Osman Samiuddin
Sportswriter at the National

Afridi: a Pakistani sort of hero

Enlightenment and order take a walk when he delivers the rare performance that brings the country together like nothing else can

Osman Samiuddin

March 3, 2014

Comments: 108 | Text size: A | A

Shahid Afridi roars after hitting the winning six, India v Pakistan, Asia Cup, Mirpur, March 2, 2014
You have to see it to believe it © AFP
Related Links
Players/Officials: Shahid Afridi
Series/Tournaments: Asia Cup
Teams: Pakistan

I'm quite enjoying this stats assault from the Asia Cup broadcaster. Some of it is a bit much, especially when they veer into, you know, real statistics and start messing with probabilities (Pakistan may win 78% of matches in which Mohammad Hafeez takes two wickets and scores 30 or more, but if he's taken 2 for 78 in a total of 360 and got out for 30, then that percentage is pretty pointless). Mostly, though, it has been refreshing and has saved us all the hassle of getting on Statsguru during a match.

What I wanted it to do on Sunday night was tell me about Shahid Afridi. I wanted it to tell me about Afridi and the last five balls for which he was on the pitch. I wanted to be shown fancy numbers about the likelihood of Pakistan winning after Afridi crosses over off the last ball of the penultimate over to get off strike and not being there for the first ball of the last over when 10 are needed, two wickets are in hand and he is the man charged with winning it. And then when, because of him, Saeed Ajmal is bowled off the very first ball and that leaves Afridi needing, at best, 9 off four balls. And then Junaid Khan picking up the most important single in Pakistan's history since Tauseef Ahmed did. The chances of that single itself could not have been very high, given his last ten innings: 2 not out, 0, 4, 0, 4, 1 not out, 0 not out, 1 not out, 0, 1 not out.

But the real figure I wanted to see was the probability of two familiar and successive Afridi mistimed hits going for six, in the last over, winning a game, winning the game to win (the Asia Cup merely being an excuse to see Pakistan play India). What were the chances, eh? Of that scythe over extra cover (ish) and that cross-batted heave that somehow goes towards long-on (ish) going over the rope, when they both for so long held the same illusory quality that Misbah-ul-Haq's paddle in Johannesburg in 2007 did? They had to drop into a fielder's hands, right? At least one? When they fell over it felt like only a great surge of belief and prayer had pushed them over. Where, I asked, were the calculations of this scenario?

Every time Afridi wins with the bat, and not necessarily the match itself, Enlightenment has lost. And you know what? The Age of Ignorance throws a pretty mean party. I don't mind that cricket has become more meticulous and better-planned, that coaches generate and deploy vast amounts of data in pursuit of a workable, repeatable formula for success. That broadcasters throw all kinds of information at me. In his own way, even Misbah has tried to take Pakistan into, if not the age of reason, then one of relative order and calm at least. Bless him, post-match he even tried to ascribe Afridi's innings to a plan. It is natural in something that is taken so seriously as sport.

But it's good to know that chaos cannot be permanently defeated, no matter how much we try to order ourselves. It's good to know that even the Deep Blue supercomputers in English cricket's country-sized backroom can be made redundant. (Incidentally, the last Pakistani to win a game against India by one wicket with a six in the last over - Javed Miandad, in case you'd forgotten, or are dead - said that his brain was working like a computer that day). Some things we cannot know or plan for, and many things we cannot account for, ever. Oxygen plays a big part in keeping us alive but I'd venture that this not knowing, not understanding and the search to change that is vital too. Else what are we here for? And if too often at the end of our striving to know, to understand, we come to heartache and strife, then the joy of coming to as inexplicable an incident as Afridi winning a game against India with the bat in the last over is a joy that cannot be matched.

To know it has happened once and to anticipate being alive the day it happens again is what makes Afridi's batting so compelling. Not too many people will have seen that first, record-breaking hundred he made in Nairobi in 1996, or not live at least. But the thought of seeing something as plain ridiculous as that? I was in Kanpur the day he made that 45-ball hundred against India in 2005. I saw it with my eyes and I couldn't believe what he had done. I got an SMS from Rahul Bhattacharya shortly after the innings and it being a decade and several handsets later, I recreate as best as memory can. "I never could believe the Nairobi hundred was true because I couldn't imagine a 37-ball hundred, but now I can." In other words, you have to see it to believe it, but I would also venture reversing that, especially for Pakistanis who have waited for Afridi's every innings to be so: you have to really believe that he can do it, for the payoff of seeing it.

I recently wrote a piece for ESPNcricinfo's anthology on Sachin Tendulkar. Towards the end, what struck me most about Tendulkar, much more than his batting, was his status as an unqualified hero. In Pakistan I always felt - and loved the fact - that we consider heroes to be a figment of the imagination, a whimsy of the privileged in a hard, mean world. Using Jinnah, the Bhuttos, and the Khans, Jahangir and Imran, to illustrate this tendency, I argued that Pakistan didn't, or couldn't, have the kind of hero Tendulkar was.

Fool was I to not even consider Afridi, who represents something about the modern soul of Pakistan as vividly as anybody. No current cricketer in Pakistan is as popular. He has many, many detractors, sure, and many who don't take him at all seriously. But who else has, in the last decade, brought an entire country together this exhilaratingly as often as Afridi, even if it isn't nearly as often as we'd like? Maybe he isn't a hero but today, on a day that marks five years of the darkest doom to have struck Pakistan cricket, he has managed to make Pakistan fret about it a little less, even if briefly. If that is not heroic then I'm not sure what is.

PS: Because this is what everyone should do, my personal favourite of the 34 runs (one for each year of his age, neatly) was the sweep (!), stepping outside off stump to Bhuvneshwar Kumar in the 47th over, to place it between square leg and short fine leg. I saw it and I still don't believe it.

Osman Samiuddin is a sportswriter at the National

RSS Feeds: Osman Samiuddin

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ahsanjabbar on (March 8, 2014, 14:51 GMT)

Last time WorldCup in Australia (1992) a Khan did it for Pakistan ! Fast Forward 2015 it can be another Khan again do the magic (Australia Lucky for Pakistan!) Viv, Gayle, Gilchrist, Hayden, Yuvi, Dhoni, Jayasuriya, Klusener, Razzak n Afridi form a formidable entertainment package of Top 10 cleanest-hitters in Cricket History!

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (March 6, 2014, 15:20 GMT)

lala at his prime in destroying

Posted by espncricinfomobile on (March 6, 2014, 12:30 GMT)

cricket will produce more batsman like brian lara,sachin,ricky ponting but will not entertainer like shahid afridi.he is great.

Posted by eng_mdkhan on (March 6, 2014, 5:38 GMT)

@ Sumit Narang.........if you think Sachin is God (as it comes natural for you to make almost anything and everything God) it does not mean everybody else does the same. Sachin was an extremely talented player no doubt, but Sachin can never be Afridi or vice versa both have their own standing in world cricket but Afridi is definitely more charismatic than Sachin.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2014, 4:51 GMT)

Afridi is very much famous, very much liked and at the same time very much criticised for what he is. Over all he is a great cricketer and moreover , a great entertainer.

Anyone buys a ticket to watch a cricket match or rather can afford to spare almost 8 to 9 hours to watch the match, deserves to be entertained. And as far as the cricketing world is concerned, the only man that has ever and always entertained, in a cricket match, is Afridi and him alone.

Nobody would spend his/her hard earned money or waste 8 to 9 hours to watch a batsman make a hundred in300 odd balls. I definitely would not rate him as an entertainer. Everyone wants excitement and entertainment - and it is only Shahid Afridi who can and has,for so many years, provided to the cricket loving spectators.

Lara and Sachin, well they are big names - but Afridi is a name nobody can ever deny or love to hate.

Posted by   on (March 6, 2014, 2:50 GMT)

Very nice and motivating article by Osman. keep it up

Posted by msharif911 on (March 5, 2014, 22:48 GMT)

Great article and it was an exhilarating innings. But Afridi and Tendulkar are not comparable. Its like the tortoise vs the hare. Sure the tortoise won the race, but the hare is far more exciting.

Back to Afridi, this is the long awaited innings. Every time he goes out to bat this is what we are waiting for. When he doesnt deliver, we are disheartened. When he went out for this innings I thought "we cant win this, the guy is a loser" and just like Pakistan, the Mercurial team, he surprises us when we least expect it.

Dont forget, there is only one letter difference between Hero and Zero.

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 21:31 GMT)

I agree that Tendulkar was obviously a very consistent batsman for india, but thats what we love about afridi and thats what makes him and the Pakistani team in general all such big heroes - their unpredictability !!! Pakistan zindabad !

tendulkar may be a hero for indians but he's retired, and wasnt there to save india from our much bigger hero afridi and his massive sixes !!

Posted by   on (March 5, 2014, 20:45 GMT)

The sweep is someones favorite shot. Especially a hard bunt to leg. And the proverbial ''Aaaja''

Posted by Bilal_Choudry on (March 5, 2014, 20:10 GMT)

Perhaps only Pakistan produces players who will go for broke everytime ... Mcgrath is a prime example .. that guy could bowl at 90 miles an hour but didnt and relied on control .. a Pakistani would never do that .. they will go for 100 of 10 overs in search for that one memorable wicket ... same with afridi .. not many would remember best Inzi innings in karachi chasing 350 but everyone will remember afridi 100 in kanpur

Comments have now been closed for this article

Email Feedback Print
Osman SamiuddinClose
Osman Samiuddin Osman spent the first half of his life pretending he discovered reverse swing with a tennis ball half-covered with electrical tape. The second half of his life was spent trying, and failing, to find spiritual fulfillment in the world of Pakistani advertising and marketing. The third half of his life will be devoted to convincing people that he did discover reverse swing. And occasionally writing about cricket. And learning mathematics.

    A year of triumph and disaster

Martin Crowe: Misbah, McCullum, and the ICC's efforts against chucking were the positive highlights in a year that ended with the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death

    Two fortresses called Brisbane and Centurion

Numbers Game: Australia haven't lost at the Gabba since 1988, while South Africa have a 14-2 record in Centurion

Zimbabwe's decade of hurt

The Cricket Monthly: Ten years ago 15 white Zimbabwean cricketers went on strike. The game has not been the same since
Download the app: for iPads | for Android tablets

    'Lara v McGrath was a great battle of our generation'

Dravid and Manjrekar discuss Brian Lara's adaptability

Would Brearley have picked Cook as captain?

Nicholas Hogg: Cook lacks certain qualities the ex-England captain listed as those fitting of an ideal leader, in particular, charisma

News | Features Last 7 days

The perfect Test

After the tragedy of Phillip Hughes' death, this match showed that cricket and life will continue to go on. This time Test cricket dug in and got through to tea.

Kohli attains batting nirvana

Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

Australia in good hands under proactive Smith

The new stand-in captain has the makings of a long-term leader, given his ability to stay ahead of the game

What ails Rohit and Watson?

Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena

Karn struggles to stay afloat

The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

News | Features Last 7 days

    BCCI's argument against DRS not 100% (164)

    Turning your back on a system that the whole cricketing world wants a discussion on, refusing to discuss it because it is not 100%, is not good enough

    Karn struggles to stay afloat (114)

    The failed gamble of handing Karn Sharma a Test debut despite him having a moderate first-class record means India have to rethink who their spinner will be

    Kohli attains batting nirvana (110)

    Virat Kohli's innings on the final day transcended the conditions, the bowlers and his batting partners, and when it was all in vain, he displayed remarkable grace in defeat

    When defeat isn't depressing (57)

    After a long time we have seen an Indian team and captain enjoy the challenge of trying to overcome stronger opposition in an overseas Test

    What ails Rohit and Watson? (51)

    Both batsmen seemingly have buckets of talent at their disposal and the backing of their captains, but soft dismissals relentlessly follow both around the Test arena