Zimbabwe v Australia, Tri-series, Harare

Unforgiving Australia expose Zimbabwe's cracks

Helmed by an overburdened head coach and weighed down by inconsistent selection, Zimbabwe's faults were glaringly obvious in their heaviest-ever defeat to Australia

Liam Brickhill in Harare

August 25, 2014

Comments: 8 | Text size: A | A

Sikandar Raza ducks under a short ball, Zimbabwe v Australia, Tri-series, Harare, August 25, 2014
Mitchell Johnson's brutal use of the short ball showed Australia were in no mood to take it easy against Zimbabwe © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links

"Get ready for a broken f***ing window," Mitchell Johnson didn't say to Elton Chigumbura as he strode out to bat, though a warning to the television commentators, who were sprayed by shards of glass after Johnson's monstrous mow down the ground smashed a press-box window, might have been charitable. Charity, however, has never been the Australian way.

For Zimbabwe, charity clearly begins at home and their meek showing surely helped Australia ease into the tour, if they had any rust to shake off after a five-month lay-off. Australia have only been in the country since Thursday, but there was more intensity to their centre-wicket practice at the Country Club on Saturday than there was at any point during this match - until Johnson shattered the peace.

The press-box windows are made of shatterproof glass, but a similarly massive hit several years ago had weakened that pane. No one had seen fit to replace it, presumably reckoning the odds of someone hitting the exact spot were slim indeed. The brittleness of Zimbabwe's cricket team stems from a similar selection of dents, cracks and fault lines - and none of them have been repaired either. Along comes the world's top-ranked one-day side, and Zimbabwe are duly shattered into little pieces. For at least a decade, Zimbabwe have masked their weaknesses and papered over their cracks, without ever settling on a lasting solution. As Tatenda Taibu put it before he walked away from the game: "ZC are just painting a house that has no foundations."

A South African side might let you get away with that without overly heavy punishment. Like a big brother easing off as he notices tears welling in the eyes of a younger sibling, it now seems South Africa went somewhat easy on the Zimbabweans - despite the 3-0 scoreline from their one-day series. There was no such clemency from Australia, whose ground-and-pound strategy was evident in Maxwell's relentless hitting and Johnson's equally unforgiving bowling, with both contributing to Zimbabwe's 198-run defeat: their largest against Australia.

Zimbabwe are not being helped by the inconsistencies in their selection. Richmond Mutumbami, asked to open against South Africa, was shunted to No. 7 while Zimbabwe field-tested yet another unsuccessful opening partnership in Tino Mawoyo and Sikandar Raza. Brendan Taylor, dropped for the third ODI against South Africa, was brought back but wafted nervously to slip before he could make an impact. Earlier, Chigumbura had done his best to juggle a bowling attack missing Brian Vitori, Neville Madziva, Luke Jongwe and Shingi Masakadza - all of whom played against South Africa as part of what coach Steve Mangongo called Zimbabwe's "best possible XI".

Mangongo, it is hoped, has a firm grip on the whys and wherefores of Zimbabwe's selection decisions. He better, given he and Givemore Makoni now make up the entire selection panel after Wayne James was removed on Friday. The idea that "no one is safe" has permeated the team's recent selections, but the result of that is that Zimbabwe can find no peace either on or off the field. What effect must playing for one's place in every match have on a team for whom confidence has never come easily, and for whom defeat is a fact of life?

"Pressure is always there," Mangongo insisted in the post-match press conference. "Whether you're playing game one, game 20, game 200, pressure is always there. And if you don't perform, I don't see any science in you playing.

"Yes there will always be people given a run, but there are also certain people who have been given enough of a run that, yes, they will be dropped. Simple and straightforward. But there is no guy who has played one game and then gets dropped the next game. But if you have played more than 50 games and you don't perform and you don't execute your role, you have got no justification whatsoever to be in the team."

Mangongo will himself be no stranger to pressure, given his role as head coach and selector combines the batting, bowling, fielding and strategic coaching roles all on his own, with previous batting and bowling coaches Grant Flower and Heath Streak now working with Pakistan and Bangladesh respectively.

"It's extremely difficult; absolute nightmare," admitted Mangongo. "I know for a fact that Zimbabwe Cricket administrators are working on that, so hopefully we will have the right set-up as we go along. But yes you cannot have a head coach trying to coach batting one-on-one, bowling, spin, fast bowlers, team strategy, gameplan, you name it."

Perhaps Zimbabwe's most notable achievement was managing to keep their over rate in check despite having to fetch the ball from beyond the boundary 15 times. They will at least have the week to re-group before their match against South Africa on Friday. Australia's only worry, if one can call it that, is that their squad only contains one specialist spinner and despite the fact that the Harare Sports Club pitch is likely to play slow and low throughout the series, Nathan Lyon was their most expensive bowler.

Mitchell Marsh, who chipped in with a wicket to complement his 89 at no. 3, shrugged off suggestions that Australia might be a spinner light.

"The way all the bowlers bowled today, they took pace off the ball at the right time and I think that's going to be key on this wicket," said Marsh. "There's a lot of experience in our changing rooms, they've played on these sorts of wickets all around the world, so I don't think it's anything too new."

Liam Brickhill is a freelance journalist based in Cape Town

RSS Feeds: Liam Brickhill

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by   on (August 26, 2014, 13:23 GMT)

I totally agree with Bob. An era where Flower brothers, Heath Streak, A.Cambell, Stuart Carlisle, T.Friend, Henry Olanga it was a treat to watch Zimbabwe's match. I still remember the Test match against Oz where Zimbabwean fought bravely with mighty aussies in Streak's captaincy...now it is fruitless and frustrating to watch any game of Zimbabwe...I hope they will rise from the dust..and retrieve for the golden era in Zimbabwean cricket....

Posted by dunger.bob on (August 26, 2014, 10:10 GMT)

If it's of any help at all, which it isn't, I don't know anyone who wouldn't like to see Zimbabwe back in there and mixing it with us. I'm old enough to remember players like the Flower bro's and Heath Streak. In those days you had to really watch it when you played them because they were a threat.

Posted by   on (August 26, 2014, 9:24 GMT)

Our convenor of selectors and national coach are being exposed more and more. Some of the selection decisions are mind boggling. Just wonder what is their agenda and at whats cost to ZC. Its high time the ZC board takes control before the the whole situation gets out of control.

Posted by Anti_ZCFOutkast on (August 26, 2014, 2:29 GMT)

Mangongo will presumably chop some dead wood after this defeat and send Hamilton Masakadza into exile for not converting his 50 into a 100. Much like Taylor was punished for only scoring 93 against the worlds best test team. Not sure who will replace these senior players that Mangongo is alienating. The cupboard of young players is bare as ZC have failed to spread the game and driven away anyone who has talent. They put on a good show by busing in some school children to events but they aren't taught anything about the game and most of them wouldn't even recognise a cricket bat.

Posted by Crickeyvet on (August 25, 2014, 23:02 GMT)

Hate it or love it cricket is a game that is heavily reliant on sponsorship, as all sport at the top level is. the abscence of funds translates to the unattractiveness of the sport to would-be champions, as a means of earning a livelihood; and to the lack of competitiveness in the domestic leagues. ther is no high-stakes competition or league, where players refine their craft, get streetwise in the game and adopt the best habits and methods. there is a clear stagnation of progress btwn high school talent and a national team player.compare Quinton de Cock to Hamilton Masakadza. Hamilton anywher in Oz, S.A. or England, or India wud be a colossus!imho our best chance of competing is to have players sent to play in foreign leagues, to invite foreign players to complement our local lads, ala Neil Johnson, Murray Goodwin in those days, but then again Zim Cricket is 2 broke to pay em...oh, what to do with this Zim team? feel helpless.

Posted by xtrafalgarx on (August 25, 2014, 21:51 GMT)

Well written article, a good read.

Posted by Nduru on (August 25, 2014, 19:43 GMT)

This policy of creating deliberate insecurity and instability among the most experienced players is deadly. Instead of promoting confidence and security, they are being told they have to perform unreasonably well, every time, even if its against serious bowlers like Johnson or Steyn or any of the other SA and Aus bowlers. And all this in a team which has so, so few real quality players. What is going to happen is that those players who get "dropped" the whole time will simply walk away because, like Taibu, they will get sick of being treated so badly by a coach and administrators who have not a clue what they are doing. Mark my words people.

Posted by and1son on (August 25, 2014, 19:29 GMT)

besides the obvious weaknesses of Zim like administration, players themselves, getting paid and the coaching... there is the fact that there is too much shuffling in the top and middle order batting order

Hammy, Sibanda, Raza, Mawoyo, Kasuza and Welch are the only guys should be considered as openers. the opening experiments also cost people like Coventry a career when he failed as an opener. especially i remember it was Zim vs Aus in the game Ponting lost his cool and broke a tv after being run out by Bobby Mpofu. That was the closest Zim came to beating Aus in recent times after bowling well against Aus

Zim players and coaches need to understand there is a skillset that makes you an opener, middle or lower order batsman. Mawoyo failed today but i recommend keeping the same team except for maybe Vitori in for Panyangara. if there is continuous failure then you bring the Sibandas at the top and the Wallers/Jongwes in the middle order and Madzivas/Musokos/Mushangwes as bowling options

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Liam BrickhillClose
Tournament Results
Australia v South Africa at Harare - Sep 6, 2014
South Africa won by 6 wickets (with 55 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v South Africa at Harare - Sep 4, 2014
South Africa won by 63 runs
Australia v South Africa at Harare - Sep 2, 2014
Australia won by 62 runs
Zimbabwe v Australia at Harare - Aug 31, 2014
Zimbabwe won by 3 wickets (with 12 balls remaining)
Zimbabwe v South Africa at Harare - Aug 29, 2014
South Africa won by 61 runs
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days