Jarrod Kimber
Jarrod Kimber Jarrod KimberRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
One half of The Two Chucks, and the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

England v Australia, 2nd Investec Test, Lord's, 4th day

Aussies struggle to provide value for money

For great sums, Australian cricket fans can follow the Ashes, meet the coach and offer suggestions. The best idea at the moment could be a refund request

Jarrod Kimber at Lord's

July 21, 2013

Comments: 42 | Text size: A | A

Steven Smith trudges off after being given out on review, England v Australia, 2nd Investec Test, Lord's, 4th day, July 21, 2013
Steve Smith's failed review was indicative of Australia's problems © AFP

"Fans pay good money to come watch our athletes perform and I'd like to think they got their money's worth over the five days of the first Test." Darren Lehmann.

For AUS$7,959 you can follow the Australian team to watch the fourth and fifth Tests with the Cricket Australia Travel Office. Airfares not included. That isn't just cricket, you also get a trip to Scotland, full English Breakfast every morning and "a private session with Australian coach - Mickey Arthur".

"Imagine sitting with the coach in an exclusive group during an Ashes Series and discussing team tactics, the wicket, what's likely to unfold, and more. On CATO Exclusive Fully Escorted Tours you will meet with Mickey Arthur the day before or during a Test to analyse the match and perhaps make a recommendation or two." That is straight from the online brochure. It has not been updated. Nothing has changed. Much like the change of coaches, at least in the short term.

Now imagine you are the Australian fan back at home. You have paid close to 10,000 bucks, you are yet to get on a plane or meet a CATO tour escort. And your team is already 2-0 down. That must hurt. Of course, some of those same people are here right now. Just sitting there, drunk on pain, trying to understand what is happening. Their faces are grey, the warm beer is not cheering them up and they're wondering why they spent enough to buy them a boat, or 10 items of Channel Nine's merchandise.

Instead they got no Mickey Arthur, and for large parts, no Australia. Today must inspire some of them to ask about the possibility of refunds.

While Cricket Australia were still investigating who the honest person was who used their Twitter account yesterday, Mickey Arthur was releasing more statements that made them look silly. David Warner's brother's tweet made the news, and so did the term "escape-goat".

On the field, while marketing men in met in Richmond to discuss the best way to use him, Ashton Agar limped into the crease around the wicket, into the footmarks, hoping Matt Prior wouldn't hit him onto the Nursery Ground. Instead a mistimed shot came back to him at the sort of speed you should never drop car keys, beers or cricket balls. Our Ashton never saw it. It just smashed into him. Well, bumped into him. Then the rest of the players went out to the boundary at one. Like it was a walk off. And to follow up that drop, Agar fired in a quick one down the leg side for four byes.

You get to the end of the day, and the kind of spirit, determination and technical prowess you expect from your top order is shown by three tailenders.

England declared, but only after Joe Root had played a scoop on 180.

Then something happened that quite often happens. In fact, it happens at the second highest percentage of any cricketer who has played 50 innings or more. Shane Watson was out lbw. A split-screen later on showed almost no difference at all from the first innings. Well he didn't review it. Which was for the best really.

Chris Rogers was confused by some good spin bowling from Graeme Swann. Or, if you want to be blunt and accurate, left a straight one. Phil Hughes had a ball straighten on him, was given out, and then referred. It is now quite clear that no one in the Australian team knows that to get a ball overruled for an lbw, you need the ball to be missing the stumps completely. Just being upset you have missed a ball and have been given out is not enough reason to wake the third umpire.

Then Usman Khawaja and Michael Clarke put on a partnership. It should have been respite, but instead it included Clarke being beaten up by short balls. The Mechaclarke of Australia had been replaced by the Tin Man of England. The only way Khawaja could help get one back was to run through Swann.

That push in the back took Swann from the field. Which seemed like a good thing. Until Joe Root bowled a dog ordinary ball down the leg side that Clarke deflected straight into leg slip's hands. Then Root took the edge of Khawaja and his push in the back cost Australia their best partnership of the Ashes from two players who are paid to bat.

Steve Smith was caught behind off Tim Bresnan. He referred it before the finger was all the way in the air. Then Hot Spot made him look a bit silly. Gideon Haigh pondered if the thicker edges on bats made it harder for batsmen to tell if there were nicks. It might be the "if a tree falls in the forest" of our cricket times.

When Our Ashton flashed at one outside off, England went up. Erasmus did not. So they reviewed it. Tony Hill saw no Hot Spot but saw a deflection and heard a noise. The deflection seemed non-existent, the noise slightly late. For what it's worth, Aaron Wilson, on twitter, suggested that the noise was Agar's bat hitting a piece of grass. It was that kind of day.

Brad Haddin left a ball from Swann that pitched on middle stump from around the wicket. It was as if he forgot Swann was an offspinner. Had Australia had a review by then (now there is a fairytale) they might have reviewed it, but they probably wouldn't have. It turned out that it was missing the leg stump.

And then you get to the end of the day, and the kind of spirit, determination and technical prowess you expect from your top order is shown by three tailenders who are fighting to make the match go into a fifth day so they could still lose by over 300 runs. This is the high point for these fans who have shelled out boat money to get here. Jimmy Pattinson chipping straight balls into the legside, Peter Siddle pushing into the offside and Ryan Harris edging between slip and keeper.

On Twitter, Cricket Australia could manage only: "Great fight by Harris and Pattinson, almost pushing the match into the final day. Players shake hands."

That tweet said less than the look on Pattinson's face when he was out, lbw to Swann. You would assume his wicket meant Australia had lost by a run, not 347. Pattinson was essentially a man who ran into a burning house and was frustrated he couldn't save the pot plant. Or maybe he just wanted to take the game into the fifth day to give those travelling sad broken fans their "money's worth".

That is where Australia have landed; trying to make sure they only lose in five days, and not four. Scrounging around the bottom of cricket's bin looking for an unsullied chicken wing. That rogue Cricket Australia tweet got it right when it used the hashtag #bull****. When Darren Lehmann fronts up to the Cricket Australia Travel Office for his next private session, those Aussies fans might "make a recommendation or two" or even suggested Australia's performance "sucked ass".

Jarrod Kimber is the mind responsible for cricketwithballs.com

RSS Feeds: Jarrod Kimber

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by YorkshirePudding on (July 23, 2013, 8:13 GMT)

I think the best advice i saw was from Alec Stewart, and that was to stick with the current batting line up and tell them they have 3 tests to prove themselves, anyone who doesnt (Clarke excepted) is cast aside on the return leg and you look at the personell in the states for batsmen with 20/30 games experience, low SR's (50'ish, and averags over 40) then stick with them for 2-3 series, to buy time while you develop youngert talents who start pushing for places.

Hopefully by the time the new bread of players are ready the team has started to get that winning feeling, so the new players get used to it. New players are given 15-20 tests to prove themselves and replaced if they dont step up, earlier if they look totally out of thier depth.

Posted by   on (July 23, 2013, 8:12 GMT)

fantastic work Jarrod. you had me laughing like a drain. :-)

Posted by AnyoneButVettel on (July 23, 2013, 8:05 GMT)

@Rally_Windies: Couldn't agree more mate.

Posted by Nuwan_R on (July 23, 2013, 3:11 GMT)

I'm sure people that signed up to pay for this already knew the risks and state of Australian cricket before the first test. We were only deceived by Ashton Agar's 98 in the first test.

Posted by spindizzy on (July 23, 2013, 2:01 GMT)

After this game Hill should be removed immediately from all umpiring for incompetence.

And probably Hughes and Watson as well.

Posted by Rally_Windies on (July 23, 2013, 0:54 GMT)

Jarod ...

I hope you read this ..

on your headline " Aussies struggle to provide value for money" ....

This is a common problem with ALL teams whose goal is : "try to be competitive" !

It was a HUGE problem with "Bangladesh" & Zimbabwe , it is a HUGE problem with the West Indies !

And now Australia has picked up that HORRIBLE mentality .....

Ireland did not beat England by : "trying to be competitive" & Sri Lanka did not win a world cup by : "trying to be competitive" ...

If you are a Cricket Coach, or captain and you are not "trying to win" ! Then you have already lost the series ! And you might as well pack up and go home !

& also - the Austrailian batting line up .... looking at Stats .. it looks like a Zimbabwe batting line up !

Posted by Chris_Howard on (July 22, 2013, 23:29 GMT)

@Rahulbose Agreed. However, that Aussie side thumping the Poms was full of some of the greatest players in Test cricket history.

The same can't be said of the current English side (yet). They are a very good side, with very good players, but if you were picking a best ever English team, maybe only Anderson, Cook or KP might get considered.

So, the Poms of ten years ago could at least take consolation in the fact they were playing probably the second best team to ever turn out for Australia, and some would argue the best.

No such consolation for the Aussies now. Although being beaten by a very good side, it does show how awful we are.

Those Poms of 10 years ago would have pummelled this Aussie team too.

Posted by   on (July 22, 2013, 22:04 GMT)

Before people get too carried away,this series could have been 1-1 with a bit of luck.Cool heads are needed,continuity is required as well as selection consistency.Guys like Kallis and Amla were allowed lengthy settling in periods of a few years and shaky starts to their careers before they blossomed.One poor match does not mean the end of the world-it happens. Stick with the core,let them play their natural game,provide assurance that their places are safe for the series and let the controllable factors be executed as well as possible.

Posted by Rahulbose on (July 22, 2013, 20:31 GMT)

I am reminded of the heady days of 2003-04. 10 years ago I used to regularly have discussions with my cricket friends on why Aussie dominance was so boring. How we wished someone would match their players and give them a good fight. This series makes me just as sad, if the Ashes is this one sided that might be the last nail in Test crickets coffin. Here' s hoping that Aussies bowlers will win them a few games and we won't be looking at 10-0.

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Jarrod KimberClose

    Has international cricket begun to break up?

Simon Barnes: The disenchantment among the weaker teams is forcing a devaluation of Test cricket

    'I never stole money, yet I was given five years'

Half a decade since his ban ended, Maurice Odumbe continues to live with the stigma of corruption. By Tim Wigmore

    Younis Khan and the art of scoring hundreds

Numbers Game: Only five Pakistanis have scored 15-plus hundreds, but his appetite for tons matches that of the best

From oranje to green and gold

Netherlands' batting mainstay Tom Cooper dreams of playing for Australia, his country of birth. By Peter Miller

The bias of umpires

Scott Oliver: Understanding the historical trends in decision-making might help you deal with your own iffy calls. Or maybe not

News | Features Last 7 days

How India weeds out its suspect actions

The BCCI set up a three-man committee to tackle the problem of chucking at age-group and domestic cricket, and it has produced significant results in five years

A rock, a hard place and the WICB

The board's latest standoff with its players has had embarrassing consequences internationally, so any resolution now needs to be approached thoughtfully

Twin Asian challenges await Australia

What Australia have not done since returning a fractured unit from India is head back to Asia to play an Asian team. Two of their major weaknesses - handling spin and reverse swing - will be tested in the UAE by Pakistan

WICB must tread on eggshells with care

The WICB statement should cool down emotions and allow all parties involved to take the next step forward

Kohli back to old habits

Stats highlights from the fourth ODI between India and West Indies in Dharamsala

News | Features Last 7 days