August 29, 2014

Can keep, can bat

The modern wicketkeeper needs to be more than capable with the bat, and West Indies and Pakistan have had some success with them recently
  shares 23

Denesh Ramdin has scored 405 runs in his four ODI innings and averages 42.36 in his last 17 Tests, with three times as many hundreds as he scored in his first 42 Tests
Denesh Ramdin has scored 405 runs in his four ODI innings and averages 42.36 in his last 17 Tests, with three times as many hundreds as he scored in his first 42 Tests © AFP

Till a few decades ago, not too many teams were bothered about the batting skills of their wicketkeepers. Their primary function was to do a clean job behind the stumps and take all the catches that came their way; the runs they scored was a bonus. That's the logic that allowed wicketkeepers like Wasim Bari and Bob Taylor the opportunity to play more than 50 Tests despite batting averages of less than 17.

In today's age of the multi-skilled cricketer, it's highly unlikely that any wicketkeeper with batting skills of that nature would be allowed such a long international stint. The decade-wise batting numbers for wicketkeepers in both Tests and ODIs have undergone significant change, as is evident from the tables below.

In Tests, the big difference came in the 2000s, which was the first decade in which the average for wicketkeepers topped 30. In the 1990s, the average was similar to that of the 1970s, but Adam Gilchrist (and, to a lesser extent, Andy Flower) changed the rules of the game. There were 65 centuries scored by wicketkeepers in the 2000s, more than twice the number in the previous decade, while the rate of scoring one improved from one every 36 innings in the '90s to one every 23 innings, an improvement of 36%. So far in the 2010s, the average has further improved to 34.35, and the century rate to one every 19 innings, thanks to the likes of Matt Prior, MS Dhoni, BJ Watling, Mushfiqur Rahim and Denesh Ramdin.

In ODIs, the change in the last two-and-a-half decades has been even more dramatic. In the 1980s, wicketkeepers averaged 18.62 runs per wicket, and scored one century in 754 attempts. (Zimbabwe's Dave Houghton made an unforgettable 142 in the 1987 World Cup against New Zealand.) Since the beginning of 2010, they've averaged 34.42, an improvement of 85%. The overall ODI average for all batsmen during this period has gone up only marginally, from 26.43 in the 1980s to 28.71 since the beginning of 2010. Clearly, teams have sought more from their glovemen over the years, and the players have adapted accordingly.

Decade-wise batting stats for wicketkeepers in Tests since 1950
Decade Tests Inngs Average 100s/ 50s
1950s 164 505 20.60 10/ 39
1960s 186 588 23.59 12/ 59
1970s 198 624 27.29 11/ 84
1980s 266 773 23.63 14/ 63
1990s 347 1086 27.28 30/ 126
2000s 464 1490 31.81 65/ 207
2010s 193 635 34.35 34/ 107
Decade-wise batting stats for wicketkeepers in ODIs
Decade Inngs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
1970s 118 18.17 61.37 1/ 6
1980s 754 18.62 67.77 1/ 35
1990s 1500 23.70 72.64 14/ 129
2000s 2413 29.53 77.42 48/ 322
2010s 1053 34.42 81.65 40/ 174

While the general trend has been of wicketkeepers getting more productive with the bat, some teams haven't been a part of this trend in the last few years. In the period between 2010 and 2013, Pakistan's keepers averaged 18.32 in 34 Tests, which was a throwback to the Wasim Bari era. (Except that, unlike Bari, many of these keepers weren't even so solid behind the stumps.) That average of 18.32 was easily the worst among all teams during those four years, and Pakistan were the only team to play more than ten Tests without a single century from their wicketkeeper in that period.

In 2014, though, Pakistan have found someone who, on early evidence, suggests he can turn it around for them. Sarfraz Ahmed hasn't played many Tests, so a full verdict on him must wait. However, in the four Tests he has played this year, Sarfraz has looked the part, scoring 399 runs in eight innings against Sri Lanka, at an average of 57. He has also scored his runs quickly, and his 103 against Sri Lanka in Colombo earlier this month was the first century by a Pakistan wicketkeeper since Kamran Akmal's unbeaten 158 against the same opponents in February 2009. Sarfraz also has eight centuries in 101 first-class matches (including the Tests), but against teams other than Sri Lanka in Tests, he has scored 89 runs in eight innings. On current evidence, he should get plenty of opportunities to improve upon those numbers.

Even with those stats for 2014, though, Pakistan's Test numbers are still the worst among all teams since 2010, because of their four poor years before the current one.

Team-wise batting stats for wicketkeepers in Tests since Jan 2010
Team Tests Inngs Runs Average 100s/ 50s
South Africa 41 60 2578 46.03 6/ 13
Bangladesh 22 40 1494 39.31 2/ 9
England 59 90 2958 38.92 5/ 19
India 50 82 2697 35.96 3/ 17
New Zealand 38 67 2004 35.15 5/ 10
Sri Lanka 41 65 1931 33.87 5/ 7
Australia 50 88 2539 32.55 4/ 17
West Indies 36 58 1409 28.18 3/ 5
Zimbabwe 11 22 488 23.23 0/ 2
Pakistan 38 63 1315 23.07 1/ 8

Another team which struggled to get runs from their wicketkeeper - till fairly recently - was West Indies. Ramdin has been around in international cricket for almost a decade now, but after a promising start, there was a long period when his batting had faded badly. In his first 42 Tests, Ramdin's Test average was 22.80, quite poor by today's standards, and it wasn't a surprise when he was replaced by Carlton Baugh. West Indies would have expected more runs from him, but in the 16 Tests he played between 2010 and 2012, Baugh did even worse, scoring 414 runs in 26 innings at 17.25. That might have sufficed a few decades ago, but not today.

West Indies returned to Ramdin, and in the last couple of years that faith has been repaid quite handsomely. In his last 17 Tests, Ramdin has averaged 42.36; in 27 innings during this period, he has scored three hundreds (including one which was followed by a not-so-smart retort at Viv Richards); in his first 73 innings he had one.

In these last two years, he is West Indies' third-highest run-scorer in Tests, after Shinarine Chanderpaul and Marlon Samuels, and only Chanderpaul has scored more Test hundreds. His average of 42.36 is third among wicketkeepers who've batted at least 15 innings during this period, after AB de Villiers (average 63.37 in Tests when he has kept wicket) and Mushfiqur Rahim (43.31). When Ramdin was dropped from the team, he averaged less than 23 in 42 Tests; in just 17 Tests he has lifted his career average by nearly five runs.

Denesh Ramdin's Test career
Period Tests Inngs Runs Average 100s/ 50s
Till 2011 42 73 1482 22.80 1/ 8
2012 onwards 17 27 932 42.36 3/ 3
Career 59 100 2414 27.74 4/ 11

However, what's brought the focus upon Ramdin more recently are his ODI exploits: in his last four innings - one against England, three against Bangladesh - Ramdin has scores of 128, 74, 34, 169. That's 405 runs at an average of 101.25, and 34% of the runs he scored in his first 80 ODI innings. Before these four innings, Ramdin averaged 19.88 in 80 ODI innings; after 84, his career average has gone up to 24.96, an increase of five runs in just four games.

Denesh Ramdin's ODI career
Period Inngs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
First 108 matches 80 1193 19.88 74.84 0/ 3
Last 4 matches 4 405 101.25 113.44 2/ 1
Career 84 1598 24.96 81.90 2/ 4

Those two hundreds by Ramdin are the first by any West Indian wicketkeeper in ODIs; in fact, he is only 336 runs away from equaling the West Indian record for most ODI runs by a wicketkeeper - Jeff Dujon has 1934 runs in 118 innings.

West Indies have had several great aspects to their cricket over the years, but a wicketkeeper who scores plenty of runs isn't one of them. In the entire history of ODIs, their wicketkeepers average 21.54, which is the lowest among all teams (with a 100-innings cut-off). They've managed only two hundreds, which is the joint-lowest, along with Bangladesh - even Kenyan wicketkeepers have more (three). In Tests, West Indian wicketkeepers have a poorer average than all teams except New Zealand.

Despite Ramdin's recent exploits, they're also at the bottom of the ODI pile since the beginning of 2010. If he plays a few more innings like the ones he has been playing recently, Ramdin might just lift West Indies from that last slot.

Team-wise batting stats for wicketkeepers in ODIs since Jan 2010
Team Inngs Runs Average Strike rate 100s/ 50s
South Africa 77 3519 53.31 95.59 13/ 14
Sri Lanka 125 5446 49.50 82.22 10/ 38
India 109 3583 47.77 86.46 3/ 25
New Zealand 74 2041 32.39 93.02 2/ 11
Bangladesh 75 2019 30.59 71.49 2/ 11
Zimbabwe 60 1709 30.51 69.89 0/ 15
England 84 2167 29.68 101.68 1/ 11
Pakistan 92 2142 28.18 83.93 1/ 12
Australia 99 2395 26.91 74.37 1/ 13
West Indies 79 1693 24.89 75.74 2/ 4

S Rajesh is stats editor of ESPNcricinfo. Follow him on Twitter

Comments have now been closed for this article

  • Somya7 on August 29, 2014, 7:10 GMT

    best 3 keepers in odi for all teams , from 1 to 3

    India - Dhoni , Saha , Parthiv Patel

    Australia - Haddin , Paine , Luedeman

    South Africa - De kock , AB de Villers , Morne Van Wyk

    Pakistan - Umar Akmal , Sarfraz Ahmed , Kamran Akmal

    West Indies - Ramdin , Simmons , Darren Bravo

    Sri Lanka - Sangakkara , Chandimal , KUSHAL Prearra

    England - Jos Buttler , Steven Davies , Chris Read.

    New Zealand - Luke Ronchi , BJ watling , Brendon McCullum

  • ygkd on August 30, 2014, 7:09 GMT

    Not only did Australia last gain and hold the number 1 Test ranking with a keeper who could bat a bit (Healy), their keeper batting average this decade tells the other side of the same story. Australia has gone for batting first in the post-Gilchrist era. Fair enough, one might say, but what about the results? Well, the table above shows that since the start of 2010, Australia's keepers have averaged with the bat only enough to be 7th out of 10 in Test-playing nations in that criteria. By contrast, Bangladesh, which has a brittle batting line-up and could be excused for going down the batting-first path - if only it didn't rely on spinners and therefore also need a very good gloveman, is 2nd on that table. Their's is a World-class keeper who has learnt how to bat, in Rahim. Ramdin, too, of the WI, has improved his batting. Australia has been getting runs but some of the keeping has been sub-standard as a result and there haven't been anywhere near enough runs to justify this policy.

  • ygkd on August 29, 2014, 23:52 GMT

    Sangakkara has to be the best batsman in the game at the moment. He was a vey good keeper, but his worth to the SL Test side has increased significantly since he gave up the gloves and concentrated on batting. This is the Alec Stewart point. Letting a champion bat just bat and having a specialist wickie keep surely gives the best results. Australia may have been the best-in-the-World with Gilchrist (who was the exception that proves/tests the rule) but they got to number one with Ian Healy. Often that is over-looked.

  • ygkd on August 29, 2014, 23:44 GMT

    Chris_P is correct. Wayne B. Phillips was fine left-handed opening bat who should not have been burdened with the gloves. Alec Stewart was another who would have been more use just making runs at the top of the order. In both cases, better glovemen were kept out of the team. There is a simple, fundamental equation in Test cricket wins - barring opposition declarations, 20 wickets are needed. If top-line glovemen can help deliver that, then provided they're not bunnies they should be considered. One-day cricket is different, but perhaps it shouldn't be. There are almost never any slips. The rules should be changed to require 2 slips, or combinations including a leg-slip or bat-pad and other close catchers at all times. Having to field slips would change how captains view wickets, and how bowlers subsequently bowl, and would bring keepers back into the one day game. Let the batsman-backstop types have T20 cricket. The shortest format suits them, for they have less deliveries to mess up.

  • Chris_P on August 29, 2014, 22:54 GMT

    @BillyCC. While Haddin is very capable, Knott was another level, IMHO. Jack Russell was as good a gloveman that I have witnessed, (@Stuart_online, I was at the SCG & witnessed Russell's legside stumping Dean Jones off Small bowling about 140kph, absolutely amazing!) & he was a very talented lower order batsman, I think England did themselves a disservice tossing the gloves to Stewart as his batting also suffered. Gilchrist, while very capable, wasn't the best gloveman about, but his batting was exceptional (same for Flower). Gilly wasn't even NSW's 1st choice keeper & played as a batsman before going to WA to get a run with the gloves.

  • Rally_Windies on August 29, 2014, 22:13 GMT

    @riverlime ..

    not just Baugh

    the WI selectors decided to take an uncapped wicket keeper to the last 50 over world cup ... Devon Thomas was a total failure .... while Baugh was injured and Ramdin was available .....

    2010 - 2014 ,, Ramdin has had very few games in WI colors actually ! though he is the only one whose performances anyone seems to remember .....

    Baugh, Thomas and Charles , kept getting chances even though Ramdin never really fialied

  • on August 29, 2014, 16:35 GMT

    @somya7 what about Gilchrist, Boucher, Parore, Kaluwitharana, Rahul Dravid

  • BillyCC on August 29, 2014, 15:31 GMT

    @John Price, I don't know anything about JT Murray, but I doubt Knott was a 10 run worse off proposition than Murray over the long term. If the difference was only marginal at best, then of course anyone would go for the better batsman. But today, there is a genuine concern that even though cricketers like Prior averaged better than Knott, he was so awful relatively behind the stumps that the difference is more than 10 runs in terms of mistakes made, drops, technique etc.

  • Stuart_online on August 29, 2014, 15:27 GMT

    What about the effect keeping has on batting ?

    Sangakkara averages a staggering 69 in 80 tests where he didn't keep, but just 40 when he was keeper. SL could easily have dropped a specialist keeper in place of any specialist batsman and KS would have made up any shortfall.

    Likewise Alec Stewart kept out Jack Russell because of his better batting, but he was nearly 10 runs worse when keeping wicket than when he only batted. I remember Stewart being handed the gloves to bolster England's weak batting in a series in Australia around 1990. This in the match after Russell executed a leg side stumping standing up (!!!) to Galdstone Small. Phenomenal skill, saves countless runs.

  • its.rachit on August 29, 2014, 13:46 GMT

    @billycc and chris_P - very good points ... another example is Dhoni ... he may be the captain and made close to 350 runs in this series, but every one said he was a bad keeper this series and haas always been an average keeper ... he must have cost India atleast 200 runs by the catches he let go ... reduce them from 150 and you have an excellent keeper who can bat a bit .... instead of a good batsman who can keep ... like uthappa or umar akmal ...

  • Somya7 on August 29, 2014, 7:10 GMT

    best 3 keepers in odi for all teams , from 1 to 3

    India - Dhoni , Saha , Parthiv Patel

    Australia - Haddin , Paine , Luedeman

    South Africa - De kock , AB de Villers , Morne Van Wyk

    Pakistan - Umar Akmal , Sarfraz Ahmed , Kamran Akmal

    West Indies - Ramdin , Simmons , Darren Bravo

    Sri Lanka - Sangakkara , Chandimal , KUSHAL Prearra

    England - Jos Buttler , Steven Davies , Chris Read.

    New Zealand - Luke Ronchi , BJ watling , Brendon McCullum

  • ygkd on August 30, 2014, 7:09 GMT

    Not only did Australia last gain and hold the number 1 Test ranking with a keeper who could bat a bit (Healy), their keeper batting average this decade tells the other side of the same story. Australia has gone for batting first in the post-Gilchrist era. Fair enough, one might say, but what about the results? Well, the table above shows that since the start of 2010, Australia's keepers have averaged with the bat only enough to be 7th out of 10 in Test-playing nations in that criteria. By contrast, Bangladesh, which has a brittle batting line-up and could be excused for going down the batting-first path - if only it didn't rely on spinners and therefore also need a very good gloveman, is 2nd on that table. Their's is a World-class keeper who has learnt how to bat, in Rahim. Ramdin, too, of the WI, has improved his batting. Australia has been getting runs but some of the keeping has been sub-standard as a result and there haven't been anywhere near enough runs to justify this policy.

  • ygkd on August 29, 2014, 23:52 GMT

    Sangakkara has to be the best batsman in the game at the moment. He was a vey good keeper, but his worth to the SL Test side has increased significantly since he gave up the gloves and concentrated on batting. This is the Alec Stewart point. Letting a champion bat just bat and having a specialist wickie keep surely gives the best results. Australia may have been the best-in-the-World with Gilchrist (who was the exception that proves/tests the rule) but they got to number one with Ian Healy. Often that is over-looked.

  • ygkd on August 29, 2014, 23:44 GMT

    Chris_P is correct. Wayne B. Phillips was fine left-handed opening bat who should not have been burdened with the gloves. Alec Stewart was another who would have been more use just making runs at the top of the order. In both cases, better glovemen were kept out of the team. There is a simple, fundamental equation in Test cricket wins - barring opposition declarations, 20 wickets are needed. If top-line glovemen can help deliver that, then provided they're not bunnies they should be considered. One-day cricket is different, but perhaps it shouldn't be. There are almost never any slips. The rules should be changed to require 2 slips, or combinations including a leg-slip or bat-pad and other close catchers at all times. Having to field slips would change how captains view wickets, and how bowlers subsequently bowl, and would bring keepers back into the one day game. Let the batsman-backstop types have T20 cricket. The shortest format suits them, for they have less deliveries to mess up.

  • Chris_P on August 29, 2014, 22:54 GMT

    @BillyCC. While Haddin is very capable, Knott was another level, IMHO. Jack Russell was as good a gloveman that I have witnessed, (@Stuart_online, I was at the SCG & witnessed Russell's legside stumping Dean Jones off Small bowling about 140kph, absolutely amazing!) & he was a very talented lower order batsman, I think England did themselves a disservice tossing the gloves to Stewart as his batting also suffered. Gilchrist, while very capable, wasn't the best gloveman about, but his batting was exceptional (same for Flower). Gilly wasn't even NSW's 1st choice keeper & played as a batsman before going to WA to get a run with the gloves.

  • Rally_Windies on August 29, 2014, 22:13 GMT

    @riverlime ..

    not just Baugh

    the WI selectors decided to take an uncapped wicket keeper to the last 50 over world cup ... Devon Thomas was a total failure .... while Baugh was injured and Ramdin was available .....

    2010 - 2014 ,, Ramdin has had very few games in WI colors actually ! though he is the only one whose performances anyone seems to remember .....

    Baugh, Thomas and Charles , kept getting chances even though Ramdin never really fialied

  • on August 29, 2014, 16:35 GMT

    @somya7 what about Gilchrist, Boucher, Parore, Kaluwitharana, Rahul Dravid

  • BillyCC on August 29, 2014, 15:31 GMT

    @John Price, I don't know anything about JT Murray, but I doubt Knott was a 10 run worse off proposition than Murray over the long term. If the difference was only marginal at best, then of course anyone would go for the better batsman. But today, there is a genuine concern that even though cricketers like Prior averaged better than Knott, he was so awful relatively behind the stumps that the difference is more than 10 runs in terms of mistakes made, drops, technique etc.

  • Stuart_online on August 29, 2014, 15:27 GMT

    What about the effect keeping has on batting ?

    Sangakkara averages a staggering 69 in 80 tests where he didn't keep, but just 40 when he was keeper. SL could easily have dropped a specialist keeper in place of any specialist batsman and KS would have made up any shortfall.

    Likewise Alec Stewart kept out Jack Russell because of his better batting, but he was nearly 10 runs worse when keeping wicket than when he only batted. I remember Stewart being handed the gloves to bolster England's weak batting in a series in Australia around 1990. This in the match after Russell executed a leg side stumping standing up (!!!) to Galdstone Small. Phenomenal skill, saves countless runs.

  • its.rachit on August 29, 2014, 13:46 GMT

    @billycc and chris_P - very good points ... another example is Dhoni ... he may be the captain and made close to 350 runs in this series, but every one said he was a bad keeper this series and haas always been an average keeper ... he must have cost India atleast 200 runs by the catches he let go ... reduce them from 150 and you have an excellent keeper who can bat a bit .... instead of a good batsman who can keep ... like uthappa or umar akmal ...

  • Kingman75 on August 29, 2014, 13:44 GMT

    The more tests AB played as keeper, the worst his keeping got. The catches were still good but that's because he's so talented. However, technique was slipping and it was just sloppy to watch. By the end of the Australian series, it was something he needed to give up for the sake of the team. Otherwise, he would have turned into Prior eventually, although only the keeping part - still a great batsmen.

  • Jonathan_E on August 29, 2014, 13:39 GMT

    Les Ames was similar to Alan Knott: both wicket keepers from Kent who could bat as well as keep, and both faced competition from a "pure keeper" who sometimes batted as low as 11.

    Ames's competition was George Duckworth of Lancashire: Knott's competition was, of course, Bob Taylor.

    In both cases, the incompetent batsman was initially rated the superior gloveman: and in both cases, they improved their *keeping* enough that their batting then got them in the team because the difference in wicket keeping standards was only marginal if anything.

    Interestingly, when Bruce French played Tests in the mid-1980s, he kept Jack Russell out of the team - on wicket keeping ability (well it certainly wasn't his batting) even though Russell was a truly excellent keeper and eventually overtook French as both batsman and keeper. Russell also scored 94 on debut (against SL) and a hundred in the disastrous 1989 series (against Australia) to show that he could bat as well

  • kiwicricketnut on August 29, 2014, 10:16 GMT

    @ Eitan Shai i havn't seen dickwella play, buttler seems more suited to limited overs cricket but he might prove me wrong, sangakara and gilchrist are the pinnacle of wicket keeper batsmen but i was surprised how low nz ranked on the list considering since i've been alive we have always picked keepers that can bat to compensate for a usually fragile batting line up with the exception of lee germon who was a specialist captain, what a nightmare that was but a list of watling, mccullum, parore, smith isn't bad of coarse there have been others like hart and van wyk but they were just fill ins for the other 4 who were all pretty goid with the bat and exceptional glovemen

  • bedders78 on August 29, 2014, 9:48 GMT

    Could you give some stats on byes conceded and catches/stumping taken to give a rough idea if the standard of keeping has changed?

  • riverlime on August 29, 2014, 9:37 GMT

    The Carlton Baugh experiment by the West I ndies imploded badly. Not only did Baugh fail to produce runs, but his keeping was always more along the lines of "stop the Ball" rather than quick hands. He missed dozens of chances behind the wicket, usually to spinners, and would have given away far more runs than even Lara could have made up. As a result, whenever Ramdin played with his own gang of spinners, that team won spectacularly, as Trinidad's recent run of success has shown.

  • xtrafalgarx on August 29, 2014, 9:22 GMT

    Wow, SA's stats are unbelievable. De Villers didn't keep till around 2012, so Boucher would have had a big impact as well. To add QDK to that and they are flying.

    Prior did an admirable job for England though in tests.

  • John-Price on August 29, 2014, 9:11 GMT

    It's is not true that teams in the past never used to worry about batting skills of wicket-keepers. Jim Parks played over 40 tests as England wicket keeper in the1960s due to batting skills - JT Murray was a much better keeper.

    It is forgotten now, but most pundits rated Taylor as a better keeper than Knott, but Knott was a batter batsman. Most of Taylor's games came when Knott was unavailable for selection.

    Much earlier Les Ames was a front line batsman for England as well as the wicket keeper. I don't know if there were any better keepers around but would be interested to learn.

    In the West Indies Sir Clyde Walcott kept wicket for his first 15 tests. I understand that he wasn't a great keeper but his potential with the bat got him in the side.

  • BillyCC on August 29, 2014, 8:24 GMT

    @ChrisP, excellent point. To me, the increase in batting standards for a keeper is a neutral for the overall team, completely offset by the drop in technique, missed chances, lack of awareness of slips communication. Those factors are probably worth the 10-15 runs that you see over the long term. With all respect to Haddin, you just don't mention him in the same breath as someone like Knott. Gilchrist was justifiable because at one stage, he was averaging 25 to 30 runs more than the average keeper. But even then, Healy was the better proposition technically.

  • on August 29, 2014, 6:52 GMT

    @kiwicricketnut, Niroshan Dickwella from Sri Lanka is another one to watch... his batting technique is amazing. Also, don't forget Jos Buttler from England!

  • Starvybz on August 29, 2014, 6:18 GMT

    would ya look at that west indies highest runscorer in tests in the last two years loses his place to kirk edwards

  • kiwicricketnut on August 29, 2014, 5:52 GMT

    bj watling is probably the best keeper batsman at the moment, will average well over 40 soon and is so sharp behind the stumps, should be in the odi team as well, far superior to ronchi, de kock is the one to watch though, just another run machine coming out of south africa

  • Chris_P on August 29, 2014, 5:26 GMT

    All interesting stats but I would really love to know, although we can't get access to the information is how many chances are missed by these not so adept 'keepers & in terms of runs conceded what it cost? Just from our pov Matthew Wade's efforts behind the stumps were cringe worthy, even though he scored a lot of runs, the cost of some of those chances easily wiped out his batting contributions. I can recall Wayne "Flipper" Phillips who was given the gloves reluctantly in a ridiculous notion by the aussie selectors to include a batsman who could keep wickets to strengthen the lower order. As much as he hated keeping, he must still have nightmares of the chances he missed. That folly of a decision wrecked his confidence as a cricketer as well as his batting went downhill after scoring a memorable century on test debut as a batsman. sure, have the keeper work on his batting, but a top gloveman will do it for you every time.

  • on August 29, 2014, 5:09 GMT

    south africa is likely to maintain that average because quinton de kcock is certainly capable of it.

  • on August 29, 2014, 5:09 GMT

    south africa is likely to maintain that average because quinton de kcock is certainly capable of it.

  • Chris_P on August 29, 2014, 5:26 GMT

    All interesting stats but I would really love to know, although we can't get access to the information is how many chances are missed by these not so adept 'keepers & in terms of runs conceded what it cost? Just from our pov Matthew Wade's efforts behind the stumps were cringe worthy, even though he scored a lot of runs, the cost of some of those chances easily wiped out his batting contributions. I can recall Wayne "Flipper" Phillips who was given the gloves reluctantly in a ridiculous notion by the aussie selectors to include a batsman who could keep wickets to strengthen the lower order. As much as he hated keeping, he must still have nightmares of the chances he missed. That folly of a decision wrecked his confidence as a cricketer as well as his batting went downhill after scoring a memorable century on test debut as a batsman. sure, have the keeper work on his batting, but a top gloveman will do it for you every time.

  • kiwicricketnut on August 29, 2014, 5:52 GMT

    bj watling is probably the best keeper batsman at the moment, will average well over 40 soon and is so sharp behind the stumps, should be in the odi team as well, far superior to ronchi, de kock is the one to watch though, just another run machine coming out of south africa

  • Starvybz on August 29, 2014, 6:18 GMT

    would ya look at that west indies highest runscorer in tests in the last two years loses his place to kirk edwards

  • on August 29, 2014, 6:52 GMT

    @kiwicricketnut, Niroshan Dickwella from Sri Lanka is another one to watch... his batting technique is amazing. Also, don't forget Jos Buttler from England!

  • BillyCC on August 29, 2014, 8:24 GMT

    @ChrisP, excellent point. To me, the increase in batting standards for a keeper is a neutral for the overall team, completely offset by the drop in technique, missed chances, lack of awareness of slips communication. Those factors are probably worth the 10-15 runs that you see over the long term. With all respect to Haddin, you just don't mention him in the same breath as someone like Knott. Gilchrist was justifiable because at one stage, he was averaging 25 to 30 runs more than the average keeper. But even then, Healy was the better proposition technically.

  • John-Price on August 29, 2014, 9:11 GMT

    It's is not true that teams in the past never used to worry about batting skills of wicket-keepers. Jim Parks played over 40 tests as England wicket keeper in the1960s due to batting skills - JT Murray was a much better keeper.

    It is forgotten now, but most pundits rated Taylor as a better keeper than Knott, but Knott was a batter batsman. Most of Taylor's games came when Knott was unavailable for selection.

    Much earlier Les Ames was a front line batsman for England as well as the wicket keeper. I don't know if there were any better keepers around but would be interested to learn.

    In the West Indies Sir Clyde Walcott kept wicket for his first 15 tests. I understand that he wasn't a great keeper but his potential with the bat got him in the side.

  • xtrafalgarx on August 29, 2014, 9:22 GMT

    Wow, SA's stats are unbelievable. De Villers didn't keep till around 2012, so Boucher would have had a big impact as well. To add QDK to that and they are flying.

    Prior did an admirable job for England though in tests.

  • riverlime on August 29, 2014, 9:37 GMT

    The Carlton Baugh experiment by the West I ndies imploded badly. Not only did Baugh fail to produce runs, but his keeping was always more along the lines of "stop the Ball" rather than quick hands. He missed dozens of chances behind the wicket, usually to spinners, and would have given away far more runs than even Lara could have made up. As a result, whenever Ramdin played with his own gang of spinners, that team won spectacularly, as Trinidad's recent run of success has shown.

  • bedders78 on August 29, 2014, 9:48 GMT

    Could you give some stats on byes conceded and catches/stumping taken to give a rough idea if the standard of keeping has changed?