Most Impactful Batters of the Series (Only T20s)The Batting/Bowling Impact is a factor not only of the runs scored/wickets taken/economy rate, but also of the pressure under which these performances happened.
Player | Team | Batting Impact | BI/inn | Inns | Runs | Impact Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI NY | 507.3 | 63.4 | 8 | 388 | 440.9 | |
| SEO | 312.4 | 52 | 6 | 235 | 260.6 | |
| MI NY | 304.7 | 43.5 | 7 | 209 | 246.8 | |
| LAKR | 272.5 | 54.5 | 5 | 206 | 244.9 | |
| SEO | 261.9 | 37.4 | 7 | 264 | 262.8 | |
| TSK | 246.8 | 35.2 | 7 | 221 | 232.2 | |
| SF | 216.7 | 43.3 | 5 | 168 | 190.7 | |
| MI NY | 196 | 39.2 | 5 | 165 | 179.6 | |
| SF | 194.6 | 38.9 | 5 | 190 | 192.6 | |
| SEO | 185.7 | 26.5 | 7 | 191 | 193.9 | |
| WSF | 176.1 | 29.3 | 6 | 142 | 156.1 | |
| LAKR | 170.5 | 34.1 | 5 | 133 | 147.9 | |
| MI NY | 161.4 | 23 | 7 | 164 | 168.1 | |
| WSF | 150.3 | 25 | 6 | 152 | 154.1 | |
| TSK | 149.5 | 37.3 | 4 | 136 | 144.1 | |
| TSK | 136.4 | 19.4 | 7 | 143 | 141.7 | |
| TSK | 127.9 | 25.5 | 5 | 103 | 111 | |
| SF | 125.1 | 25 | 5 | 127 | 130.2 | |
| WSF | 109.5 | 21.9 | 5 | 67 | 84.5 | |
| WSF | 108.7 | 18.1 | 6 | 122 | 120.4 | |
| WSF | 96.9 | 16.1 | 6 | 125 | 115.5 | |
| MI NY | 96.6 | 19.3 | 5 | 108 | 109.5 | |
| WSF | 96.3 | 16 | 6 | 95 | 96 | |
| SF | 95.9 | 19.1 | 5 | 75 | 84.3 | |
| TSK | 94.3 | 13.4 | 7 | 87 | 90.6 | |
| SEO | 80.6 | 13.4 | 6 | 146 | 124.6 | |
| WSF | 67 | 16.7 | 4 | 59 | 63.2 | |
| TSK | 65.7 | 13.1 | 5 | 76 | 75.9 | |
| LAKR | 65.3 | 21.7 | 3 | 54 | 60.4 | |
| WSF | 58.7 | 9.7 | 6 | 78 | 73.2 | |
| MI NY | 58.2 | 19.4 | 3 | 29 | 41.6 | |
| SF | 54.2 | 10.8 | 5 | 74 | 67.3 | |
| TSK | 51.9 | 10.3 | 5 | 39 | 43.6 | |
| TSK | 51.7 | 7.3 | 7 | 101 | 83.3 | |
| SF | 51.2 | 12.8 | 4 | 52 | 51.3 | |
| LAKR | 51 | 10.2 | 5 | 48 | 53.3 | |
| SEO | 43.7 | 8.7 | 5 | 62 | 52.8 | |
| LAKR | 43.4 | 10.8 | 4 | 68 | 60.9 | |
| SEO | 41.1 | 10.2 | 4 | 69 | 56.8 | |
| SEO | 40.8 | 20.4 | 2 | 59 | 51.1 | |
| LAKR | 39.9 | 7.9 | 5 | 53 | 52.9 | |
| SEO | 36.1 | 18 | 2 | 23 | 29.5 | |
| MI NY | 28.4 | 4.7 | 6 | 63 | 50.6 | |
| MI NY | 26 | 8.6 | 3 | 41 | 34.3 | |
| SF | 22 | 4.4 | 5 | 68 | 52.8 | |
| LAKR | 21.6 | 21.6 | 1 | 12 | 15.4 | |
| WSF | 18.5 | 9.2 | 2 | 15 | 14.5 | |
| LAKR | 16.7 | 4.1 | 4 | 40 | 30.3 | |
| TSK | 14.2 | 7.1 | 2 | 32 | 26.2 | |
| SF | 13.4 | 4.4 | 3 | 7 | 9.8 | |
| LAKR | 13.4 | 3.3 | 4 | 22 | 19.6 | |
| LAKR | 12.8 | 12.8 | 1 | 10 | 11.5 | |
| TSK | 12.5 | 1.7 | 7 | 46 | 34.7 | |
| SEO | 10.8 | 3.6 | 3 | 27 | 20.6 | |
| LAKR | 8.2 | 2.7 | 3 | 7 | 6.9 | |
| MI NY | 6.6 | 1.6 | 4 | 30 | 19.9 | |
| LAKR | 2.9 | 1.4 | 2 | 5 | 4.9 | |
| SF | 2.8 | 0.9 | 3 | 9 | 6.1 | |
| MI NY | 2.6 | 0.8 | 3 | 17 | 8.8 | |
| LAKR | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1 | 5 | 3.6 | |
| TSK | 2.1 | 0.4 | 5 | 11 | 5 | |
| LAKR | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2.5 | |
| SEO | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1 | 2 | 2.1 | |
| WSF | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1 | 4 | 3 | |
| WSF | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1 | 3 | 2.7 | |
| SF | 1.3 | 0.2 | 5 | 22 | 12.6 | |
| TSK | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | |
| SF | 0.7 | 0.3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| TSK | 0.6 | 0.1 | 4 | 4 | 2.4 | |
| WSF | 0.6 | 0.6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| MI NY | 0.3 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 16.6 | |
| SEO | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.3 | |
| LAKR | -0.1 | -0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| MI NY | -0.4 | -0.2 | 2 | 5 | 1.1 | |
| TSK | -1 | -1 | 1 | 0 | -1.2 | |
| MI NY | -5.6 | -2.8 | 2 | 1 | -3.8 | |
| MI NY | -7 | -7 | 1 | 6 | 1.4 | |
| SEO | -7.2 | -2.4 | 3 | 6 | -0.8 | |
| LAKR | -11.3 | -5.7 | 2 | 0 | -5.1 |
Developed in partnership with IITM CESSA
Top Wicket Takers
22
Innings: 8Average: 10.36
11
Innings: 7Average: 17.36
11
Innings: 7Average: 20.90
Top Run Scorers
388
Innings: 8Average: 64.66
264
Innings: 7Average: 44.00
235
Innings: 6Average: 58.75
Instant answers to T20 questions