Robin Singh still good enough to play for the country
The Coca-Cola Champions Trophy in Sharjah in 2000-01 was the last time Rabindra Ramnarayan Singh played a full series for India
Anand Vasu
03-Jul-2001
The Coca-Cola Champions Trophy in Sharjah in 2000-01 was the last time
Rabindra Ramnarayan Singh played a full series for India. Dropped for
the home series against Zimbabwe, Robin Singh had suddenly fallen from
grace as India's first choice number six cricketer in the shorter
version of the game. Since that tour in November 2000, the all rounder
from Tamil Nadu has played just one limited overs match for the
country against Australia at Vizag. That was the fourth one-day of
the series, and Robin Singh did not get a look in for the three
matches that preceded it, or the one that came after. After being
overlooked for the tour of Zimbabwe, one cannot help wondering if
Robin Singh has played his last match for India.
Speaking to a national newspaper soon after hearing that he was not
picked for the tour of Zimbabwe, Robin Singh was quizzed in his
hometown Chennai about the future. "I'm still fit and training hard. I
hope to make a comeback and maybe play in the 2003 World Cup," the
newspaper quotes Robin Singh. Is that just a farfetched dream, or is
there more to it? A look at the composition of the Indian team post
Robin Singh provides a hint.
While the vacuum left by Robin Singh has opened up the slot for a
utility cricketer, one must also remember that the Indian team now has
two other vacancies the slots left by the exclusion of Mohammed
Azharuddin and Ajay Jadeja for their alleged involvement in the
matchfixing scandal. Ever since, the selectors have adopted a policy
that suggests that they are looking to fill these three slots with one
regular batsman and two bits and pieces cricketers. The fight for the
batting slot is quite well settled, with two talented southpaws
Hemang Badani and Dinesh Mongia vying for honours.
The two spots for the utility cricketers however is still wide open,
with many cricketers being tried, tested and even rejected. First
there was Tamil Nadu's Sridharan Sriram, who came into the side as a
top order batsman who bowled a bit. In six ODIs, Sriram managed a
meagre 21 runs with the bat at an average of 5.25. With the ball in
hand too, Sriram was unspectacular, going for over five and a half an
over while scalping five wickets. Perhaps it was just the case of a
youngster being thrust in the wrong role and finding himself a bit out
of his depth.
Exit Sriram, enter Yuvraj Singh. The dashing striker from Punjab burst
onto the international scene with an explosive 84 against Australia in
the ICC KnockOut at Nairobi last year. Praised by all for his
aggressive approach and clean striking of the ball, Yuvraj began to
believe that he had arrived. Then began the slump. An innings of 41
against South Africa later in the same tournament was the only knock
of substance to flow off the willow of the well built Chandigarh lad.
In all, Yuvraj got a run of 14 one-day matches before being dispatched
to the cricketing wilderness by the selectors. He managed 279 runs at
an average of 21.46. Nothing to write home about, as is his solitary
wicket.
Then there's the lad seen by so many as the natural successor to Robin
Singh in the side Reetinder Singh Sodhi. He bowled a bit, batted a
bit and fielded like clean laundry was going out of vogue. After
success as an all-rounder in the Under-15 and Under-19 Indian teams on
the world stage, Sodhi was branded a 'fighter' and a 'team man' in the
Robin Singh mould. With the media gushing over 'fighter' Sodhi, one
former Indian cricketer was prompted to remark, "What about the rest
of us? Were none of us fighters or team men?" Fighter or not, Sodhi
got his chance at the highest level against Zimbabwe at home. Perhaps
he found the going a touch harder than he expected. Despite making 53
not out in one essay, Sodhi in general found it difficult to go out in
the middle late in the innings and score quickly. In three other
knocks, Sodhi managed 9, 4 not out and 4. In all, 70 runs at an
average of 35, thanks mainly to two not outs. With the ball, Sodhi
managed just two wickets.
Finally, one has the case of Delhi batsman Virender Sehwag. A batsman
with a vigorous approach, Sehwag has caught the imagination of many.
In seven matches Sehwag has averaged 22.75 at a strike rate of almost
90. With the ball, five wickets at an average of less than 40
demonstrates the ability to bowl more than decent off breaks.
Having examined all the possibilities, one must return to the man who
is being replaced, Robin Singh. In 136 matches, the Tamil Nadu
southpaw has accumulated 2336 runs at an average of almost 26 and a
strike rate of almost 75. All his batting has been mostly at number
six or lower. With the ball, the story is one where the captain simply
does not seem to have faith in Robin. In 136 matches, he has completed
10 overs on just 12 occasions. Interestingly, his average when allowed
to bowl his full complement is 28.31 (as compared to a career average
of 43.26), his economy rate is 3.77 (career average 4.79) and strike
rate 45 (career 54.1). One wonders if Robin has been under-bowled all
his career.
At the end of the day, it is a bit premature to pass judgment on
several of Robin's replacements. In the same vein, it was certainly
premature to leave Robin out of the side as early as the Indian
selectors chose to. All things considered, only Sehwag seems to have
shown signs of taking up the responsibility that Robin's exclusion has
created. The selectors have said more than once that the decision to
blood youngsters at the expense of Robin Singh was taken with an eye
on the future. A hasty decision perhaps, considering that the ideal
way to groom these young and no doubted talented cricketers would have
been to play them alongside a war-horse like Robin.
After playing two ODIs, Robin had to wait nearly eight years for his
third. Back in 1989, he had age on his side. Now, in 2001 he certainly
does not. One hopes the selectors, who took eight years to reverse
their decision to drop him, act a little faster the second time
around.