England v India, 1st ODI, Bristol August 24, 2014

Hales in as England attempt subtle evolution

England's selectors have given Alastair Cook their backing and he will have a new opening partner as the focus turns to a marathon of one-day cricket culminating in the World Cup
21

Play 06:51
'England show their hand' Giles

How many times in one summer should a captain be expected to save his job? In the eyes of England's selectors, probably only once. Alastair Cook re-established his authority as England's Test captain during their 3-1 defeat of India in the Investec Test series. His resilience could not have been clearer. It would be immensely wearying for him to imagine that he might have to do it all again.

In these days of split captaincy, securing a position as Test captain, however redoubtable the effort, is not automatically useful now England face seven months of unbroken ODI cricket, climaxed by the 2015 World Cup in Australia and New Zealand.

Cook's Test career has always been his strongest suit. His place in the one-day side has been debated regularly. The debate will continue, even if only at a low level, but all the signs are that it is an irrelevant one.

He might have built a castle in the mountains only to find the next campaign is on the coast. But he has benefited from the examination of his captaincy credentials. His leadership is no longer an inheritance, it is now a thing of substance.

That England's selectors are intent on Cook leading England in the World Cup is apparent. Barring disasters, any debate is superfluous. The chance to make a change was now, ahead of a Royal London ODI series against India - the first of them in Bristol on Monday - more 50-over cricket in Sri Lanka before Christmas and a triangular series in Australia, with India the third participants, in the New Year.

But they had little heart for it, especially when one of the strongest candidates, Eoin Morgan, was having such a dismal time in charge of Middlesex. Instead they are calculating that signs of a new England Test side coming together will feed positively into the 50-over side.

The decision taken, the time has come for consistent planning. England can now commit time to addressing their long-perceived cricketing weaknesses in the 50-over format. No longer will they have to do this as an afterthought. It is what this run of one-day series was designed for.

"We haven't had this period ever - certainly not since I started - where you have had just one-day cricket for seven months," Cook said. "There's time to dedicate to practicing those skills that are needed for one-day cricket, especially the extra skills you need like in the Powerplay overs, both with bat and ball, and death bowling. And that is what we will need to do if we are to have a chance of winning the World Cup in what will be good conditions for us."

Changes are subtle ones. Cook will have a new opening partner in Alex Hales, who he suggested would be given the entire series to prove himself. Ian Bell is also scheduled to bat at No. 3. Hales gives England more energy at the top of the order, but it is his ability to make hundreds - four of them in 50-over cricket in the wink of an eye - which has finally persuaded England's selectors to turn to him.

"He is a different batter to the other guys - he hits the ball incredibly hard, in different areas, with an unorthodox technique"
Alastair Cook on Alex Hales

Cook will benefit from the change, but he knows he cannot regard Hales' presence as permission to potter on at whatever rate he chooses. A captain with a career strike rate in ODIs of 78 runs per 100 balls has been paired with a young buck with a List A strike rate of 100. But Cook is keen to point out that since his return to England's ODI side, his strike rate is above 80 runs per 100 balls. He knows that cannot be allowed to diminish.

"I don't think it changes my role," he said, of Hales' inclusion. "The job of the top four or five is to try and score a hundred and win the game, by setting up the game. You have to try and do it in your way. What's pleasing about Alex over the last month or so is that he has scored four centuries for Nottinghamshire and at a good rate too.

"He is a different batter to the other guys - he hits the ball incredibly hard, in different areas, with an unorthodox technique. He's done really well in T20 cricket and he's got the opportunity over these five games to show us what he can do in 50-over cricket."

Suggestions of a major overhaul of the ODI squad were wide of the mark. The only obvious victim is Ravi Bopara and because of his all-round ability with bat and ball, his absence causes England immediate selection problems.

The exclusion of Bopara essentially commits England to a five-bowler strategy for the World Cup, believing that a phalanx of high-quality seamers is their strongest chance of belying their outsiders status in Australia and New Zealand with a strong challenge.

Hales' inclusion must therefore impact on a batsman. As unlikely as it seems, with Bell earmarked for No. 3, Gary Ballance or Joe Root could be in contention for the No. 4 spot, followed by Eoin Morgan, either Moeen Ali or Ben Stokes as an allrounder, and the wicketkeeper Jos Buttler.

Bristol has had a welcome makeover, so becoming the latest England ground to make definite advances in the past decade or so, but for all that it remains England's most rudimentary international venue. It does not immediately strike you as a place where successful World Cup campaigns are first bedded in, and England do not strike many as potential World Cup winners. It is time for them to try to change that perception.

David Hopps is the UK editor of ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • himanshu.team on August 26, 2014, 5:04 GMT

    I wonder David, if you have purposely omitted the bowling woes or it was a genuine oversight. Either ways, it is one thing to finalize a captain and very different to sort out all issues related to the limited overs format. Hales might be the best batsman in England with his hard hitting and unorthodox technique. However, if you look at other teams, all top teams have such batters in plenty. Plus the truly top sides have technically correct batsmen who are capable of scoring at well over a run-a-ball without breaking a sweat. Teams have mastered the art of 'pacing the innings' with adequate balance between scoring in first ten overs, two in between power plays and the period between them and the death overs. Do England have batters for all these different situations. It is not as simple as one of the top 4 scoring a hundred and laying a foundation. If you are chasing 300+, which is the norm now, then one batter batting fifty overs and scoring just about 100 is too slow!

  • indianzen on August 25, 2014, 22:54 GMT

    With Aussies and Proteas in a blistering form, I cannot doubt that this year is going to be a non Asian team lifting the cup. Eng, Pak, WI, NZ stand far below the amount of discipline and efforts put into teams like Aus, SA and India & SL.

  • on August 25, 2014, 15:47 GMT

    Though an India fan, I became an admirer of English cricket from my schooldays. My sports Sir (they used to call him 'drillmaster'), a catholic priest from England, force fed we kids with the heroics of Len Hutton, Wally Hammond and the like. He used to get newspapers from England (often a month late), used to read out in the class, every word written on English cricket, therein. His inspirational reading made Hutton & Hammond my heroes.

    I had followed English cricket's ups & downs, and often criticized Eng giving preference to migrants, over local boys. It started with the formidable D'Olivera and continued till Andy Flower. Now, at 75 I have reconciled to the realities. I think England, today is on the cusp of resurrection; with Hays, Ballance, & Root providing the nucleus of batting. Jimmy is at his best, and I started liking Jimmy-Broad pair (far below Truman-Statham, though). England can build a formidable team around these five; under a "right" captain. Good luck, England.

  • Jinxy.The.Cat on August 25, 2014, 13:34 GMT

    1.rahane 2.gambhir 3.virat 4.rohit 5.raina 6.dhoni 7.jadeja 8.ashwin 9.bhuvi 10.shami 11.mohit sharma 12.yuvi 13.rayudu 14.samson 15.j.bumrah 16.rishi dhawan 17.umesh yadav. This will be ideal squad to beat in WC2015.

  • on August 25, 2014, 12:24 GMT

    having watched the Australian squad against Zimbabwe and their batting and bowling creates goosebumps among an Indian fan like me. With the likes of Maxwell, finch, Johnson, starc etc..the Indians would be doomed. We don't have an aggressor like Maxwell or a pace like starc or Johnson. the Dhawans the kohlis the kumars would be a laughing stock for sure.

  • on August 25, 2014, 12:16 GMT

    In these days every top cricket team might have been planning to bring one or two hard hitting batsmen in their team who can bang the ball hard with or without conventional cricketting classical shots. For example aus has maxwell,pak has afridi,West indies has Chris gale,nz land has mcculam,South Africa has a.bdevilier,so india should also consider sehwag,samson and yusuf pAthan to keep themselves in the contention of winning the wc2015.

  • hiranya on August 25, 2014, 12:09 GMT

    Let it rain. we can sleep peacefully - Indian cricket fan.

  • ruester on August 25, 2014, 12:06 GMT

    Apart from the England selectors and Downton does anyone in the country think that Cook should be anywhere near the ODI squad? Morgan can be captain and we can go with some of the big hitters at the top of the order. great to see Hales but so utterly depressed at still seeing Cook. England have never won the WC. And we won't if we have Cook opening. he can hardly say he is in prime form, those fifties in the test series were some of the ugliest, luckiest and scratchiest I have ever seen.

  • yorkshire-86 on August 25, 2014, 8:05 GMT

    Hales Root Bairstow Ballance Morgan Bopara Buttler Broad Tredwell Onions Anderson. That should be the team. Anderson has missed practically all the bilateral ODIs in the last 5 years and is in no further need of rest. Onions is the 2nd bet bowler in the country and should play. Bell isn't actually that good, he just has the odd purple patch. As for Cook, he was forced into the team and given skip, neither of which he deserved.

  • s_harris on August 25, 2014, 7:27 GMT

    @Chris Silva: Here are the stats on the WC final appearances since the 1976 world cup - Australia - 6 appearances - 4 wins India - 3 appearances - 2 wins West Indies - 3 appearances - 2 wins Sri Lanka - 3 appearances - 1 win England - 3 appearances - No win Pakistan - 2 appearances - 1 win

  • himanshu.team on August 26, 2014, 5:04 GMT

    I wonder David, if you have purposely omitted the bowling woes or it was a genuine oversight. Either ways, it is one thing to finalize a captain and very different to sort out all issues related to the limited overs format. Hales might be the best batsman in England with his hard hitting and unorthodox technique. However, if you look at other teams, all top teams have such batters in plenty. Plus the truly top sides have technically correct batsmen who are capable of scoring at well over a run-a-ball without breaking a sweat. Teams have mastered the art of 'pacing the innings' with adequate balance between scoring in first ten overs, two in between power plays and the period between them and the death overs. Do England have batters for all these different situations. It is not as simple as one of the top 4 scoring a hundred and laying a foundation. If you are chasing 300+, which is the norm now, then one batter batting fifty overs and scoring just about 100 is too slow!

  • indianzen on August 25, 2014, 22:54 GMT

    With Aussies and Proteas in a blistering form, I cannot doubt that this year is going to be a non Asian team lifting the cup. Eng, Pak, WI, NZ stand far below the amount of discipline and efforts put into teams like Aus, SA and India & SL.

  • on August 25, 2014, 15:47 GMT

    Though an India fan, I became an admirer of English cricket from my schooldays. My sports Sir (they used to call him 'drillmaster'), a catholic priest from England, force fed we kids with the heroics of Len Hutton, Wally Hammond and the like. He used to get newspapers from England (often a month late), used to read out in the class, every word written on English cricket, therein. His inspirational reading made Hutton & Hammond my heroes.

    I had followed English cricket's ups & downs, and often criticized Eng giving preference to migrants, over local boys. It started with the formidable D'Olivera and continued till Andy Flower. Now, at 75 I have reconciled to the realities. I think England, today is on the cusp of resurrection; with Hays, Ballance, & Root providing the nucleus of batting. Jimmy is at his best, and I started liking Jimmy-Broad pair (far below Truman-Statham, though). England can build a formidable team around these five; under a "right" captain. Good luck, England.

  • Jinxy.The.Cat on August 25, 2014, 13:34 GMT

    1.rahane 2.gambhir 3.virat 4.rohit 5.raina 6.dhoni 7.jadeja 8.ashwin 9.bhuvi 10.shami 11.mohit sharma 12.yuvi 13.rayudu 14.samson 15.j.bumrah 16.rishi dhawan 17.umesh yadav. This will be ideal squad to beat in WC2015.

  • on August 25, 2014, 12:24 GMT

    having watched the Australian squad against Zimbabwe and their batting and bowling creates goosebumps among an Indian fan like me. With the likes of Maxwell, finch, Johnson, starc etc..the Indians would be doomed. We don't have an aggressor like Maxwell or a pace like starc or Johnson. the Dhawans the kohlis the kumars would be a laughing stock for sure.

  • on August 25, 2014, 12:16 GMT

    In these days every top cricket team might have been planning to bring one or two hard hitting batsmen in their team who can bang the ball hard with or without conventional cricketting classical shots. For example aus has maxwell,pak has afridi,West indies has Chris gale,nz land has mcculam,South Africa has a.bdevilier,so india should also consider sehwag,samson and yusuf pAthan to keep themselves in the contention of winning the wc2015.

  • hiranya on August 25, 2014, 12:09 GMT

    Let it rain. we can sleep peacefully - Indian cricket fan.

  • ruester on August 25, 2014, 12:06 GMT

    Apart from the England selectors and Downton does anyone in the country think that Cook should be anywhere near the ODI squad? Morgan can be captain and we can go with some of the big hitters at the top of the order. great to see Hales but so utterly depressed at still seeing Cook. England have never won the WC. And we won't if we have Cook opening. he can hardly say he is in prime form, those fifties in the test series were some of the ugliest, luckiest and scratchiest I have ever seen.

  • yorkshire-86 on August 25, 2014, 8:05 GMT

    Hales Root Bairstow Ballance Morgan Bopara Buttler Broad Tredwell Onions Anderson. That should be the team. Anderson has missed practically all the bilateral ODIs in the last 5 years and is in no further need of rest. Onions is the 2nd bet bowler in the country and should play. Bell isn't actually that good, he just has the odd purple patch. As for Cook, he was forced into the team and given skip, neither of which he deserved.

  • s_harris on August 25, 2014, 7:27 GMT

    @Chris Silva: Here are the stats on the WC final appearances since the 1976 world cup - Australia - 6 appearances - 4 wins India - 3 appearances - 2 wins West Indies - 3 appearances - 2 wins Sri Lanka - 3 appearances - 1 win England - 3 appearances - No win Pakistan - 2 appearances - 1 win

  • dinosaurus on August 25, 2014, 4:28 GMT

    @ Chris Silva

    Are you sure that SL have made more finals than SL? Aus have won the cup 4 times and lost in the final at least once (to SL in India). All 4 Aus wins have been away from home, they didn't even make the elimination stages in their only previous attempt at home.

  • dunger.bob on August 25, 2014, 2:59 GMT

    Gee, I don't don't know about that England. Cook, Bell and Root seems a little dodgy in a ODI to my way of thinking. Up against really good bowling all 3 of them tend to err on the side of caution and inadvertently play into the oppositions hands. In a 50 over game it doesn't really matter if you don't get a bloke out as long as he isn't scoring freely. .. I realise there are times when you need to be circumspect but hopefully the pitches for the WC will be good for stroke play and runs, not survival, will be what's needed. I think you only need 2 of those guys, not all 3, but then again, what do I know.

  • landl47 on August 25, 2014, 0:58 GMT

    Broad not being available does create some problems for England. The tail looks rather long with Finn or Gurney in the side. Spin is also an issue; personally, I'd have loved to see Adil Rashid given a chance. He's been bowling well this season and legspinners traditionally do better in Aus than finger spinners. He can bat, too, so he doesn't weaken the side there.

    Like Nick Sharland, I think Ballance should be in the side. However, there are quite a lot of games coming up and perhaps some shuffling will take place. In a way, I hope India does play better to force England to reexamine its strategy.

  • on August 24, 2014, 22:24 GMT

    It is far too early to predict. Sri Lanka are going to be the side they will all have to beat. SL have been in WC finals more than any other team. Circumstances beyond them have prevented SL winning most of them . I refer to the WC in WI and the last ODI in India. We all know what happened. Pleased with the changes and progress England my second home are making too. Best of luck Sri Lanka and England. Love to see them in the WC final 2015.

  • on August 24, 2014, 20:22 GMT

    Ravi bopara should have played and bat one drip instead of bell,also Luke wright should have been in this squad because morgan is out of torch

  • y4yoga on August 24, 2014, 17:43 GMT

    Hales got 4 centuries while playing Nottinghampshire so it would be useful in England ODI's, Indian Team is not nottinghampshire or any county, an hype as been created around Hales so as Virat before Test Series. So its Understandable an another Virat but this time from English side.... lets wait and watch

  • JustIPL on August 24, 2014, 17:37 GMT

    Morgan has to be dropped after one game as he is really off color while ballance can come in for him. Morgan should have shown his class in the warmup game but he coudnt and may be didnt.

  • JustIPL on August 24, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    No doubt english squad is too strong. This is a good chance they can rotate their players because they are facing india that too at home. Against stronger sides they can stick to a winning combo later on.

  • siddhartha87 on August 24, 2014, 17:22 GMT

    England got a great pace attack.They should play Anderson,Finn and Broad in world cup. One of the reason that England fails in ODIs is that these 3 rarely play together. Stokes should bat at no 7 while Tredwell should play as the spinner.

  • on August 24, 2014, 16:46 GMT

    I would really love to know why Ballance is an optional player in the ODI squad, and Cook, Bell, Hales and Morgan are dead certs to play. Ballance's List A average is comfortably 10 runs higher than most of the other players in the squad (52.36), and he scores his runs at a strike-rate of 90.1. Moreover, we saw in the test series that he's as good at scoring quickly as he is at grinding out runs. He clearly has all of the gears necessary for ODI cricket.

    Only two players in the history of cricket have higher List A averages than Ballance (Bevan and Pujara). There is a popular myth that Ballance's statistics are inflated by having played some domestic cricket in Zimbabwe - if the games he played in Zimbabwe were taken out of the equation, he would drop to 7th on the all-time list for List A averages, still comfortably above 50 and still the best English player. Eoin Morgan, for comparison, has an average of 38 and a strike rate of 88 - so I ask again, why is Ballance optional?

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on August 24, 2014, 16:24 GMT

    O.K. so that's yet another opening option in Hales; but the big question is, what are England going to do for the rest of the team for the WC? Is this the extent of England's tinkering/preparation for the WC, which need I remind them is down in Australia/New Zealand? I can see Ali/Stokes getting taken apart if they're relied upon for 10 overs bowling. Will Tredwell be dragged along, or will England try and pull a rabbit out of their hat and bring along someone like big Ollie Rayner, who's height and awkward bounce might be more profitable in Aus. conditions than desperately trying to spin a ball? Just saying/thinking; not sure if ECB are (enough).

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • R_U_4_REAL_NICK on August 24, 2014, 16:24 GMT

    O.K. so that's yet another opening option in Hales; but the big question is, what are England going to do for the rest of the team for the WC? Is this the extent of England's tinkering/preparation for the WC, which need I remind them is down in Australia/New Zealand? I can see Ali/Stokes getting taken apart if they're relied upon for 10 overs bowling. Will Tredwell be dragged along, or will England try and pull a rabbit out of their hat and bring along someone like big Ollie Rayner, who's height and awkward bounce might be more profitable in Aus. conditions than desperately trying to spin a ball? Just saying/thinking; not sure if ECB are (enough).

  • on August 24, 2014, 16:46 GMT

    I would really love to know why Ballance is an optional player in the ODI squad, and Cook, Bell, Hales and Morgan are dead certs to play. Ballance's List A average is comfortably 10 runs higher than most of the other players in the squad (52.36), and he scores his runs at a strike-rate of 90.1. Moreover, we saw in the test series that he's as good at scoring quickly as he is at grinding out runs. He clearly has all of the gears necessary for ODI cricket.

    Only two players in the history of cricket have higher List A averages than Ballance (Bevan and Pujara). There is a popular myth that Ballance's statistics are inflated by having played some domestic cricket in Zimbabwe - if the games he played in Zimbabwe were taken out of the equation, he would drop to 7th on the all-time list for List A averages, still comfortably above 50 and still the best English player. Eoin Morgan, for comparison, has an average of 38 and a strike rate of 88 - so I ask again, why is Ballance optional?

  • siddhartha87 on August 24, 2014, 17:22 GMT

    England got a great pace attack.They should play Anderson,Finn and Broad in world cup. One of the reason that England fails in ODIs is that these 3 rarely play together. Stokes should bat at no 7 while Tredwell should play as the spinner.

  • JustIPL on August 24, 2014, 17:26 GMT

    No doubt english squad is too strong. This is a good chance they can rotate their players because they are facing india that too at home. Against stronger sides they can stick to a winning combo later on.

  • JustIPL on August 24, 2014, 17:37 GMT

    Morgan has to be dropped after one game as he is really off color while ballance can come in for him. Morgan should have shown his class in the warmup game but he coudnt and may be didnt.

  • y4yoga on August 24, 2014, 17:43 GMT

    Hales got 4 centuries while playing Nottinghampshire so it would be useful in England ODI's, Indian Team is not nottinghampshire or any county, an hype as been created around Hales so as Virat before Test Series. So its Understandable an another Virat but this time from English side.... lets wait and watch

  • on August 24, 2014, 20:22 GMT

    Ravi bopara should have played and bat one drip instead of bell,also Luke wright should have been in this squad because morgan is out of torch

  • on August 24, 2014, 22:24 GMT

    It is far too early to predict. Sri Lanka are going to be the side they will all have to beat. SL have been in WC finals more than any other team. Circumstances beyond them have prevented SL winning most of them . I refer to the WC in WI and the last ODI in India. We all know what happened. Pleased with the changes and progress England my second home are making too. Best of luck Sri Lanka and England. Love to see them in the WC final 2015.

  • landl47 on August 25, 2014, 0:58 GMT

    Broad not being available does create some problems for England. The tail looks rather long with Finn or Gurney in the side. Spin is also an issue; personally, I'd have loved to see Adil Rashid given a chance. He's been bowling well this season and legspinners traditionally do better in Aus than finger spinners. He can bat, too, so he doesn't weaken the side there.

    Like Nick Sharland, I think Ballance should be in the side. However, there are quite a lot of games coming up and perhaps some shuffling will take place. In a way, I hope India does play better to force England to reexamine its strategy.

  • dunger.bob on August 25, 2014, 2:59 GMT

    Gee, I don't don't know about that England. Cook, Bell and Root seems a little dodgy in a ODI to my way of thinking. Up against really good bowling all 3 of them tend to err on the side of caution and inadvertently play into the oppositions hands. In a 50 over game it doesn't really matter if you don't get a bloke out as long as he isn't scoring freely. .. I realise there are times when you need to be circumspect but hopefully the pitches for the WC will be good for stroke play and runs, not survival, will be what's needed. I think you only need 2 of those guys, not all 3, but then again, what do I know.