September 5, 2014

The unquestioning loyalty of the sports nut

True sports fans are like Harley-Davidson loyalists. Poor marketing and tacky innovations will never turn them away from the game they love

Innovations like LED bails may come and go. Fans may frown at it, but they will continue watching
Innovations like LED bails may come and go. Fans may frown at it, but they will continue watching © Getty Images

Many moons ago, during my university years, I had my first and last commerce-based epiphany while sitting through a marketing lecture. The speaker, whose name, voice and face I couldn't recall if I tried, started talking about the way in which the Harley- Davidson motorcycle company essentially had a huge portion of their customers in the palm of their hand because these diehard riders and motorbike enthusiasts displayed what marketers called "loyalty beyond reason".

This meant that no matter how the company behaved, how tacky the licensing deals they pursued or how ubiquitous their brand name became, the lifestyle that surrounded their product and the emotional pull of their bikes for rusted-on diehards was too strong for those customers to resist or abandon. The Apple brand is now probably a more salient example, such is the unquestioning faith a huge number of their customers place in both the brand and the cult of Steve Jobs.

At the time, this idea of loyalty beyond reason made me question whether there were people or ideals or products that I clung to with unquestioning faith. Thinking as loftily of myself as university men are wont to do, I concluded that I was a person of intellectual fortitude and couldn't be pushed around and told what to think. In hindsight, not only was this wrong but it was a supremely ironic thing to think as I sat bored stiff in a lecture theatre, partaking in one of life's great symbolic rituals of conformity and fulfilment of parental expectation.

What I failed to admit then was that my almost daily displays of loyalty beyond reason are tied to sport. Cricket primarily, but also Australian Rules football, basketball, tennis, soccer, and any number of other essentially trivial events around which I organise my entire life, and to which I've devoted the lion's share of my discretionary waking hours.

Maybe you're a little like me and think that your cynicism and finely tuned worldview act as a shield to the avarice, corruption and simmering sense of discontent that characterise modern sport but I'd follow up the establishment of that point by asking you how many times you've sat and watched these sports in the last two weeks. In my head I can tick off a checklist of many ills that have blighted cricket in the last ten years and many more reasons for which a perfectly reasonable person could abandon the sport and take up a new hobby. I don't, though, because they've got me by the balls.

It makes me wonder just how bad cricket could get before I stopped watching it. The last ten years have proved that all of the subtle shifts in the landscape have a cumulative effect of altering the game markedly and not always for the better

I'll probably end up paying $400 for a World Cup final ticket, I'll upgrade my pay-TV subscription so I can watch a meaningless ten-game ODI tournament, and I'll probably even buy the reissued 1992 Zimbabwe World Cup shirt because I'm a cricket nuffy. I decry the gauche incursion of monster trucks in the Big Bash League but then I'll go ahead and watch nearly every single game of the tournament. My loyalty goes beyond reason, as yours might too, and the marketing people know it. They could drive the monster trucks onto the ground mid-over and I'll keep watching.

In a way it makes me wonder just how bad cricket could get before I stopped watching it. That's no insult to the game in its current form because I love it as I always have done, but the last ten years have proved that all of the subtle shifts in the landscape have a cumulative effect of altering the game markedly and not always for the better. By the time I'm 70 years old there might be no suitable willow left to make bats, so they'll use aluminium ones or some composite fibre that hasn't even been invented yet. India, England and Australia might be the only teams playing in ICC events. The ICC might have been disbanded. Grounds might be half the size and the spectacle unrecognisable from what we see today, but it will still be called cricket and therefore I'll still be watching it.

This fan dilemma plays out elsewhere obviously. Hardened football fans who wax romantic about the away days at ramshackle suburban pitches of the '70s might be physically repulsed by the obscene wages paid to English Premier League players and the ludicrous cost of a seat at the new mega stadiums, but mostly they keep watching, reading and forking out their dough to take part. Sport lovers are like those Harley- Davidson-riding bikies and not just in a tribal sense; the love of these games that lives within them is as crucial to the beating of their hearts as the atrial septum.

One thing I would say is that for me sport has never stood in the way of maintaining a healthy amount of interpersonal relationships, but increasingly I find that it fills most other crevices of life. I'm more resigned to this than chastened or sad, but there are times when you've got to question that level of loyalty. I'll probably just wait until the cricket has finished, though.

Russell Jackson is a cricket lover who blogs about sports in the present and nostalgic tense for the Guardian and Wasted Afternoons. @rustyjacko

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Speng on September 5, 2014, 18:50 GMT

    You can be a curmudgeon all you want but I blooming love the Zing bails. Now on the replays it is blindingly obvious when when the bails have come off. No more frame back, frame forward and some numpty saying "I reckon they're off there".

  • on September 5, 2014, 16:19 GMT

    I'll extrapolate a situation to try & explain why you're a sports nut. The situation: Almost all my friends watch tv EVERYDAY after coming back from work. Only during May-June, because a channel shows cricket (IPL) every evening, they watch that channel. They could watch anything, but because there is cricket available to watch somewhere, they watch it. If there were no IPL, they would not be watching that channel. They would be watching movies or reality shows during May-June, like they do in the remaining 10 months of the year. They dont skip work and watch the cricket. It's just that cricket is available during the period of relaxation. But we still consider them cricket nuts (more specifically, IPL nuts). Now think of not just the IPL but of cricket as a whole (or any other sport). Matches are available round the year whenever we come home from work, college, school, & even on holidays when we are at home. If you had other obligations at those times, would you watch the cricket?

  • Katey on September 5, 2014, 10:06 GMT

    "... Love is not love Which alters when it alteration finds, Or bends with the remover to remove: O no; it is an ever-fixed mark, That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;"

    Just so.

  • ygkd on September 5, 2014, 7:54 GMT

    There are so many things in cricket that fall under the "Why do so many seem so happy to put up with this?" tag. The IPL, massive bats, the BCCI hegemony, ECB jargon, CA spin, other boards' incompetence, political interference.... I could go on but there's only 698 characters left in this comment box.

  • Speng on September 5, 2014, 18:50 GMT

    You can be a curmudgeon all you want but I blooming love the Zing bails. Now on the replays it is blindingly obvious when when the bails have come off. No more frame back, frame forward and some numpty saying "I reckon they're off there".

  • on September 5, 2014, 16:19 GMT

    I'll extrapolate a situation to try & explain why you're a sports nut. The situation: Almost all my friends watch tv EVERYDAY after coming back from work. Only during May-June, because a channel shows cricket (IPL) every evening, they watch that channel. They could watch anything, but because there is cricket available to watch somewhere, they watch it. If there were no IPL, they would not be watching that channel. They would be watching movies or reality shows during May-June, like they do in the remaining 10 months of the year. They dont skip work and watch the cricket. It's just that cricket is available during the period of relaxation. But we still consider them cricket nuts (more specifically, IPL nuts). Now think of not just the IPL but of cricket as a whole (or any other sport). Matches are available round the year whenever we come home from work, college, school, & even on holidays when we are at home. If you had other obligations at those times, would you watch the cricket?

  • Katey on September 5, 2014, 10:06 GMT

    "... Love is not love Which alters when it alteration finds, Or bends with the remover to remove: O no; it is an ever-fixed mark, That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;"

    Just so.

  • ygkd on September 5, 2014, 7:54 GMT

    There are so many things in cricket that fall under the "Why do so many seem so happy to put up with this?" tag. The IPL, massive bats, the BCCI hegemony, ECB jargon, CA spin, other boards' incompetence, political interference.... I could go on but there's only 698 characters left in this comment box.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • ygkd on September 5, 2014, 7:54 GMT

    There are so many things in cricket that fall under the "Why do so many seem so happy to put up with this?" tag. The IPL, massive bats, the BCCI hegemony, ECB jargon, CA spin, other boards' incompetence, political interference.... I could go on but there's only 698 characters left in this comment box.

  • Katey on September 5, 2014, 10:06 GMT

    "... Love is not love Which alters when it alteration finds, Or bends with the remover to remove: O no; it is an ever-fixed mark, That looks on tempests, and is never shaken;"

    Just so.

  • on September 5, 2014, 16:19 GMT

    I'll extrapolate a situation to try & explain why you're a sports nut. The situation: Almost all my friends watch tv EVERYDAY after coming back from work. Only during May-June, because a channel shows cricket (IPL) every evening, they watch that channel. They could watch anything, but because there is cricket available to watch somewhere, they watch it. If there were no IPL, they would not be watching that channel. They would be watching movies or reality shows during May-June, like they do in the remaining 10 months of the year. They dont skip work and watch the cricket. It's just that cricket is available during the period of relaxation. But we still consider them cricket nuts (more specifically, IPL nuts). Now think of not just the IPL but of cricket as a whole (or any other sport). Matches are available round the year whenever we come home from work, college, school, & even on holidays when we are at home. If you had other obligations at those times, would you watch the cricket?

  • Speng on September 5, 2014, 18:50 GMT

    You can be a curmudgeon all you want but I blooming love the Zing bails. Now on the replays it is blindingly obvious when when the bails have come off. No more frame back, frame forward and some numpty saying "I reckon they're off there".