The Heavy Ball

This, that and the other. Mostly the other

The anarcho-syndicalist splendour of Pakistan

If cricket teams were political systems, we know what doctrine Afridi and Co would be

Imran Yusuf

Comments: 34 | Text size: A | A
Mohammad Aamer sees off David Warner, Australia v Pakistan, 2nd semi-final, ICC World Twenty20, St Lucia, May 14, 2010
Mohammad Aamer shows off his best anti-authoritarian grimace © AFP
Enlarge
Related Links
Teams: Pakistan

A few days ago Pakistan's captain Shahid Afridi said that "politics" in the team would not be tolerated. Comrade Shahid should know that cricketers from his land - that patch of earth sandwiched like a thin little sliver of cucumber between the two big chunks of cricketing superpower that are India and Afghanistan - have always been political radicals, revolutionaries, smash-the-system types. We don't just wear the Che Guevara t-shirt, we live the life. (Think of all the beards, and also, at least in Zaheer Abbas' case, of the penchant for cigars).

Now, since Pakistani cricketers are humans (though tests are still being done on Shoaib Akhtar) and therefore political animals, we inevitably squabble and scheme and swear oaths on holy books against team captains. I mean, who doesn't? But in the broader sense, Pakistan cricket is about sticking a middle finger up at politics, at government, at authority. If our team was placed in one of those political-spectrum diagrams I remember from PolSci courses at college, it would occupy the part from libertarianism through to full-fledged Molotov cocktail-flinging anarchism.

Just as taxation is theft, Pakistani cricketers see fielding for the good of the team at large as an unfair infringement on their individual rights. Just as it's the faceless monsters we call governments that send us to war to kill each other, Pakistani cricketers recognise the philosophical integrity of never following orders. The state has no right to tell us what to do; neither does Ijaz Butt. Or, for that matter, the team captain. Or even the batting partner at the other end screaming "Yes, yes, dammit, RUN. I said YES! RUN!" How dare he, the fascist.

We've always been a team of individuals, united by a common cause but not out of subjugation to a higher authority. Sometimes those individuals have been brilliant and we have done well. Other times those individuals have been less than brilliant and we have lost to Ireland.

Since Imran Khan retired in 1992, Pakistan have had 14 different Test captains, a clear case of power-sharing and true people power, as is only possible under our anarcho-syndicalist model. Australia, by comparison, have had just four Test captains since Allan Border retired in 1994. The power-hungry, undemocratic capitalist pigs.

My arguments here also put a new spin on our reputation for lawlessness. No, we were not tampering with the ball or fixing matches or taking nandrolone. We were liberating the cricketing masses from the evil tyranny they are too innocent to realise has kept them on their knees for centuries.

We have also contributed much to world cricket through our irreverence and innovation. As is accepted by everyone who knows their history, or more likely everyone who has seen the Apple "Think Different" advert, it is the wackos and freaks and geeks who change things, who take mankind forward. Think of the doosra, reverse-swing, the reverse-sweep (notice the proliferation of "reverse", i.e. turning things back, i.e. Viva La Revolucion). The system does not breed genius. And before you tell me that Australia have the best players in the world and also happen to have the best cricket structure, yes, before you tell me that, I will end this paragraph.

But what is a Pakistani captain to do? Our greatest cricketing success came under the near-dictatorial rule of Imran. Or so one would think. Javed Miandad actually has a better record as Test captain than the great King Khan, yet his premierships were beset by constant chaos and uncertainty.

So tune in to the Asia Cup and then the series in England this summer: the Revolution will most certainly be televised.

Imran Yusuf works for the Express Tribune, an English-language newspaper in Pakistan

Tell us what you think. Send us your feedback

© ESPN Sports Media Ltd.

Comments: 34 
. Your ESPN name '' will be used to display your comments. Please click here to edit this.
Comments have now been closed for this article

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 5, 2010, 8:24 GMT)

Wunnerful...... Specially the feilding part... Same can be applied to some other sub continent players.

Posted by Md on (June 5, 2010, 3:24 GMT)

Don't know why everyone is craving about India's loss to Zimbabwe although they had sent a second string team to Zim.

Posted by Jawwad on (June 5, 2010, 1:02 GMT)

As much a senile Pak Cricket is yet it has managed to create a a huge fan base. I guess it is that "individual" effort or so called "ourselves" has been the X factor. Great to see Akhtar making a comeback. He must be roaring to go.

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 4, 2010, 22:26 GMT)

perfectly placed....Pakistan Zindabad!!!!!!!!

Posted by Naeem on (June 4, 2010, 22:13 GMT)

I'm glad the sarcasm was mixed with humour, as a Pak fan u've got to look at the bright side of life.....otherwise there's a lot of gloom (on the field) followed by a few bright spells - sounds like the UK weather forecast! However, some of the euphemisms were lost on me :p

A lot of the world teams guarantee some predictable characteristics, but NEVER do Pakistan....luv or hate em (indian fans)......the men in green are unique in their failings and success.

Certainly there are mornings you wake up and wonder, how nice it would be....for the team to be predictably consistent, yet with most things desired in life - it remains elusive....i.e. finding a decent opening pair, fielders that can catch or a Capt who is allowed to survive his tenure.....ultimately its the Soap Opera which is Pak cricket!

The above is only bearable when backed up with immense talent, which with every blue moon threatens to explode (rather than implode) and sweep most opposition...minus Aus :(

Posted by Bilal on (June 4, 2010, 20:55 GMT)

excellent article. I laughed the whole way through. I think the you underestimate the 'strength' of this argument. True, we might not always win, but neither does communism! But we sure had some flashy moments (doosra, reversed things) as we go down. Long live our thunder-striking decline, and may we long continue to lose in the name of a cause greater than ourselves... namely... ourselves.

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 4, 2010, 20:51 GMT)

It is foolish to say Afghanistan cricketing giant, may be writer of this article needs to be more informative, Pakistan Cricket Team, the Best in Business.

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 4, 2010, 19:39 GMT)

LOL'd at the Shoaib Akhtar tests being done part

Posted by Mohammed on (June 4, 2010, 19:34 GMT)

amazing article nw i hav da feelin dat pakistan cna again be the team they were under imran khan.... i mean look at india the way they lost to zimbabwe i still havnt seen any article talkin bout how bad they played but after pakistan lost to ireland i've seen plenty bout. pakistan zindabad

Posted by Dummy4 on (June 4, 2010, 19:32 GMT)

Great article. On their day Pakistan are the best in the world. It's been that way for years. Understanding why "their day" is so rare makes this a great article. When you play against Pakistan, you never know what will happen, but it's always passionate and fiery. Just what sport should be :-)

Email this page to a friend Email Feedback Feedback Print Print
More in The Heavy Ball
RSS FeedAll
  • ESPN
  • ESPNF1
  • Scrum
  • Soccernet