February 5, 2014

The good, the bad and the Greigy

Remembering English cricket's favourite punching bag, who didn't always do the right thing, but had unbridled passion for the game
16

Tony Greig didn't care to mould his image to conform to English standards
Tony Greig didn't care to mould his image to conform to English standards © PA Photos

Port-of-Spain, 40 years ago this week, and Tony Greig was, well, being Greigy. However inadvertently, he'd caused a row; a big, stinking cowpat of a row. To call it a force-ten gale of a storm in a teacup would be to misjudge the mood of the times. It should have been strenuously avoided by any England vice-captain, let alone a white, South African-born one in Trinidad while apartheid and racial unrest raged.

Despite the shaky evidence of a blink-and-miss-it TV bulletin, the cause appeared clear. Playing the last ball of the second day of the first Test to Greig at silly point, Bernard Julien heads off to the pavilion; partner Alvin Kallicharran, 142 not out, follows suit and Alan Knott pulls out the striker's stumps.

Greig's day, though, is not quite done: spotting Kallicharran "out of the corner of my eye", oblivious to the wicketkeeper's impromptu cessation, he throws instinctively at the non-striker's end, hits and appeals. Not having called time, umpire Douglas Sang Hue assents. Kallicharran stomps off, breaking his bat on the pavilion steps. The opportunist already knew he'd put his foot well and truly in the doo-doo. "As soon as I hit the wicket I thought, 'Oh dear, this could cause a problem or two.'"

Outraged spectators besieged the away dressing room; two tense, chilling hours inched by. Having correctly backed Sang Hue (he'd been right, technically if not spiritually), the West Indies board announced that the appeal had been withdrawn "in the interests of cricket generally and this tour in particular". The statement also asserted that Greig had "in no way intended his instinctive action to be contrary to the spirit of the game and he is truly sorry". Geoff Arnold was one of the nervier tourists: "They'd have killed us if we hadn't let [Kallicharran] bat the next day."

It was a sign of less fractious times when, in Georgetown 17 years later, Australia's Dean Jones fell foul of a similar miscarriage of justice. Bowled by a Courtney Walsh no-ball, he failed to hear the call, set off for the pavilion and was run out; and remained out, even though he had not attempted a run. Both captains, Allan Border and Viv Richards, admitted ignorance of the law.

Pietersen may be convinced he's been picked on, but has any sporting émigré endured the wrath - or, worse, snobbery - of his adopted home quite like Greig?

Opinions were anything but uniform in 1974: Derek Underwood blamed Kallicharran for not waiting until Sang Hue had lifted the bails; Keith Fletcher blamed skipper Mike Denness for not realising the Guyanan had been "cheated out" and refusing to reinstate him there and then. Denness' own memories wavered: interviewed shortly before his death last year by Dave Tossell, Greig's most recent and assiduous biographer, Denness recalled Knott uprooting the stumps; talking to Greig's first biographer, David Lemmon, three decades earlier, he made no mention of this. Whoever the watching Mick Jagger held culpable, it wasn't Greig. At lunch the next day, Mr Rolling Stone met Mr Equally Provocative on the pavilion steps: "Good work," enthused Jagger. "I don't blame you."

"We were going on to Jamaica after that, and we do know the locals can become quite volatile," reasoned Denness, explaining the climb down. "Also, I am looking at Tony's background and the way apartheid was then." Knott was similarly mindful. As Denness walked towards the ground on the third morning, he was assailed by questions about "Kalli". Queuing spectators were carrying "little bags… full of empty bottles"; if Kalli didn't resume batting, he claimed he was advised, "they are for you". Before play, villain and reprieved shook hands in the middle, defusing the tension, but Kallicharran recently insisted on this site that he was "forced to do it".

Happily, for team, player and game, suggestions that Greig be sent home were repulsed: centuries in Bridgetown and Georgetown helped salvage draws before, back in Trinidad, 13 wickets for those lesser-spotted offbreaks earned a shared series. When Denness lasted one Test the following summer, Greig succeeded him as tosser-in-chief.

Further opprobrium would descend after that needling and entirely daft "We intend to make them grovel" overture to the sides' next encounter in 1976. Daft not just because it aroused the indignation of Andy Roberts and Mikey Holding, or because it was utterly insensitive to the social climate at the time - especially, again, coming from a white South African - but because not even his enemies could fairly characterise Greig as racist. Engaging brain before tongue never became a habit. Still, he had sharpened his diplomatic act come winter, bonding with crowds in India, where he is still fondly recalled as perhaps the most popular of visiting captains.

"I can't say I can think of anyone else who would have tried to do [what Greig did in Trinidad]," concluded Denness "He wanted to be in everyone's face the whole time." In defending Greig, Bob Willis went directly for the jugular, blaming his "uncompromising" South African background: "It would have been almost unthinkable for an English-born cricketer."

****

When Greig told us he was stricken with lung cancer, it was almost impossible to process. Greigy, vulnerable? The stand-up tough guy who took on Lillee and Thommo as resolutely as he faced down those mighty buffers at Lord's and the High Court, not to say epilepsy? The always-on performer who found a new lease of life as the game's loudest, proudest and most amorous cheerleader? At length, disbelief gave way to more dispassionate reflections. There was always a hint of fragility, something bravado could never fully conceal. Being an outsider is never easy. Ask our Kev.

Greig blazed a trail followed by many - too many, some have argued. Not until Kevin Pietersen did any match him for brass balls. English cricket, uncoincidentally, has enlisted no better South Africans. The difference between them, of course, is a matter of skin. Not pigmentation but thickness.

Pietersen may be convinced he has been picked on (and not without good reason), but has any sporting émigré endured the wrath - or, worse, snobbery - of his adopted home quite like Greig? Tough being KP? Compassionate as I am, he should have tried spending his career occupying the shoes of his predecessor as English cricket's favourite punching bag.

As Bruce Springsteen warranted, it's bloody hard to be a saint in the city, particularly when it's not your own. Greig was always too innate a competitor to compromise without a damn good fight. But for all his faux pas and foot-in-mouthings, there's one asset he possessed that helped him cope, one that Pietersen so palpably lacks: a reluctance to allow the brickbats to deflect him - though, to be fair, they do fly that much thicker, faster and further in this Twitter era. Had his skin been thinner, Greig would have been half the cricketer and a far lesser leader. Maybe that's why he was a far superior captain.

Only once did that skin prove too thin. In that cricketing-life-will-never-be-the-same Ashes summer of 1977, after Greig had announced his reviled decision to join Kerry Packer's magical mystery tour, the habitually kindly and fair-minded John Woodcock let anger get the better of him in the Times and vented his prejudices: the outgoing England captain was a traitor, he charged, because he was not "an Englishman through and through". Shades of Willis?

Being Englishmen through and through hadn't dissuaded four of Packer's other five Pommy signings, Knott, Underwood, Dennis Amiss and John Snow. Nobody cared that Bob Woolmer had been born in India. Despite that resilient hide and a Scottish father who had been one of the RAF's most daring and heroic fighter pilots during the Second World War, Greig bridled for decades over Woodcock's slight.

Beyond the cringe factor, one could only relish the unabashed enthusiasm and inclusiveness when Greig reinvented himself as a commentator able to dart between different audiences with ease, to soar over the thorny hurdles of language and culture. Chortle all you like at that early catchphrase "Goodnight Charlie" (no offence to the Vietcong intended, of course), but it is hard to recall a comment that did quite so much to lighten the mood as the game dragged itself, kicking and screaming about the good old days, into what may one day be hailed as its Accessible Age. Nobody sold the game quite like him.

That said, judging by the 2012 MCC Spirit of Cricket Lecture, which Greig gave at Lord's six months before his death, it is unlikely even he would have supported the latest sales pitch from Dubai. He really did save his best, and wisest, for last.

"Cricket as we know and love it has plenty of problems. Most of those problems can best be solved if the ICC members put the game's interests before their own interests; if India accepts the survival of Test cricket is non-negotiable; if India accepts its responsibility as leader of the cricket world; if it embraces Nelson Mandela's philosophy of not seeking retribution; and if it embraces the spirit of cricket and governs in the best interests of world cricket, not just for India and its business partners."

"You won't have Nixon to kick around anymore," said the self-pitying US president upon leaving office in disgrace. Greig might have had similar thoughts when he traded in the England captaincy for a lifestyle more befitting his talents, and wound up doing much to give the game a future. If only he was still around. The game needs lovers not businessmen right now, and few have been so ardent. For all those tactless moments, we could also sorely do with his transparency.

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • on February 6, 2014, 16:57 GMT

    Being a South African and former cricket writer from the province for which Tony Greig made his first-class debut - Border - I must comment that he was always ready to give East London newspaper an interview. His mother, Joyce, now well in her nineties, lives not 5km from the newspaper offices and Tony and even Ian used to visit often. When that infamous bomb went off in Sri Lanka some years ago and the Proteas opted to return home, I managed to reach Tony at his hotel via telephone in Colombo, and he was so helpful and accommodating and I managed to get a 'scoop." I recall interviewing Tony at the East London airport about five years ago, he stretched his long, long frame across the seat and into the aisle and in a loud and of course recognisable voice which had the onlookers staring, answered my questions about Australian and world cricket at the time. Those lovely memories I have of him, and I for one was very sad to hear of his passing 14 months ago at what was a very young age.

  • rizwan1981 on February 6, 2014, 12:53 GMT

    Tony Greig was a true friend of SRI LANKA - Always supported the underdog and the smaller nations.

    If Greig was around today , he would have excoriated India and the country that he captained as well as the place he called home when he died.

    Its sad that except for a few ex-cricketers( Atherton , Ian Chapple and Martin Crowe) , a majority have been silenced by the BCCI

  • EngineerKhan on February 6, 2014, 2:30 GMT

    He was superb. Simply superb!!

    "O.. He has dropped it as well..!!"

    (in Boxing Day Test, 2009 when after dropping a few catches in the slips, Imran Farhat, while trying to return the crowd's ball, dropped it as well )

  • on February 5, 2014, 17:38 GMT

    I miss you Tony. What a man....

  • tokoloshe on February 5, 2014, 16:15 GMT

    What a legend. Loved listening to his commentary. Miss you Greigy!

  • on February 5, 2014, 15:41 GMT

    we miss u .......sri lankan...hope he will reborn as a srilankan........

  • Dirk_L on February 5, 2014, 13:00 GMT

    Thanks for the reference to Greig's speech. It contains the following utterly prophetic words:

    "At the risk of over simplifying things, the major problems facing cricket at the moment are: the decline in the image of cricket; ICC's control; the international calendar and the mix of different types of cricket; gambling; the Decision Review System; governance; unequal resources; and the possibility of India cherrypicking the Woolf Report to increase its power.

    Fortunately, I think most of the problems can generally be addressed if India invokes and adheres to the spirit of cricket. "

    Too bad, Tony: India didn't.

  • MuzzaBH on February 5, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    Come come, Rob, you can do better than this; as an academic, you should present the whole picture, rather than being blatantly selective. Tony Greig announced his prime motives in joining Kerry Packer: "I did it for Tony Greig first, and for my family. Secondly I did it because the Establishment deserved it." Not much concern there for the pay scale of his fellow-players. And John Woodcock did not accuse Greig of being a traitor. He wrote that it should be remembered he was, "English not by birth or upbringing but only by adoption, which is not the same thing as being English through and through". As an Australian of British descent, resident in London for nearly half a century, and taking UK citizenship forty years ago, I would never claim to be "English through and through". So why is that statement of simple fact regarded by Greig defenders as an insult? Tony Greig was under-appreciated as a player, but too often over-praised as a man.

  • regofpicton on February 5, 2014, 10:16 GMT

    Interesting article, a little spoiled by misplacing the Nixon quote. That happened after Nixon was beaten in a run for California Governor, not after his resignation from the Presidency.

  • on February 5, 2014, 8:23 GMT

    Where Grieg differs from his tattooed, self-serving countryman (KP) is that Grieg ALWAYS displayed method in his 'madness'. His Packer involvement was through a GENUINE love of the game at the highest level and the improvement of the international player's lot whilst bringing in to the fold the mighty South Africans of the era to play with and against Black African descendants. It was NEVER about him. His spirit of cricket lecture is a must-read for all lovers of the game.

  • on February 6, 2014, 16:57 GMT

    Being a South African and former cricket writer from the province for which Tony Greig made his first-class debut - Border - I must comment that he was always ready to give East London newspaper an interview. His mother, Joyce, now well in her nineties, lives not 5km from the newspaper offices and Tony and even Ian used to visit often. When that infamous bomb went off in Sri Lanka some years ago and the Proteas opted to return home, I managed to reach Tony at his hotel via telephone in Colombo, and he was so helpful and accommodating and I managed to get a 'scoop." I recall interviewing Tony at the East London airport about five years ago, he stretched his long, long frame across the seat and into the aisle and in a loud and of course recognisable voice which had the onlookers staring, answered my questions about Australian and world cricket at the time. Those lovely memories I have of him, and I for one was very sad to hear of his passing 14 months ago at what was a very young age.

  • rizwan1981 on February 6, 2014, 12:53 GMT

    Tony Greig was a true friend of SRI LANKA - Always supported the underdog and the smaller nations.

    If Greig was around today , he would have excoriated India and the country that he captained as well as the place he called home when he died.

    Its sad that except for a few ex-cricketers( Atherton , Ian Chapple and Martin Crowe) , a majority have been silenced by the BCCI

  • EngineerKhan on February 6, 2014, 2:30 GMT

    He was superb. Simply superb!!

    "O.. He has dropped it as well..!!"

    (in Boxing Day Test, 2009 when after dropping a few catches in the slips, Imran Farhat, while trying to return the crowd's ball, dropped it as well )

  • on February 5, 2014, 17:38 GMT

    I miss you Tony. What a man....

  • tokoloshe on February 5, 2014, 16:15 GMT

    What a legend. Loved listening to his commentary. Miss you Greigy!

  • on February 5, 2014, 15:41 GMT

    we miss u .......sri lankan...hope he will reborn as a srilankan........

  • Dirk_L on February 5, 2014, 13:00 GMT

    Thanks for the reference to Greig's speech. It contains the following utterly prophetic words:

    "At the risk of over simplifying things, the major problems facing cricket at the moment are: the decline in the image of cricket; ICC's control; the international calendar and the mix of different types of cricket; gambling; the Decision Review System; governance; unequal resources; and the possibility of India cherrypicking the Woolf Report to increase its power.

    Fortunately, I think most of the problems can generally be addressed if India invokes and adheres to the spirit of cricket. "

    Too bad, Tony: India didn't.

  • MuzzaBH on February 5, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    Come come, Rob, you can do better than this; as an academic, you should present the whole picture, rather than being blatantly selective. Tony Greig announced his prime motives in joining Kerry Packer: "I did it for Tony Greig first, and for my family. Secondly I did it because the Establishment deserved it." Not much concern there for the pay scale of his fellow-players. And John Woodcock did not accuse Greig of being a traitor. He wrote that it should be remembered he was, "English not by birth or upbringing but only by adoption, which is not the same thing as being English through and through". As an Australian of British descent, resident in London for nearly half a century, and taking UK citizenship forty years ago, I would never claim to be "English through and through". So why is that statement of simple fact regarded by Greig defenders as an insult? Tony Greig was under-appreciated as a player, but too often over-praised as a man.

  • regofpicton on February 5, 2014, 10:16 GMT

    Interesting article, a little spoiled by misplacing the Nixon quote. That happened after Nixon was beaten in a run for California Governor, not after his resignation from the Presidency.

  • on February 5, 2014, 8:23 GMT

    Where Grieg differs from his tattooed, self-serving countryman (KP) is that Grieg ALWAYS displayed method in his 'madness'. His Packer involvement was through a GENUINE love of the game at the highest level and the improvement of the international player's lot whilst bringing in to the fold the mighty South Africans of the era to play with and against Black African descendants. It was NEVER about him. His spirit of cricket lecture is a must-read for all lovers of the game.

  • mamboman on February 5, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    Richard Nixon actually made that quote after losing the California Gubernatorial election in 1966...

  • IshaqMalik on February 5, 2014, 7:53 GMT

    One of the best commentators, surely he is missed by many.

  • ishrat1971 on February 5, 2014, 7:23 GMT

    The game needs lovers not business men. This one phrase says it all. Please let the governing body be run by people who genuinely love the game. BTW Tony Grieg was unique and well loved (other than four west indies bowlers who had other thoughts).

  • AltafPatel on February 5, 2014, 6:46 GMT

    No commentator as entertained as he did. He could blow life to any dead match or even that of minnows teams as well. World cricket miss him.

  • lodd on February 5, 2014, 6:36 GMT

    Fabulous to work with, Rob, one of the very best. The secret , as you say, is a love and passion for the game .......

  • Charith99 on February 5, 2014, 4:33 GMT

    We little lankans miss you tony. RIP

  • No featured comments at the moment.

  • Charith99 on February 5, 2014, 4:33 GMT

    We little lankans miss you tony. RIP

  • lodd on February 5, 2014, 6:36 GMT

    Fabulous to work with, Rob, one of the very best. The secret , as you say, is a love and passion for the game .......

  • AltafPatel on February 5, 2014, 6:46 GMT

    No commentator as entertained as he did. He could blow life to any dead match or even that of minnows teams as well. World cricket miss him.

  • ishrat1971 on February 5, 2014, 7:23 GMT

    The game needs lovers not business men. This one phrase says it all. Please let the governing body be run by people who genuinely love the game. BTW Tony Grieg was unique and well loved (other than four west indies bowlers who had other thoughts).

  • IshaqMalik on February 5, 2014, 7:53 GMT

    One of the best commentators, surely he is missed by many.

  • mamboman on February 5, 2014, 8:09 GMT

    Richard Nixon actually made that quote after losing the California Gubernatorial election in 1966...

  • on February 5, 2014, 8:23 GMT

    Where Grieg differs from his tattooed, self-serving countryman (KP) is that Grieg ALWAYS displayed method in his 'madness'. His Packer involvement was through a GENUINE love of the game at the highest level and the improvement of the international player's lot whilst bringing in to the fold the mighty South Africans of the era to play with and against Black African descendants. It was NEVER about him. His spirit of cricket lecture is a must-read for all lovers of the game.

  • regofpicton on February 5, 2014, 10:16 GMT

    Interesting article, a little spoiled by misplacing the Nixon quote. That happened after Nixon was beaten in a run for California Governor, not after his resignation from the Presidency.

  • MuzzaBH on February 5, 2014, 12:28 GMT

    Come come, Rob, you can do better than this; as an academic, you should present the whole picture, rather than being blatantly selective. Tony Greig announced his prime motives in joining Kerry Packer: "I did it for Tony Greig first, and for my family. Secondly I did it because the Establishment deserved it." Not much concern there for the pay scale of his fellow-players. And John Woodcock did not accuse Greig of being a traitor. He wrote that it should be remembered he was, "English not by birth or upbringing but only by adoption, which is not the same thing as being English through and through". As an Australian of British descent, resident in London for nearly half a century, and taking UK citizenship forty years ago, I would never claim to be "English through and through". So why is that statement of simple fact regarded by Greig defenders as an insult? Tony Greig was under-appreciated as a player, but too often over-praised as a man.

  • Dirk_L on February 5, 2014, 13:00 GMT

    Thanks for the reference to Greig's speech. It contains the following utterly prophetic words:

    "At the risk of over simplifying things, the major problems facing cricket at the moment are: the decline in the image of cricket; ICC's control; the international calendar and the mix of different types of cricket; gambling; the Decision Review System; governance; unequal resources; and the possibility of India cherrypicking the Woolf Report to increase its power.

    Fortunately, I think most of the problems can generally be addressed if India invokes and adheres to the spirit of cricket. "

    Too bad, Tony: India didn't.