New Zealand v Australia, 2nd Test, Hamilton

Green pitch dents Williamson's debut hopes

Brydon Coverdale in Hamilton

March 25, 2010

Comments: 28 | Text size: A | A

Mathew Sinclair drives during his 47, New Zealand v Bangladesh, 2nd Test, Wellington, 2nd day, January 13, 2008
Mathew Sinclair could play his first Test in two years © Getty Images
Enlarge

Kane Williamson's hopes of making a Test debut at his home ground have taken a nosedive after the New Zealand camp was surprised by a green pitch and wet conditions at Seddon Park. The inclusion of James Franklin in the squad is an indication that they are considering an extra seamer and the coach Mark Greatbatch said on Thursday Peter Ingram and Mathew Sinclair were competing for the No. 3 spot.

"[Daryl] Tuffey's injury and also the conditions we were expecting to face at Seddon Park; dry conditions and a dryish wicket, was one of the reasons why we started talking about Kane," Greatbatch said on Radio Sport. "We got to Hamilton yesterday and what we were expecting and what we played on earlier in the season was not what we saw yesterday. At this stage there's quite a lot of grass on the wicket.

"Ingram and Sinclair are vying for that spot at three. It's not easy at the top of the order in Test cricket and we're still looking for that solution. We need someone to stand up and actually perform. Williamson was brought in for the conditions we thought we were going to face. For his selection for this game the conditions will have to be right for him, on the dryish side, and that looks unlikely at the moment. But you never know, come Saturday."

If he was to play, Williamson would likely bat at No. 6 but it now appears that the main two battles in the squad are between Ingram and Sinclair, and between Franklin and Jeetan Patel. Should Sinclair win a place it will be his first Test in two years and he said the indications from Greatbatch had been positive.

"He's given me a quick wink and nod and said there could be a possibility you may well be playing this Test, depending on the wicket and if a batsman breaks down or whatever happens," Sinclair said. "I've had the lucky experience of playing with Mark and being coached by Mark. When he gave me a ring and said 'Skip are you keen to come back' and I said 'Absolutely mate' and away we went.

He adds that positivity to this environment that is quite encouraging. It's a feel-good thing, we're getting out there and working for each other and that's the key. When you want to beat an Australian side you all have to work together and that's something he's really trying to bring into this team and that's been great."

Sinclair spoke as if he was attending a job interview when he faced the press at Seddon Park on Thursday, defending his record and his recall at the age of 34. His relationship with the media has been rather fraught over the years, as the expectations grew following his double-century on Test debut, only for him to struggle to live up to that standard for much of the remainder of his international career.

Criticism of his lack of footwork nagged at him in his younger years but Sinclair has discovered that piling up runs in domestic cricket is the best answer and this summer has scored 778 in the Plunket Shield at 59.84. Starting a family has given him perspective on his in-and-out times in the New Zealand team, although he remains very eager to play for New Zealand.

"It's definitely motivated me in the last two years," Sinclair said of the desire to add to his 32 Test caps. "I like the setup we've got in the camp at the moment, it's got a good fresh feel about it. I guess my performances in the last two seasons have warranted me being here. That's encouraging and hopefully I can take that domestic form into this international environment.

"I put a little bit too much pressure on myself [in the past]. I've changed now; it's amazing when you start having a family, and the sleepless nights, I guess my perspective has changed from when I first started. There's a lot of things that have gone on and I want to leave that in the past. I don't like to dwell on those sort of things, I'm really enjoying my cricket at the moment and the performances have been there to warrant that. I feel like I'm in a good head space."

The New Zealanders trained in drizzly conditions in Hamilton on Thursday in the Seddon Park nets and their team balance will become clearer when the covers come off the pitch. The forecast for the next two days is fine, but whether it will dry the surface out enough for Williamson to come in to contention remains to be seen.

Brydon Coverdale is a staff writer at Cricinfo

RSS Feeds: Brydon Coverdale

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Posted by ezzanevawaz on (March 26, 2010, 9:30 GMT)

If it's going to swing...Franklin at 9 , Southee then Arnel at 11 . Williamson/Patel...either...With Patel in Franklin goes to 8. Can't see room for Martin.Just having him in the batting line up , makes us a batter short every time. Just see how the guy at the other end throws wild shots trying to go for broke as soon as he comes in.It's tragic!.You need an 11 who can potentially hang in there , even for time.I've Chatfield , Morrison,Allot all hold an end up with reasonable defense. Plus ,he's just not bowling the right line consistently enough , and doing too little with the ball.Such a pity McKay is out.

Posted by mike5181 on (March 26, 2010, 7:30 GMT)

i know they are looking at sinclair at 3 but to be honest he should be played at 4 just to give him a little more of a chance to get a score. If they play him at 3 hel b in within the first over with fresh bowlers at 145+ i do not rate his chances in that situation. Team should be 1.Macintosh 2.Watling 3.Taylor 4.Sinclair 5.Guptill 6.Williamson 7.McCullem 8.Vettori 9.Franklin 10.Southee 11.Arnel/Martin. Man we really do need sum openers. If we get rhyder, mills, mckay back team would actually be half decent. 1.Watling 2.Guptill 3.Taylor 4.Sinclair 5.Rhyder 6.Williamson 7.McCullem 8.Vettori 9.Franklin 10.Mills 11. Mckay.-maybe one more bowler i dont know.

Posted by Octa on (March 26, 2010, 4:50 GMT)

I am disheartened NZ cricket continues to cottonwool a cricketer who has already shown great early promise and repeated ability and thirst for runs in Kane Williamson.

Surely if Williamson has the ability to Capt the U19s he has the ability to bat 6 against Aus in a dead rubber on his home ground? I cant think of a better situation to bring him in. Lets face it his pedigree is such that he should be in the spine of the NZ batting for years to come.

NZ cricket need to get away from the soft mental approach to the game and teach our young stars to handle pressure from day 1 as teams around the world do. We do not have the depth of talent to continue moulding cricketers at first class level who face lacklustre bowling for 7 years at provincial level and then come into the side and underperform against international bowling lineups.

Sometimes you need to recognise a great talent and nurture that talent in the right environment. Batting 6 in the test lineup for 2 years is appropriate.

Posted by Blearyeyes on (March 26, 2010, 3:53 GMT)

Does anybody else get the feeling that maybe Greatbatch is just playing games by implying the selectors will go with Sinclair, in the hopes of surprising Australia by including Williamson at the last minute? Perhaps that way the Aussies won't have done their research on Williamson (they'll certainly know all about Sinclair and his weaknesses). I'd really hope that could be the case... Either way, Ingram HAS to go, surely!

Posted by _NEUTRAL_Fan_ on (March 26, 2010, 3:33 GMT)

Well said Octa, best comment I've seen in a while. Vettori is a player who relies more on intellect and guile rather than sharp turn so a green top vs a dry surface won't make much of a difference to him. Kane can be told to contain more so than attack with his spin since the top is green. Then ask the pacers to up their game. Selecting Franklin over Kane just because the pitch should favor pace rather than spin could well back-fire.

Posted by hamNZ on (March 26, 2010, 1:14 GMT)

Should be 1. Watling 2. McIntosh 3. Taylor 4. Guptil 5. Williamson 6. Vettori 7. McCullum 8. Franklin 9.Southee 10. Arnel 11. Martin. Have your best batsman at 3. PERIOD, Guppy can move up a spot, don't change Vettori or McCullum as they have performed. And the bowling, well to be honest who cares because they are all as hopeless as each other

Posted by NZ-Bonza on (March 26, 2010, 0:53 GMT)

Surely Williamson is worth a crack. The series is gone and what better opposition to test yourself than Oz? No point blooding him against Bangas or Windies. NZ cricket should join the Aussie domestic scene, much like union, league and soccer have. Look at NZ soccer, they made the world cup for the 1st time in nearly forever. The OZ Domestic secene is the strongest in the world & NZ would benefit no end from being apart of it. Also when will NZ get rid of Martin? I know he's up there on the overall wickets list but he's lost his pace and movement of earlier years and his utter hopelessness with the bat has surely cost NZ countless chances to save and even win the odd test. With lower order players like McCullum, Vetorri and Tuffey, an 11 who could at least defend for a few overs could prove vital. My NZ 11 from the current crop of players would be 1- McIntosh 2-Watling 3-Taylor 4-Guptil 5-Ryder 6-Williamson 7-Vettori 8-McCullum 9-Tuffey 10-Southee 11-Mackay/Arnel

Posted by mmatahaere on (March 25, 2010, 23:15 GMT)

OCTA can you please become a seletor. You have it absolutely SPOT ON! Good stuff bro

Posted by   on (March 25, 2010, 22:57 GMT)

6 Batters, 1 Keeper, 4 Bowlers.

How, Vincent, Guptill, Taylor, Watling, Williamson, Ryder, McCullum, Vettori, Southee, Arnel.

Arnel and Southee to use the new ball, Vettori and Williamson for spin, Ryder as 5th bowler with assistance from Guptil and wherever else can bowl. (I hear McCullum can bowl, shhhh! I didn't tell you that!)

Ryder's primary role is a bowler here, so it may be wise then to use a different all-rounder and not risk him. Who else is there? Only Mr Franklin...

Posted by rastapopolous on (March 25, 2010, 22:49 GMT)

jjoseph you think papps whould be in the team? reeeeeeallllly??? papps is rubbish if you ask me. also, taylor batting at 5? and marshall being in the team? come on man. as for williamson, i am worried that we are gonna rush him into the team and expose him too early. while he shows tremendous talent but are we sure he is ready? as for arguing betwen ingram and sinclair? why bother, whoever you put in is going to fail. too many nz batsmen find success in domestic only to find the step to international is much too big.

Posted by WalkingDistance on (March 25, 2010, 21:36 GMT)

Octa has it right. We need our strongest players at number three. I also agree with the rest of you that Williamson needs a shot. He has proven himself at domestic level, and too often re draft in and recall these players that are in the autumn years of their career. Just like with Ross Taylor, we need to get Williamson involved early and stick with him. He has great potential and should be a good investment for NZ.

Posted by MarkM33 on (March 25, 2010, 21:26 GMT)

I say throw Williamson in. If he can score 50 or 60 runs for the match I'd say that would be a pretty successful debut for him. If he's as good as people make out and how much he wants to imporve his game then, even if he has a bit of a shocker, he'll know what he has to be able to deal with at international level and go away and work on whatever he needs to.

I see no point in waiting until we play the Bangers or Windies again to put him in. What's he going to learn from that??

While NZ want to win or at the very least compete in this match, I see little benefit sticking Sinclair in, as he doesn't offer anything for the future.

Posted by avidfanatic on (March 25, 2010, 20:58 GMT)

For my money Octa has this exactly right - especially regarding playing both williamson and sinclair - and I think the bowling choice should be Franklin, not Southee. That's because while both swing the ball, Franklin as a leftie adds at least a little variety, and after seeing what Southee did at the crease last time up I think he needs to be told to go away and think about what batting on the last morning of a test for your country means. Obviously the selectors want to give Ingram a decent shot and don't want to admit picking him in the first place was a mistake - but when the writing is on the wall... The writing is NOT on the wall for Franklin, who really can bat a little (he's a genuine test no8 I'd say but NOT a genuine batsman), and as for Sinclair - well, he shouuld have been in most NZ teams for the last few years.

Posted by masterblaster1971 on (March 25, 2010, 19:59 GMT)

Franklin and Sinclair? COME ON GREATBATCH PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF THE SAND! I agree with Kris, a perfect time to blood in Williamson. Soft excuse= 'the wicket is a green top so we won't play him' so what does that mean, any time you have a green top you are scared to play him? Typical bloody useless revolving door policy! Same mentality as always and with this nothing is ever going to change. No wonder all our top players leave and play overseas and or the IPL. All because of muppets like Greatbatch can't grow some ba=*s!!!

Posted by geebob on (March 25, 2010, 19:38 GMT)

Some heartbreak for kiwi fans again...

Posted by jjoseph4 on (March 25, 2010, 18:42 GMT)

the future nz team test team should be like this;papps,williamson,sinclar,ryder,taylor,marshal,mccullum,oram,vettori,tuffey,arnel/southee and ingram,guptil,mclantosh,watling is a complete waste

Posted by zn264 on (March 25, 2010, 16:47 GMT)

No No No! There is nothing worse than trying to support a team that play your favourite support when you really don't believe the players out there can do the job. We have seen Sinclair and Franklin fail, time and time again, so why bother? Let's bring in a new batsman and give him a shot, c'mooooon sunshine!

Posted by bunce01 on (March 25, 2010, 15:23 GMT)

I'm sorry but to even be thinking that Sinclair is a better choice because the wicket is green is farcical. Everyone knows he has been exposed for lack of footwork and on a green wicket against Australia I would expect nothing less than two failures. Having said that Sinclair v Ingram is a choice between the lesser of two evils. Give the kid a chance.

Posted by Munsta101 on (March 25, 2010, 14:40 GMT)

Come on SUN!!! Dry out that pitch!!

Posted by Octa on (March 25, 2010, 12:34 GMT)

Adding a 6th bowler is an utter waste of time. 4 main bowlers plus an extra offspin option in williamson will be plenty. Either play Franklin OR Southee. 4 seamers cant do a better job than 3.

NZ need to put our best and most complete batter at No 3 - we always put pressure on new players to step into the No3 role and it really weakens the top order and places a lot of pressure on 3, 4 & 5 who have had to come in too often with an hour til lunch on day 1.

NZ need to learn some lessons from recent years and bite the bullet.

Australia play their best batter at 3 - so do most good teams, they also play future batters at 5-6, remember Clarke playing 5 when he started.

This is the team that should play from the squad chosen

1.McIntosh 2.Watling 3.Taylor 4.Sinclair (can roll his arm if needed) 5.Guptil 6.Williamson (5th bowling option) 7.McCullum 8.Vettori 9.Southee OR Franklin 10. Arnel 11. Martin -who needs to step up his pace back to the 140+ of last summer, Hamilton swings.

Posted by mautan on (March 25, 2010, 12:11 GMT)

Peter Ingram again?Greatbatch, you must be joking...you can't be serious. The guy cannot bat at ll. Looks pretty much a slogger got lucky.Take anybody else, but not Ingram.

Posted by Rev0408 on (March 25, 2010, 11:12 GMT)

What are NZ thinking! They're going to add another bowler to a batting lineup which couldn't survive in Wellington? A greentop wouldn't be ideal for Williamson to debut on but surely you have to demand that Martin and Southee step up on a bowler-friendly surface. It's a shame Ryder is out, they need his batting and his bowling would be a plus at Hamilton also.

Posted by   on (March 25, 2010, 11:01 GMT)

Great. So instead of playing by far the best young prospect in the country in a dead rubber at home (the perfect possible situation for a debut) we are recalling two domestic bullies who have a proven track record of being completely and utterly hopeless at the international level.

Great job, Greatbach and Dictator Dan.

Posted by gustus69 on (March 25, 2010, 10:33 GMT)

what does williamson have to do to get a start average 60? franklins has been tried before and failed

Posted by Shaps on (March 25, 2010, 8:27 GMT)

good to see teenagers coming fro NZ

Posted by Arsh on (March 25, 2010, 8:21 GMT)

Franklin again?? C'mon.... that guy can't bat or bowl for christ sake. Get over him.

Posted by   on (March 25, 2010, 7:47 GMT)

Good move, not fair to bring Williamson in on a green seamer, he needs to be blooded further down the track, lesser opposition, better batting conditions. Facing the best team in the world, with bowlers bowling 140-155 on a seamer doesnt sound like a nice intro too international cricket to me!! But i guess if he has the goods he could put that all aside. Sinclair and Frankin both have to play. 1.McIntosh 2.Watling 3.Sinclair 4.Taylor 5.Guptill 6.Vettori 7.McCullum 8.Franklin 9.Southee 10.Arnel 11.Martin (he is past his best and shouldl be dropped when Andy McKay is fit)

Posted by pvwadekar on (March 25, 2010, 7:32 GMT)

Why has New Zeland shot themslevs in the foot ? making a green wicket for the likes of Michell Johnson and friends ?

Comments have now been closed for this article

TopTop
Email Feedback Print
Share
E-mail
Feedback
Print
Brydon CoverdaleClose
Brydon Coverdale Assistant Editor Possibly the only person to win a headline-writing award for a title with the word "heifers" in it, Brydon decided agricultural journalism wasn't for him when he took up his position with ESPNcricinfo in Melbourne. His cricketing career peaked with an unbeaten 85 in the seconds for a small team in rural Victoria on a day when they could not scrounge up 11 players and Brydon, tragically, ran out of partners to help him reach his century. He is also a compulsive TV game-show contestant and has appeared on half a dozen shows in Australia.
Tour Results
New Zealand v Australia at Hamilton - Mar 27-31, 2010
Australia won by 176 runs
New Zealand v Australia at Wellington - Mar 19-23, 2010
Australia won by 10 wickets
New Zealand v Australia at Wellington - Mar 13, 2010
New Zealand won by 51 runs
New Zealand v Australia at Auckland - Mar 11, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 17 balls remaining) (D/L method)
New Zealand v Australia at Hamilton - Mar 9, 2010
Australia won by 6 wickets (with 16 balls remaining)
More results »
News | Features Last 3 days
News | Features Last 3 days
Sponsored Links

Why not you? Read and learn how!