New Zealand v Pakistan, Group E, World Twenty20, Barbados

Grit over glamour for New Zealand

There are teams with more talent and flair at this tournament than New Zealand, yet no one can surpass them for their resilience

Andrew McGlashan in Bridgetown

May 8, 2010

Comments: 53 | Text size: A | A

Ian Butler snared Shahid Afridi, New Zealand v Pakistan, Super Eights, Group E, World Twenty20, Barbados, May 8, 2010
New Zealand found an unlikely hero in Ian Butler © Getty Images
Enlarge
Related Links

You have to admire New Zealand. Their victory against Pakistan was a stunning effort in defending a small target. To make it even more impressive Ian Butler, the man entrusted with the final over, was playing his first match of the tournament. The celebrations at the end suggested they'd won the tournament, but the win has ensured they still have a chance to do just that.

It was also the match the competition needed. The four Super Eight matches so far had included plenty of eye-catching action but the results had been one-sided. Yesterday, both India and West Indies were out of their run chases within the first few overs of the reply. Twenty20 not only needs outstanding individual contributions; it also needs close finishes.

New Zealand have been involved in the two tightest finishes of the tournament so far. They opened the event with a penultimate ball chase against Sri Lanka and it's no surprise they have come out on top in both edge-of-seat encounters. They are that sort team; fighting until the last and often finding that unlikely figure to pull off an unexpected victory.

Previously it was Nathan McCullum and this time it was Butler. He had the benefit of a recent positive memory against Pakistan after taking 4 for 44 in the Champions Trophy semi-final at the Wanderers. On that occasion he helped set-up victory, but this time he had to complete it.

The final over started with 12 needed and it was a series of six mini-dramas, each changing the momentum. The first four deliveries went dot, four, dot, four as Salman Butt, who held together Pakistan's faltering reply, slashed boundaries over short third man and through backward point. Crucially, though, he lost the strike with a penultimate ball bye which left Abdur Rehman on strike.

One run would have secured a Super Over and Daniel Vettori set an in-out field as he tried to cover his options. Rehman went for the victory blow but could only pick out deep square-leg who barely had to move. Butt sank to his knees while New Zealand players ran around like excitable children.

"You usually back yourself with 12 runs," Butler said. "I said to Hoppy [Gareth Hopkins] 'that's why we play the game', but after the four through point I was starting to doubt whether that was the case. As long as you keep yourself in the game death bowling is what you have to be good at."

It was a day where selection decisions - and tactical shifts - certainly played dividends. New Zealand took the brave call to leave out Jacob Oram, a potential match-winner with the bat even when not in the greatest of form, along with the more logical move of replacing the struggling Tim Southee. Between them the two replacements, Butler and Kyle Mills, took 5 for 52 from their eight overs. Shane Bond and Vettori, New Zealand's Twenty20 bankers, took 1 for 59 in their shared eight.

Even before the tense last over Butler had played a vital role as he removed Misbah-ul-Haq and Shahid Afridi as Pakistan fell to 58 for 5. New Zealand's fielding earned them Afridi's scalp as Nathan McCullum recovered from a slight misjudgement at midwicket to take a superb catch diving forward at deep midwicket.

"We knew we were a little under par but we back ourselves as a bowling and fielding unit, that has always been our strength in any form of the game," Vettori said. "The selection of Ian and Kyle gave us a bit more impetus. We managed to take wickets and kept taking them which makes a difference. The total wasn't enough but we knew if we started well we had a chance."

Until today New Zealand had opened the bowling with McCullum's offspin - and he produced another vital display of 1 for 19 - but this time they reverted to the conventional ploy of two quicks. Mills and Bond responded with three wickets in the first 20 balls which put the skids under Pakistan and gave Vettori's team real hope.

"Looking through our history Kyle has been outstanding at the top of the order and we knew we needed to take early wickets," Vettori said. "Pakistan are pretty good players of spin so we wanted to give our swingers a chance. Also, the last time Ian bowled against them in the Champions Trophy he took four so we backed some past reputations and they came to fruition.

"It's quite exhausting playing in that heat and in an emotional game in terms of us scrapping to make 130-odd then putting them under pressure with the balance swinging backwards and forwards," he added. "We are pretty proud of what we achieved and it gives us a chance of going into the semis."

There are teams with more talent and flair at this tournament than New Zealand, yet no one can surpass them for their resilience.

Andrew McGlashan is assistant editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew McGlashan

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by muntaqa on (May 10, 2010, 8:52 GMT)

Afridi's catch by mcullum was definitely not genuine. Had the ball bounced on his fingers, they'd be broken by now. Just imagine, you diving forward, with your fingers against the ground and the ball falling on top of them. That would definitely hurt a lot; in any case, the third umpire should've been called for a review. Commentators were very biased in claiming it to be a stunning catch when it was clearly evident that the ball bounced. If you can't tell for sure that it didn't bounce on the ground, benefit goes to the batsman. That's the unwritten rule!

Posted by nzmatt17 on (May 10, 2010, 8:33 GMT)

If NZ win they are through...simple as that...it does not matter if Pakistan win or lose. I believe you will see Pakistan and South Africa both packing their bags by the end of tonight! England without KP are very beatable and NZ can easily win tonight. The Pakistan should start packing their bags now.

Posted by mani2001 on (May 9, 2010, 17:54 GMT)

pakistan will win the world cup .......i believe in them and they can beat SA tomorrow we shall see

Posted by mani2001 on (May 9, 2010, 17:41 GMT)

look I am really tired of all these whinny , crying little Indian critics on Pakistanis...Pakistan fought hard and lost a gr8 cricket game with just one run...but todat Westindies are thrashing India sooooo one sided ..its just aweful..and now all these little crying indians should salute Pakistan to come into this tournament and do much better than their Indian bunch...Oh yeah one more thing Pakistan still has a better run rate in its group and beating SA tomorrow means Pakistan will make it to semifinal .... and India oooops didnt make it again...big mouth and no moves....

Posted by   on (May 9, 2010, 17:09 GMT)

You know n.z deserved that win! They always give their best effort to the last ball. I think respect for a team that does not have that many stars should be given, and the true believers know what I'm talking about! They are the real fighters of world cricket.

Posted by Lucas_Pallesano on (May 9, 2010, 16:54 GMT)

Wow...an awful lot of finger pointing and arguments. I just thought it was an excellent game of cricket. Especially impressed with Butler and Butt.

Posted by Lucas_Pallesano on (May 9, 2010, 16:44 GMT)

Wow...an awful lot of finger pointing and arguments. I just thought it was an excellent game of cricket. Especially impressed with Butler and Butt.

Posted by Croc_on_mara on (May 9, 2010, 16:16 GMT)

Well written Andrew! I am personally a huge fan of New Zealand. They may lack a bit of flamboyance but they more than make up for it through sheer grit. I also agree it was a brave decision to leave out Oram and Suthee. The win vindicates the decision no doubt...and Ian Butler in many ways epitomises the Kiwi work ethic. Regarding the filthy comments being made by Pak supporters regarding 'cheating', well, what can i say? I am pleasantly surprised that you didn't drag India (and Israel) in to this! For a change stop believing in conspiracy theories and accept the fact your players are simply over-rated (happens a lot in the sub-continent) and simply dont deserve to win.

Posted by yetigoat on (May 9, 2010, 14:38 GMT)

How did Pakistan contrive to lose that game? Yet again you have to wonder about the integrity of there players/officials

Posted by   on (May 9, 2010, 14:34 GMT)

Kiwis can't goto semis they surely gone home because they will can't play with Pakistan now so no chance of winning from SA they already loose so bye bye KIWIS too

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew McGlashanClose
Andrew McGlashan Assistant Editor Andrew arrived at ESPNcricinfo via Manchester and Cape Town, after finding the assistant editor at a weak moment as he watched England's batting collapse in the Newlands Test. Andrew began his cricket writing as a freelance covering Lancashire during 2004 when they were relegated in the County Championship. In fact, they were top of the table when he began reporting on them but things went dramatically downhill. He likes to let people know that he is a supporter of county cricket, a fact his colleagues will testify to and bemoan in equal quantities.
Tournament Results
Australia v England at Bridgetown - May 16, 2010
England won by 7 wickets (with 18 balls remaining)
Australia v Pakistan at Gros Islet - May 14, 2010
Australia won by 3 wickets (with 1 ball remaining)
England v Sri Lanka at Gros Islet - May 13, 2010
England won by 7 wickets (with 24 balls remaining)
West Indies v Australia at Gros Islet - May 11, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 22 balls remaining)
India v Sri Lanka at Gros Islet - May 11, 2010
Sri Lanka won by 5 wickets (with 0 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days