World T20 2016 March 28, 2016

Lehmann wants better T20 schedule for Australia


'We've got to get better playing as a group' - Lehmann © Getty Images

Australia coach Darren Lehmann has called for a more extensive programme of T20 matches ahead of the next World T20 to be hosted down under in 2020, highlighting a lack of matches in the format as a key reason for his side's failure to progress to the semi-finals.

While being generous in his praise for the wondrous innings played by Virat Kohli, Lehmann said Australia can perform better next time around through a more carefully planned T20 schedule. Australia played a solitary T20I in 2015, before a quick run of six games immediately before this event. He also pointed to the team's opening loss against New Zealand, when they faded badly chasing a middling total, as pivotal to their fortunes.

"If anything it was the eight runs against New Zealand that cost us. When we were 1 for 60 off about seven [2 for 51 off 6.4], we should have got those runs," Lehmann said. "You can have all the excuses under the sun. No Mitchell Starc, no Patrick Cummins, all that. But at the end of the day we weren't good enough and we've got to get better playing as a group. Scheduling is always the toughest thing for us, we know that.

"We've just got to make sure we've got enough games leading into a World Cup. It's a bit easier next time, because it's four years away so we've got plenty of time to schedule some more games, and the next one is at home. So wickets will be bouncing and they'll be nice and good wickets for everyone to play on so it'll be fine next time."

Lehmann defended the composition of the squad selected for the tournament, pointing to the success of Adam Zampa as a major positive but also highlighting some failures in the top order. David Warner failed to make an impact after being demoted from opening, while Usman Khawaja's undoubted class was not capitalised upon with a truly match-defining innings.

"He's calm, played better the higher he's gone, so that's a pleasing thing for us," Lehmann said of Zampa. "I know it was a big issue, [Cameron] Boyce or Zampa, but we got that one right. Nothing against Cameron, because he was very good for us in Sydney before we left. They're the tough calls you've got to make sometimes but that's a plus for us this tournament.

"[Zampa] is in our one-day team as well, that's a start. His four-day record has got to improve, he's the first to admit that. But the pleasing thing is when he's steps up he's played well for us. Pressure does strange things to people, full stop. He's handling himself really well, been very impressed with him.

"You would have liked see Warner to score more runs. He probably had a quiet tournament but that's understandable occasionally. You're there to make runs all the time but sometimes you struggle. I think Usman was fantastic. Would have liked him to go on with it if there's one criticism. [Shane] Watson floating up and then down was good. I think our bowling attack, we made the best of the conditions."

As for Kohli's brilliance, Lehmann said there was much to be learned from the way he orchestrates India's batting. "That was an unbelievable innings. That was the best T20 innings I've seen for a long time," he said. "I think everyone is probably in awe of that innings itself, especially on a wicket that was a little bit difficult. The way he went about it was exceptional.

"I thought we were ahead of the game at about 15 overs but you knew you had to get him out. They played really well. And you can get beaten by one bloke in this format sometimes, and we certainly did. He's always ahead of the game, isn't he? His record chasing is exceptional obviously.

"Having said that, if we maybe were a millimetre out with a yorker or a millimetre wide he carved us up. That's one of those innings you get beaten. I think whoever won would go a long way in the tournament. I think everyone thinks that around the world anyway. I can't see them losing, that's my personal opinion.

"It would have been nice to go through and have no subcontinent team in the World T20, but it wasn't to be."

Daniel Brettig is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo. @danbrettig

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Unni on March 30, 2016, 5:18 GMT

    India played 3 T20's vs Australia. After the first T20 the key players (Warner, Smith etc) went to NZ to prepare for the test series. Instead of that they should have stayed back for more practice in the other 2 T20 matches. That is not suggest to that their fate would have been any different in this T20 WC, It was a question of prioirty - whether they gave more importance to the NZ series (test and ODI) or the T20 WC.

    You win some. You lose some

  • Brian on March 29, 2016, 20:06 GMT

    @TheBigBoodha - Your comment is spot on! Just gross incompetence in the Australian team set-up. After all these failures, and all the people saying the same thing, I actually wonder if Rod Marsh, is a bit old school for the task he's been given. Or maybe just past it analytically. As you say, you can't imagine it being any worse, or in fact, any more laughable. This is Australian cricket these guys are messing up! While the rest of the world understands that you pick a T20 team for a T20 game, we still pick a test/ODI style team, trotting out the usual suspects, sprinkled with a few 'gut-feels', and random thought bubbles! Frustrated - you bet!

  • Jazib on March 29, 2016, 19:41 GMT

    no cummins? cummins ain't even a good bowler

  • ARVIND on March 29, 2016, 15:13 GMT

    Why Indian Wins are based on Luck according to others and Other teams win is performance.

    Grow up Guys. Both teams are playing on same surface. See way the NZ , WI and India have prepared n selected there team. As WC is in India, Its a commonsense that Pitches will b slow and there will be spin too. So what was the problem for loosing teams not prepared accordingly and select team accordingly.

    And After loosing reasons are Customized wicket as per Indians, Scheduling was not proper, Not Having Match Practises, Main Bowlers are not playing.

    Good Luck WI, India, NZ n Eng

  • ARVIND on March 29, 2016, 15:03 GMT

    Let Australian test team come back to India for Test series, Then the No.1 Tag will get vanished.

    Australia got No.1 status by playing in there own den and secondly Also played much more games too.

    ICC should plan equal no of test at home and away & same no of matches for all team, Then it will be right Judgement of Top Team and Also Top Players.

  • dave on March 29, 2016, 12:37 GMT

    No doubt Australia was the best team at the tournament and they and their fans still believe that, so if not for the poor scheduling, the toss, some umpiring decisions and ..... bad luck they would be No 1 in all three formats. Agree?

  • Doug on March 29, 2016, 12:20 GMT

    Very disappointed to read that Lehmann is calling for more T20 games. This is rubbish cricket, it's fine for the franchise tournaments for a bit of fun, but not international cricket.

  • Cricinfouser on March 29, 2016, 11:56 GMT

    Every got the same amount of opportunity. Please accept the fact that oz need tons of improvement in T20 and move on.

  • John on March 29, 2016, 11:47 GMT

    Sorry but the ozzies cricket team, are just not up to it at this level,less whinging, and harder work is needed.

  • Robin on March 29, 2016, 10:55 GMT

    Australia struggled without the umpiring of Ian Gould!! Don't believe me? Look at the 9 bad decisions against the Indian batsmen in the first two test matches..both lost by India. All these were from Gould. The moment the proper umpires came in..the next two were drawn??!! Truth about Aus cricket is skewed at the best of times.

  • No featured comments at the moment.