Mark Nicholas
Mark Nicholas Mark NicholasRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Former Hampshire batsman; host of Channel Nine's cricket coverage

Swing: can't get enough of the thing

There's magic in the air when the ball hoops around corners

Mark Nicholas

February 7, 2013

Comments: 90 | Text size: A | A

Mitchell Starc in follow-through, Australia v West Indies, 1st ODI, Perth, February 1, 2013
Starc: makes it go whoosh © Getty Images
Related Links
Players/Officials: Mitchell Starc | Ramnaresh Sarwan
Series/Tournaments: West Indies tour of Australia
Teams: Australia

This is the year of the cheap bowl-out. Pakistan, New Zealand, Australia and West Indies - all skittled for a song, or fewer than 75 to be precise. And the common denominator? Swing.

Wonderful summer swing, nice and late and breathtaking in its effect. If you are yet to catch Mitchell Starc on a swing day, a treat awaits you. In he bounds, all rhythm and timing, to deliver at 145 kilometres per hour, and whoosh, in it hoops and over go the hobs. The ball that bowled Ramnaresh Sarwan in Perth last Friday was pure Wasim Akram, and you can't say fairer than that.

There have been three truly exceptional quick left-arm swing bowlers. Akram, perhaps first among equals; Garry Sobers; and Alan Davidson. "Davo's" figures are incredible: 186 wickets in 44 Tests at 20.53 each - a better average than Roberts, Holding, Marshall, Garner, Ambrose and Walsh. All three were immensely strong men, though Davidson's shoulders took the biscuit - still do, come to think of it. Starc is a surprisingly big man too. Perhaps it is the species.

Australia have really got something here, and pray he stays fit. The selectors' "informed player management" policy should, in theory, see to it.

There is something utterly compelling about fast swing bowling. From behind the arm, the ball appears momentarily suspended, allowing the viewer to appreciate its flight path before the last split-second change of direction that then homes in on the target. Sarwan missed the crackerjack Perth ball by a mile. Little did he know that 48 hours later he was to suffer a similar, though even more humiliating, fate.

It began with Starc trapping a mesmerised Chris Gayle in front of off stump with the fourth ball of his first over. Sarwan arrived in Gayle's stead, took itchy guard but then pushed the fifth ball to cover comfortably enough. "Over," called the umpire. Phew, thought Sarwan. Channel 9 went to an ad break. The fielders swapped ends and Starc trotted off to long leg. "Oops," said the umpire, "we're a ball light, back you go lads." Thus everyone rebooted, even 9, who crashed out of their ad break. Nice one ump, thought Sarwan, who barely saw what came next.

Starc's belated sixth ball might have been a guided missile for all the Guyanan knew of it. Just a tiny shuffle forward before the deadly strike, centre-point of the pad, slap in front of middle, halfway up. First the inswing, then the finger. Thanks ump, thought Sarwan and off he went, dragging the wretched twist of life with him.

Swing is the thing. The game expands because the ball must be pitched up. Batsmen have the drive at their behest but with risk in the back of their mind. Swing is a temptress, luring those with the willow to indiscretion. Swing at speed is killer - there one moment, gone the next. Swing surprises, shocks, disappoints and delights.

There is no explaining it. One day it does, the next it doesn't. They say it is the batch of balls, the weight of the ball, the size of the ball, the seam, the atmospheric conditions, moisture in the pitch or otherwise. Those are the materials. The workman must deliver the seam upright. To do so he must release the ball with his wrist behind it.

Some hold the ball firmly and deep in the hand. Others hold it lightly and at the tips of their fingers. Some have their thumb under the ball, resting under the seam; others have that thumb alongside the ball, resting on the leather. Experts swear by theories and other experts tear them apart. Sideways action to bowl outswing, front-on to bowl inswing? Not necessarily, proved Malcolm Marshall and Wasim Akram. Scientists analyse the hell out of swing. Coaches search for its holy grail. Bowlers spend as many hours on swing as in the bar.

Swing is a temptress, luring those with the willow to indiscretion. Swing at speed is killer - there one moment, gone the next. Swing surprises, shocks, disappoints and delights

Then there is reverse swing: still swing of course but with the ball turned 180 degrees in the hand so that the movement occurs against the conventional method. Usually the ball swings to the direction of the rough side of the ball. With reverse, it reverses itself. Bowlers who shine one side of a new ball, scratch, scuff or wet one side of an old ball. The more damaged the leather, the better. On the parched playing surfaces of the subcontinent, reverse swing is a must. In England in May, forget it.

Why does the reversed method swing later? Search me. Why do the great reverse-swing bowlers practise a slightly lower arm at the point of delivery? Search me. Why does reversed inswing move more than reversed outswing? Search me.

There has been a court case about reverse swing. There has been a Test match called off and awarded to the batting team because of reverse swing. There have been diplomatic incidents because of reverse swing. It is a thing mistrusted and a thing of jealousy. And by heaven, it is a thing of envy. When the old ball tails in, travelling most of the pitch before its snake-like strike, a class fast bowler can barely contain his excitement.

Red ball or white ball, which swings most? Search me. Some say the new white ball and the old red ball are the most likely, sometimes. Is that the dye in the leather, or the white paint? Search me. Bowlers prefer cricket balls that are dark red, almost brown. Some of them, that is, while others could not care less. Some use sweat to shine it. Others, well let's just say there is above board and below board. Come to think of it, why does the brand new ball swing? There is no difference to the condition of either side of the ball, so no change in its balance. Perhaps the proud seam is the perfect rudder, canting this way and that. Perhaps not.

A reasonable argument says let the bowler do to the ball as he wishes, of his own volition but not with an outside influence. Shine it, scratch it, pick it, wet it, rub it in the dirt till the crowd go home, but no bottle tops, no pen knives, no sticks or stones. Imagine the growth of fingernails amongst the fraternity! I say let it swing any which way, for cricket is poorer when the air is dead to swing or the length too short. T20 take note: let it swing.

As I write, Australia are playing West Indies with a white ball in a one-day match. Not a single delivery has swung, not even those offered by Starc. Weird, huh. Maybe Sarwan will get a few tonight. Maybe not. The game is a mystery.

Mark Nicholas, the former Hampshire captain, presents the cricket on Channel 9 in Australia and Channel 5 in the UK

RSS Feeds: Mark Nicholas

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by Tests_always_66 on (February 10, 2013, 14:18 GMT)

@mikey. It is a pity that you call someone that differs from you clueless. I happen to agree with the view that Kallis, although not as flamboyant as Sobers, would be in my team above Sobers anyday. I find it ironic that you start off saying people get to wrapped up in stats, where Kallis is slaughtering Sobers, on all counts, but then immediately recall the 365 which wasn't beat for 40 years (also a stat but this time to suit you). @Mark. Your article is not as good as usual this time, if you want to discuss swing and the fact that you like what Starc is doing, don't quote stats not relevant to him. Saying this, I am a fan of your writing in general.

Posted by thruthecovers on (February 9, 2013, 0:34 GMT)

@josh1942 I like you. I'm assuming you're English and therefore I definitely get a warm and fuzzy feeling eversince you decided to pick a side in this Sobers/Kallis debate. Biased maybe but I prefer to support your view on matters. Just as a side...we as SA's have come to accept not getting our dues when it matter. Kallis is not making a song and dance about, neither is anyone in his team or the whole country. We know what we have and that is what every other country can only dream about. Occassionaly you'll get the Kallis wannabe like a Watson, Flintoff or Hasan but honestly there realy have only been one true prince (or is it king?) for the last 17 years. I haven't seen Sobers play, but even, or especially Charles Darwin would only shake his head at the rediculousness of this debate. If evolution is widely accepted fact, it should be obvious that Kallis is better than Sobers. Like the numbers suggest, but because he is SA, the likes of Chappell would rather die than give him his due

Posted by mikey76 on (February 8, 2013, 22:03 GMT)

Josh1942. Your pretty clueless when it comes to cricket history. Sobers was a wonderful bowler who could bowl in many different styles. So what if his figures are not as good, people get too wrapped up in averages and how fast people bowl. As far as batting goes Sobers wins hands down, he scored 365 which wasn't beaten for 40 years. He could bat in any style and in any conditions against some of the games greatest bowlers.

Posted by ManintheWhiteCoat on (February 8, 2013, 22:02 GMT)

Mark, I can understand if you are a born Aussie hyping Starc. He is a great bowler no question about it. But if you are writing about Swing, not too sure this is the place. He is a good fast bowler not a swing bowler. It is a real shame when Kulasekara gave such a hard time right through out the ODI series to Aussies but not even mentioning it. I guess you should change the heading to "Starc the Great Bowler" (btw I'm not a SL fan) Cricinfo please have guts to publish this.

Posted by Josh1942 on (February 8, 2013, 20:57 GMT)

@Meety Sobers was a mediocre test bowler. His strike rate is not good. The job of a bowler is to get the batsman out. Not keep him in. Kallis stats against the minnows are right on his average and gained no advantage there.Nor did he get the new ball to bowl with as Sobers did. Stop trying to go against the facts, Kallis is a 50% better bowler in terms of results than Sobers was.And contrary to what you believe he averaged 145kmph as a fast bowler when he started his career with the odd ball near 150kmph. Even today he can get to 145kph if he wants to. He is genuinelyfast which Sobers never was. Sobers boweled military medium. And forget the old argument re Sobers bowling spin. He bowled on many spin friendly wickets and yet his spin stats are even worse than his medium pace. Face the facts - Kallis is a far superior bowler and probably the better batsman as well. As allrounders? Kalis by many a mile is far better than anyone who has played the game to date.

Posted by mikey76 on (February 8, 2013, 17:23 GMT)

BigBoodha. I didn't say Anderson was fast, merely too fast for Australia. And it was pretty dry in Australia in the last ashes wasn't it? Didn't see any rain in Adelaide when he was hooping the ball away in the air. Didn't see too much rain or cloud in India recently too. Very silly comments all round really. As for bashing other teams, well I'm afraid Randy/Jonesy easily take the biscuit on that one. Most people in England were quite happy to acknowledge Australia's greatness in the 90's and 00's. You just can't deal with the fact that your average right now.

Posted by UK_Chap on (February 8, 2013, 15:46 GMT)

How can all talk about Swing and reverse swing without ever managing to mention probaly one of the deadliest swing bowlers of all time Waqar Younis. He was far more lethal that Steyn, Philander etc...

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Mark NicholasClose
Mark Nicholas A prolific and stylish middle-order batsman for Hampshire, Mark Nicholas was unlucky never to have played for England, but after captaining his county to four major trophies he made his reputation as a presenter, commentator and columnist. Named the UK Sports Presenter of the Year in 2001 and 2005 by the Royal Television Society, he has commentated all over the world, from the World Cup in the West Indies to the Indian Premier League. He now hosts the cricket coverage for Channel Nine in Australia and Channel 5 in England.

    Open with Rohit and Binny, with Kohli at No. 3

Ian Chappell: India's batting is going the way of their bowling, and they need get their order sorted before the World Cup

    Dressing-room discontent weighs Holder down

Tony Cozier: The young WI captain must challenge the indifference shown by several of his senior players

    'I'd get rid of warm-ups in cricket'

Samit Patel also doesn't like hotel rooms without WiFi and running singles

    An order for an overhaul

Sambit Bal: The tenor of the Supreme Court verdict on the IPL corruption case is unambiguous, and it makes clear that it's time for the BCCI to look within

What do we talk about when we talk about aggression?

Alex Bowden: Why do people think players who get up in the opposition's faces also have aggressive approaches in their cricket?

News | Features Last 7 days

44 balls, 16 sixes, 149 runs

Stats highlights from an incredible day in Johannesburg, where AB de Villiers smashed the record for the fastest ODI ton

Kohli at No. 4 - defensive or practical?

It seems Virat Kohli is to not bat before the 12th or 13th over to strengthen the middle and the lower middle order. It suggests a lack of confidence in what was supposed to be India's strength in their title defence: their batting

'The definition of a cricketing genius'

Twitter reactions to AB de Villiers' record-shattering 31-ball ODI hundred

Why cricket needs yellow and red cards

David Warner's repeated transgressions tell us that the game has a discipline problem that has got out of hand

On TV it looks uglier than it actually is

Often reasonable arguments on the field look nasty beyond the boundary and on camera

News | Features Last 7 days