| Series | Countries | Live Scores | Fixtures | Results | News |
Features
|
Photos | Video & Audio | Blogs | Statistics | Archive | Games | Mobile | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
As a batsman alone Garry Sobers was among the very best; to add to that, he had talent to spare to take 235 Test wickets
December 13, 2010
![]()
|
|||
|
Related Links
Players/Officials:
Sir Garry Sobers
Teams:
West Indies
|
|||
First there is Sir Garry Sobers, and then there are all the other great allrounders in Test cricket. Sir Don Bradman unquestionably qualifies as the best batsman ever seen in Tests, but several pundits are willing to bet that in terms of all-round match-winning ability, none has surpassed - and perhaps no one ever will - the sublime Sobers.
Bradman himself called Sobers the "five-in-one cricketer", and with good reason: apart from being an outstanding batsman and fielder, Sobers the bowler was so versatile that he could bowl three different styles - left-arm seam and swing, slow left-arm orthodox, and left-arm wrist spin. Sobers' skills with the ball allowed West Indies to often play an extra batsman - in fact, it was almost as if they were playing with 12 members in the team.
Sobers' leading suit, though, was his ability with bat in hand. He finished with an average of almost 58, and even that doesn't do full justice to his skills. Throughout his career, Sobers never particularly bothered with trivialities like stats and numbers, which make his achievements even more remarkable. It's astonishing that even after scoring at a rate that most specialist batsmen couldn't keep pace with, Sobers still had enough talent to spare to go ahead and take 235 Test wickets at a bowling average of less than 35.
Unlike a Sachin Tendulkar, though, Sobers didn't immediately set the world on fire when he entered Test cricket. For the first three years or so he was fairly ordinary, with only one half-century to show in his first 15 innings. The first sign of his truly precocious talent came during the course of a resounding defeat at the hands of England at The Oval in the summer of 1957. In extremely difficult batting conditions, in which West Indies were bundled out for 89 and 86 in their two innings, Sobers scored 39 and 42. No other West Indian batsman touched 30 in either innings.
From 1958, Sobers' batting graph soared. In only his third Test of the year, against Pakistan in Kingston, he scored a monumental unbeaten 365. It was the record for the highest Test score, and stayed that way for the next 36 years, which is the longest any batsman has held this record. His career average shot up almost 15 runs after that one innings, and in his next Test it touched 50 for the first time, from where it never dipped below 50 again. In fact, from the beginning of 1959 to the end of his career in 1974, his average never went below 56.
And then, of course, were his knocks outside of Test cricket. One of his finest batting displays - one that the Don said was "the greatest exhibition of batting ever seen in Australia", came at the MCG in 1972, when Sobers, playing for World XI, destroyed an Australian attack that included a rampant Dennis Lillee on the way to 254. Lillee had taken 8 for 29 in the previous Test, and had dismissed Sobers first ball in the first innings in Melbourne, but in the second innings Lillee finished a distant second-best, as Sobers cut and drove him to distraction. A few years earlier, a much lesser bowler, Glamorgan's Malcolm Nash, had been at the receiving end when Sobers spanked him for six sixes in an over, the first time it had ever happened in first-class cricket.
| Period | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Till Dec 1957 | 14 | 672 | 30.54 | 0/ 3 |
| Jan 1958 onwards | 79 | 7360 | 62.90 | 26/ 27 |
| Career | 93 | 8032 | 57.78 | 26/ 30 |
As a bowler, Sobers' stats aren't as stunning, but he was more than handy with his ability to bowl various styles. His peak period as a bowler was understandably much shorter, but during the eight years between 1961 and 1968, he was quite a handful, averaging less than 28 and taking almost four wickets per Test.
In fact, his bowling career can be divided into three distinct parts: till 1960, he bowled quite sparingly, taking only 43 wickets in 34 matches, without a single five-for. Then came the best passage for him as a bowler, during which period he delivered two of his most incisive performances: at Headingley in 1966 he returned figures of 5 for 41 and 3 for 39 to help West Indies win by an innings; at the Gabba a couple of years later, his orthodox left-arm spin was good enough to give him a second-innings haul of 6 for 73 and bundle Australia out for 240 as they chased 366 for victory.
| Period | Tests | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | 5WI/ 10WM |
| Till Dec 1960 | 34 | 43 | 47.25 | 118.7 | 0/ 0 |
| Jan 1961 to Dec 1968 | 33 | 125 | 27.93 | 76.3 | 5/ 0 |
| Jan 1969 onwards | 26 | 67 | 36.94 | 103.6 | 1/ 0 |
| Career | 93 | 235 | 34.03 | 91.9 | 6/ 0 |
More than most other cricketers, Sobers was able to, on more than one occasion, deliver his excellence with bat and ball in the same series. Scoring 300 runs and taking 20 wickets in a series is no mean feat - it's only been achieved 15 times in the entire history of Test cricket - but Sobers managed it three times on his own, twice against England, and once against India. The Australian allrounder Keith Miller did it twice, but no one else has achieved it more than once. Ian Botham, Kapil Dev, Richard Hadlee and Shaun Pollock were among those who did it once each, while Imran Khan didn't even achieve it once.
Overall, Sobers' all-round numbers are outstanding - his batting average is nearly 24 more than his bowling average. In terms of this differential, only Jacques Kallis of South Africa has a slightly higher difference.
| Player | Tests | Runs | Average | Wickets | Bowl ave | Diff in ave |
| Jacques Kallis | 142 | 11,449 | 55.84 | 267 | 31.90 | 23.94 |
| Garry Sobers | 93 | 8032 | 57.78 | 235 | 34.03 | 23.75 |
| Imran Khan | 88 | 3807 | 37.69 | 362 | 22.81 | 14.88 |
| Shaun Pollock | 108 | 3781 | 32.31 | 421 | 23.11 | 9.20 |
| Ian Botham | 102 | 5200 | 33.54 | 383 | 28.40 | 5.14 |
| Richard Hadlee | 86 | 3124 | 27.16 | 431 | 22.29 | 4.87 |
| Chris Cairns | 62 | 3320 | 33.53 | 218 | 29.40 | 4.13 |
| Kapil Dev | 131 | 5248 | 31.05 | 434 | 29.64 | 1.41 |
Excluding the first three years of his Test career, when Sobers was still finding his feet in international cricket, he averaged nearly 63 in 79 matches, which was easily the best during that period. England's Ken Barrington was the only other batsman whose average was close to 60. Even Sobers' overall career average of 57.78 is among the very best: with a cut-off of 3000 runs, only five batsmen have done better.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Garry Sobers | 79 | 7360 | 62.90 | 26/ 27 |
| Ken Barrington | 80 | 6754 | 59.76 | 20/ 35 |
| Hanif Mohammad | 37 | 3018 | 51.15 | 10/ 11 |
| Doug Walters | 50 | 3869 | 50.90 | 12/ 23 |
| Rohan Kanhai | 74 | 6021 | 49.35 | 15/ 28 |
| Bob Simpson | 50 | 4045 | 48.73 | 8/ 23 |
| Ted Dexter | 62 | 4502 | 47.89 | 9/ 27 |
| Geoff Boycott | 63 | 4579 | 47.69 | 12/ 26 |
And in the eight years when Sobers was at the peak on his bowling powers, he was among the best in that aspect too: only three bowlers took more than 100 wickets at an averge lower than Sobers' 27.93. West Indies had a pretty useful attack during that period too: Wes Hall and Charlie Griffith took care of the fast-bowling duties, while Lance Gibbs was the number one spinner. Since Sobers obviously wasn't the leading fast bowler or spinner, he was more of a support act, and hence seldom got the opportunity to bowl fast with the wind or slow against it. Later in his career with West Indies' fast-bowling resources dwindling, Sobers bowled long spells with defensive fields, but he managed that too without his bowling stats suffering too much.
| Bowler | Tests | Wickets | Average | Strike rate | 5WI/ 10WM |
| Fred Trueman | 26 | 133 | 21.67 | 49.4 | 10/ 3 |
| Lance Gibbs | 33 | 158 | 24.24 | 75.7 | 12/ 2 |
| Peter Pollock | 24 | 101 | 25.22 | 57.7 | 8/ 1 |
| Garry Sobers | 33 | 125 | 27.93 | 76.3 | 5/ 0 |
| Graham McKenzie | 46 | 201 | 28.42 | 68.8 | 14/ 3 |
| Wes Hall | 30 | 100 | 29.17 | 57.8 | 3/ 0 |
| David Allen | 32 | 109 | 29.91 | 89.6 | 4/ 0 |
| Fred Titmus | 47 | 145 | 30.82 | 96.1 | 7/ 0 |
As a captain Sobers was a mixed bag. Of the nine series he led in, West Indies won three, but those were the first three series he captained. In 1966 in England, especially, Sobers was immense: in five Tests Sobers scored 722 runs, including three hundreds, at an average of 103.14, and took 20 wickets at 27.25. At Lord's in the second Test he played arguably his greatest innings: his unbeaten 163 helped turn around a first-innings deficit of 86 and helped West Indies recover from a precipitous 95 for 5 in the second innings. With David Holford, who made an unbeaten 105, Sobers added an undefeated 274 for the sixth wicket. He scored another century at Headingley and starred with both bat and ball in that game.
Thereafter, though, his captaincy stock fell, especially when his reckless declaration at Port of Spain leading to an England win in a Test in which they took only nine wickets.
Despite the pressures of captaincy, Sobers' batting standards remained high, with an average of almost 59 in the 39 Tests he led in. Among captains who've scored at least 3000 runs, only Don Bradman has a higher average.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Don Bradman | 24 | 3147 | 101.51 | 14/ 7 |
| Garry Sobers | 39 | 3528 | 58.80 | 11/ 15 |
| Graham Gooch | 34 | 3582 | 58.72 | 11/ 16 |
| Brian Lara | 47 | 4685 | 57.83 | 14/ 19 |
| Greg Chappell | 48 | 4209 | 55.38 | 13/ 19 |
Sobers was also one of the greatest match-winning batsmen in Test cricket: his average in wins was 77.42, which remains among the highest. Only the Don and Pakistan's Inzamam-ul-Haq have higher averages.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Don Bradman | 30 | 4813 | 130.08 | 23/ 4 |
| Inzamam-ul-Haq | 49 | 4690 | 78.16 | 17/ 20 |
| Garry Sobers | 31 | 3097 | 77.42 | 12/ 11 |
| Kumar Sangakkara | 42 | 4282 | 76.46 | 15/ 15 |
| Greg Chappell | 38 | 3595 | 70.49 | 14/ 16 |
Some of Sobers' most memorable innings came against England. From 36 Tests against them, Sobers scored 3214 runs, which accounts for 40% of his total aggregate. He played eight full series against them, and averaged more than 75 in four of them. His poorest series against England was his last one, in which he managed only 100 runs from five innings, including scores of 0, 0 and 20 in his last three innings. Despite that, he finished with a 60-plus average against them, which is among the highest for any batsman who's scored more than 2000 runs versus England.
| Batsman | Tests | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Don Bradman | 37 | 5028 | 89.78 | 19/ 12 |
| Viv Richards | 36 | 2869 | 62.36 | 8/ 15 |
| Brian Lara | 30 | 2983 | 62.14 | 7/ 11 |
| Sachin Tendulkar | 24 | 2150 | 61.42 | 7/ 10 |
| Garry Sobers | 36 | 3214 | 60.64 | 10/ 13 |
And unlike some of the current batsmen who are much greater batsmen in the first innings than the second, Sobers had no such problem. Even in the fourth innings of matches, Sobers managed an average of almost 47. Apart from that unbeaten 163 at Lord's mentioned earlier, one of his most meaningful second-innings contributions came against India in Kanpur in 1958. Both teams had been bowled out for 222 in their first innings, and in their second, West Indies were struggling at 83 for 4 when Sobers struck a magnificent 198 to lift them to 443, a target which turned out to be well beyond India in their second innings.
Sobers' overall second-innings average of 55.15 is the second-highest among batsmen with 2500 runs; only Jacques Kallis of South Africa has done better.
| Batsman | Innings | Runs | Average | 100s/ 50s |
| Jacques Kallis | 99 | 4231 | 59.59 | 9/ 26 |
| Garry Sobers | 67 | 2923 | 55.15 | 8/ 15 |
| Allan Border | 111 | 4371 | 54.63 | 11/ 24 |
| Kumar Sangakkara | 63 | 2899 | 52.70 | 9/ 12 |
| Matthew Hayden | 81 | 3472 | 51.82 | 11/ 13 |
| Sunil Gavaskar | 90 | 3963 | 51.46 | 11/ 22 |
| VVS Laxman | 75 | 2968 | 51.17 | 5/ 18 |
| Geoff Boycott | 85 | 3319 | 51.06 | 9/ 17 |
| ||||||
| Comments have now been closed for this article |
||||||
Stats editor Every week the Numbers Game takes a look at the story behind the stats, with an original slant on facts and figures. The column is edited by S Rajesh, ESPNcricinfo's stats editor in Bangalore. He did an MBA in marketing, and then worked for a year in advertising, before deciding to chuck it in favour of a job which would combine the pleasures of watching cricket and writing about it. The intense office cricket matches were an added bonus.

Fixing? It's people like us doing it
Ed Hawkins: It's convenient to blame the underworld for every instance of fixing, but it's ordinary punters behind many of them
The perils of scoffing at failure
Rob Steen: Excessive success can destroy inhibition, and hence the capacity for shame
New Zealand shaken and stirred
Andrew Alderson: The second-innings collapse at Lord's has revived concerns about New Zealand's top order
'The most complete fast bowler I've seen'
Allan Donald on one of the bowlers he found intimidating: the relentless Wasim Akram
The hollow feeling of a Monday morning
Paul Ford: New Zealand offered a glimmer of hope to their fans at Lord's, only to snatch it back and smash it to pieces on day four
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
A talent that didn't know its own worth
Sreesanth wasn't the most likeable team-mate or opponent, but he had skill beyond doubt, which we might have seen the last of
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
A time for anger, a time for action
Out of the shattered lives of three young men caught up in allegations of fraud, newer and stronger players must emerge
Another season in the bottom half
With some of their big names stumbling this season, Kings XI Punjab were rarely serious contenders for a playoff place
Even at the height of his success with the national side, Sreesanth was a lonely cricketer who felt hard done by
Dravid and the art of T20 captaincy (56)
Despite a small squad bereft of big names, Rajasthan Royals' captain has churned out win after win
Anderson's magic not to be missed (47)
None of the other three England bowlers with 300 Test wickets - or many other of the game's finest swing merchants - could have bowled better than James Anderson at Lord's
Pollard sledges Watson, Dravid is angry (43)
Plays of the day from the IPL match between Mumbai Indians and Rajasthan Royals in Mumbai
"Minimise sixes" - Two words sum up farcical contest (40)
The eight-over dash between Bangalore and Chennai was as close as cricket played on the field can get to cricket played on smartphone apps
ICICI Bank M2I. Register Now and Get A Gift Offer.
Safe & simple online money transfer. Apply Now!
Buy Wisden 2013 & get a FREE Playfair
Available now at Cricshop
A legend.No doubt, Sir.Sobers is the Greatest Cricketer . dr.shrikant,desai.India
Posted by harshthakor on (December 15, 2010, 3:09 GMT)Another allrounder worthy of consideration was Keith Miller who could have been Sober's greatest rival had he had a longer career.In this part I would like to qutre some famous legends
'Sobers was a cricketer beyond compare-the only Perfect player,the game has ever produced -if evere there was one,what with his mear impossible qualities."
Don Bradman:Sobers was the 'five in ine cricketer '-batsman,fieldsman and three in -one bowler. Quoting Geoff Armstrong "If a better all-round cricketer than Sobers ever emerges,that man will be the greatest cricketer the game has ever seen"
Remember Sobers bolwed in an attack with Hall and Griffith,as well as lance Gibbs and was thus compelled to bolw long defensive spells after the top bolwers faded.Infact in the main part of his bolwing career he capture 125 wickets in 33 tests at an average of 27 runs,which is remarkable.
Had Gary played in the recent weak West Indian team he may have proved a greater champion.
Posted by ampshare on (December 14, 2010, 19:42 GMT)Anyone who saw both Kallis and Sobers play and thinks Kalliis is better needs help. If Sobers had gonein at number four instead of six or seven he would have averaged over 70. Andanyone who saw him knows his seam bolwling was as good as Kallis and he had other styles as well.
Posted by harshthakor on (December 14, 2010, 17:58 GMT)Gary Sobers,in addition to being the best all-rounder is arguably the best West Indian batsman of all,the best left-handed batsman of all,and amongst the graetset left-arm bowlers and fielders.Arguably,he is also the most complete batsman after Bradman,if you evaluate his brilliance in a crisis in all situations ,conditions and against any opposition.Sobers superiority as an allrounder is the equivalent of Bradman to batsman.Had he played in the modern age ,he may well have been in another league,adapting to the neds of the one-day game.Gary was lethal with the new ball,unlike Kallis .
The later Imran khan was the closest to Sobers as a cricketer ,with his brilliant match-winning flair as a player and a captain ,who could turn the complexion of a game more than Viv Richards or Sachin Tendulkar.
Posted by harshthakor on (December 14, 2010, 17:47 GMT)Reproducing Ananth Narayan's stats analysis Analysis 1-just batting and bowling points added 1. Sobers G.St.A ~ ~ 69.15 2. Kallis J.H 67.74 3. Botham I.T 61.27 4. Imran Khan 60.81 5. Pollock S.M 58.95 6. Hadlee R.J ~ 56.71
Analysis 2-colums below represent batting,bolwing and all-round performance index
01.Sobers G.St.A 26.47 14.64 13.74 54.86 02.Botham I.T 17.32 20.91 11.07 49.29 03.Imran Khan 15.11 25.90 7.37 48.38 04.Hadlee R.J 12.54 26.85 8.72 48.11 05.Kallis J.H 25.28 13.97 7.17 46.42
Gary Sobers is most closely challenged by Botham as a pure allrounder.As a fastbolwing all-rounder Imran Khan was the best of them all.However when he championed the cause with the bat he hardly shone with he ball.Had Wasim Akram done justice to his batting talent he could well have been Sober's greatest rival for the title.
Posted by harshthakor on (December 14, 2010, 17:30 GMT)I thoroughly endorse the point of hammerstats that Sobers performed outstandingly agaisnt superior oposition than Kallis.In 3 analysis of Ananth Nrayan on cricinfo Gary Sobers is at the top.I repeat Kallis has never turned matches or series consistently with bat and ball.Stas are never atrue reflection to Sobers bowling or even his overall merits as acricketer.Kallis has never made the same impoact on the game as Sobers,and has neve equalled Sober's match-winning ability as acricketer.Kallis has a relatively low batting strike rate and has often failed to force the pace,unlike Gary in similar situations.
As a pure all-rounder Ian Botham is Sober's graetset challenger since he has been the most consistent all-round performer with both bat and ball at his best from 1977-1982,infact even overshadowing Sobers in the 1981 Ashes and 1980 Jubillee test.He was alos a graet slip fielder.
If he had done justice to his talent Wasim Akram should have been the Sobers of the modern era.
Posted by absha1 on (December 14, 2010, 16:41 GMT)Kallis is wonderful, but for a player who has played so many tests, he should have completed the all-rounder's triple by now. When he does get it, he will be slowest to reach the mark by miles, but he has to get it to merit consideration amongst the great allrounders.
With less than a wicket a test, Kallis' all round credentials are a weak argument - like Wasim Akram with the skills balanced in reverse.
Kallis' batting is excellent and will improve, like that of many other great batsmen, but really, even now, South Africa need a five pronged attack with him in the team. They should have beaten Pakistan recently but lacked the firepower. Bowling wins tests, not batting. I would rate Sobers much higher.
Posted by Xolile on (December 14, 2010, 16:07 GMT)@HammerStats - If you want to ajust Kallis' stats for Zim and Bangladesh you have to adjust Sobers' for India and Pakistan. Especially Pakistan in 1958/9 were hardly a world force, and if it weren't for his exploits against them, Sobers would probably not be recognised as an undisputed all-time great. The 365* innings is a case in point. Pakistan's best bowler had to leave the field. The depleted attack was quick broken on a very flat pitch. If Sobers didn't run out Hunte, Hunte probably would have broken the record, and history would have been very different.
Posted by wonky on (December 14, 2010, 15:44 GMT)I hear you hammerstats but you're grabbing at straws .. his average against australia was against the Mcgrath's and Warnes of the world and he averaged better than most against them. Sobers never faced them. The fact that kallis is mentioned in most of these posts and is an underlying theme in this article proves all that needs to be proved. He is right up there and as long as he has a better all rounder average .. .quite frankly that says it all. One thign is for sure ... its between Kallis and Sobers and hsitory will be the decider. So far its kallis by a whisker ... the bottom line though is Botham, Dev, Akram are all pretenders to the throne.
Posted by Engle on (December 14, 2010, 15:30 GMT)The biggest difference between Sobers and Kallis is that Sobers was an entertainer; Kallis was not.