Andrew Miller
Andrew Miller Andrew MillerRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
UK editor, ESPNcricinfo

A bloodless coup

There is more than just a hint of cowboy about the way in which the ECB has leapt into bed with Allen Stanford, the first and highest bidder

Andrew Miller

June 11, 2008

Comments: 23 | Text size: A | A


Show me the money: Allen Stanford poses with US$20 million © Getty Images
Enlarge
 

If there were any doubts remaining as to whether Allen Stanford planned to back up his lofty words with deeds, consider them blown away once and for all. The breezy whirring of his jet-black helicopter's rotor-blades did for that, as he and his cast of all-stars swooped in as if from Antigua itself, to perform a bloodless coup at the very home of English cricket.

Lord's has never before seen anything quite like this. Less than 24 hours earlier, the ground had played host to Archbishop Desmond Tutu, invited by the MCC to deliver the annual Cowdrey Lecture on the Spirit of Cricket. But the traditional values espoused then were nowhere to be seen now, as English cricket put dignity to one side and embarked on the biggest cash-grab the game has ever seen.

Down swooped the chopper, the legend "Stanford" emblazoned in gold letters along the side. It paused momentarily above the square of the Nursery ground, rotated 360 degrees, then came to rest by a freshly painted "H" in the outfield. It's fairly apparent what impression this was meant to give, but the din of the descent was more Apocalypse Now than Opportunity Knocks. Trepidation, slight nausea and wide-eyed intrigue were the overriding emotions for the entourage of journalists invited to witness the dawn of English cricket's brave new era.

As the engines were cut, Stanford emerged triumphant into the light, pointing cheerily into the middle distance in that matey manner so beloved by US presidents, with his entourage following closely behind him. Sir Vivian Richards, Sir Everton Weekes, Richie Richardson, Curtly Ambrose and Desmond Haynes arrived by air, along with the WICB president, Julian Hunte, while Sir Garry Sobers joined them at ground level moments after landing.

By then, the ECB delegation had already marched out to meet him. The chairman, Giles Clarke, led the way, strutting to the middle as if keen to present himself as an equal partner (though General Jodl at Reims came more readily to mind). But it was his sidekick, David Collier, who gave a truer indication of England's standing in this arrangement. He was unable to decide whether handshakes or hugs were appropriate for Texan royalty, and so ended up performing a floppy chest-bump that was exquisite in its awkwardness.

 
 
There's no question that Stanford's involvement with West Indies cricket has been a force for good, but English cricket is not flatlining quite so drastically as to require this degree of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation
 
And there is something undoubtedly awkward about all this, although it would be wrong to be out-and-out cynical. Money is something that English cricket desperately needs, both to promote the game domestically and to compete at boardroom level internationally, and let's not forget that, back in 2003, the entire English media (and I include myself) was wrong in its initial impression of the Twenty20 Cup. But in keeping with the Texan connection, there is more than just a hint of cowboy about the way in which the ECB has leapt into bed with the first and highest bidder.

That sense of unease had been fuelled as we waited for the arrival. As various scenarios were speculated upon by the journalists, one of the tabloid reporters stated baldly that Richards and Sir Ian Botham would be making cameo appearances in November's inaugural winner-takes-all game, to provide some "legendary" pizzazz. It soon turned out he was joking, but it was a measure of the moment that no one could seriously write such a suggestion off.

And then there was the d├ęcor. All around the Nursery pavilion, placards had been hung on the walls with grand motivational quotes plucked from history. The one that caught my eye came from Rudyard Kipling's "If". "If you can make one heap of all your winnings. And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss," were the chosen lines. The next two words, as if anyone needs reminding are: "And lose". Too much of this arrangement seems out of context with the game that we have known and loved for generations, but Clarke has taken his gambler's instinct and made a break for the big-time.


Stanford's presidential-style arrival at Lord's © Getty Images
Enlarge
 

At what cost, however, remains to be seen. There's no question that Stanford's involvement with West Indies cricket has been a force for good - the team's recent improved form undoubtedly stems from the improved sense of worth and identity that his competition has brought to the region, not to mention the riches. And yet, English cricket is not flatlining quite so drastically as to require this degree of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

In fact, there is a fine line between a kiss of life and a smothering, because the greatest fear about the day's events was the one that Stanford singularly failed to allay. When asked his opinion of Test cricket, he responded baldly: "I find it boring, but I'm not a purist." Then, in a sweeping metaphor about the architecture at Lord's, he went on to liken the "1700s" pavilion to the Test game, and the "Eye in the Sky" media centre to Twenty20s. "Test cricket is the foundation, that's where cricket came from. Twenty20 is the future, that's where the money is."

It's not a ringing endorsement for traditional values, and on today of all days, Clarke was not about to leap to Test cricket's defence. "He's more than entitled to his opinions," Clarke retorted. "We've made it very clear how highly we regard Test cricket in this country, we think England is the home of Test cricket." How much longer can this remain the case, however. The only man in Stanford's line-up who spoke out on the old game's behalf was Botham, who also looked as though he'd strolled off the golf course with a Pringle sweater draped over his shoulders. But even his words were lost amid the glitz. Botham, remember, refused to go to the ICC World Twenty20 because he thought the format was a joke. Something's changed his mind, and it's probably the very same thing that has turned the ECB's heads.

Stanford is no fool, but nor is he a philanthropist. He wants a return on his investment, and - as the tagline from Jerry Maguire goes - he expects the ECB to show him the money. With that in mind, he decided to flash the cash himself, and onto the sleek, black, neon-lit stage, he wheeled a vast cabinet full of 50 dollar bills. So that's what US$20 million looks like - it's also what England's future looks like. Nothing about this game is ever going to be the same.

Andrew Miller is UK editor of Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Andrew Miller

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Irishfan on (June 13, 2008, 14:20 GMT)

LOL at RajKS. When it's an Indian giving millions to play T20, it's alright, but not when a whitey does it? Spek hit it right on the money. Test cricket is not financially viable, and ODIS are slowly dying. T20 is exciting enough to bring into Europe and American markets, and see it become a global sport in a few decades, rather than just a commonwealth pastime.

Posted by karthi52 on (June 13, 2008, 12:24 GMT)

stanford has prescence in golf ,i think. he wants to promote cricket in america and wants to capture the market in america ,mexico,brazil..(north and south america).that may be his desire..right now he caught the big fish.ie ecb..his aim is to absorb one big fish intially.ie india or australia or england.he achieved one thing one..his another desire is to capture the american market....there are big money in america...remember.it can overtake some sports

Posted by delboy on (June 13, 2008, 10:07 GMT)

CricketCrazy19 , Stanford is an American citizen and therefore cannot offically be referred to as SIR. We could not have SIR Ronald Reegan and many others before or after him for the same reason. If Al Fahad moves his head quarters to Antigua, Bermuda or the Falkland island he still cannot become SIR.. Is Stanford's reall interest then buying a knighthood via the WI and England? A case of have money will get what I want.

Posted by Spek on (June 13, 2008, 9:35 GMT)

As long as Test cricket remains superior to T20 (which T20 detractors always maintain is the case) then there is nothing for Test fans to worry about. Right? After all, what other professional sport is conveniently played mostly during working hours on weekdays, when few can either attend or watch it live on TV? Add to that the buttock-numbing duration which sees the crowd halved by stumps each day, and the near empty stadium which greets the climactic finale of most matches, the inability to tell one player from another, and the drawn out defensive play that the format fails to discourage, and you have a surefire winner for the 21st century.

Posted by Diwakar on (June 13, 2008, 6:54 GMT)

The ECB and the Windies board have decided that they are not going to look the gifted horse in the mouth. Whether all this money will mean a resurgent West Indian team is any body's guess. However, from reports over the years, it appears that the lack of money in the sport is what prompted young West Indians to take up football or basketball. In terms of a wider talent pool, this surely is good.

What is upsetting, though, is Stanford's utter disregard for Test cricket. He is not a purist, granted, but does that mean that he has to wear it on his sleeve? If - or is it when - cricket makes waves in the US, there will be several other money men who will want to jump on to the bandwagon. And then, what fate Test cricket? Where is the time to play it in the midst of all the T20 games?

Modi, you have no idea what you have unleashed. Count the money and watch the demise of Test cricket.

Posted by cyborgxyz2000 on (June 12, 2008, 22:47 GMT)

Its amazing that the ECB has no qualms accepting this cash, however, they were up in arms over the money being bandied around in the IPL. What a hypocritic bunch. Its okay for ECB if tomorrow a group supporting Bin Laden offers ECB 20 million USD to play a one-off match against the Taliban crazies or some other scum of the society. They would then claim that they are just promoting cricket everywhere. The nerve of them to find fault with the IPL, ICL etc.

Posted by evicl1982 on (June 12, 2008, 22:13 GMT)

I live in the u.s.a. but I was born in Jamaica....still follow the game though.I think I known what Stanford wants(to kill Test Cricket so he can make more money) but I am not sure what those W.I. legends viz. Sir Viv. Everton Weekes, Richie Richardson, Sir Gary and Dessie Hanes among others want. The Man had openly said that Test Cricket is boring, so he has no interest there. I guess that he must have turn all these people heads with his money for not one of them to be saying anything about the relative merit of both forms of the game and to see where Stanford is taking it. There is no way that T20 cricket is going to lead to an improvement of the game in the Caribbean. These legends follow the money then complain when the youngsters on the present team fail to perform. The money in the game is directed at the wrong place and I think that these experienced former players should be the ones to see this first. But I think the money talks and all else walks.

Posted by SummerofGeorge on (June 12, 2008, 19:22 GMT)

sorry, but i fail to be led into the idea that he is some heart warming philanthropist with just the love of the game and the Windies spurring him on. One does not accidentally become a Texan Billionaire. He's savvy and he knows America is his breakable market as soon as he can manufacture a game that will appeal to their ad heavy television style, and the four hour spectacle akin to Baseball. If it helps developing cricketers then great, if it makes for competitive test futures even better, if it simply makes a new generation of sloggers looking for the short boundary, then it's a disaster waiting to happen. But that's sport these days, amazingly i fail to notice an increase in my enjoyment of an event in direct relation to the cash windfalls the players are relishing. And Botham should hang his head frankly...

Posted by CricketCrazy19 on (June 12, 2008, 18:02 GMT)

I don't understand what's wrong here. If one billionaire wants to spend his wealth for his entertainment, on his favorite sport and, on his two favorite teams, why are others having stew about it?? Let him[Sir Stanford] spend(Or waste, whatever it turns out) his money. It's cricket which is an eventual winner out of all this coup. We all know that, test cricket is not going to end with this stint. What's wrong if cricketers also earn as much(if not more) as footballers do?? We should thank Sir Stanford and Mr. Giles and even Lalit modi, for that matter, for bringing-in life in cricket, once again, which was almost dead after the last ODI world cup. According to me, it's an "Bloody lively coup" rather than "Bloodless coup", again opinions will always differ..

Posted by karthi52 on (June 12, 2008, 15:33 GMT)

this stanford is very smart guy.he is not interested in the result.he wants the english board to his control.there by he will control the icc ,very very easily.so that he will make the icc's decisions in future.thereby taking the competition to the bcci.so it will be stanford vs bcci in future.in smart it will be stanford vs modi....am i right

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Andrew MillerClose
Andrew Miller Andrew Miller was saved from a life of drudgery in the City when his car caught fire on the way to an interview. He took this as a sign and fled to Pakistan where he witnessed England's historic victory in the twilight at Karachi (or thought he did, at any rate - it was too dark to tell). He then joined Wisden Online in 2001, and soon graduated from put-upon photocopier to a writer with a penchant for comment and cricket on the subcontinent. In addition to Pakistan, he has covered England tours in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, South Africa, Australia and New Zealand, as well as the World Cup in the Caribbean in 2007

    Gower savours life in the last chance saloon

Rewind: David Gower was on the verge of being dropped for good in 1990 when he made a charismatic century against India

    The diggers' doctor

Ashley Mallett: One of few non-cricketers to share a bond with Don Bradman was a South Australian doctor, Donald Beard

    For the love of cricket grounds

Review: A diligent examination of grounds in Britain that no longer host first-class cricket

'He's got no real weaknesses'

Modern Masters: Rahul Dravid and Sanjay Manjrekar discuss Jacques Kallis' terrific record in all conditions

Whose top five is that? Not New Zealand's?

The Beige Brigade boys roll out an old hit about Monty P and his black patka, and discuss Pakistan v NZ

News | Features Last 7 days

India look for their Indian summer

Billboards are calling the series England's Indian Summer, but it is India who are looking for that period of warmth, redemption after the last whitewash, for they have seen how bleak the winter that can follow is

South Africa face the Kallis question

Accommodation for a great player like Jacques Kallis should be made with careful consideration and South Africa cannot get carried away with sentiment

India's bowling leader conundrum

The present Indian bowling line-up will tackle its first five-Test series without the proven guidance of Zaheer Khan, their bowling captain. India had unravelled without him in 2011. Will they do better this time around?

Five key head-to-heads

From two embattled captains to the challenge for India's openers against the new ball, ESPNcricinfo picks five contests that could determine the series

Bevan's best, and a combined Indo-Pak team

A look back at five high-profile exhibition matches

News | Features Last 7 days

    India look for their Indian summer (87)

    Billboards are calling the series England's Indian Summer, but it is India who are looking for that period of warmth, redemption after the last whitewash, for they have seen how bleak the winter that can follow is

    South Africa face the Kallis question (56)

    Accommodation for a great player like Jacques Kallis should be made with careful consideration and South Africa cannot get carried away with sentiment

    India's bowling leader conundrum (44)

    The present Indian bowling line-up will tackle its first five-Test series without the proven guidance of Zaheer Khan, their bowling captain. India had unravelled without him in 2011. Will they do better this time around?

    Five key head-to-heads (33)

    From two embattled captains to the challenge for India's openers against the new ball, ESPNcricinfo picks five contests that could determine the series

    Shakib puts on brave face after suspension (31)

    Shakib Al Hasan trained with his team-mates as the BCB directors held their meeting in Mirpur, unaware of the massive punishment he was about to be hit with