July 4, 2011

'We need to recover quicker than West Indies'

Steve Rixon, Australia's new fielding coach, talks about how they need to get back to the basics to become the world's top fielding outfit again
  shares 18

Steve Rixon was last week named Australia's new fielding coach. The former Test wicketkeeper joins Justin Langer and Craig McDermott as the assistants to the head coach, Tim Nielsen. After his appointment, Rixon spoke to ESPNcricinfo about his new role and the current state of Australian cricket.

After 20 years of coaching around the world, it must be pleasing to be part of the Australian side again?
It is. I've spoken to a lot of people who said, "It must have rejuvenated you a lot." I haven't needed any rejuvenation! I've been extremely rejuvenated wherever I've been involved, and have had plenty of success wherever I've been involved.

It is always great to be involved with any Australian side. My big thing is about being able to do something to actually try to help get Australia back into a better place. At the end of the day, a lot of people sit on the fence and do nothing. Well, I've been given an opportunity to be able to do something about it. I'm extremely excited at the proposition of working with a lot of those kids I've seen over the years. I've seen things that I would like to sit down and talk to the boys about, and hopefully turn them into better cricketers - certainly from the fielding perspective.

What do you think of the fielding standard around the world at the moment?
If you go through the best sides of the past, whether it's the Windies in the 80s, through to the cream of the crop with Australia, we've had some outstanding fielding teams. You can see the English now have upped the ante with their fielding, and it's standing out. I've noticed the Indians are starting to hit the deck more often, and they've become better. Everyone has eventually realised that you can't have a passenger in the field anymore. To me, it's always been an important part. You can walk into any organisation and really not know whether someone is going to go out and get a hundred or get five-for, but there's one thing you should always be assured of, if your preparation has been good, and that's that they make limited errors in the field, and maybe do something that might change the pattern of the game.

Not long ago Australia were the world's best fielding team. Is that still the case?
I don't think so. I won't say that. We've got some world-class fielders. Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke and Michael Hussey - they're three of the older boys. That tells me there are a lot of youngsters that need to get back to some simple basics in the field like they do in the other aspects of their game. I have no question they are crying out to be helped, and I think they will improve. But we're definitely not leading the way in the fielding anymore.

It was a little bit different when you had Warne and McGrath in your side, because even if you did drop a catch, it wouldn't be too much longer before McGrath would give you another opportunity. Warnie just created opportunities for fun, and you can't buy that back. In the changing of the guard, you don't have that. That, to me, is something we've got to be realistic with. So what we've got to do is make sure that when we have an opportunity, we're going to make the best of it. That's when our fielding will be at a new level, because we'll have people who are not missing anything, really. That's in the perfect world, of course, but that's the objective. We're talking about getting less opportunities but getting more catches when we do.

"A lot of people will field for hours, and eventually they'll walk off when they've had the worst quarter hour of fielding of the whole time they were out there. You gain nothing out of that. You stop when you're on top of your game"

Is the fact that the fielding standard has dropped a reflection on domestic cricket around Australia?
I think that's a very good summation. I have seen some of the domestic games, and there is the odd standout, but it does need a new level brought into state cricket. They've fallen off the pace quite a bit there. We need to be much more consistent and realise that every opportunity that comes could be the changing of the game. It is a reflection on our domestic game, which is a bit sad, because that has been without question the strength of Australian cricket. Our grade sides have been strengthened by the fact that we've had a lot of state players go back to grade cricket on occasions. That lifts the standard, as does Test cricketers coming back and playing state cricket. If we're looking at getting that standard to a higher level, we're certainly going to have to do that.

Why have fielding standards dropped away in domestic cricket?
I've seen some games where the fielding is very, very good, and I've seen some games where the intensity level is down. Your intensity level comes from your preparation. If you prepare and train smart, you'll probably find you've got a little bit of an edge. It's not by accident those three older guys I talked about [Ponting, Hussey and Clarke] turned out to be very good fielders. They're all quite athletic, but [the more important question is] who does that little bit extra from a young age all the way through? These guys have done the extra work.

We need to focus on the intensity of training, and also the smartness of when to stop. I've seen a lot of people will field for hours, and eventually they'll walk off when they've had the worst quarter hour of fielding of the whole time they were out there. You gain nothing out of that. You stop when you're on top of your game, and you trust that preparation is the way you're going to go out into the next game.

How important was fielding practice in your previous coaching jobs?
I remember only too vividly turning a group of guys in New Zealand into arguably the best slips cordon I've seen, outside of anything Australia have produced. We had [Adam] Parore, [Stephen] Fleming, [Nathan] Astle and [Bryan] Young, and I can't remember them dropping any more than about five catches collectively in all the games that we had. So we did have something special. We had to, because we didn't have the bowling power or the batting power to compete with a lot of nations. That single-handedly kept us in a lot of these games.

Will you be working with the keepers as well?
I've been working with Brad Haddin for seven or eight years, so nothing will change there, except that I'll be around more often. Hadds and myself have had a special relationship for a long, long time and that's never waned. I'll certainly be doing my work with him and [Tim] Painey. It's something I really enjoy doing. The slips cordon is something I'll be doing a lot of work on.

I want to make players take ownership of a position. We've got to work out where everyone fits into the equation. We want players to have a wishlist of where they'd like to be - outside of stuck at fine leg or third man all day - if they'd like to be at slip or short leg, or be one of the important players square of the wicket. If you feel you can do it, let's put it on the wishlist and work towards it. Then if the situation ever arose, you're not out of your depth. That to me is very important - you have the basics covered but also have something in mind as to where else in the field you might be able to contribute, so we don't have any passengers at any stages.

The appointment is for the tours of Sri Lanka and South Africa. Do you want to stay on after that?
They [Cricket Australia] came to me asking the questions, I didn't go chasing the job. I've never taken a coaching job and committed to anything like three or four years. I back myself to do two years and then reassess. Let's see how it goes for two tours and see if it's the sort of thing I would like to continue with - I'll be very surprised if it isn't. IPL is very much part of my life at the moment, with the Chennai Super Kings. They've been extremely good to me, so I've said from day one that that will be a priority. The idea of the shorter term is as much for me as it is for Cricket Australia.

Will you be a sounding board for the other coaches as well, in areas besides fielding?
Most definitely. With 20-odd years of coaching and 15 years as a player, I'd be very surprised if they didn't want to hear from a new set of eyes around the place. If I was a coach and had someone new come in, I'd be all over him. I'd want honesty out of him and I'd want him to tell me as he sees it, because that's the only way you move forward. As Michael [Clarke] and Tim [Nielsen] know, I'll be very happy to be honest with what I see. It's not about individuals, this is about a group going together and trying to get Australia back on track, to get away from ever looking at fifth position on a Test table ever again. We don't want to ever be seen or thought of in the same breath as, say, West Indies after their reign at the top of the tree. We need to recover quicker than anything West Indies have done.

Are you confident Australia has the young talent to climb back up the Test rankings?
That's the only part I really do know without any apprehension. I look at what we've got in our youngsters, throw in your mix of senior players, and we have the ability to get back on top of things very quickly - albeit we will be taking things in small steps, looking at the fourth position before we look at first. We want to be tracking to that first position, but that may take a little bit of time. We definitely have the quality of players in Australia, no question about that.

Brydon Coverdale is an assistant editor at ESPNcricinfo

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 23:38 GMT

    @Winsome - listening to the Ch 9 commentry team - they've always said that w/k are responsible for fielding standards, (particulalry slips, but also general enthusiasm). I never thought Ronchi was that bad a keeper but I haven't seen enough of him. What I do know is that Oz fielding was at its best when Healy was the w/k. Apart from Healys brilliance - the slips were possibly the best of all time, trying to get a single in the infield was very risky business. It use to seem like we could go a whole summer without dropping a chance. I think Oz fielding started to decline from Gilly's days onwards to Haddin. Our fielding is not all bad - I think our ground fielding is still the best in the world. But we don't hit the stumps like we use to & our slips fielding is nowhere near the best in the world. I think England & Sth Africa are the best & Dravid keeps India above Oz in the slips. We are about 4th with Sri Lanka - funnily enough thats about our Test ranking too!

  • POSTED BY Winsome on | July 5, 2011, 8:43 GMT

    Woody, the catching at state level is really duff. But it starts with keepers that are chosen for batting. Ronchi is an awful keeper but has his spot behind the stumps for the Warriors intact. Their slips is pretty shot as well. Beer would have had far better figures for his first season in first class cricket if the slips would hold onto chances, I'd say they drop at least 2 per match probably more. I don't know what has happened to our state system. The fielding is a reflection of the standards of everything else.

  • POSTED BY Woody111 on | July 5, 2011, 0:54 GMT

    @Winsome; that's a very good point mate. It must be more throws at the stumps are missing. Gone are the days someone like Border would pick up and throw down the stumps leaving the batsmen 2 metres short, or Mark Waugh would back-hand flick from slip. Excelling in the field makes such a difference - even apart from catching your opportunities. Saving 30 runs over the course of an innings and the pressure that builds at the time is what helped make Aus so dominant. Regarding the quality at state level; there's little Rixon or anyone in the Aus set-up can do. When I've watched domestic games it's scary how poor the catching technique is and you start to expect a drop rather than a catch.

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 0:24 GMT

    One of the reasons I rate Cosgrove (for Tests) is that not only is he a very good batsmen - but I think he is a pretty good slips fielder, (he'd need to be because he won't win any friends amongst bowlers when fielding in the covers). The other good slipper is S Smith - I think he could eventually be one of our very best. Unfortunately we don't have the luxury of a specialist slipsmen - so he needs to score more runs! I think the same goes for Cameron White - he's brilliant in the slips but needs to score a lot more runs.

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 0:18 GMT

    @ jonesy2 - I think our ground fielding is still quite good. Our slips are shoddy. As much as Punter is a great fielder, he is not a great slipper. Our slips have steadily declined since Mark Waugh was dropped nearly 10 yrs ago. Matty Hayden was a great slipper to spin bowling but I thought he was average back against pace. Warney wasn't that good either but they are better then the slips we have now. I rate Pup as an excellent fielder but he is not a natural in the slips. @ robheinen - what International players are you talking about???? I'm pretty sure Jonesy is talkinag about Shield cricket. The only overseas born players I can think of are Khawaja (3 yrs old when he came here) & I think Nesser of QLD. @HatsforBats - agree re: Pup. re: Rixon - a good point re: Haddin (I cringed when I read that), I think Rixon is being lined up for the top job. Personally - I would of gone for either Bobby Simpson (too old?) or Mark Waugh.

  • POSTED BY Winsome on | July 4, 2011, 19:50 GMT

    The Aussies hardly ever run people out these days. Punter stopped doing it ages ago and the catching is a bit duff. It doesn't help the bowlers. They don't make as many chances as they used to and the chances they do make, aren't taken. I really hope Rixon can do something about this.

  • POSTED BY reeksrok on | July 4, 2011, 16:11 GMT

    I think that it is an awesome statement to make by rixon who I remember made that NZ outfit so good and recently transformed the CSK unit to win just by fielding that 20 runs extra. He is a disciplinarian which is the only thing that is going to be difficult for the brash young aussie to adhere to but something that will help aussies of the future. Any cricket lover will not want australia become the future west indies of current and this is surely a step in the right direction

  • POSTED BY Herath-UK on | July 4, 2011, 15:59 GMT

    Sri Lanka is awaiting to climb up the ladder in both Tests & ODI ranking and so it is pretty important to improve whatever Rixon can do before the visit there.However my concern is his heart seems to be mainly with the T20 commitment. Ranil Herath-Kent

  • POSTED BY KingofRedLions on | July 4, 2011, 14:08 GMT

    robeheinen - Influx of overseas players? Perhaps if you only watch the Big Bash. Otherwise, completely wrong.

  • POSTED BY fazald on | July 4, 2011, 13:19 GMT

    No doubt our fielding standards have deteriorated very badly during the last three years or so since the exit of Andrew Symonds. I remember how batsmen used to dread taking a sharp single when Ponting, Symonds & Clarke were fielding in the covers & have been run out many times.Nowaday's our fielding standards are so poor that the batsmen seem to have no fear at all & manage to take singles at will as we hardly ran out batsmen these days.Our catching is no better & batsmen have more than one life. Likewise our standards in batting & bowling have deteriorated so much that we are finding it very difficuilt to keep up with the rest of the world anymore & sliding down the world test cricket rankings like a tsunami very quickly.No doubt Steve Rixon's skill & experience as a former coach comes in handy not only to fix our fielding standards but also his knowledge in all other areas of coaching as well. Surely we are not going to languish like the West Indies at the bottom for fifteen years?

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 23:38 GMT

    @Winsome - listening to the Ch 9 commentry team - they've always said that w/k are responsible for fielding standards, (particulalry slips, but also general enthusiasm). I never thought Ronchi was that bad a keeper but I haven't seen enough of him. What I do know is that Oz fielding was at its best when Healy was the w/k. Apart from Healys brilliance - the slips were possibly the best of all time, trying to get a single in the infield was very risky business. It use to seem like we could go a whole summer without dropping a chance. I think Oz fielding started to decline from Gilly's days onwards to Haddin. Our fielding is not all bad - I think our ground fielding is still the best in the world. But we don't hit the stumps like we use to & our slips fielding is nowhere near the best in the world. I think England & Sth Africa are the best & Dravid keeps India above Oz in the slips. We are about 4th with Sri Lanka - funnily enough thats about our Test ranking too!

  • POSTED BY Winsome on | July 5, 2011, 8:43 GMT

    Woody, the catching at state level is really duff. But it starts with keepers that are chosen for batting. Ronchi is an awful keeper but has his spot behind the stumps for the Warriors intact. Their slips is pretty shot as well. Beer would have had far better figures for his first season in first class cricket if the slips would hold onto chances, I'd say they drop at least 2 per match probably more. I don't know what has happened to our state system. The fielding is a reflection of the standards of everything else.

  • POSTED BY Woody111 on | July 5, 2011, 0:54 GMT

    @Winsome; that's a very good point mate. It must be more throws at the stumps are missing. Gone are the days someone like Border would pick up and throw down the stumps leaving the batsmen 2 metres short, or Mark Waugh would back-hand flick from slip. Excelling in the field makes such a difference - even apart from catching your opportunities. Saving 30 runs over the course of an innings and the pressure that builds at the time is what helped make Aus so dominant. Regarding the quality at state level; there's little Rixon or anyone in the Aus set-up can do. When I've watched domestic games it's scary how poor the catching technique is and you start to expect a drop rather than a catch.

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 0:24 GMT

    One of the reasons I rate Cosgrove (for Tests) is that not only is he a very good batsmen - but I think he is a pretty good slips fielder, (he'd need to be because he won't win any friends amongst bowlers when fielding in the covers). The other good slipper is S Smith - I think he could eventually be one of our very best. Unfortunately we don't have the luxury of a specialist slipsmen - so he needs to score more runs! I think the same goes for Cameron White - he's brilliant in the slips but needs to score a lot more runs.

  • POSTED BY Meety on | July 5, 2011, 0:18 GMT

    @ jonesy2 - I think our ground fielding is still quite good. Our slips are shoddy. As much as Punter is a great fielder, he is not a great slipper. Our slips have steadily declined since Mark Waugh was dropped nearly 10 yrs ago. Matty Hayden was a great slipper to spin bowling but I thought he was average back against pace. Warney wasn't that good either but they are better then the slips we have now. I rate Pup as an excellent fielder but he is not a natural in the slips. @ robheinen - what International players are you talking about???? I'm pretty sure Jonesy is talkinag about Shield cricket. The only overseas born players I can think of are Khawaja (3 yrs old when he came here) & I think Nesser of QLD. @HatsforBats - agree re: Pup. re: Rixon - a good point re: Haddin (I cringed when I read that), I think Rixon is being lined up for the top job. Personally - I would of gone for either Bobby Simpson (too old?) or Mark Waugh.

  • POSTED BY Winsome on | July 4, 2011, 19:50 GMT

    The Aussies hardly ever run people out these days. Punter stopped doing it ages ago and the catching is a bit duff. It doesn't help the bowlers. They don't make as many chances as they used to and the chances they do make, aren't taken. I really hope Rixon can do something about this.

  • POSTED BY reeksrok on | July 4, 2011, 16:11 GMT

    I think that it is an awesome statement to make by rixon who I remember made that NZ outfit so good and recently transformed the CSK unit to win just by fielding that 20 runs extra. He is a disciplinarian which is the only thing that is going to be difficult for the brash young aussie to adhere to but something that will help aussies of the future. Any cricket lover will not want australia become the future west indies of current and this is surely a step in the right direction

  • POSTED BY Herath-UK on | July 4, 2011, 15:59 GMT

    Sri Lanka is awaiting to climb up the ladder in both Tests & ODI ranking and so it is pretty important to improve whatever Rixon can do before the visit there.However my concern is his heart seems to be mainly with the T20 commitment. Ranil Herath-Kent

  • POSTED BY KingofRedLions on | July 4, 2011, 14:08 GMT

    robeheinen - Influx of overseas players? Perhaps if you only watch the Big Bash. Otherwise, completely wrong.

  • POSTED BY fazald on | July 4, 2011, 13:19 GMT

    No doubt our fielding standards have deteriorated very badly during the last three years or so since the exit of Andrew Symonds. I remember how batsmen used to dread taking a sharp single when Ponting, Symonds & Clarke were fielding in the covers & have been run out many times.Nowaday's our fielding standards are so poor that the batsmen seem to have no fear at all & manage to take singles at will as we hardly ran out batsmen these days.Our catching is no better & batsmen have more than one life. Likewise our standards in batting & bowling have deteriorated so much that we are finding it very difficuilt to keep up with the rest of the world anymore & sliding down the world test cricket rankings like a tsunami very quickly.No doubt Steve Rixon's skill & experience as a former coach comes in handy not only to fix our fielding standards but also his knowledge in all other areas of coaching as well. Surely we are not going to languish like the West Indies at the bottom for fifteen years?

  • POSTED BY venkatSan on | July 4, 2011, 13:10 GMT

    Good for Australian Cricket, for now, if Steve Rixon takes over from Tom Nielsen.... Tom is the baggage in the entire setup - of course apart from the selectors - of CA. Perhaps, some of the players will not like the work ethics of Steve Rixon but he is the need of the hour for Aussie cricket.. Good Luck Australia!

  • POSTED BY HatsforBats on | July 4, 2011, 13:10 GMT

    No offense to Rixon, but can't CA find a better fielding coach than a wicketkeeper. If he has worked with Haddin for 7-8 years, that speaks volumes. This is another example of the ineptitude of CA; we have 2 of the best ever in their respective roles (McGrath & M. Waugh), and neither is being utilised. Australian cricket is suffering from complacency after 2 decades of success.

  • POSTED BY HatsforBats on | July 4, 2011, 13:02 GMT

    @RD270; if you don't think Clarke is a good fielder than that is because you have an agenda that doesn't align with the well-being of Australian cricket, and it is by no means an affirmation of your opinion on the merits of Rixon, nor a confirmation of the validity of your comment. I've been watching cricket for 30 years and played baseball and cricket for more than 2 decades; I could not name a dozen players with a better arm in the inner circle than Michael Clarke, and half of those have come from the Australian first class system.

  • POSTED BY robheinen on | July 4, 2011, 9:32 GMT

    @JONESY2

    It is clear that your perception is lagging in time by a decade. It's weird to think that the Australian domestic competition is the strongest in the world. If so, why the influx of overseas players, which was anathema before? Australia used to lead the way in how cricket teams were trained an manged, but the rest of the world, or at least part of the rest of the world has caught up. Time to take cricket to the next level instead fo whinging about how great Australian cricket these days is, because it isn't.I would like to see Australian cricket back on top. With proper batsmen and proper bowlers. Batsmen who know their shots and have different options for similar situations. Bowlers who have a proper action and who think.

  • POSTED BY skkh on | July 4, 2011, 5:02 GMT

    With Cricket Australia concentrating on the crap format of twenty20 I see gloomy times ahead for the baggy green in tests. If only our cricket administartors thought otherwise.

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | July 4, 2011, 4:44 GMT

    i dont understand. how are people saying that australia has dropped off in the fielding stakes? and the other thing is australia has the best domestic cricket in the world by an absolute mile so why are people talking about the standard slipping? what a load of nonsense, i think it's just a way to talk down australian cricket to catch everyone off guard.

  • POSTED BY RD270 on | July 4, 2011, 3:31 GMT

    Well if Steve Rixon really thinks M. Clarke is a good fielder he has very low standards. And if he is just saying this to please the new skipper, he does not have the strong character required to be a top shelf coach. Weak character or low standards, he does not seem like a good choice. But let us keep an open mind and see if he can turn things around?

  • POSTED BY JustOUT on | July 4, 2011, 3:26 GMT

    Its pity, already ppl are started comparing Aussies with WI.

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • POSTED BY JustOUT on | July 4, 2011, 3:26 GMT

    Its pity, already ppl are started comparing Aussies with WI.

  • POSTED BY RD270 on | July 4, 2011, 3:31 GMT

    Well if Steve Rixon really thinks M. Clarke is a good fielder he has very low standards. And if he is just saying this to please the new skipper, he does not have the strong character required to be a top shelf coach. Weak character or low standards, he does not seem like a good choice. But let us keep an open mind and see if he can turn things around?

  • POSTED BY jonesy2 on | July 4, 2011, 4:44 GMT

    i dont understand. how are people saying that australia has dropped off in the fielding stakes? and the other thing is australia has the best domestic cricket in the world by an absolute mile so why are people talking about the standard slipping? what a load of nonsense, i think it's just a way to talk down australian cricket to catch everyone off guard.

  • POSTED BY skkh on | July 4, 2011, 5:02 GMT

    With Cricket Australia concentrating on the crap format of twenty20 I see gloomy times ahead for the baggy green in tests. If only our cricket administartors thought otherwise.

  • POSTED BY robheinen on | July 4, 2011, 9:32 GMT

    @JONESY2

    It is clear that your perception is lagging in time by a decade. It's weird to think that the Australian domestic competition is the strongest in the world. If so, why the influx of overseas players, which was anathema before? Australia used to lead the way in how cricket teams were trained an manged, but the rest of the world, or at least part of the rest of the world has caught up. Time to take cricket to the next level instead fo whinging about how great Australian cricket these days is, because it isn't.I would like to see Australian cricket back on top. With proper batsmen and proper bowlers. Batsmen who know their shots and have different options for similar situations. Bowlers who have a proper action and who think.

  • POSTED BY HatsforBats on | July 4, 2011, 13:02 GMT

    @RD270; if you don't think Clarke is a good fielder than that is because you have an agenda that doesn't align with the well-being of Australian cricket, and it is by no means an affirmation of your opinion on the merits of Rixon, nor a confirmation of the validity of your comment. I've been watching cricket for 30 years and played baseball and cricket for more than 2 decades; I could not name a dozen players with a better arm in the inner circle than Michael Clarke, and half of those have come from the Australian first class system.

  • POSTED BY HatsforBats on | July 4, 2011, 13:10 GMT

    No offense to Rixon, but can't CA find a better fielding coach than a wicketkeeper. If he has worked with Haddin for 7-8 years, that speaks volumes. This is another example of the ineptitude of CA; we have 2 of the best ever in their respective roles (McGrath & M. Waugh), and neither is being utilised. Australian cricket is suffering from complacency after 2 decades of success.

  • POSTED BY venkatSan on | July 4, 2011, 13:10 GMT

    Good for Australian Cricket, for now, if Steve Rixon takes over from Tom Nielsen.... Tom is the baggage in the entire setup - of course apart from the selectors - of CA. Perhaps, some of the players will not like the work ethics of Steve Rixon but he is the need of the hour for Aussie cricket.. Good Luck Australia!

  • POSTED BY fazald on | July 4, 2011, 13:19 GMT

    No doubt our fielding standards have deteriorated very badly during the last three years or so since the exit of Andrew Symonds. I remember how batsmen used to dread taking a sharp single when Ponting, Symonds & Clarke were fielding in the covers & have been run out many times.Nowaday's our fielding standards are so poor that the batsmen seem to have no fear at all & manage to take singles at will as we hardly ran out batsmen these days.Our catching is no better & batsmen have more than one life. Likewise our standards in batting & bowling have deteriorated so much that we are finding it very difficuilt to keep up with the rest of the world anymore & sliding down the world test cricket rankings like a tsunami very quickly.No doubt Steve Rixon's skill & experience as a former coach comes in handy not only to fix our fielding standards but also his knowledge in all other areas of coaching as well. Surely we are not going to languish like the West Indies at the bottom for fifteen years?

  • POSTED BY KingofRedLions on | July 4, 2011, 14:08 GMT

    robeheinen - Influx of overseas players? Perhaps if you only watch the Big Bash. Otherwise, completely wrong.