain his spot had his Ashes mirrored his recent form. No one talked Bell up before this series. He was just the third or fourth name you mentioned when talking about the 'batting unit'.

According to him, he is now better at grinding out innings than ever before. But he's not suddenly turned into Paul Collingwood; he's just using his normal skills and technique to essentially keep England in this series.

Today's innings was magnificent. It was heroic. It was Ian Bell at his best. Chanceless. Pretty. And without any fuss or smiles.

Bell doesn't get involved in sledging. His sex life doesn't make the papers. He's not in court on charges ever. He does not abuse his teammates. He seems unlikely to make himself into a Reality TV regular. He's not got a drug addiction. He's never claimed to suffer from depression. He just bats. And bats well.

Alastair Cook is posh and doesn't sweat. KP is ego and genius. Graeme Swann is a failed rockstar and a confident spinner.

Ian Bell has played more Ashes Tests than all of them. And yet, all that comes to mind about him is that he bats pretty and he sometimes goes out softly. A PR firm would have a tough job selling him on anything else.

While they were making bronze statues of Jimmy Anderson outside Trent Bridge, there was little reference to the short ginger batsman who is apparently too soft to score runs when they matter but who gave Jimmy the lead he needed to get England over the line. England would not be 1-0 without Ian Bell. They would not be 289 for 7 today if not for Ian Bell.

This series Jonathan Trott has been careless. Alastair Cook has looked distracted. And KP has yet to find full form. England needed someone to step up.

For the second straight innings, it was Ian Bell. He did it in the exact same way he left that ball that bowled him by Paul Harris, with grace, confidence and technically perfect.

It's just that now there is something behind the facade where Ian Bell has improved. It's the grinding we don't notice in between the pretty drives. Something has changed in him. He's got it.

Even when he was out of form, against New Zealand, he still fought to save a Test. Sure, he'll continue to go out in ways that we see as lazy, silly or cheap, because when he is in form like this, it's impossible to understand how he could ever be dismissed.

If you've ever seen an Ian Bell hundred in person, you're a lucky human being.

If you're England in this Ashes, you're a lucky team.

Jarrod Kimber is 50% of the Two Chucks, and the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

RSS Feeds: Jarrod Kimber

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by 5wombats on (July 19, 2013, 13:39 GMT)

@Thomas Cherian (July 19, 2013, 12:37 GMT) what are you talking about?!?! Check these Ian Bell facts on cricinfo... Multan 2002 = 71. Faisalabad 2002 = 115. Lahore 2002 = 92. Sydney 2007 = 71. Kandy 2007 83 & 74. Napier 2008 = 110. Durban 2009 = 140. Brisbane 2010 = 76. Sydney 2011 = 115. Nagpur 2012 = 116 no. SO @Thomas Cherian, how about describing him as an away ground bully? To me he has excelled on many tracks strange to him so you can call him world class. All you people slagging off Ian Bell need to check your facts and then ask whether batsmen on your team have such a good record away from their own back yard. please publish.

Posted by mikkkk on (July 19, 2013, 12:58 GMT)

"How about describing him as a home ground bully"

How about describing him as a good batsman? He averages over 42 away. How many others do?

Posted by   on (July 19, 2013, 12:37 GMT)

How about describing him as a home ground bully? To me until he excels in a track strange to him you cannot call him world class

Posted by mikkkk on (July 19, 2013, 12:16 GMT)

@DustBowl

"BUT he didn't go on in either innings, just made the ton in both cases"

Yes, just the 3 tons on the trot. Most of the Aussies would love to fail like Bell fails, Watson in particular, who has flattered to deceive yet again before blowing.

The Aussies came over here raving about their young bowling attack (Starc and Pattinson). Turns out they are nothing more than a couple of show ponies. They dropped one of them after the first game and the second one managed to bag a tailender for his single wicket. They talk a good game though.

Posted by ravi-1967 on (July 19, 2013, 11:53 GMT)

Arrow is right, TheMehssiah you are wrong

Bell Averages 36+ in Asia

he averages 54+ at home and 42.5 away.

Does not help anyways to confirm he is a world class batsman

Posted by dirick on (July 19, 2013, 11:38 GMT)

When will Pietersen come up with a statement that BELL can easily overhaul Tendulkar's 16k Test runs ! He did that with COOK and Cook hardly scored in the 3 innings after that statement.

Posted by TheMehssiah on (July 19, 2013, 11:04 GMT)

Arrow - that's just nonsense. Go and look at Bell's averages away against India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh. His away averages against each of them individually are all over 40, and cumulatively his average away in the Subcontinent is over 56. Do your homework before posting.

Posted by 5wombats on (July 19, 2013, 10:57 GMT)

@Arrow011 (July 19, 2013, 10:31 GMT) questions for you - where is Nagpur? Is it a spin pitch? And who scored 116 not out there in December 2012? And it does count because Nagpur, I believe, is in India.

Posted by Arrow011 on (July 19, 2013, 10:31 GMT)

@5wombats - Once & for all? Since when? Bell has not performed in the sub-continent like KP or Cook have, so he is just a pace pitch player not a player who can play well in spin pitches. The world does not end with an Ashes series scores.

Posted by py0alb on (July 19, 2013, 10:03 GMT)

Textbook... when facing fast bowling and innocuous spinners on flat pitches. His technical problems agains any half decent spinner are well documented.

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Jarrod KimberClose
Tour Results
England v Australia at Southampton - Sep 16, 2013
Australia won by 49 runs
England v Australia at Cardiff - Sep 14, 2013
England won by 3 wickets (with 3 balls remaining)
England v Australia at Birmingham - Sep 11, 2013
No result
England v Australia at Manchester - Sep 8, 2013
Australia won by 88 runs
England v Australia at Leeds - Sep 6, 2013
Match abandoned without a ball bowled
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days