Will his deeds match his words?
"I never worry about action, only inaction" said Sir Winston Churchill
AC Ganesh
27-Jun-2000
"I never worry about action, only inaction" said Sir Winston
Churchill. The same expression can be used on the 'Hansiegate'
scandal for on Monday there was no action on the match-fixing
front. With no significant developments from any part of the
world and virtually no news whatsoever on the Indian front, it
was a barren day following a series of action packed weeks.
Even the customary press meets for briefings on the progress of
the case were not held, except for the testimony of Hamid Cassim
in the King Commission.
The coming weeks should see some action with the crucial ICC
meeting currently underway. With a former commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Paul Condon being appointed as Director
of the ICC's anti-corruption wing, things seem to have really
hotted up at the ICC. Despite opposition from Pakistan, Condon
has been given full powers and heads a team of four which is independent of the ICC's executive board. The team will report
directly to the Code of Conduct Commission. Condon has a reputation
for his tirade against corruption during the years in the Metropolitan police. This can be seen as the first positive step by the ICC in their effort to wipe out the spread of the cancer from the game.
Condon who had his appointment questioned by some member countries, said "I profoundly respect those views, but I've been satisfied by
the President today that there is a critical mass of support and all the constituent boards will support the endeavour that we're talking about.'' He added ``This is about cricket and not about colour or
race. Everyone is aware of the challenges I've been through in
recent years and if anyone is sensitive to the need to treat
everybody fairly regardless of race, colour and religion, then hopefully it's someone like me. I bring to this challenge that experience and that sensitivity."
Condon was of the opinion that universally all those who love
the game want something to happen to eradicate corruption. He
said "There is an absolute resolve within world cricket to deal
with this, the alternative is really unthinkable. All the
legitimate stakeholders in cricket want something to happen,
whether they are players, fans or administrators - it's in the
interest of everyone to get this right."
On his role, Condon said "My role will be to make sure there is
proper co-ordination of the endeavour around the world to deal
with these issues, to make sure we get in place the best regime
within cricket so that these sort of things cannot happen so
easily in the future."
Condon has his task cut out right away with UCBSA managing
director's Ali Bacher's testimony to the King Commission where
he alleged that the World Cup 1999 match between India and
Pakistan was fixed. It was subsequently referred under protest
to the ICC by India. He also has to check the authenticity of
the tapes with regard to Salim Malik's alleged conversation with
an undercover journalist of the News of the World newspaper.
The former policeman has voiced his opinion confidently to start
with, but given the situation with vote bank politics playing a
big way within the ICC, one has to see whether he will be given
a free hand which he would like to have. With the racial divide
clearly evident, one wonders whether he can really get the
necessary help from the member countries. Under the circumstances,
with an agenda on match-fixing, one can look forward to a stormy session at the ICC meeting in the coming days.
In India, there seems to be a lull for the past few days. One of
the reasons for the sudden dullness could be attributed to the
King Commission inquiry. But things can move rapidly with a sudden burst of statements from any one of the major players in the
ongoing match-fixing scandal to keep the pot boiling. Surely one
can expect more drama once the investigative agency summons three former captains for deposition. As William Blake put it in his essay `There is no natural religion' - Reason, or the ratio of all we have already known, is not the same that it shall be when we know more.