Rob Smyth
Rob Smyth Rob SmythRSS FeedFeeds  | Archives
Freelance writer, author of The Spirit of Cricket

Broad's mighty challenge

Few England players in the modern era have been booed to the extent Broad will be. Will he rise to the occasion?

Rob Smyth

November 8, 2013

Comments: 27 | Text size: A | A

Stuart Broad beams with delight as he takes the final wicket, England v Australia, 4th Investec Test, 4th day, Chester-le-Street, August 12, 2013
Stuart Broad: Few pretty boys have such a hard nose © PA Photos
Enlarge

Stuart Broad does not know what is about to hit him. He cannot because there is no precedent. Hundreds of England players have been lucky enough to experience Bay 13's unique take on the concept of banter, but in the modern era - when fan-player interaction took on a slightly different hue - none have been booed to the extent Broad will be.

As with England fans booing Ricky Ponting, a gesture that was at best misplaced and at worst disgraceful, it is difficult to understand why Broad should be quite so unpopular. He recently won a poll to find the English cricketer who most got under Australians' skin, finishing above Douglas Jardine and Sir Ian Botham with nearly half the vote. All because he did that most Australian of things: he did not walk.

The Australian culture of not walking is so entrenched that Adam Gilchrist said he felt "very lonely" in the dressing room after walking against Sri Lanka in the 2003 World Cup semi-final. Broad will feel even lonelier out in the middle because he did not walk at Trent Bridge last summer. It is arguable that the real villains of that infamous incident were Aleem Dar, who failed to spot a pretty clear edge, and Michael Clarke, who had frivolously used up both of Australia's reviews.

The whole thing has the feel of a media construction - or perhaps a social-media construction, a textbook example of modern society's new favourite sport, faux outrage, and increasing aversion to independent thought. The desire to castigate Broad has led to thousands of people wilfully ignoring the fact that he edged the ball to Brad Haddin, who fumbled it to first slip. The story goes that Broad middled one to slip and did not walk. It wouldn't be a complete surprise if, by the year 2050, the story goes that he slapped one to cover, refused to walk and head-butted Ashton Agar.

A Melbourne company, which specialises "in T-shirts protesting wrongs which deserve attention such as Japanese whaling, notorious civil wrongs and the like" have identified the existence of Stuart Broad as one of society's principal ills. They have released a t-shirt that reads: "Cheating is a Broad church. Never forgive." The company website says "the artwork on the T-Shirts is confronting and designed to raise awareness by peaceful protest". Which should not be confused with cynically cashing in, at A$40 a pop, on a story that wasn't particularly interesting in the first place, never mind four months later.

There are reasons why Australians might dislike Broad: he is good-looking and can be petulant, but against that he has qualities that Australia traditionally admires in its cricketers. Few pretty boys have such a hard nose. Broad has plenty of mongrel, is capable of genuinely great performances and - deceptively important, this, as Phil Tufnell and Devon Malcolm will tell you - is a brilliant fielder. His villain status does not really stand up to cursory scrutiny.

Maybe that's the point. The England cricketers Australia loves to hate are often those for whom they have a grudging or latent respect, with Jardine, Botham and John Snow the most obvious examples.

 
 
Broad has plenty of mongrel, is capable of genuinely great performances and - deceptively important, this, as Phil Tufnell and Devon Malcolm will tell you - is a brilliant fielder
 

Mike Brearley was a different story. Although the quote that defines him - "he has a degree in people" - came from Australia, he is not venerated as he is in England. The image of Brearley seems to be that of an effete, effeminate intellectual, who grew a beard to try to show he was hard, and who - worst of all - wasn't good enough to get in the team anyway.

The Australian way of picking the XI and then the captain would have meant no room for Brearley. But then it might have meant no room for Ray Illingworth, who, while also an Ashes villain, is the subject of much greater respect. Just as love is often undefinable, so can hate be, a judgement that is maybe one part logic, three parts instinct. Often it comes down to nothing more than whether someone is fair dinkum or the cut of their jib is likeable. Then again, with Illingworth, maybe Australians unconsciously recognised Lancashire and Yorkshire as suburbs of their own country.


That didn't help the Yorkshire-born Rockley Wilson during his only Ashes tour in 1920-21. Wilson and Percy Fender wrote for some English newspapers while on tour, and one piece in which Wilson was critical of the umpiring was relayed to Australia. That led to him being barracked by the crowd; when he responded by bowing, things got worse. England asked for police protection at one stage, and crowds chanted "Please Go Home Fender", a play on Fender's initials, for much of the rest of the tour.

Often the hatred is of the pantomime variety: Tufnell's brain and the building of an idiot, or the pig with "Hemmings" and "Botham" daubed on each side. But there is no doubt Australian cricket fans are the harshest judges around. Just as bands are nothing until they have cracked America, so cricketers are nothing until they have cracked Australia. The simplest way to do that is to have ticker and tekkers, to be a talented, attacking cricketer with heart and personality.


The Ayatollah - Mike Brearley in Australia, December 1979
Mike Brearley: not venerated in Australia as he is in England © Getty Images
Enlarge

Most do not get close to satisfying this Australian demand. "Everything about Chris Tavaré annoyed the Australians in the early 1980s, right down to his acute accent: he was the antithesis of their idea of a cricketer," writes Matthew Engel on Tavaré's ESPNcricinfo profile.

It is a cricket culture that has had never had much time for those who are perceived to be boring. Geoff Boycott and Trevor Bailey were others. But slow scoring is not a crime per se: Mike Atherton, "the cockroach", was hugely respected by Australian crowds and players for his obvious toughness. Even when he eventually became Glenn McGrath's bunny, he never lost Australia's respect.

The primary reason is Atherton never showed weakness, even when he could barely move because of his back. Australians resent weakness, whether it's Steve Harmison's wide, Gubby Allen's refusal to bowl Bodyline, or Ian Bell's constant struggles from 2005 to 2009. Bell's Ashes character arc is almost cinematic: he was a chump, widely ridiculed, compared to a hopeless virgin from a teen film, yet last summer he produced arguably the greatest performance by an England batsman in a single series for the last 40 years.

It's one thing to not be good enough for Test cricket - such players are held in complete contempt - and another to be good enough but not strong enough mentally to fulfil your talent. In Australian eyes that is probably a worse crime, and it was certainly perceived of players like Mark Ramprakash, Andy Caddick, Graeme Hick, and for a time Bell. They formed a sub-genre: the Ashes villain as victim, nothing more than Poms to the slaughter. Interestingly weakness is sometimes excused: Graham Gooch asked to be dropped during the 1989 Ashes, anathema to the Australian cricket culture, yet his reputation survived because of the credit he already had in the bank.

Martin McCague was in debit before his Test career started. McCague, christened the "rat who joined the sinking ship", probably got the worst stick of all the Australian-born players to represent England, although Alan Mullally and Craig White were not too far behind. On the 1994-95 tour McCague hailed a taxi after a dinner at the British Embassy. The driver wound down his window, saw McCague and said, "Oi. You're that bloody English traitor. Clear off mate. I'm not taking you."

Stuart Broad is wise enough not to hail too many taxis on his own over the next three months. He should not really be one of the great Ashes villains, but he is going to feel like one.

Rob Smyth is the author of The Spirit of Cricket - What Makes Cricket the Greatest Game on Earth

RSS Feeds: Rob Smyth

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by 2MikeGattings on (November 13, 2013, 21:48 GMT)

I was definitely one of the doubters when Broad had a test bowling average of 45 but he has come good time and again since then, and explosively. When he is on a burst he seems to have the capacity like Botham and Flintoff to get batsmen out by the force of personality - he wills them out.

But at his best he is a cunning bowler. When Anderson retires Broad will take over as leader of the attack, and I wonder if like Jimmy the consistency of his performances will improve with the experience.

Posted by   on (November 9, 2013, 21:36 GMT)

Broad hat-trick over the Ashes would be great. If he wasn't unpopular enough... Think England will win the Ashes again, 3-1 or something like that.

Posted by foursandsixes on (November 9, 2013, 21:26 GMT)

Broad may be obnoxious but not "good looking"! I think you are making a stretch here. He's not going to get booed that bad, and since he can give it, I'm sure he can take it!

Posted by   on (November 9, 2013, 16:04 GMT)

australia take the series 2-1 hard fought contest in our hand

Posted by oscoli67 on (November 9, 2013, 10:58 GMT)

It seems almost inevitable 12 days out from the first test that 2 things will happen: 1) Dear dear Mitchell "The darling of the barmy army" Johnson will be selected for the first test. He'll bowl on the left etc... etc .., many a chorus will be sung, and he will sulkily return 1/150 2) Based on the Gabba 2010 and Hobart on Wednesday, Australia will spend great swathes of time in the field and Broad will do the same in the dressing room. By day 3 at Adelaide the realisation that England will retain the Ashes will have dawned on most Australian supporters and they will either turn on their own team or come to the ground disguised as empty seats. I'd have to agree with Michael Vaughan that out of the whole England touring party the 2 players most likely to prosper in the face of provocation are Broad & KP. I can't wait for the fun to begin.

Posted by hhillbumper on (November 9, 2013, 10:01 GMT)

Gosh Aussie fans don't like an Englishman. I am off to lie down for a couple of hours to get over the shock. Broad can tear apart line ups when he gets on a roll. one of those performances wins us a test.As for his average you will find that has come down recently.As for the Aussie bowling line up and its strengths what exactly has it won recently? Yep. I suppose though those statistics are wrong as well. Its been like 9 wins in a row this year in tests hasn't it? The reality is Aus would pray for someone with his character because at the moment all Aus produce is hissy fits in the press.

Posted by scrappa on (November 9, 2013, 1:55 GMT)

As an Aussie I dislike him immensely but conversely that's why I like him. He's got attitude, petulance, strengths and weaknesses - he is raw and not as managed as some are. On one hand I will boo him but on the other - welcome and thanks for coming and giving the game the characters it needs.

Posted by jb633 on (November 8, 2013, 22:17 GMT)

I am English and I must confess I have never liked him as a cricketer. What annoys me the most is when things go wrong he seems to play the blame game and doesn't dig deep. I remember on a tour to the WI a few years ago he constantly moaned about there not being a blade of grass on the wickets. This is a guy getting paid a serious amount of money and instead of getting on with the job ( a job most fans would give their arm for) he just moaned about the wickets. He goes long spells of being completely hopeless and then has one game a series where he is unbelievable. I can certainly see why the Aussies don't like him, the same way they can probably see why we can't take Warne seriously any more.

Posted by JG2704 on (November 8, 2013, 22:01 GMT)

Polls reflect very little when you compare people from different eras.

I mean not everyone will remember or even have seen Botham playing and very few would likely even have been born before Bodyline , so Broad's incident still being fresh in folk's minds is always likely to sway opinions more.

Being booed by one's own fans can be very hurtful. I don't think the same applies with opposition fans. Ponting is mentioned in this piece but I think that's partly because he's a fierce competitor (something similar to Broad) and partly because Eng fans saw Ponting as such a big player. Broad may even take the booing as a mark of recognition

Posted by shillingsworth on (November 8, 2013, 20:57 GMT)

@CoverDrive88 - When Pattinson produces match winning performances in Ashes tests, he might displace Broad from your imaginary squad. Until then, your comparison makes very little sense. On the subject of cricketers who are 'legends in their own mind', Pattinson is ironically a much better example than Broad - similar on field demeanour but with rather fewer test wickets.

Posted by CodandChips on (November 8, 2013, 19:22 GMT)

If he has one of those incredible spells when he rips apart a team, the booers will quickly be stunned to silence. However if he gets it wrong, the boos will make his head drop and he will only get worse.

Agree with the comments on Oz fans only turning up when they are winning. Melbourne first day is the best example. Would love a repeat, but it seems unlikely.

Posted by   on (November 8, 2013, 18:04 GMT)

Every good team needs a "firestarter".Someone who is prepared to make a statement and not let the game drift.Broad is that type of player,as was Ian Healy and Merv Hughes for Australia many years ago.I respect Broad and I despise those who want to make money or gain attention by calling him a cheat.And I'm an Aussie.We just don't have people in the team who are prepared to get involved in the game-winners are not very pleasant people when they're doing the business.

Posted by Green_and_Gold on (November 8, 2013, 15:50 GMT)

@Chris Ward - i think he will thrive on it if he is doing well or if Eng are winning. I think it will hit him hard if the opposite is true. Ive seen him have a few strops on the field - this will wind him up if he gets in one of those moods.

Posted by countjimmoriarty on (November 8, 2013, 15:45 GMT)

One thing not quite right - Australia is of course a suburb of Yorkshire - not the other way round!

Posted by CoverDrive88 on (November 8, 2013, 15:39 GMT)

This Aussie dislikes him more for the fact that it always appears that he's a legend in his own mind, but his figures say that he is at best an average Test cricketer - over 30 with the ball, under 25 with the bat. I doubt he would have made it into the Aussie squad any time in the last 20-odd years except in the last 2-3, and even then I doubt we would have pushed any of Harris, Siddle or Pattinson out of the team for him. That non-walking episode didn't look good, but I suspect Dar had said "not out" before Broad even looked up, and things just went from there. But it will be a good excuse to go after him. Perhaps something to take the crowd's mind off our batting.

Posted by mahjut on (November 8, 2013, 14:02 GMT)

not sure the Aussie's did percieve Hick etc in the way it's described here ... I think - especially in Hick's case (as i was interested in the subject some years back) they viewed it as most people do these days: horribly mismanaged talent! could be why they've employed him...

I don't see Broad as much more than most teams' bowling offerings - he's certainly no Steyn or Anderson i doubt i would ever have selected him over Onions personally but he does occasionally make telling contributions - bit like KP, you keep him in the teambecasue when he does perform you can be pretty certain of a win but your actual value comes from the Trott's, the Cook's, the Anderson's and the Swann's ... the guys who will be steady EVERY innings of EVERY match.

Posted by   on (November 8, 2013, 11:43 GMT)

Haha it was fun the same people sledging me were the same wanting autograph s after the days play take it with a pinch of salt and enjoy every moment that's my advice

Posted by Front-Foot-Lunge on (November 8, 2013, 8:00 GMT)

As we all saw last time, Australian fans only watch their team play if they're winning. Which mean Australian stadiums are mostly empty these days. Who could forget the rows upon rows of empty seats that dominated the stadiums last time as England won game after game.

Posted by   on (November 8, 2013, 7:58 GMT)

if Gillespie is the Australian exception and Broad the English exception; then one can understand their respective histories. (heh heh)

Posted by HatsforBats on (November 8, 2013, 6:24 GMT)

He's incredibly talented, but he's inconsistent and his performances at times are almost inept. He's petulant and gets stroppy when things don't go his way; how many times has he been cited by the match referee? The teapot stance is also fairly hypocritical considering his own fielding is often rubbish. Those are the main reasons he isn't liked. I'll wager the fact that he's got an irritating habit of scything through our batting lineup and boshing boundaries when they're 9-for have a great deal to do with it too. I don't think Bay 13 were ever going to cheer him, standing his ground after such an obvious dismissal was just the icing on the cake.

Posted by subnys on (November 8, 2013, 6:04 GMT)

What's so special about Broad walking himself rather than the umpire making the right decision. Had Broad walked out honestly, did anyone give Aussies the chance to lift the Ashes? I can understand if a batsman of a calibre of Cook, Strauss, Peiterson, Bell etc. not walking away honestly. If Broad is the highest ranked batsman (if I can say that) for the Oz, then God bless them. This "booing Broad" situation is not taking them anywhere as Broad is not a premiere batsman nor is he the English captain.

Posted by Wunfa517 on (November 8, 2013, 4:52 GMT)

I doubt if it will come to that. Australian "fans" only go to the cricket when their team is winning.

Posted by Black_Rider on (November 8, 2013, 4:26 GMT)

I know Stuart Board is no saint. But if he need to survive this he need to take a leaf out of Murali's book. This is nothing when you compare it with Murali's. At the end Great man got 800 test wickets. You need to have that kind of character to survive these kind of situations.

And By the way, Murali's behavior is thousand times better than Stuart Board's

Posted by   on (November 8, 2013, 3:25 GMT)

He'll absolutely thrive on it. The more they boo, the better he'll play. He'll probably end up with 40 wickets, 350 runs, ten catches and couple of stumpings, haha. The crowds would be wise to keep quiet, haha.

Posted by heathrf1974 on (November 8, 2013, 3:25 GMT)

Broad will be fine. There maybe some at first but the Aussie fans will get bored with it and just watch the game.

Posted by keithmillersmesserschmitt on (November 8, 2013, 3:17 GMT)

Plenty of people disliked him before his failure to walk off the thickest of edges and biggest of deviations. I doubt he'll get anywhere near the quite often disgraceful treatment players like Ponting, Gillespie, and Johnson have got in England---for a start half the crowd will be English, if previous Ashes in Oz are anything to go by.

Posted by   on (November 8, 2013, 3:09 GMT)

Broad is disliked in Australia because he has the grace and charm of a public school prefect on freshman whipping day. The not walking was just a catalyst.

Comments have now been closed for this article

FeedbackTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print

Chanderpaul, the coach's nightmare

Modern Masters: He developed a rhythm that worked for him and gave him better balance at the crease

    'I spent 95% of my career bowling the same ball'

Angus Fraser talks about his workmanlike bowling, playing second fiddle, his stop-start career, and England in the '90s

    'A coach earns respect by working as hard as the players'

Sanjay Bangar talks about his quick transition from player to coach, his philosophy and the reasons behind Kings XI Punjab's turnaround

    'Swann could bowl length blindfolded'

Erapalli Prasanna on a thoroughbred professional whose basics were extraordinarily strong

The mathematician who loved cricket

Haider Riaz Khan: GH Hardy, a regular at Cambridge, ranked mathematicians and physicists on the 'Bradman class'

News | Features Last 7 days

Champions League T20 still battling for meaning

The thrills are rather low-octane, the skills are a bit lightweight, and the tournament overly India-centric

From Constantine to Chanderpaul

As West Indies play their 500th Test, here's an interactive journey through their Test history

'My kind of bowling style is gone now'

Former New Zealand seamer Gavin Larsen talks about wobbly seam-up bowling, the 1992 World Cup, and his role in the next tournament

Busy keepers, and Waqar's bowleds

Also, high scores and low averages, most ducks in international cricket, and the 12-year-old Test player

Soaring in the 1980s, slumping in the 2000s

In their pomp, West Indies had a 53-13 win-loss record; in their last 99, it is 16-53. That, in a nutshell, shows how steep the decline has been

News | Features Last 7 days